The False Narrative: Her Name Was Henrietta Crawford

This is Henrietta Crawford.

She was kidnapped, raped and murdered. Her decomposing body was found in a wooded area behind a Waffle House in Greenville, South Carolina just off I-85:

“GREENVILLE, S.C. – Deputies say a 28-year-old man has been charged with kidnapping, rape and murder in the death of a woman whose burned body was found three months ago in Greenville County.

An arrest warrant said Markius Yeargin killed 34-year-old Henrietta Crawford sometime between Oct. 20 and Nov. 6, when the woman’s burned remains were found by a hunter in woods behind a Waffle House near Interstate 85.

Deputies said in a news release that Yeargin was connected to Crawford’s death through two other rape and kidnapping cases that court records show he was arrested on in November. …”

This is Markius Rashad Yeargin. He has been charged with doing it.

Apparently, he burned Henrietta’s body to destroy the evidence of his crime. He raped another woman at knifepoint and sexually assaulted yet another woman at gunpoint. All in one month.

Note: The SPLC has condemned the CofCC for spreading a “false narrative of a victimized white majority under siege by allegedly violent people of color in the United States.”


  1. I assume nothing.

    I simply observed that the (((Js))) almost always resort

    to sexual ad hominam early in a debate.

    Probably the result of 2,000 + years of inbreeding.

    As an example; consider how they have abused
    the President and Mrs Trump.

  2. Okay, take it up with them, then. Not my tribe.

    What is your particular problem, dipshit? Are you an offended Moon-hoax believer too? Sticking up for for your idiot “priest” friend?


    Wow. I bet those would be strong words, if I or anyone else understood your own peculiar idiolect.

    I’m sorry. I have no idea what you’re saying there. I don’t speak retard.

  4. HW, I believe SLCain needs to be banned. He’s insulted everyone that has responded to him, and has offered no rational corroboration to his slanders.

  5. Don’t really know about the moon missions,

    but the Govt. has been involved in so many hoaxes
    that it is not unreasonable to suspect everything they are involved in.

  6. I don’t give a fuck. But nobody doesn’t wan’t to get the last word, do they? You obviously seem intent on it.

  7. I’m sure there are a lot of things you don’t really know about.

    “it is not unreasonable to suspect everything they are involved in.”

    Actually that sounds almost like a definition of unreasonable. Reason doesn’t seem to be your strong suit. But, hey, knock yourself out, clown.

  8. “He’s insulted everyone that has responded to him,….”

    No, just you, and perhaps your sock-puppet.

    “….and has offered no rational corroboration to his slanders.”

    They are not slanders, and – on the contrary – I have offered rational arguments as to why your silly belief that the Moon landings were faked are wrong. What you do is what your ilk always does: ignore any argument proferred and move on to the next specious point, and then the next, and the next. Tell us again – what knowledge do you have that makes your opinion on the matter of any value at all?

    You come here to what is essentially a White Southern Nationalist blog, insult the memory of a murdered white woman, insult the South in general, and figuratively piss all over the accomplishments of White America, and you demand that others be banned?

    You’ve got a lot of nerve. Unfortunately, that doesn’t make up for intelligence or judgement, both of which you evidently lack.

  9. I haven’t seen a single thing you’ve written here that is correct.

    But I don’t necessarily think you are ignorant. More likely you are willfully stupid.

  10. The world hereabouts doesn’t seem to, to judge by up-flags and comments to you posts.

    Keep doinnuffin, Dan. It’s what you’re probably best at.

  11. It’s funny seeing a criticism of someone else’s thinking by a guy who thinks Bart Sibrel or “Fr. Dipship” (or whatever his name is) is smart.

    You are certainly a very persistent spambot. Although not nearly as convincing as others I’ve seen. With luck, and better programming by your creators, you might someday pass the Turing test.

    Good luck with that.

  12. You, my not so esteemed interlocatur, are the one who has an overblown estimation of his own intelligence.

    I had no beef with you concerning your intellectual / dialectical disagreement with the good father; disagreements are a part of life.

    It is your epic egocentrism [totalitarian, mocking and controlling] and instant resort to the crudest ad hominem [both, as a rule, leftish tropes] that got my attention and made me resolve to give you a taste of your own medicine.

    Yer a rude creep.

    Yer mother should have taught you manners.

  13. “You, my not so esteemed interlocatur, are the one who has an overblown estimation of his own intelligence.”

    No, I have a quite accurate estimation of my own intelligence. And I am certainly a lot more intelligent than you, not that that in-and-of itself would be anything to brag about.

    “It is your epic egocentrism [totalitarian, mocking and controlling”

    You don’t even know what words mean. How is anything I said “totalitarian” or “controlling”? I don’t control the terms of discussion here. I replied to someone; he replied to me, etc. If anything it was Fr. John who acted “totalitarian”, calling for me to be banned.

    As for “mocking” – sure – I mock idiots like Fr. John. They deserve to be mocked. So do you, dipshit.

  14. I shall simplify it for you.

    Anyone who dares disagree with you will be on the receiving end of your gutter level abuse…….

    So, if you deal in it, expect to receive it in return.

    I do disagree with Fr. John’s call for you to be banned;
    although it is regrettable that your father [if you knew him] didn’t teach you grace and class, and, apparently did not beat you enough to prevent you from becoming
    a pseudo intellectual roue.

  15. “Anyone who dares disagree with you will……….”

    No, just offensive and stupid people like Fr. John, and gratuitous assholes like you.

    And………..gutter level? Was it not gutter level of Fr. John to impugn the character of a helpless murdered woman? Fuck him.

  16. No, he “started it” – by being a contemptible ass. Apparently you are a like-minded follower. Nitwit.

  17. You’re a fine one to talk about “pathetic”. You are apparently such a passive-agressive little manlet as to even say what you mean.

    For my part, to you, I wish you a sincere Fuck You. Fuck you very much. Twat.

Comments are closed.