Scots Reject Brexit – Hating English, Embracing the EU

“For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders; in so much that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.”
– Matthew 24:24 (King James Version)

We’re enjoying a stunning victory in the United Kingdom. British patriots have defied the globalist elites, Islamists and Guardian Newspaper multi cult traitors to vote Brexit!

Britain is leaving the European Union!

Poll results indicate that this battle was won by English and Welsh voters, Scottish voters voted to “Remain” in the cursed EU.

What’s the problem with the once proud Scots?

Occidental Dissent readers should be familiar with the multitude of fake conservative, patriot, and “Christian” movements, organizations, and leaders in the United States – there are similar false Christs in Scotland.

A close examination of the recent Scottish independence program shows the Scots wanted to secede from Britain to be ruled from Brussels by the European Union, submit to EU dictates on finance, labor and even hate speech/thought crimes tribunals. On the live or die issue of mass immigration, the Scottish National Party favored leftwing Swedish policies. Yes, they basically were inviting the entire world, including the Islamic Third World, to move to Scotland and be recognized as Scots!

It seems these Scottish Nationalists wanted independence from the English, but “union” with 200 million Pakistani and Algerian Muslims! This strange clan of SINO – “Scotsmen in Name Only” – were 110% opposed to RACISM. Under the twisted dictates of Cultural Marxism, only Whites, especially English Whites can be racists – under this twisted Hollywood, Mel Gibson world view – the Scotts are another oppressed minority group- likes Blacks, Muslims, LGBT, transgender something.

What’s going on here is yet another example of false nationalists profiting off popular discontent with the status quo. It appears to be the same thing with the various fake conservative and Christian movements here in the United States. The US establishment, which is anti-White, anti-Southern, anti-Christian, and anti-secession, dresses up the same politically correct, welfare state, open borders immigration, internationalist program in a conservative, patriotic, Christian jingoist disguise.

The disguise is somewhat effective –  there is an implied “us” versus “them” – the “us” being ordinary, poor, White working class Scots against the “them” – evil, rich, middle class, conservative English – a historic enemy that goes way back in Scotland’s history. Under the flag of false nationalism (Ireland is another example), the enemy is always a perfectly healthy White European group, and never the nasty, child raping Pakistani Muslims, rioting negroes, black home invaders, diseased African refugees, or the Third World jihadists setting off explosions and beheading soldiers in the streets.

From the “neoconservatives” to the Christian Zionists to the Rainbow Confederates, all kinds of movements target regular White Americans and pretend to be on our side, but nefariously work for an open borders immigration policy for hostile aliens or endless foreign wars for foreign interests like Israel. One year they have us fighting expensive foreign wars against secular Arabs in Iraq, Syria, and Libya. A few years later, it’s drone attacks and expensive new wars for the Kurds or for the handful of remaining secular Arabs against Islamic extremists.

The main argument of the neoconservative warmongers are using now goes something like this: “We must fight these terrible Islamic extremists in the Middle East, ISIS, before they launch  terrible terrorist attacks in the United States.”

Real conservatives and nationalists argue that we should just prevent the Islamic extremists from immigrating to the United States and other Western countries in the first place. We should start deporting those that are already here. OTOH, the fake conservatives and fake Christians always manage to see to it that we don’t control immigration, and we are slandered and marginalized as terrible, disreputable RACISTS.

We’ve had quite a bit of this false nationalism in the United States over the century: corrupt elitists who wanted to go to war with Germany waved the US flag to fight the evil German Kaiser and avenge the German Huns cutting off the hands of Belgian babies, and so many of the same lies had us fighting another false patriotic World War against Germany and its allies in Finland, Italy, Croatia, and Hungary. As soon as the “Great Patriotic War” against Germany was over, we were engulfed in another 60 year Cold War against our kinsmen the Russians (this includes two devastating hot wars against North Korea and North Vietnam), which culminated in the insanity of Reagan conservatives wasting the 1980s fighting the Russians in Afghanistan and Nicaragua, and arming nasty, cut throat jihadists.

How did that turn out for us in the long run? Not so good.

What’s the solution? The answer is real nationalism which promotes the legitimate interests of your own people while simultaneously being kind and fair to closely related groups of other White European people. Some of the most effective nationalists in Europe are doing just that right now, especially in France, Russia, and other parts of Eastern Europe. There is very little or no hatred for Germans among nationalists in France and Putin’s Russia.

