AfD: It’s Time To Discard Germany’s Historical Guilt

As I said on Twitter, the major divide of the 21st century is nationalists vs. globalists. It isn’t nationalists vs. nationalists anymore. We’re fighting for the survival of our entire civilization. We’ve learned from past mistakes and moved on from litigating old quarrels:

“History is a whore of politics,” Björn Höcke, one of the party’s most radical politicians, said in an interview. “A great people like the German people, which lost two world wars in one century, no longer has a historical narrative of its own.”

In an ornate Dresden ballroom in January, local AfD candidate Jens Maier told the crowd that what he called Western Allies’ re-education efforts after World War II led to Germans being convinced “we are bastards, criminals, that we are worth nothing.”

As his voice rose, Mr. Maier hollered into his microphone, to applause: “I hereby declare this cult of guilt to be over! To be over, once and for all!”

To a political establishment for which Holocaust remembrance is an integral part of public life, the AfD’s break with the consensus is a shocking turn. …

The AfD is the most successful party to have arisen to the right of Germany’s mainstream conservative bloc, which Ms. Merkel now leads, since World War II. For decades, far-right parties failed to gain a foothold in Germany. Leading conservative politicians made it their stated mission to prevent the rise of nationalist movements. …”

Sweden remained neutral during the Second World War.

It is the same struggle there though. I’m told Sweden is a country overrun by McDonald’s and Third World refugees. Does that sound familiar? In the 21st century, Swedes live under the same Iron Curtain of political correctness, multiculturalism and mass immigration as the British, the Germans and the Americans. Do you know who really lost the World Wars? It was all of us.

The White race was the loser of the 20th century. We started the 20th century as the rulers of the planet and ended it under siege in our own homelands. Everyone who was unborn at the time was the loser of those disastrous wars. Liberalism was the victor. Globalism was the victor. Non-Whites were the victor. That’s who has been empowered over us everywhere you look.

Think about it: whether it is Australia, Canada, Ireland, Sweden, Spain or Greece, we’re all being dispossessed in our homelands by the same class of people who represent the same system. Why are the Swedes so self-hating? What did they do to deserve this? They didn’t even participate in the Second World War. They didn’t have large overseas colonies.

Note: “Conservative” parties everywhere exist to defend the liberal status quo. Angela Merkel is a “conservative.” ¡Jeb! is a conservative.

Note: In light of their staggering losses, I’m not sure I would call Jews the victor of the Second World War, but the creation of Israel was a result of that conflict. They certainly emerged from the war far more powerful and influential in the West than they had been before it.

46 Comments

  1. Unfortunately, Mr. DeLarge, this metre may be accurate for those of us in the Alt-Right, but, speaking about society, as a whole, it seems quite to the contrary.

  2. I’ve met several Germans and I don’t get any hostility from them. Several Germans have gone to school here and love our country and our people. I don’t even think that the average European hates the average American. They are a little bemused by us at times and I’ve been cornered by them so that I can explain our attachment to God and guns.

    Despite the media brainwashing about Trump, I don’t get any sense of resentment out of the Europeans over Trump’s America First stance. There was a darling little You Tube response to America First put out by the Netherlands which caused all the European countries to get competitive and clamor to be second. Germany, too. Check it out:

    But for the sake of argument, the Germans have every reason to hate Americans. Before the Americans got involved in WWI, every European nation involved had gotten to the point where they all realized that no one could win. They were all ready to take their soldiers and go home, sadder but wiser.

    But England signed the Balfour Agreement so that American Zionists would involve the Americans and have them help the British defeat the Germans. It also helped that American so-called neutrality involved lending more money to the English than the Germans for their war effort.

    The irony of this is that if the American had not allowed themselves to be sucked into WWI, we might have seen all the European countries get together and form some kind of European Union or United States of Europe that would have benefited Europeans and ultimately European-Americans. German innovation and engineering could have powerhoused the overall European economy with Brittannia still ruling the waves and ultimately sparing the USA from becoming subject to the military-industrial complex that Eisenhower warned against.

    Instead of a real armistice where everyone just quit fighting and went home, Germany was scapegoated as the real villain behind WWI and forced to agree to the unfair and humiliating Treaty of Versailles which led to such abysmal conditions that Hitler seemed like the Germans’ only salvation, ultimately leading to millions of German lives ruined or lost when the Allies defeated them in WWII.

