Counter-Currents: A Northern Alliance

Over at Counter-Currents, Robert Finstock takes a first stab at an Alt-Right foreign policy vision on Russia:

“Since it burst onto the scene, most of the Alternative Right’s energies have rightfully focused on metapolitics, networking, and domestic agitation. So far as international politics is concerned, there is a broad Alt Right consensus that globalism is the enemy, rapprochement with Russia is critical, and we must end and reverse the dark invasion of our countries. Yet these are easy calls; if our success continues and we eventually see white governments proliferate across North America and Europe, how would we achieve our objectives, consolidate our gains, and increase our strength? To ensure the long-term flourishing of our race, we should ultimately pursue an explicitly pro-white Northern Alliance of North America, Europe, and Russia,[1] acting in strictly enforced cohesion on matters of immigration, defense, and foreign policy. Absent this, our prospects in this century are almost certainly doomed …”

It is a good start.

1.) If we are ever going to recover from the 20th century, we all agree that there should be no more devastating intra-European wars. World War I was the beginning of the downfall of our civilization. If it wasn’t the beginning (you could argue it was the French Revolution), it was still one of the most important turning points for our entire race.

2.) We all agree that a major corollary of this is that there is no reason to continue to treat Russia as our enemy. Instead of treating Russia as our enemy, Russia should be welcomed into the family of European nations. Ideally, we want to move toward a world of peace and prosperity in Europe. The Cold War is over. Why shouldn’t that world include Russia? It already includes Poland and the Baltic states.

3.) We all agree that the major challenges we are facing are a demographic death spiral, migration from the Third World and a long term conflict with Islam. Say what you want about Vladimir Putin, but he is one of the few leaders in the world who understands this and has spoken out about it.

4.) We all agree that we want to move away from NATO, which is antiquated and includes Turkey, and toward a Northern military alliance which would include Russia and end the great rift within the White world. It is a North/South world that is taking shape, not an East/West world anymore.

5.) We all agree that the ideal Northern alliance would be based on a blend of race, culture, ethnicity and religion, NOT on abstract liberal ideology:

“The Republican regulars build their grand strategies upon the post-World War II international order — the American-led alliances, norms and organizations that bind democracies and preserve global peace. The regulars seek to preserve and extend this order, and see Vladimir Putin as a wolf who tears away at it.

The populist ethno-nationalists in the Trump White House do not believe in this order. Their critique — which is simultaneously moral, religious, economic, political and racial — is nicely summarized in the remarks Steve Bannon made to a Vatican conference in 2014.

Once there was a collection of Judeo-Christian nation-states, Bannon argued, that practiced a humane form of biblical capitalism and fostered culturally coherent communities. But in the past few decades, the party of Davos — with its globalism, relativism, pluralism and diversity — has sapped away the moral foundations of this Judeo-Christian way of life. …”

Russia is authoritarian … unlike David Brooks, we’re not liberals, so we don’t care. We’re not interested in haranguing Russia with human rights lectures. In fact, we admire Russia for the way it handled the Pussy Riot situation. There has been a breakdown of authority in the West. Liberalism has metastasized into a suicide cult and frankly it is a relief that someone in the world is trying to resist the tide.

Anyway, David Brooks reminds us that we are still a long way from dismantling the liberal world order. Electing Trump was an important first step in the United States. In order to get there, we will first have to get beyond the Little Marcos in Congress.

Note: Before anyone chimes in below, I am fully aware that Russia isn’t a White Nationalist utopia. Russia has all kinds of problems just like we do. We’re only talking about Russia because the liberal establishment has declared that Russia is our enemy for wanting to be an independent country. They’re demonizing Hungary and Poland and the Alt-Right for the same reasons, but not with the same ferocity.


  1. Sorry Steve, the (((globalists))) ARE the Judeos and are directly responsible for our current state of affairs and have ALWAYS HATED Christians! We will tell the Jews that we will be moving them to Madagascar, and they will be leaving their nukes behind for us to dismantle. Imagine if we did that in 1933? Hitler was right!


  2. If Trump can use Hitler as a humanshield I’m sure the old mustached one wouldn’t mind.

  3. It may well be, Laguna though, it may well be not.

    ‘Yankee colonies’, in our state, are already beginning the process of breaking apart, this owing to what they regard as our ‘repressive new laws’, and the growing reluctance of many to relocate to these places.

