Michael Savage – Border Collie

Michael Savage is the border collie for the “right wing extremism” faction of society. There will always be a far right and/or ethnic nationalist faction of any human society, and “Savage” was assigned to this “savage” area of society. Even his name gives it away. His job is to police the White “savages” before we go totally “off the globalist plantation.”

That’s the whole reason behind his radio name. He’s been assigned to herd the “savages” — us!

More specifically, Michael Savage’s mission is to preserve Christianity among the White remnant. He says “politically incorrect” things to draw the audience, even at times explicitly defending the White race, but I, quite inadvertently, set off all his alarms, and in doing so, got a look into his true motives. Kind of like when a scout plane breaches enemy airspace in order to see what kind of defenses are in place — e.g. radar, surface to air missiles, scrambled fighters.

It was totally inadvertent on my part, of course. I called in to defend cremation versus burial, and had no intent of talking about World War II. He brought it up, and so I figured since he brought it up, I might as well take the opportunity.

I have not yet perfected it, but this clip is an example of ignoring the Jew’s question and getting your talking point downrange. For example, when he had me talking about the death and dying class, I said, “we watched a lot of Holocaust movies, and I realized that Schindler’s List was shot in black and white so the dummies would think they were watching actual footage.” I also mentioned Henry Ford and his book, and he didn’t edit it out of the archived show, though he did edit out when I said links to real history web sites.

Anyway, what really offended Michael Savage was my saying that many things about Christianity such as burial, and not taking baths, and original sin and guilt, need to be discarded. Of course we take baths nowadays, but it used to be considered “unchristian” to bathe. In saying that Christianity should be discarded, I think Michael Savage heard, “A very useful mechanism of Jewish control over Whites should be discarded,” and I can see why he had the reaction he did.

Here’s the clip:

http://www.mediafire.com/?vo2yqqt2mymKievsky et al v. Savage

23 Comments

  1. Silver,

    It would be a pity to see you stop blogging, and even worse if you deleted what is already there.

    I disagree firmly with you on a number of primary issues (Jews, Evola, etc.) but your blog always provides an interesting read and some of the entries over there are quite amusing. I particularly enjoyed the following discussion of Southern Europeans:

    I want to talk about S. European racialists. If they’ve been around racialism for any length of time, they must have, I’m sure of it, realized two things:

    (1) N. Europeans say they don’t want them as often as they say they do, and they’ve probably got an inkling that the ones who say they do don’t really mean it.

    (2) That plenty of N. Europeans favor a partition solution.

    Putting those two together you’d think that’d make S. Europeans partition fanatics. But you’d be wrong.

    Despite the fact that all their lives they’ve been quite happy to exclude nordics (parties, get-togethers, etc), the moment they get a handle on race they all want to be Germans, and if they can’t be Germans they don’t want to be racists.

    Now this is what gets me. They’ll have their own parties, their own Easters, their own circles of friends, but you give them the chance to have their own country [see Racial Compact], and they turn you down. Apparently they’d rather spend the rest of their lives dodging spics* and niggers*. Well, nordics have recognized for a long time that dagoes aren’t all that bright.

    Here is McCulloch writing in The Occidental Quarterly:

    Is there anything we could offer the groups selected for separation that would significantly lessen their opposition to it? What could be done to accommodate those groups, to lessen their opposition to separation, and possibly even gain some measure of support? Certainly whatever could be done within reason, that does not defeat the purpose of Nordish racial preservation or sacrifice the legitimate interests of the Nordish-American population, that would be worthwhile and not in vain, that addresses legitimate concerns without catering to obstructionism, should be done.

    Geezus, is there? I had to rub my eyes to make sure I wasn’t imagining that. Fuck yes there is, is this guy’s answer.

    Before I get to that answer, a few words about Richard McCulloch. This man knows race like few people know race. You read his earlier books and the impression you get is the next nordic you run into down the street will want to lop your head off for infecting his gene pool. So when Rich McCulloch is talking partition, you can be damn sure it’s the result of some very long hours spent thinking about race. Call me stupid, but him I feel I can trust. (Now, the rest of them, like my good buddy “CaptainChaos,” I’m not too sure about. Him, we’ll have to work on.)

    Back to that answer. Look, the prospect of having our own country carved out of the U.S.A is so deliciously attractive that I can’t believe American dagoes haven’t published sixteen books on how to convince American jingoists to grant us one. (I have a pretty good answer on how to sell that one too — so I like to think, anyway.) Nevertheless, it’s obvious some people are going to require some enticing. First and foremost, you don’t describe it as “selected for separation.” That makes it sound like you’re about to load people onto cattle carts and gas ‘em. The trick is to sell people on the wonders of it. I’ll detail some of that in an upcoming post.

    (By the way, for any Australian dago readers from Melbourne (I doubt there’ll be many for now, but we’ll scrounge some up), remember how great the northern suburbs used to be 10, 20 years ago? Before all the Samoans, Tongans, Sudanese, Indians etc started descending on the place? When it was just us vs the Aussies? Imagine those places were our country and we were in charge: could anyone ever trick us into accepting these people in our midst?)