    No way, no how would your average German sit on his hands and allow all of Africa and the Middle East to invade his homeland if there weren’t still American bases and tanks occupying their country. Do you think he likes watching his sons bullied and his daughters raped? Why would Germans love Americans? Give me one good reason.

  3. My experience with Germans is that they have long gotten over their guilt. I would say that, by the 1990s, when half of the country had never known WWII, in person, they were there.

    The problem is that, for those on The Left, they benefit greatly by extending guilt, where it exists, and or manufacturing it where it does not.

    There is a lot of this in the Angela Merkel phenomenon, both in the existence of her person, and how she thinks, and, as well, all those many who have, and still do, support her.

  4. You’re right, Miss Lucy – not just about in defending white society against Jewish assertions, but, in general – that, when you are systemically attackt, over and over, you just cannot afford to ignore it.

    Doing that does not work.

  5. No, Mr. DeLarge – Germans, collectively, have had a lot for which to feel genuinely guilty.

    With respect ; their burning of over 400 Byelorussian villages, the reprisals against so many occupied Europeans, the wholesale compulsory conscription of French, Dutch, Poles, Czechs, Russians, Belgians, Ukrainians, and God knows who else into their slave labour camps, for the manufacture of weaponry is a dark page in modern history.

    How they starved occupied Russia and Holland, and, as well, vindictively reduced all of Warsaw to rubble, is a wretched thing.

    The sending of not only millions of Jews, but, homosexuals, disabled, Jehovah’s Witnesses, and gypsies, not to mention dissidents, to their deaths is, at the least, a damn scandal.

    That the Soviets would, inevitably, rival this unwarranted cruelty still does not change the heinous crimes of The 3rd Reich upon the whole peoples of Europe.

    Let me be clear, here – I have many of these reports firsthand – from those I have known, who lived under the German thumb, and everything they said about it confirms the conventional narrative.

    Also, on a final note, The way the Nazi Government forcet practically every German to be an active part in all this, or face death, is sickening.

    Nothing I would want for my children or yours.

    That said, I have know and loved some wonderful Germans, and been loved by them.

    It’s time to move past this nightmare, and get on to the business at hand – destroying the Merkel administration, and replacing it with something that is truly ‘other’.

    Have a good night.

  6. ‘”In light of their staggering losses, I’m not sure I would call Jews…”

    What losses?’

    I know many Jews, personally, whose family members disappeared in the camps, or in the killing fields outside of villages.

    I’ve known them, personally, from the erstwhile East Prussia, Hungary, Lithuania, Russia, Poland, the Czech Republick, Holland, and the Ukraine.

    You can say it was deserved, but, it did happen. Whether it was 4, 6, or 8 ,million, is irrelevant.

    It was huge, systemick, and barbarick,

    That horrible suffering was, in the end, visited upon The Germans, does not change this.

    Most who suffered in the conflagration are worthy of sympathy.

  7. My great-great grandfather was an Ohioan who fought on the Union side of the War Between The States. Mind you, this was at the time where despite the double-cross the Founding Fathers did when they promised only to strengthen the Articles of Confederation only to install a federal government with the Bill of Rights, North and South believed the union was voluntary and composed of nation-states which all had a right to leave. New England seriously considered secession but decided to stay without any coercion from the rest of the country.

    He was one of many soldiers who understood what the Southerners were fighting for and the concept of duty as inscribed on the Confederate War Heroes Monument in the Arlington National Cemetery:

    Not for fame or reward
    Not for place or for rank
    Not lured by ambition
    Or goaded by necessity
    But in simple
    Obedience to duty
    As they understood it
    These men suffered all
    Sacrificed all
    Dared-all and died

    http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/csa-mem04.jpg

    http://www.arlingtoncemetery.mil/Explore/Monuments-and-Memorials/Confederate-Memorial

    These were not American traitors; they were all patriots. Georgian patriots, Floridian patriots, etc. Their nation-states were invaded and they defended their families and their countries like any good patriots would do.

    Not only that, but even though their ancestors were forced to remain in a union they no longer wanted, the Southern men answered the call to arms in many wars since. They fought for the USA in every war and did not dodge the draft like many leftists deriding them over their antebellum past. If they want to keep raising the Stars and Bars and honoring their Confederate war dead, it is no skin off my nose or yours, for that matter.

    It’s their culture, it’s part of American history and it should be respected as such.