    As this process accelerates, owing to Trump’s infusing the judiciary with Strict-constructionalist judges, many more will begin to leave our state, only accelerating our processes.

    We, traditional Tarheels, have a firmer reins over our government than any other Southern state, save, perhaps, for Miss’ippi’.

    There is, however, another route, as well – that North Carolina does regain much and or all of it’s lost sovereignty, but that a few spots, such as Raleigh or Charlotte become free-city states, much as Konigsberg or Venezia once were.

    Another issue is finance – and North Carolina’s financial rating is at the highest mark. We have a very diverse production – from hi-tech to farming, and we need only energy – which does not rely on Washington for that ability.

    Thank you for your thoughts.

  4. One more thing – not only do I think North Carolina could make it alone, it really is a moot point, as ,in the event of a reconfederation, we could establish many economick relationships with other state or countries.

    In the end, the issue is whether we could make it without the central government in Washington D.C., which has shown itself to be the enemy of N.C. over and over again.

    If Romania, Ireland, Holland, Hungary, or small Italian or German states, or Monaco, even can, for centuries make it alone, so can we.

    In conclusion, though you may not be a leftist, I hear this from them all the time – that NC is simply incapable of being by herself.

    I respectfully disagree.

  5. ‘North Carolina itself is unlikely to survive as a unitary state, due to the overwhelming presence of Africans.’

    Also, Laguna, that is not accurate. Our Negro population is 23%, which is much much lower than in quite a few Southern states.

    Also, unlike many Southern states, our capital is a White majority city – and by a considerable amount.

    One area where I agree with that to which you may have alluded is that, of our 1,650,000 Negroes.

    Now, if I take away 500,000 of those either retired or of school age, that still leaves approximately 600,000 of them have forgotten how to work. (550,000 are gainfully employed)

    Those folks only know electronic food stamp cards, Yankee plantation housing and Yankee government vouchers – the latter which they spend in endlessly creative ways that form a kind of secondary blackmarket of it’s own kind.

    White Tarheels are very tired of paying for them, and I doubt very seriously, in any gogvernmental reorganization, that resolving this dilemma would be easy.

    Certainly no other state would want them, we would stop paying for them, and as they would not be willing to work, what would happen?

    THAT problem, would overshadow the issue you mention between Yankee colonies, in our state, (18-20% part of our state in terrain)and the rest of us (controlling and occupying all the rest),

  6. I’m not buying it. These civilizations are thousands of years old. They were in silk pajamas when the West was sleeping in animals skins and living with the chickens and pigs.

  7. “If anyone ever wants to learn how to spot fakes and frauds, feds and
    informers, loons and kooks, then be sure to look for incongruity of
    thought and conflicting statements stacked on top of each other.”

    As Al Pacino/Lt. Col. Frank Slade said in Scent of a Woman, “I’ve been around, you know?” And that’s a pretty lame and jaded cliche response. (Watch it again; it’s good for morale and esprit de corps something homosexuality is devoid of)

    Nitpicking on your part. Are you Greg Johnson? Are you a homosexual? Wow, it’s been a very long time since I’ve engaged on an Internet message board but no matter how long it’s been I still hold utter contempt for anonymity. I’ve been non-anonymous from the very start.

    I’m not an intellectual and so I’m not into parsing. Direct is my only style.

    However, looking at your criticism I do discern an apparent non-sequitur. However, it’s simply a matter of poor writing on my part not to spell out every last detail. IOW, on the one hand I demand homosexuals stay in the closet and then turn right around and demand a homosexual come out of the closet or so I assume that’s your interpretation. But that’s not the history. Greg Johnson was outed by Alex Linder more or less and that ended it for me with Johnson. So this is my point. I don’t want homosexuals associated with White leadership. I don’t feel like spelling out all the reasons because I’m physically tired from physical work I just got through completing. My instincts tell me you don’t want homosexuals involved in anything that is vital and critical.

    But again, if you suggest you are a White leader you better be ready to withstand the criticism and live up to the very highest standards.

    “Which one is it? Are they staying in the closet or are you going to make a public spectacle of dragging them out of the closet?”