Putin’s Russia pursues sound immigration policies (inviting South African Boer farmers, discouraging, evicting Muslim illegals from the Caucuses) while implementing a common sense, pro-Russian foreign policy in the Middle East by backing secular Arab forces like Syria’s Assad over throat cutting, head chopping Islamic extremists who are raping, enslaving, and exterminating Christians.

But remember … above all, avoid false Christs, false saviors, and false flags. And guys… Mel Gibson’s Braveheart isn’t honest history. All White English people aren’t cruel, evil, racists and rapists of poor, oppressed Scots. Braveheart, Schindler’s List, Django Unchained  … that’s Hollywood stuff folks, not us – we will not find our saviors in Hollywood.

78 Comments

  1. “What’s the problem with the once proud Scots?”

    All the good Scots have gone, leaving behind the dregs.

    • Their nationalism is defined as opposition to Englishness. They do not understand (God forbid they do understand it) that the English folk are voting against Pakis and Niggers overrunning the island.

      • Yes, that’s it.

        But it also more than a fair bit about want to go the PC rout, to be back in the good guy team of Hollywood. The Irish do/did this sh** for so many years, staying with Ted Kennedy for, well really forever.

        My tennis teacher here in Chicago is Chicago Irish, proud that all the mayors, police and fire chiefs were Irish from about 1910 through 1980. He’s still got neighborhood friend Sheriff Thomas Dart who he went to Catholic high school with – he’s trying to get Thomas Dart to run for Mayor.

        This guy Thomas Dart is a TV Liberal poser, young and telegenic like the new Prime Minister of Canada. This Cook County Sherif does TV propaganda where the Black convicts in Cook county to art and poetry projects and are treated like artist, political prisoners instead of the brutal gang criminals we know them to be.

        Yeah, the Irish and Scots can be real #*&$# when they go political correct and it is usually a great career move for the leaders.

    • They came to the United States.

      There is a book, when Scotland was Jewish. Could very well still be.

  2. Edward Longshanks was on very bad terms with the Jews. And you have to wonder exactly who was really funding Bruce and Wallace. Food for thought. Hovever, if the Scots want autonomy they are welcome to it. But the French and Germans will not subsidize these people like the English subsidize them.

    • “But the French and Germans will not subsidize these people like the English subsidize them.”

      The current situation is that the English and the Scots subsidize the Africans, the Jews, the Pakistanis, and all sort of other parasites.

      I think Trump is right: every country should defend its own interests.

      That’s why Scotland needs its own separate government.

      • Yup. I am truly sorry to learn of the dementia of Scotia – but they must learn for themselves. I will troll Scots on Twitter. I do now.

        • “The reality is that Scotland is subsidised by England.”

          In every centralized country, most of the population ends up in the capital: London, Paris, Moscow, Madrid, Athens… And then, the claim is made that the rest of the country is heavily subsidized by the capital.

          London is about to become completely third-world, but we are still supposed to believe that people in London are so smart and hard-working that are able to subsidize the rest of the country.

          I think the real reason why London has grown so much is the economic centralization, which is a consequence of the political centralization. The result is that many Scots had to go to London to find a good job. The jobs are in London, most taxes are raised in London, and it makes it possible to claim that London is subsidizing everyone, when in fact, the capital is sucking the lifeblood out of the rest of the country.

          The solution for Scotland is to get political separation so it can have its own administration, its own economic activities, its own intellectual life, and so on.

          • Armoric: “The solution for Scotland is to get political separation so it can have its own administration, its own economic activities, its own intellectual life, and so on.”

            The solution has to address the real problem. The real problem is white genocide.

            What good would it do Scots to go out from under the rule of a London where the white English have been reduced to a minority and the mayor is a Muslim, only to go under the rule of an Edinburgh where white Scots would be reduced to a minority and the mayor would eventually be a Muslim?

            Under anti-white rule, the Scottish nation will not have its own administration, its own economic activities, its own intellectual life, and so on.

            Under anti-white rule, any white nation will be driven down, and eventually it will cease to exist.

          • “What good would it do Scots to go out from under the rule of a London where the white English have been reduced to a minority and the mayor is a Muslim, only to go under the rule of an Edinburgh where white Scots would be reduced to a minority and the mayor would eventually be a Muslim?”

