Yesterday, the NSM and their local supporters held their “Stand in the South” protest in Knoxville, Tennessee. This protest was widely advertised on OD and other pro-White sites as an “ecumenical event” that would draw together the various strands of White Nationalism in a breakthrough rally over illegal immigration.
The video speaks for itself:
For months, “Biological Racist” and others heckled me on the OD forum and challenged me to “show up” in Knoxville or cease to be “relevant” in the White Nationalist movement. The Knoxville rally was described as the “tip of the iceberg.” You see, the “underground” was supposed to turn out at this event and “threaten” Jewish hegemony.
Needless to say, I was highly skeptical and made plans to be elsewhere this weekend. The event lived up to my high expectations: counterprotestors turning the rally into a circus, outnumbered White Nationalists screaming “Sieg Heil” on camera, innumerable individuals acting out their fantasies with discordant symbols in the streets, misfits with swastikas everywhere in plain sight, the blind following Cliff Herrington from Joy Of Satan Ministries on camera into a public carnival.
Fortunately, the immigration reform movement fell into more capable hands long ago. If the NSM and their White Nationalist allies were responsible for leading the fight against “comprehensive immigration reform,” we would have lost that war and every other one like it a long time ago.
In some corners, there is another voice in the pro-White community which advises a far different course of action from my own.
This voice judges others on the basis of their words, not their actions. Thus, the NSM is seen in a positive light because it has adopted an extreme rhetorical position that sounds pleasing to White Nationalist ears, even though their actions are ineffective and counterproductive.
Similarly, these people have nothing but contempt for Sarah Palin and the Tea Party, or the so-called “pied pipers of implicit Whiteness,” because they have adopted a moderate rhetorical position that is not explicitly racial or anti-Semitic enough for their tastes. Their actions might be effective, but they give lip service to anti-racism and multiculturalism. Their tone is annoying and offensive to highly sensitive ears.
Who is really the gullible one here?
If you are right, but can’t do anything for me, why should I support you? If you are wrong, but are useful, why should I oppose you?
It’s not enough to be right.
Talk is cheap. Action speaks louder than words. Personally, I would say anything to move the goal posts. Words are meaningless.
I will drink the tea this time around, even if it is bitter and disagreeable, not the kool aid, even if it is sweet and tastes good. Because if the NSM is White America’s last chance, we have already lost, and I am not ready to give up just yet.