    For the non-leader stay in the closet. For the White leader, pony up to the truth. And get out of the business of White Leadership if you are a homosexual. I’m not going to follow you anywhere and I will ignore everything you say or write.

    More precisely, I think the perversion inherent in homosexuality attaches to everything the homosexual touches, especially ideas and strategy. It’s like the foundation of a building needs absolute strength and wholesomeness which is something homosexuality is the antithesis of.

  8. In response to several questions and assumptions:

    No, I’m not Greg Johnson. I’ve never met him.

    No, I’m not homosexual. I’m married and have kids. I like the ladies, and more importantly, the ladies like me.

    So what if I’m anonymous? I’m not asking for your money or asking you to do things that I wouldn’t do myself. If I’m a genius, then I’m just an anonymous genius. If I’m an asshole, then I’m just an anonymous asshole. There are plenty of people who aren’t anonymous, and that hasn’t stopped them from being some of the biggest sacks of shit on the planet.

    Yes, you are somewhat correct that I don’t want homosexuals involved in top-level positions of power. Writers I don’t have a problem with at all. Greg Johnson is a writer, not necessarily a leader. The only thing that he’s leading is an esoteric online book club. He’s not leading men into battle. Even if he was leading men into battle, he’s never really flaunted anything and has obviously “kept it in the closet,” since people are still pestering him to admit to something he’s never admitted to. When it comes to the old ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ line of thinking, I’d support reinstating that policy with a little more emphasis: ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. If Asked, LIE!”

  9. You inspire not. You quibble because you are an intellectual. You dodge and evade while throwing your intellect around.

    It’s cowardly to be anonymous no matter what.

    You defend Johnson and homosexuality. I don’t know who you are hoping to persuade but it’s not the White Working Class.

    But I’m unmarried without children so it’s easy for me to run my big fat mouth. I’ve paid a huge price for it too. I got stood up tonight by a girl I met today. Google is a killer for me with most pretty women.

    Anyway, Hunter Wallace IMO is a brilliant writer and I encourage him to stay away from homosexual writers.

  10. I grew up in Memphis. I went to a Memphis City School. I lived in not-so-great neighborhoods where I was one of the only White kids around. I worked my ass off in attics and crawl spaces for years to get to a position where I could put myself and my family in a better neighborhood. I might be intuitive. I might be a fast learner. I might even be really fucking good with money. But I sure in the hell ain’t no “intellectual.”

  11. This is a problem of nationalism, not of racialism. A judicious application of racialist principles is a very effective method of overcoming idiotic nationalist disputes.

    “White” may not possess much emotive strength when uttered in those realms, but contra the fuckwit de Maistre it’s a living reality, and it’s what remains once you strip away the extraneous baggage of “Polish” or “Russian.” That’s my view: motherfuck that antiquated nationalist nonsense. It may feel good, but like a bad drug habit, it destroys you.

  12. They need more than moderation, they need leadership. Petty nationalism is deeply entrenched in that part of Europe.

  13. Yugoslavia was a wonderful idea. It was just a bit ahead of its time and despite superficial appearances to the contrary, it gave far too much leeway to the petty nationalists which in the end destroyed it.

  14. You’re conflating Russia-under-Putin with Russia itself. They’re not the same thing. Propositions concerning dealings with the latter don’t necessarily apply to dealings with the former.

  15. You’re entitled to your views, but they have no relevance to the positions held by readers here.

    And in case that invitation to depart is too subtle: fuck off.

  16. You come across as a complete elitist. Smooth, slick and clever.

    Trump won because of the White Working Class, coarse, direct and blunt.

    1. Russia is a friend not an enemy to White People.
    2. Homosexuality is an enemy to White People.

    I attack homosexuality and you defend it.

    I am Secretary of White Working Class Mojo in the Trump Administration and I say pathetic to your defense of homosexuality and willingness to associate with it.

    And I tire of conversing with an anonymous pro homosexual.

  17. No thanks. Your presumption to speak “for the readers here”, is too inane to process. Did you discuss it with them? Take a poll? What are their names?

    See how stupid you are? No logic, no thought, no reasoning. Only a vulgar epithet. Typical of someone with an IQ in the range of Negro average =85 or less.