            So far, the non-whites have been imported in Britain by the British government (that is to say, by the jews). England has been hit the hardest, but Scotland has been hit too. There is no sign that the British government is becoming more reasonable. On the contrary, they are becoming more and more fanatic.

            How do you know they are about to radically change their politics and start expelling the parasites? You didn’t give the slightest argument about that.

            From listening to you, people would think the problem comes from the Scots! That is the contrary of the truth. For now, the obvious priority for Scotland is to escape the mad house.

            I know the leaders of the SNP are supposed to be racial traitors too, but it is very unlikely they can cause as much damage as the current British government is doing. And they will be more answerable to the Scottish population. It will be harder to implement anti-white policies. And the jews will have a harder time controlling both England and Scotland.

  3. Btw the English need to purge the pakis and blacks out of the crown porsecution service. Their infiltration of the legal bench must be reversed. The civil service needs to be purged and I’d say that Sidiq Khan must be recalled.

  4. There is already a petition collecting thousands of signatures (which will go nowhere) advocating the withdrawal of London from the UK and a return to the EU. Demonstrating the true feelings of the globalist elites and proving the nationalists point that the REMAINERS dont consider themselves English/Britons at all.

    • These people really are a fucking long term menace. Tower Haramlettes should be surrounded and liquidated.

    • The Remainders aren’t. They are Jew vermin, and their hordes of Orcs. The need to be expelled from Londinium.

  5. Lord, grant that Marshal Wade
    May by thy mighty aid
    Victory bring.
    May he sedition hush and like a torrent rush,
    Rebellious Scots to crush.
    God save the King.

  6. Excellent article Jack Ryan. It’s sad that our Celtic brothers and sisters in Europe have lost their way. It’s too bad we cannot give our European cousins a taste of life on the southside of Chicago. Anyway…race reality is what helps create people like you and me. We are lucky to have a champion like you Jack Ryan!14/88

  7. This “swedish nationalism” is very weird. Sweden is afraid of russian attack and they believe that immigration is best defence. When all swedish people become nonwhite jihadis and when swedish every town is like Falluja, full of beheading, throatslicing,suicide terrorism ready middle east backround swedes, then Russia probably think twice before attack Sweden.

  8. “there is an implied “us” versus “them” – the “us” being ordinary, poor, White working class Scots against the “them” – evil, rich, middle class, conservative English – a historic enemy that goes way back in Scotland’s history”

    If you advocate secession for the South in the United States, you should also understand why secession would be a good thing for the Scots. The English annexation of Scotland has been a disaster for the Scots. There’s no more reason for them to be ruled by London than by Berlin or Moscow.

    I hope Brexit will weaken the Jewish power over both Britain and the rest of Europe. And I think Scotland’s independence could similarly weaken the Jewish power over Scotland and the rest of Britain. And Jewish power is where race replacement comes from.

    It’s a fact that the US Republican Party, the Scottish SNP, the Church, the environmentalist movement, and so on, have been derailed by the Jews, and have become favorable to race replacement ; but those who vote for the GOP/SNP, or go to church, or care about preserving nature, are still sincere in their beliefs. They have not become traitors. Most people who vote for the SNP, the US Republicans, or even the US Democrats, do not really support race replacement. The problem really comes from the leadership that has fallen under Jewish influence.

    • I was for Scottish separation when they voted for it and think they should be allowed to leave now if they choose. Additionally, I am for a unification of N.Ireland and Ireland should they choose. However, I think the choice of Remain/Leave vs separation from the UK will be very different votes and much closer in Scotland and N.I. than it was for the Referendum.

      Wales and England will remain united, Northern Ireland will probably stay in the UK, Scotland probably leaves. It should be watched closely if/when it happens. Establishing a new reinforced border, transfer of military facilities/equipment (Nuke Sub port is in Scotland), financial considerations, amicable??,etc….

      Could be useful if/when demographic, cultural, political, and geographic fissures deepen in our own land.

    • “If you advocate secession for the South in the United States, you should also understand why secession would be a good thing for the Scots. The English annexation of Scotland has been a disaster for the Scots. There’s no more reason for them to be ruled by London than by Berlin or Moscow”

      I respond:

      That’s utter ridiculous nonsense.

      The Scotts and various English speaking White people in England (Anglo Saxons, Normans, assimilated Irish etc) are kindred people.