  8. The Germans are awesome. I would say there is something great about every European country in the world. Every European in Europe and in the European Diaspora needs to recognize that and support each other. The one thing we need to take away from the White debacle of the twentieth century is that we must stop fighting in a burning house. We nearly wiped each other out. The mop up crew are the hordes from the Mideast, Asia and Africa. Let’s celebrate our great European diversity, but also unite to preserve it. Germany for Germans, Ireland for the Irish, etc. Support them in their defense of our indigenous Europa.

  9. This is Pollyannish. Your anecdotes aside, hating and wanting to dominate others is in the German DNA. Anyone or anything they don’t control, they hate and feel a compulsion to attack and try to control. This compulsion overrides any other sentiment or sensibility. These are the people who created a word, schadenfreude, because the feeling was so common in their population. The idea of American decline fills them with glee which they try not to show but can’t prevent from seeping into their eyes and voice when you offer the right bait and observe carefully. They would feel this way about us with or without the world wars. And it’s not just America. Before that, they were obsessed with the Romans. They currently enjoy yanking the Greek chain, over and above any desire for Greek austerity. They also hate the British, the Swiss, the Spanish, the French, whoever. They have an excuse for hating everyone, and they offer it.

    American bases have absolutely nothing to do with their rapefugee policy. None. You have to accept the evidence of people’s behavior. Germans are not ignorant about the world like Americans. They know what Middle Easterners are like. Yet they bring them in and support the politicians who promise to do so. They know their children are vulnerable to rape because of it, and they choose this policy anyway. THEY ARE WILLING TO ACCEPT THIS OUTCOME. They don’t have the Anglo view of sex and the body which is the manifestation of self-respect and self-esteem. They have a self-loathing stemming from egalitarian premises. On a fundamental level, they do not believe themselves better than the Arabs or anyone else. They are therefore not inherently disgusted by the idea of sex with them. It is important to understand that Aryan ideology was a shallow and late-developing overcompensation for them. Germans were breeding with Jews for centuries, and lots of camp guards were having sex with Jewesses.

    When pressed, Germans make up weird justifications for their irrational migrant policy. If you think your friends wouldn’t ultimately accept the government’s justifications for bringing in rapefugees, you haven’t pressed them hard enough. They will say bizarre things like, “There has to be immigration to keep the population from becoming inbred,” “Turks, Syrians, etc. look white,” and “Turks integrate well and consider themselves German.” I am talking about conservative Germans here, not just lefties.

    You really don’t understand how crazy Germans are. They know how to hide it well until the bitter end. They need a psychiatric intervention, not Anglo projection onto their mentality. Remember, they continue to allow the hordes in without revolt, and their two LEADING candidates promise to bring more in. Accept the evidence.

  10. The largest figure I’ve ever seen was 60 million. I don’t believe 75 million. The second website you cited showed 3.5 million in the Dutch East Indies. Did that many people really die there? I don’t know. The number from British India was just over 2 million. 2 million? I don’t believe many Indians even fought in the war. The first website you cited – ~50 million – seems more plausible

  11. “This is Pollyannish. Your anecdotes aside, hating and wanting to dominate others is in the Jewish DNA. Anyone or anything they don’t control, they hate and feel a compulsion to attack and try to control. This compulsion overrides any other sentiment or sensibility. These are the people who created a word, ??? What’s the Hebrew word?, because the feeling was so common in their population. The idea of American decline fills them with glee which they try not to show but can’t prevent from seeping into their eyes and voice when you offer the right bait and observe carefully. They would feel this way about us with or without the world wars. And it’s not just America. Before that, they were obsessed with the Romans. They currently enjoy yanking the Greek chain, over and above any desire for Greek austerity. They also hate the British, the Swiss, the Spanish, the French, whoever. They have an excuse for hating everyone, and they offer it.

    American bases have absolutely nothing to do with their rapefugee policy. None. You have to accept the evidence of people’s behavior. Jews are not ignorant about the world like Americans. They know what Middle Easterners are like. Yet they bring them in and support the politicians who promise to do so. They know the Goyim children are vulnerable to rape because of it, and they choose this policy anyway. THEY ARE WILLING TO ACCEPT THIS OUTCOME. They don’t have the Anglo view of sex and the body which is the manifestation of self-respect and self-esteem. They have a self-loathing stemming from genetic corruption. On a fundamental level, they do not believe themselves better than the Arabs or anyone else. They are therefore not inherently disgusted by the idea of sex with them. It is important to understand Talmudic ideology is a deeply psychotic and ancient overcompensation for them. Jews were breeding with any-one that would allow it, for centuries, and lots of Humans were suicidally destroying their genetic line via sex with Jewesses.