    * re spics and niggers. The reason I throw these terms is because I want to treat race with the irreverence it deserves. Race, I believe (as you can tell), is necessary for the good life. You have race, and the majority of your interactions take place with your own people and the people you see on the streets are your people and everything feels great. But that’s as far as I take race. I don’t worship it; I don’t revere it; I don’t give a god damn if anyone wants to attack mine — verbally, that is (and they’ve attacked plenty, you can be sure).

    As for the ‘dodging.’ Well, that’s reality. Hispanics aren’t as much of a problem (not for me, anyway), but blacks generally are. Nevertheless, it’s the job of every honest racialist to work with anyone who sees the need to or the value in separating (whatever form it takes), and to help those who are going to need the most help in doing it. There must be literally millions of good, loyal hispanic and black citizens who surely deserve something better than being treated as mere spics and mere niggers, no matter the difficulties we create for each other in the aggregate.

    Source: http://accidentaldissent.wordpress.com/2009/04/

    I am also a big fan of Richard McCulloch and his work. My fiance and I were lucky enough to get a photo with him after a dinner in 2008. I have never asked another racialist for a “photo op,” (I have taken photos with racialist friends during the normal course of events, which is a different thing, obviously) and unless Günther, Savitri, Evola or Rosenberg stroll in, I probably never will, but I prize that photo of McCulloch. When he told us that we must have many children, I was filled with all the self-satisfaction of a Papist whose union had just been blessed by the Pope.

  2. “Such radical shifts in Ideological leanings indicate an unstable personality.”

    Sadly Friedrich Braun may have been another of this wacko-type. — Heinous Henry

    HH,

    Here is some more evidence of the truly unstable and psychotic ramblings of the cockroach ‘yo-semite’:
    __

    Occidental Dissent » Blog Archive » James von Brunn

    7 Yosemite on 11 Jun 2009 at 12:53 pm
    “He should be regarded as a martyr for our cause.”

    http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/06/11/james-von-brunn/

  3. (More ‘Yo-semite’ quotes):

    Occidental Dissent » Blog Archive » Single Jewish Cause
    __

    6 Yosemite on 24 Jun 2009 at 1:17 am

    I agree with you, Captainchaos. And the more I think about it, the more I feel that Mr. Braun is a traitor to our cause. It’s a shame, I used to respect him. There can be NO compromise with the Jewish enemy. Anyone who says otherwise is either a philosemite or an Jewish/FBI infiltrator.

    22 Yosemite on 25 Jun 2009 at 9:40 pm

    “The only reason why whites support Israel is because Jews are pulling the strings of our politicians, who face political ruin if they refuse to support that apartheid state. There’s no use mincing words over the Jewish question any more. I’ll be quite frank with you: Hitler’s greatest mistake was that he did not commit the Holocaust.”

    http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/06/23/single-jewish-cause/

  4. (And yet more psycho-pathology — from the half-breed Hapa bastard):
    __

    Occidental Dissent » Blog Archive » Just Another Day (Part 6)

    3 Yosemite on 23 Jun 2009 at 2:45 am

    Another reason why we should support Israel as a place to deport the Jews…..then once they’re there, nuke the bastards out of existence.

    4 ATBOTL on 23 Jun 2009 at 4:59 am

    Yosemite is either a moron or an agent provocateur. Keeping saying stupid stuff like that and we will never get enough people on our side to do anything.

    http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/06/22/just-another-day-part-6/

    *Great call ATBOTL!!

  5. Yosemite,

    The sampling of quotes above appears to indicate that you are engaging in deliberately provocative behaviour for nefarious purposes, including but perhaps not limited to, bringing disrepute to this site and its users; moreover, it seems that you are using a fake e-mail address when posting comments here.

    I have never seen you make a productive comment — not once — and I am inclined to ban you unless you provide good reason, and full verity, for comporting yourself with such recklessness.

  6. “Silver,
    It would be a pity to see you stop blogging, and even worse if you deleted what is already there.” — Robert Campbell

    I second that. Your presence on the scene, Silver, has been quite valuable. In my opinion, the more voices out there the better. We all learn from each other, differing opinions notwithstanding. None of us has a corner on the truth, but every now and then even the most uninformed amongst us crosses paths with it. It is at those points we all benefit. I must say, you Silver, cross paths with the truth more often than most. Hang in there mate. Your views are appreciated by more than you may know.

  7. Yes, I do have German ancestors who lived in the Third Reich. Most of my ancestry, however, is English. The two statements are not contradictory. Despite my origins, I am a pure Englishman, if one understands by ‘English’ a person born in England of northwestern European racial heritage.

    Ah, so the little bitch claims he’s both “German” AND a “pure-blooded’ Englishman” — then has the unbelievable audacity to claim this statement is ‘not contradictory’.