      These false Christ, false Scottish Nationalists who bash the English and prostitute themselves to the EU and embrace mass Muslim immigration from places like Pakistan, Algeria under the lie that “Well we just hate the English” this Scots are just pussies, cowards, idiots – been too long on the English dole, now they want the EU dole.

      Nah.

      Today is a great day for our people – all our enemies are angry and doing petty cowardly #*$&#@ to punish great patriots in England/Britain.

      Do you really want to be on the side of George Soros, the Saudi Royals and the Guardian Newspaper?

      • “Do you really want to be on the side of George Soros”

        The Jews do not support Scottish independence!

    • Actually it was and is a “Union” not conquered supression. whether the Union was or is advantageous to Scotland can be debated. I would say during the British Empire is what extremely favourable to Scotland to be joined with England.

      • “Actually it was and is a “Union” not conquered supression”

        The Scots lost the war, their Gaelic language was destroyed by the English occupiers. I hear even bagpipes were banned.

    • “The SNP are a bunch of communists.”

      Which is funny, when you think it used to be a conservative party. That’s what we call the leftist drift of Western civilization. Everything is going downhill. Actually, it is a Jewish drift, and it is a result of Germany losing WWII to the Jews.

      It doesn’t matter that the SNP has turned communist. The trouble is they have become race-replacists. But that is also true of Labour and the Conservative party in London, as a result of Jewish influence at the top. At the grassroots, most voters both in England and Scotland still oppose immigration.

      In a decentralized system, it is harder for the Jews at the top to dictate their preferences. That is one of the reasons why every little country should opt for independence.

      And also, if Scotland secedes from England, it will probably help the Scottish conservatives and anti-replacists to re-emerge in the nation’s political life. And I think independence will force the Scottish politicians to become more reasonable. What encourages political childishness is when you are ruled by someone else than your own people.

  9. The Scots must feel stupid right now. They lacked the courage to secede from the UK in 2014. And now, the English have taught them a lesson by seceding from the EU.

    Next time there is a referendum for Scottish independence, people will be more courageous. In the meantime, everybody will have noticed that leaving the EU didn’t cause a disaster but actually improved things.

    I wonder what Merkel is going to do with all her Syrian refugees.

  10. Jack Ryan, this article is great.

    The most important part is the correct definition of real nationalism:

    “The answer is real nationalism which promotes the legitimate interests of your own people while simultaneously being kind and fair to closely related groups of other White European people.”

    We are white. Our enemies are anti-whites. Whoever promotes the destruction of the white race is our enemy, whether it’s Angela Merkel or Jeremiah Wright.

    Nothing good can come from a false answer to the question: who is the enemy? Only bad will come from false answers that turn white brother against white brother.

    • Agreed. And well said.

      Please spread your very short and to the point summation of “real nationalism” – also, spread this article far and wide, get friends and associates to read the article and then ask them what do they think of it.

      Too often in our twitter world our people are running around with words and phrases going in and out of their heads, stuff like guns, guns, guns, taxes, taxes, taxes, sexual things than in the big scheme of things aren’t really important as our enemies are working to replace us.

      Stay strong brother – we just had a major breakthrough.

    • Iranians are whites. I recognise that not all Iranians are mad mullah Muslims, but are westerners automatically on the same side as Iranians? It’s to do with relgion not race. I would rather South American latino Christian /Christian background immigrants than Muslim ones. That’s because Islam is incompatible with Western values /civilisation.

      • Why have EITHER? Both are “ALIEN” to our race, our creed, our clan, our tribe.

        Ever read Faith and Heritage blog? You ought to. They put the kibosh on this universalist heresy, pretty damn fast.

      • Shannon: “Iranians are whites. I recognise that not all Iranians are mad mullah Muslims, but are westerners automatically on the same side as Iranians?”

        Here is an example: Roosh the Rapist is partly Persian. He writes about his satisfaction in raping a white women, and he encourages his followers to act like him. He sees no need to “white knight” for whites; he is racially different, so he doesn’t care about our interests.

        Loyal, genuine whites cannot be on the same side as Roosh the Rapist. This is even before we get to the mad mullah Muslims.