    When pressed, Germans make up weird justifications for their irrational migrant policy. If you think your friends wouldn’t ultimately accept the government’s justifications for bringing in rapefugees, you haven’t pressed them hard enough. They will say bizarre things like, “There has to be immigration to keep the population from becoming inbred,” “Turks, Syrians, etc. look white,” and “Turks integrate well and consider themselves German.” I am talking about conservative Germans here, not just lefties.

    You really don’t understand how crazy Jews are. They know how to hide it well until the bitter end. They need a psychiatric intervention, not Anglo projection onto their mentality. Remember, they continue to fund and support the hordes in without revolt, and their two LEADING candidates promise to bring more in. Reality is the evidence”
    There! Fixed it for ya!

  12. Millions more Humans died, in the JewWars. I don’t shed ONE salt tear for ANY JudenTeufel deaths, and simply wish Hitler had done what he’s been accused of, and MORE.

  13. BULLSHITE. The only crimes Germans committed was allowing Jews in. You DNA is showing…………..it always does.
    JEWS need to pay for their millennia of crimes against HUMANS. The Day of Reckoning is COMING.

  14. Dear Miss Denise,
    Thank you for your thoughts, here.

    If it is my DNA which accounts for what I have written, then what would you attribute it to for all those Europeans I have known, without a drop of Jewish blood, who testified about the horrors of living under Germans, during that time?

    The government of Germany, during the 1940s, treated their fellow Europeans with such disdain that it is truly appalling.

    That the Soviet Government did likewise does not excuse it.

  15. I agree, Miss Denise, that it is very important to bring a focus on what Jewish has been in international matters, and for the crimes to be highlighted.

    The world needs to know.

    Where I don’t agree is in the notion that I ought not feel sympathy for Jews, or anybody else, who was the victim of criminal behavior up top – whether that was Jewish Banksters and communists or German militarists or Nazis.

    I do feel sympathy for the average Joe, everywhere.

  16. In putting “the flag being offensive and divisive” in quotation marks, you give the impression I used those words here—or somewhere. I don’t see that I’ve used them here, and I don’t recall using them anywhere else. In the first place, they look to be ungrammatical.

  17. Your reading comprehension needs work. What noun precedes the quotation? What does that word mean? What/Who/Whom are you being compared to directly after the quote in question? Try and keep up, faggot.

    Anywhere Southerners have oozed

    Like I said, your insinuations and, in this case, your blatant attacks on pro-White people and their/our history and heritage showcase your true SJW mentality.

  18. I guess I’m just a glutton for punishment. I’m not gonna lie, I like to fight and argue. Especially when it’s people who attack White people. Might be the Irish or Italian in me. Good thing the German always keeps me grounded and level-headed.

  19. Your use of the quotation marks give the impression that those were my words. Your entire sentence, I’ll add, is a mess since you compare rationales and insinuations, on the one hand, with human beings on the other. Also, “different than” is ungrammatical. “Rationale and insinuations” requires a plural verb.

    Maybe you meant to say something like this:

    “In objecting to the Confederate flag, you are not different from SJWs and other anti-whites, who term it ‘offensive and divisive’ and thus attack people for rallying around their own history, heritage, and culture.”

  20. It won’t let you register on the forum?

    Or maybe just try to change the password or just create a new profile (CelticDenise2 for example).

    Just let me know what it’s saying when you try to log on, and we’ll go from there.

  21. But you sure do come here a lot for someone who belittles Southerners.

    You also said “Okay, tough guy. I can give no more attention to this our exchange.” I think you’re not really sure what you want to do. I’m just gonna assume that your sexuality isn’t the only thing you find confusing.

  22. My return to this exchange of ours was necessary, once I’d realized that your use of quotation marks had left a false impression, in one of your comments, that you were quoting me. I could not leave that error on the record without remark.

  23. There was no “false impression.” You’ve made it abundantly clear that you have the same mentality as the SJWs and other anti-Whites who attack White Southerners. It literally takes a minute or so to look at your history to find the insinuations and blatant attacks. The only error is allowing your specific type of stink to permeate through a pro-White website.

