Why the White advocacy movement should take a principled stand against the death penalty
Feb 9th, 2010 by Kievsky
I always knew that if ever got to see extended footage of Crazy Abe Foxman, I’d decrypt his racket. Sure enough, the movie Hashmatsa provided the decryption key.
The whole premise of secular Jewish power is the charge that anyone who opposes them is a “potential Nazi/neo-Nazi” which means something deeper. What does it mean? It is really an accusation of murder that you haven’t committed yet. It is a claim that there is a psychopathic genocidal maniac in you, just waiting to come out! One day, you’re Joe Sixpack, the next day you’re Ralph Fiennes in a snazzy uniform with a gun that doesn’t work.
But what if you’re opposed to the death penalty on principle, in all cases, because you don’t trust the government with the power to take human life? It is the perfect counter to the censorious, “Nazi-esque” charge of “Nazi!”
We know how ubiquitous the old “Nazi” thing is. Everybody’s a Nazi, even the Tea Party people. Inevitably, any White advocate who makes a public stand will be called “Nazi,” or some variation.
“Were the Nazis in favor of the death penalty?”
“Well, of course!”
“Well, I’m not in favor of the death penalty. I don’t trust the government with the power to kill people. How could I possibly be a Nazi? Or a Communist for that matter? Or someone who is in favor of the US status quo on the death penalty. No government has a right to kill people.”
If the reporter is Jewish, you look in his eye, and say, “Are you Jewish?” He says he is, and you say,
“Well, I promise you this, if the Nazis ever come back, you can hide in my attic. But seriously, don’t you think we need to do something about the Pacific Garbage Patch?”
Why do we need to be neutral or in favor of the death penalty? Just because some Blacks get executed? Do we need to be in favor of the death penalty to feel like “tough guys?” Screw that!
I want to win. Win win win. That’s all I think about.
They have been able to hold back the White advocacy movement by charging us with being “potential mass murderers.” What a total BS accusation if there ever was one!
Of course they will say, “What about the Jews then. So you don’t want to hurt them, you’re not a Nazi, but you say this thing about a . . . what’s your term, “legitimate conflict of interest?”
Yes. Of course there is a legitimate conflict with the very influential organizations that identify themselves as Jews. It’s not like I’m making AIPAC sew a six pointed star on its jacket, that’s their logo! And anybody who is beginning to . . . PAY ATTENTION . . . knows . . . so much influence. like a voice talking in your head, from when you get up in the morning, until you GO TO SLEEP The Iraq war, such a tragic mistake it wasn’t a cakewalk like Wolfowitz said . . . let the soldiers eat cakewalk. The whole world knows, America’s dangerous because of this imbalance of influence More than anybody. It’s like when you have an argument with someone. Do they kill everyone you have an argument with? We’d all be dead. And so many people who are becoming aware of this perfectly legitimate conflict of interest, and yet they have this thought, that the TV told them. And so the more they think about it, the more it bothers you, until you can’t not think about it. You know what I’m talking about? It’s a dawning awareness that there are these people . . . on TV . . . who are called Jews . . . highly organized and have very specific agendas, but reasonable people, good people, can disagree with these agendas. We realize that we can talk about these legitimate conflicts of interest like reasonable gentlemen and gentilewomen. You know in your own minds that we are good people, you settle your differences through legal and non-violent methods, like happens in courtrooms every day . . . all the time . . . right?
Once you’ve established that you are in fact NOT a psychopathic killer in embryo, since you are opposed to the death penalty in principle, then the discussion can begin.
Most people, both laymen and scientists alike, envision the process of evolution as a struggle for fitness relative to the environment. Charles Darwin identified a type of selection in addition to natural selection:
Like many of you with me this evening, I supported Ron Paul before supporting Ron Paul was cool. I threw $20 at his first money bomb, the one which sent the first ripples of surprise through the political community. I voted for Ron Paul even though Indiana’s primary took place long after the race had been decided. I voted for Chuck Baldwin because I refused to vote for 