  11. When it comes to nationalism, most white people are far more motivated to defend their particular tribe of white people than the entirety of the white race. That’s ethnonationalism. However, the leaders of the various tribes of white people have to understand that the major continental and diaspora racial group of white people have interests that are more important than the interests of the individual tribes of white people, and that fighting among white tribes should be kept to a minimum, preferably zero. That’s white nationalism.

    • “fighting among white tribes should be kept to a minimum, preferably zero. That’s white nationalism.”

      But how do you apply that principle to the English/Scottish situation?
      Are you saying that the Scots should give up the idea of leaving the UK? Or that the UK should stop keeping Scotland prisoner?
      I think once Scotland is independent, Scottish nationalists can start spending their energy on stopping the Jews.

      • “I think once Scotland is independent, Scottish nationalists can start spending their energy on stopping the Jews.”

        I respond:

        But this is presenting a “false Christ” Matthew 24:24

        The terms “Scottish Independence” implies that the Scots will somehow be “independent”, in control of their own culture, education, finances, immigration, media etc.

        The reality of the Scottish National party version was the complete opposite – the EU in Muslim terrorized Brussels is in control of finances, immigration – how about the banking system? Didn’t really see even any talk about giving the Jewish usury banking system the boot.

        This is my/our main point:

        Our people constantly get offered all kinds of nice sounding politics of “independence”, ” a strong national defense”, return to “Christian Family Values” under all kinds of scams and lies.

        Our people have to stop falling for false Christs, false nationalism hating on some other close kindred White European oriented people – Scots hating the English, Southerners hating Midwesterners or pretty Scandinavian gals from Minnesota or hating…

        The RUSSIANS.

        My god – American Conservatives wasted the 1980s fighting our kinsmen the Russians in Afghanistan arming the likes of the Taliban Islamic Jihadists who are now slaughter White Western people everywhere we are not extinct on planet earth.

        The Russians seem to be one of the few White European oriented people who understand racial/cultural realities.

        Look Putin does to Chetnian Mountain Muslim Jihadists, look how he handles Jewish oligarchs or just the Jews.

        Putin should be our model on what to do.

        • “Our people constantly get offered all kinds of nice sounding politics of ‘independence’, ‘ a strong national defense’, return to ‘Christian Family Values’ under all kinds of scams and lies.”

          One hundred times correct. If I could give you one hundred upvotes, sane whiteguy, I would.

          PS See my reply, above, to Snowhitey, re whitesurfing.

          • Let’s connect in the real world and spread our truths, spread our courage.

            Were you at Amren in Tennessee this year?

            I was there.

          • If ever you’re in the Philadelphia area, Sane, just let me know here, at Occidental Dissent, and maybe you and I can get together some place where we can have a cheeseburger or something equivalent that I can afford to enjoy once in a while. Having neither the wherewithal nor the social traits for political activity, no, I’m afraid I didn’t attend Amren, though I imagine it was very interesting.

      • Have you seen the video of the Kike Jew, in Scotland, interrupting Trump’s appearance at his own resort, handing out Swastika golfballs?
        SO Jew.

        • Someone said there are not that many jews in Scotland.

          So what?

          It only took one reptilian douche to sabotage Trump’s speech.

          ‘This man is not actually a Trump supporter.
          He’s some Jewish comedian named Simon Brodkin.
          Yeah.
          Another Jewish anti-Trump protester. In a totally different country.’

          Daily-Stormer-Selection_087

    • “However, the leaders of the various tribes of white people have to understand that the major continental and diaspora racial group of white people have interests that are more important than the interests of the individual tribes of white people, and that fighting among white tribes should be kept to a minimum, preferably zero. That’s white nationalism.”

      I am in favor of this white nationalism.

    • The Story of WW1 is incredibly tragic. How the Kaiser and Czar rendezvoused in their yachts on the Baltic to sign a pre war peace treaty that was scuttled by their ministers and staff, how the Kaiser more than any French, British or Russian Leader was trying to avoid war, how jealousy of German economic success drove rivalry, how the Austrians lied about their demands to Serbia to Germany.

      Most tragic was that in 1916 both Turkey and Germany, who were winning (no one was in their territory, they were in others territory) offered to withdraw to pre war boundaries.

      This was rejected by well organised Zionists in both Britain and the UK who knew that if they could defeat Turkey (which required defeating her allied Germany) that they could annex Palestine and turn it into Israel. The Balfour declaration proved this. This required bringing the USA into the war on Britain’s side to swing the balance: else we may have had a 1.5 year war 1.