  24. Unless I spot another point at which this record itself has to be addressed, the present comment shall be my last one in this exchange.

  25. Infostormer and Occidental Dissent are easily among the best sites available for pro-White news and commentary. That being the case you MUST sign up with both of them, sir!

  26. Your not-so-subtle insinuations and innuendos are identical to the “White Southerners need to die” and “Southerners are inbred hicks” rhetoric that we hear coming from anti-Whites.

    I didn’t hesitate to use quotations. Would you still like to recuse yourself, faggot?

  27. Absolutely.

    She’s one of the best out there – I’m not joking.

    She helps to keep us in line on a variety of subjects (including the Jewish Problem).

    Too bad the Kikes banned Infostormer from Disqus, and made things more complicated.

  28. Ha ha. Pretty good. Ashkenazis got 40% of their DNA from the Germans. That’s probably where they got the psycho from.

  29. Think about it: whether it is Australia, Canada, Ireland, Sweden, Spain or Greece, we’re all being dispossessed in our homelands by the same class of people who represent the same system. Why are the Swedes so self-hating? What did they do to deserve this? They didn’t even participate in the Second World War.

    It was in fact Jewish moralistic terrorism that murdered the Swedish nation. It might be fair to say that a very common self-image as a “humanitarian nation” among the Swedes was a necessary precondition. But the terroristic exploitation of that self-image by a certain Jewish clicque in Stockholm was the major active ingredient in this genocidal witches’ brew. The newspaper mentioned in the long quote below was, and still is, owned by the Jewish Bonnier family. In that sense they were the main instigators of the murderous “multicult” in Sweden. And that same newspaper, still owned by that same family, has also been the most aggressive promoter of mass immigration during the last couple of decades.

    Lars-Erik Hansen’s dissertation Equality and freedom to choose. A study in the emergence of Swedish Immigration Policy (Stockholm University, Department of History, 2001) lists the actors who were a driving force in the debate to introduce the new multicultural policy. Regarding the actors, the study confirms previous academic research on how multiculturalism arose, such as Henry Román’s study En invandrarpolitisk oppositionell : debattören David Schwarz syn på svensk invandrarpolitik åren 1964-1993 [An immigration policy opponent: commentator David Schwarz’s view of Swedish immigration policy 1964-1993] who attributes Schwarz “a crucial role” in the game behind the introduction of the new policy. Thus, the ideological change started in 1964 when David Schwarz, a Polish born Jew and “Holocaust” survivor who immigrated to Sweden in the early 1950s, wrote the article “The Immigration problem in Sweden” in Sweden’s largest and most important morning newspaper – the Jewish-owned Dagens Nyheter (“Daily News”). It started a rancorous debate that mostly took place in Dagens Nyheter, but which subsequently continued even in other newspapers, on editorial pages and in books. Hansen (2001) writes in his thesis (p. 115):

    The leading debaters who were the first to claim minority rights and conditions were especially David Schwarz, Inga Gottfarb, Amadeo Cottio, Voldemer Kiviaed, Géza Thinsz and Lukasz Winiarki – all of which had an immigrant background.

    Besides Schwarz, Gottfarb had Jewish descent. Kiviaed was Estonian, Géza Thinsz immigrated from Hungary in 1956 (the same year as the massive persecution of Jews started which would have the effect that within a few decades half of Hungary’s Jews had fled the country) and Lukasz Winiarki immigrated from Poland. Schwarz was by far the most active opinion-former and accounted for 37 of a total of 118 contributions to the debate on the immigration issue in the years 1964-1968. Schwarz and his co-thinkers were so dominant and aggressive that debaters with an alternative view were driven on the defensive and felt their views suppressed. For example, Schwarz played the anti-Semitism card efficiently in order to discredit his opponents. Hansen writes (pp. 114, 126-128, 217):

    An increasing number of commentators and publishers made similar criticisms against what they saw as the majority’s lack of understanding of minorities’ conditions, particularly in the non-clearly stated, yet what many saw as a real policy of assimilation, which they feared would lead to an erasure of the different minority cultures and life patterns to amount to the rectifying or conformist national majority’s established pattern. Strongest in this criticism was David Schwarz and Voldemar Kiviaed – they claimed that the assimilation zealots appeared in the spirit of the Russians in the Baltic states and that their approach could also be compared with Eichmann’s ‘final solution’, although in more humane shape. Increased government action was required to avoid assimilation, partly by direct financial support to minorities, partly by an official policy for a pluralistic society. […]

