It’s estimated that 1 in 5 Americans have been involved in a consensually non-monogamous relationship at some point in their life. Stream the new CBSN Originals documentary, “Speaking Frankly: Non-Monogamy” now: https://t.co/2YqMQfA5pv pic.twitter.com/8GuPvsmWpb— CBS News (@CBSNews) October 24, 2019
The Right is officially cancelled https://t.co/OKuFArgivp— Scott Greer (@ScottMGreer) October 25, 2019
Good morning, Clown World!
What’s going on today in liberal democracy which we all know is the greatest and most glorious form of government ever devised by the genius of man?
Today in Satan’s Country the media IS MAINSTREAMING NON-MONOGAMY:
“One big orgy.” That’s the stereotype about the lifestyle of consensual non-monogamy — an arrangement where committed partners openly agree to have sexual relationships with other people.
But people who have practiced non-monogamy for years say it’s not all wild sex — or even all that wild. It takes a lot of work, and it carries a lot of stigma. There can be serious consequences for the family life and even careers of those involved.
“Many people are trying to create families in different kinds of ways. And a lot of people see that as dangerous,” Diana Adams, a Brooklyn-based lawyer who represents polyamorous families, says in the CBSN Originals documentary, “Non-monogamy.”
She advises clients in non-monogamous relationships to be careful about telling their employers. She’s seen some lose their jobs over it.
“There are places where it’s not safe to tell people that you’re polyamorous, and many people are not out,” Adams said. “I think employers are aware that they don’t have to allow employees to express themselves, in terms of their relationship status. Because that isn’t a protected class.” …”
“Speaking Frankly: Non-Monogamy” is a sympathetic look at polygamy by CBS News that is debuting this Sunday on October 27, at 8 p.m., 11 p.m. and 2 a.m. ET.
This is timely in light of the Rep. Katie Hill scandal:
Do you remember when the critics of gay marriage like Rod Dreher warned that it would open up Pandora’s Box and lead to polyamory and polygamy?
Well, those people were wrong because liberalism is nothing but a permanent state of social revolution and polyamory and polygamy and things like breastfeeding soyboys and transgender children and men marrying their sex dolls and overweight transgender women being the new femininity and black effeminacy being the new masculinity and International Pronoun’s Day and legalizing prostitution and the state forcing transgenderism on helpless fathers are all the poisonous fruit of the liberal order. This is all “progress.”
Some things The Libertarian Personality also needs:
My wife’s boyfriend bought me a new Nintendo Switch and we are going to see The Rise of Skywalker!
By definition, “progress” is transgression against our traditional Christian culture and the weakening and destruction of White America. The goal of liberalism is to “liberate” us from the bondage of whiteness and the authority of Christianity in order to usher in the millennium on earth. It has been that way since abolitionism although over the course of time liberals have lost their religion since the Second Great Awakening but not their missionary zeal. The War Between the States was caused when the South seceded to avoid the dystopian future of Black Republicanism which then as now was the neverending expansion of equal rights.
George Fitzhugh said it best:
“All modern philosophy converges to a single point – the overthrow of all government, the substitution of the untrammelled “Sovereignty of the Individual,” for the Sovereignty of Society, and the inauguration of anarchy. First domestic slavery, next religious institutions, then separate property, then political government, and, finally, family government and family relations, are to be swept away. This is the distinctly avowed programme of all able abolitionists and socialists; and towards this end the doctrines and the practices of the weakest and most timid among them tend. Proudhon, and the French socialists generally, avow this purpose in France, and Stephen Pearl Andrews re-echoes it from America. The more numerous and timid class are represented by Mr. Greeley and the Tribune, who would not “at once rush,” like French revolutionists, “with the explosive force of escapement, point blank to the bull’s eye of its final destiny,” but would inaugurate social conditions, that would gradually bring about that result. Mr. Greeley does not propose to do away at once with marriage, religion, private property, political government and parental authority, but adopts the philosophy and the practices of Fourier, which promise gradually to purify human nature, and fit it, in a few generations, for that social millennium, into which the bolder and more consistent Andrews urges society at once to plunge.
The Christian socialists are beautifully and energetically co-laborating with the infidel socialists and abolitionists to bring about this millennium. They also are divided into two parties. The one would wait upon Providence – only help it a little, like Mr. Greeley – and permit our poor old effete world to pass out of existence by gentle euthanasia. The other and bolder party, feel themselves “called” as special instruments, to give at once the coup de grace to the old world, and to usher in the new golden age, of free love and free lands, of free women and free negroes, of free children and free men.”
Hold that thought.
For the new golden age of free children is at hand!