State Department: United States Joins Christchurch Call to Action to Eliminate Terrorist and Violent Extremist Content Online

This is a huge relief.

The Biden administration is endorsing the “Christchurch Call to Action to Eliminate Terrorist and Violent Extremist Content Online,” however, it also remains committed to “freedom of expression” and “freedoms of speech and association protected by the First Amendment” and “people’s reasonable expectations of privacy” and opposes restrictions on “the freedoms of individuals to seek, receive, and impart information through their media of choice.” I was starting to get worried about the mounting censorship and the naked assault on civil liberties from woke progressives.

State Department:

“The United States endorses the Christchurch Call to Action to Eliminate Terrorist and Violent Extremist Content Online, formally joining those working together under the rubric of the Call to prevent terrorists and violent extremists from exploiting the Internet.  The terrible terrorist attacks of March 15, 2019 against houses of worship in Christchurch, New Zealand, and the deplorable depiction in real time of those shootings graphically demonstrated the ability of terrorist and violent extremist online content to incite violence.  For the United States, countering domestic violent extremism — including racially or ethnically motivated violent extremism — is a compelling priority.  We are committed to working closely with international partners who share our values and norms to prevent and counter all forms of terrorism. …

We applaud language in the Christchurch Call emphasizing the importance of respecting human rights and the rule of law, including the protection of freedom of expression.  In participating in the Christchurch Call, the United States will not take steps that would violate the freedoms of speech and association protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, nor violate people’s reasonable expectations of privacy.  …

To that end, we highlight the importance of ensuring that governments do not abuse the Call as justification for restrictions on internationally protected human rights, including the freedoms of individuals to seek, receive, and impart information through their media of choice. …”

If you lay siege to the White House or burn down Minneapolis or blow up police stations or attack a federal courthouse like Fort Sumter for six months or coordinate across state lines to attack police officers or topple hundreds of monuments or take over part of Seattle, but your cause is supported by the political establishment, you can say whatever you want online, the corporate media won’t label you a “domestic extremist” or “insurrectionist” and the DOSJ will not press federal charges against you.

About Hunter Wallace 11673 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent

7 Comments

  1. Is Moshiach an extremist? Is the Jewish goal of overthrowing Christ and Christianity and reconstituting the entire civilized world based on Moshiachian rule, is that extreme? These kykes are hilarious.

  2. Reminds me of “Mars Attacks!” “We come in peace” while laughing and mowing everyone down with laser guns.

  3. “Terrorist and violent extremist” means any White person who doesn’t want their race abolished.

  4. The Christchurch terrorist was an ardent follower of the Jewish ‘counter-jihad movement’ which was created and financed by Zionist think tanks in Washington DC. If you read his retarded manifesto you can see that he had nothing bad to say about Israel or the Jews that brought Muslims into the west in the first place. As always Jews set up, Jews knock down.

    Genuine pro-white advocates have nothing to fear from this legislation. Our cause is just and we have the moral high ground. The Zionist scum trying to incite white terrorism stand to lose the most.

Comments are closed.