    The policy toward Jewish immigration to Sweden, especially during World War II, was put forward as a blot in the Swedish political history. Bruno Kaplan, head of the teaching of the Jewish community in Stockholm and represented in the World Jewish Congress, lined up a number of examples of this regulatory policy (exclusion model), partly student protest against importation of some Jewish doctors in 1938, partly a number of leading newspapers which warned of this immigration. Leif Zern [who, like Kaplan, is Jewish, blogger’s note] emphasized Kaplan’s view that it was clear from the then existing policy that there was anti-Semitism, and stressed: “Of course there are no statistics on how many Jews the feature (the regulation of Jewish immigration) led to the gas chambers.” […]

    Bruno Kaplan was convinced that the survival of a small Jewish minority depended on how the state and municipalities acted – a policy that advocated tolerance and respect for minority distinctiveness was necessary. In this spirit should the Jewish minority, in their efforts to preserve their identity, get the full support from Swedish society. […]

    David Schwarz was the most active debater in the immigrant issue, his views and values had a major impact. David Schwarz became the first and foremost spokesman of the pluralistic state intervention model […]

    In the official immigrant debate, some players played a big role in the policy process, especially adherents of multiculturalism. […] They encouraged the political parties to address the issue of ethnic equality on the agenda. Then, a veritable race began to see who was the biggest and best in the immigrant issue.

    The debate gave rise to government investigations such as Invandrarutredningen (The Immigrant Investigation) 1968 which formed the basis for the government’s bill (1975:26) on guidelines for immigrant and minority policy which was adopted by a totally unanimous Swedish Parliament in 1975. David Schwarz got what he wanted, which was to be a fateful decision whose consequences we see the results of today. Red Ice, 13 July2015. How and why Sweden became multicultural

  30. Well, my guess would be that the thesis quoted, written by Lars-Erik Hanssen, is rather positively slanted towards the Jews. I very much doubt it would have had any chance of being approved otherwise. So, the explanations given by Jews arriving in Sweden during and in the aftermath of the uprising in ’56 would tend to be accepted at face value. But all the more reason to believe that this Schwarz character and a few other very active Jews, backed by the Jewish newspaper Dagens Nyheter, really were the main instigators. The purpose from Hanssen’s side would certainly not have been to cast Schwartz and the Bonnier family as villains, rather the opposite. His thesis was approved in 2001, so written at a time when the prospects of “multiculture” and the consequences of non-western mass immigration surely must have seemed somewhat brighter than the last few years. Rather improbable that the main culprits would have been pointed out that way if anything like that thesis had been written and approved by a Swedish university these days.

  31. After much study of the issue, it seems the American and English navy’s being located to the Pacific, and the sanctions put on Japanese imports on oil and rubber left them no alternative then to attack, and were kept from helping Germany in Russia.
    I believe the communist financiers out of wall street double crossed the Japanese in China also.

  32. the new ID on SG is not mine , its copied an idea of mine, I told you not to hesitate but ban any new troll ID pretending to be me

  33. Retaliation by the Hungarians against their (((Communist))) overlords in the uprising of 1956, of course. But you knew that.

  34. Don’t forget the unspeakable horrors of the lampshades, the soap, and of course the poop diamonds. Terrible.

  35. Britain’s first legislation containing any such provision as prohibiting ‘group libel’ was introduced in Parliament by Frank Soskice, the son of David Soskice — a Russian-Jewish revolutionary exile. Scholars Mark Donnelly and Ray Honeyford state that it was Soskice who “drew up the legislation” and “piloted the first Race Relations Act, 1965, through Parliament.”[7] The Act “aimed to outlaw racial discrimination in public places,” though it was soon felt, in Jewish circles, that it hadn’t gone far enough. Crucially, the 1965 Act created the Jewish-led ‘Race Relations Board’ and equipped it with the power to sponsor research for the purposes of monitoring race relations in Britain and, if necessary, extending legislation on the basis of the ‘findings’ of such research. The Occidental Observer, 12 March 2017. Free Speech, Jewish Activism, and the Trial of Jeremy Bedford-Turner.

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. Burying Hitler (Finally) « Amerika

Comments are closed.