      Very well documented, see Allison Weirs “Against Our Better Judgement”

      WW1 was Treachery.

  12. The panic in the financial markets yesterday was comparable to the riots on the Fergaza Strip. They were white collar riots.

    (1) In both places, someone did something that both groups of people despised. A white cop accosted a black criminal suspect and then had to save his own life by ending his. The people of a country voted to exit a continental unification treaty.

    (2) In both places, the dominant groups demonstrated power by being destructive. On the Fergaza Strip, the locals burned and broke things. In the financial market, the people involved in it used pens, phones and keystrokes to destroy untold billions in illusory assets.

    (3) In both instances, the destruction almost entirely negatively affected the group that did the destruction and not much beyond that. On the Fergaza Strip, the black dindus burned the businesses which serve them in their area. In the financial market, the white collar dindus destroyed a good chunk of the illusory net wealth of the high net worth individuals they serve.

    (4) In both instances, not counting the external provocation and worldwide connectivity that kept the Fergaza Strip hoopla going for longer than it otherwise would have, the chimpouts wear themselves out after 72 hours.

    (5) Common through line: George Soros.

    • Whitesurfing. No matter the waves that roil the great sea of whites, Jews stay on top.

  13. You make a number of comments, some which I would not disagree.

    However, I would strongly reject your assertion that the Soviet Union was not our enemy. Marxist ideology is the enemy of freedom. Without the right to own property, there cannot be a free society.

    As for the Irish and Scots being stupid to want to be part of the EU….please note that I ( a born Englishman) do not oppose immigration from Ireland, Germany or Italy. I do oppose Muslim immigration from Pakistan, Afghanistan and other such places. This is because Islam is incompatible with Western cultrue in regard to freedom and human rights. You appear to contradict yourself when u welcome Boer immigrants to Russia bit not Muslims.

    Free movement of people within the EU has led to a high proportion of East Europeans moving to western Europe. The vast majority of such immigrants work and easy assimilate. Most definitely thEuropean children will be assimilated into English, German, French , or wherever they are born. That does not apply to Muslim immigrants.

    The Scots face demographic decline and have villages and whole Islands being abandoned. It’s not stupid of them to welcome EU migrants.

    • “The Scots face demographic decline and have villages and whole Islands being abandoned. It’s not stupid of them to welcome EU migrants.”

      I respond:

      Yes, in theory that would fine, ok, good.

      In practical reality the Scottish Nationalists in the Scottish independence movement are most definitely NOT promoting a White Scotland immigration policy. Everything and the only thing is about hating on White English people.

      Why not encourage middle class White English along with White Poles, Finns, Serb people to move to, invest in Scotland?

      The answer is it’s the old chip on the shoulder – might as well be a Gollum with a Scottish accent:

      “I hates the English!”

      Cutting off your own nose to spite your face.

  14. if little Scotty wants to suck off the Deutsche Bank debtTit instead of the Bank of England debtTit, that’s fine. By the time little Scotty gets all snuggled up, the entire EU will have collapsed anyway. Stuka demands de-centralization, all up and down the line. Texit now!

    • The stuff I’m hearing about Scotland is horrifying. I was planning to visit this year, for Beltain. It fell through due to falling dominos (a serious family illness, my car nearly dropped dead, a few other things – all better now). Now – perhaps it’s best. YIKES. I have a standing invitation to visit the Cotswolds – mebbe I’ll go now.
      I can’t BELIEVE how stupid they are!!!

  15. Here is a made-up example of the kind of nationalism I don’t like. Unfortunately there are real examples not far from this. I would now call this a false nationalism, as opposed to a real nationalism or white nationalism.

    Breton Nationalist: I support an independent state for the Bretons.
    Me: Long may the Breton people continue. But tell me: who are your enemies?
    Breton Nationalist: The non-Breton French are our enemies. The problem is France, in which our true Breton identity has been submerged; it should be broken up so we can have our own state.
    Me: Is this about the Muslims in France?
    Breton Nationalist: No, I am not a racist. Muslims are fine; the problem is France, by which I mean the French.
    Me: And who are your friends?
    Breton Nationalist: Our fellow Bretons are our friends. Whether they are black, Jewish or Arab we love them all, as long as they are Bretons. And naturally we hope for international support, including your support.