  18. I see no downside for intermarriage of Whites to Asians, where the latter possess all of our traits, and our good ones in larger quantities.

    Proof positive that Yellow Fever Syndrome is highly contagious and malignant. It’s never content with existing in small quantities within a host. It pushes the boundaries and attempts to overtake the more numerous healthy cells by trying to convince you that not only is Yellow just like White, but that Yellow is an even better, super duper version of White.

    I’m not really hostile to Asians—I respect much about their societies. But they ain’t White. They have plenty of countries where their racial stock is protected.

    American Renaissance would be a great fit for you.

  19. Your opinion is yours. I don’t share it. At age approaching 70 and a life lived partly in the Orient, Hawaii, California and traveling half of my lifetime, I have little to learn about genetics, Eurasians, and resultant concrete results of integration into Western Culture.

    Your posting is contradictory, indicating a weak intellectual strength, or lack thereof. Yellow Fever is pejorative term for unwashed and unlearned individuals. You are common and pedestrian. And a bore.

  20. My opinion is mine? No shit, Sherlock!

    As for my “weak intellectual strength,” you might wanna scroll up and see what Mr. Jim Giles has to say about me. I’m an intellectual; an elitist; a smooth, slick and clever mama jama. Jim is now my personal online reference for any of you simpletons who doubt my omnipotence.

  21. If you are referring to me, no, my views of Russia have not changed. I agree with Durand. Russia is the white Third World, which spends a great deal of money on peddling shit-tier propaganda to Right-wing dullards, which makes us look really, really stupid (and corrupt). Russia is more similar to the United States than it is to Europe. It is a continental empire with a European ethnic core and a universalistic, messianic ideology which is an engine of miscegenation and imperialism. We are just getting rid of our first non-white leader. Russia had its first one more than 400 years ago (Boris Godunov). Europe needs to keep both the US and Russia at arm’s length. Ideally, Europe should keep NATO and throw out the US. That said, there is no reason for the US to have an anti-Russian foreign policy. The main reason we have an anti-Russian foreign policy today is because of the undue influence of neurotic Jews from the Pale.

  22. What you are is delusional, and impotent, to correct your spelling. You are probably, “….ridin’ that train, high on coca loco”. Here’s Fred, who is somebody, on Asian women:

    Why White Men Prefer Asian Women: The View From A Sushi Bar

    Read it and weep. And do something about that Hillary-like body odor.

  23. Sorry, but I don’t need “Fred” to explain anything to me. I have a White woman. I prefer White women. Delusional would better be described as the Yellow Fever geriatric coming to a pro-White website to try to push his fetishes and afflictions. If you want Asians so bad, then why aren’t you on a pro-Asian site?

  24. Come off it nitwit, people here are interested in white survival, not white erasure, which is the ineluctable result of the kind of mixing you recommend. Take it somewhere else.

  25. Those identities have served their purpose. They can still be retained as a matter of convenience, but it’s time to look beyond them for something more suitable to the challenges we’re facing.

  26. .

    Some say the Russians are the problem.
    Some say the Jews are the problem.
    Is EVERYONE a conspiracy theorist?
    Or should we all consider realigning our allegiances and loyalties?


  27. And why aren’t I “pro-White”? Because lost valley inbred knuckleheads like you say so? What about American Southerners, a large plurality of whom are part American Indian, like my first wife?
    Huh? What about Melania Trump with the high cheekbones and slanted part Mongol eyes? What about the millions of East Europeans and Russians who are Eurasian? How about Hungarians?
    How about you get some learning, some knowledge, and some consistency that is based on Reality, my pedestrian, underbite , shallow, transparent low IQ, low info, know-nothing?

  28. American Southerners do not have a “large plurality” of American Indian heritage. I heard the same thing from my family about the Indian great grandfather. I finally got sick of hearing the story and got a DNA test to see just how much truth there was to it. 0% Truth, as in 0% Amerindian DNA.

    You’re not pro-White. You’re an old crusty fuck who doesn’t have what it takes to get good White women. You’re confused and possibly senile. Probably the reason you came to a pro-White website trying to insinuate that Asians were simply better and more desirable forms of White people.

Comments are closed.