    • I know. I’ve been Tweeting obsessively since yesterday, over Brexit. Lots and lots of Europeans are really skeery stupid.

      • The stupidity that leads us to identify ourselves and each other as the enemy is a luxury we can’t afford any more.

    • “Here is a made-up example of the kind of nationalism I don’t like.”

      That kind of kosher dialogue flies in the face of real nationalism. You could hear that from Republican politicians in the USA, or from SNP politicians in Scotland, but it doesn’t represent the views of nationalist voters.

      It’s not that I know anything about Scottish politics, but it’s simple to explain the difference between England and Scotland in the referendum:

      The English have always been distrustful of the rest of Europe. They have a saying that the wogs begin at Calais. Until recently, that kind of attitude had nothing to do with an English reaction against the EU’s anti-White policies. It was simply an old English tradition. But in recent decades, the English have been hit by immigration harder than the Scots, and I think it has reinforced their hostility to the EU. But they should realize that the racial enemy of the English is the British government, just as much as the EU. More precisely, the racial attacks come from the Jewish lobby ensconced in the EU, the media, the British government, and other Western governments.

      Many Scots do not worry too much about immigration for the same reason Maine and Iowa do not worry about it as much as the last White people in Texas. But the overwhelming majority of Scots remain opposed to race replacement. They do not want Britain swamped by the Third-World. On the matter of immigration, they do not share the views of the SNP, nor of Labour or the Conservative Party.

      It’s the same with Scots as with women. We know women do not vote as often as men for nationalist anti-replacist groups. But even so, very few of them support race replacement. It’s counterproductive to complain that we have a problem with women, or with the Scots, and that they support race replacement. The only people who really want race replacement, and who are implementing it, are the jews.

      The Scots are more favorably disposed towards the EU because they think the EU can help them be independent from England. It has nothing to do with immigration.

      At the same time, the leave campaign has probably been associated somewhat with English nationalism, which is probably not friendly towards Scottish nationalism. It made it harder for the Scots to vote for Brexit. And anyway, the referendum was not officially about immigration.

      Now, I think the best way for Scotland to break with the current immigration policies would be to have a new referendum and secede from the UK. It would be good for England too.

  16. Great Britain was united under a Scottish king. Instead of abandoning the Union they should work together with the English and Welsh to take back the UK from the Asian and African hordes. Their is no sense in becoming a tiny, resource poor, faceless republic ruled by Brussels. There is more to be gained by remaining loyal to God, Queen and country and working together.

  17. The Scottish people should vote these Globalists out of office and embrace Secession. Our nations shouldn’t be involved in anything but Nationalism. No need for the EU or the United Nations. We need a Free South here in Dixie! Deo Vindice !

  18. My ancestor, Roger de Kirkpatrick was a first cousin of William Wallace. That being said, the ANTI-ENGLISH Sentiment by the Jewish Media and powerful forces that has fomented since 1707 founding of the UK is disgusting,. This Anti English sentiment has always meant that England, while being the most powerful of the four nations, had to forego her interests for the sake of Scotland Wales or Ireland. During the 1700s, thousands of BLACKS and IRISH CATHOLICS lived in London brought there as CHEAP LABOR to keep the White English workers from demanding higher wages. The 1780 Gordon Riots was the culmination of this.

    Look I will be the first to say, I don’t like the ENGLISH GOVERNMENT for what they did to our people, but I love the English people.

    • stay strong Billy Ray Jenkins …

      may your cousin Sussie Ray Jenkins marry some middle age, somewhat wealthy midwestern guy like me.

  19. It’s like a white kid who got bullied by other white kids in a white school identifying with the Other as fellow-brethren. Such a white kid may romanticize blacks and people of color as his comrades against the white bullies when IN FACT, blacks and people of color would be even worse.

    Scots feel inferiority complex vis-a-vis the English, their historical conquerors and rulers. So, the Scots, like the Irish, came to identify with those who resisted English power. Such peoples could be non-white subjects of British Imperialism. Or they could be any power that reduced English power.

    Things like this happen. Japan, an Asian people, sided with the Germans in their war on fellow Asians, the Chinese.
    Germans, a white people, sided with Turks against other whites in WWI. Germans sided with Japan against fellow whites the Russians.

    Strange world.

Comments are closed.