    So, let’s get this straight: The Germans supposedly are ‘contaminated’ with ‘Slav/Alpinid’ blood — yet you, again supposedly, being ‘born’ in England, made all that supposed Slav genes ‘disappear’ from your DNA, huh?… making you, supposedly, a ‘pure-blooded’ ‘Englishman’?!? (Gee, my this convoluted rationalization, a ‘Mexcrement’ Mestizo being born in Spain makes him a ‘pure-blooded’ ‘Spaniard’ as well.)

    OMG, only an disturbed, BROODING ASIATIC MINDSET could rationalize away such mendacious LIES, stupidity and two-faced hypocrisy!!!

    The other commenters are so right – You are absolutely not White (nor a man), let alone ‘English’, ‘German’, ‘Nordic’ or North-West European whatever. You are, however, (in Robert Campbell’s words), “engaging in deliberately provocative behaviour for nefarious purposes, including but perhaps not limited to, bringing disrepute to this site and its users…”.

    Well said, Robert.

  8. Now – Landser – I cannot tell you how much I have enjoyed your posts to Yo – a Semite, on this thread. This last post, of the Semite, reveals all to me. There is always that “telling moment”. — Denise

    Denise, thanks so much for the compliment!

    And yes, that post of ‘yo-semit-e sam’ you reference is quit revealing, and tells us all we really need to know about those who engage in Talmudic sophistry and sorcery.

    You know, those special and ‘chosen’ ones that think because they claim that ‘two-plus-two=five’ – then it “must be ‘true”!

    They ALWAYS give themselves away with those “telling moments” where they reveal their black, evil souls and the unbelievable lies they stoop to is proof positive of this.

    “By their fruits ye shall know them…”

  9. “I have never seen you make a productive comment — not once — and I am inclined to ban you unless you provide good reason, and full verity, for comporting yourself with such recklessness.”

    Yes, I’ve told you them several times before what happened. There was an individual going around here posting under my username. The IP addresses don’t match. It hasn’t happened in a while, but most of those quotes were not made by me. Anyone who has read my posts with any consistency knows that I am a moderate conservative and I wouldn’t utter such rubbish, even during my anti-Semitic past. Prozium, I believe, said he was also the victim of the same thing over at Majority Rights. Perhaps it is the same individual.

  10. “So, let’s get this straight: The Germans supposedly are ‘contaminated’ with ‘Slav/Alpinid’ blood — yet you, again supposedly, being ‘born’ in England, made all that supposed Slav genes ‘disappear’ from your DNA, huh?”

    No, I understand my genealogy better than you do. My German ancestors originated in a part of Germany that is least affected by Slavic and Hunnish migrations and invasions. And I define an Englishman as a person born in England of northwestern European racial heritage. Someone can have a few ancestors outside of England, but still in northwestern Europe, but as long as he was in addition to being racially northwestern European, born in England, he is nevertheless 100% English.

  11. Yosemite,

    You are on notice that your posts will be deleted on my threads. so don’t bother posting on my threads, OK?

    Kievsky

  12. Kievsky – I do not want to sound mean. I appreciate your ideas very very much. If I said anything that was offensive – I am truly sorry. Just for the record.

    I went to University with loads of Jews, I learned how to deal with them, then. You must be really belligerent. Not merely argumentative – belligerent. It’s what they understand.

  13. No, I understand my genealogy better than you do. My German ancestors originated in a part of Germany that is least affected by Slavic and Hunnish migrations and invasions. And I define an Englishman as a person born in England of northwestern European racial heritage. Someone can have a few ancestors outside of England, but still in northwestern Europe, but as long as he was in addition to being racially northwestern European, born in England, he is nevertheless 100% English.

    You truly are one of the most stupid, psychotic trolls that has ever polluted this site.

    Even Jeffrey ‘the Imp’ Imm and ‘Goy Weiss’ are way better men than you, and I have far more respect for the likes of them then a confused, Hapa-Mischling like yourself.

    Get this through your Asiatic head: Nobody, but NOBODY here likes you in the least… and certainly no one is buying your lying, Talmudic double-talk.

    So really, go hang out with your own kind, such as here –

    http://www.mixedasians.com/forum/

  14. Yes, I’ve told you them several times before what happened. There was an individual going around here posting under my username. The IP addresses don’t match. It hasn’t happened in a while, but most of those quotes were not made by me. Anyone who has read my posts with any consistency knows that I am a moderate conservative and I wouldn’t utter such rubbish, even during my anti-Semitic past. Prozium, I believe, said he was also the victim of the same thing over at Majority Rights. Perhaps it is the same individual.

    Why would anybody want to imitate a loser nobody like yourself? Seriously?

    8 Yosemite on 19 Jun 2009 at 10:27 pm

    “I support Israel because it’s a place to send the Jews. And I agree with the Israeli people on this question. Obama isn’t particularly pro-Israel. He is an obvious sympathizer with the Palestinian cause.

    “I say deport the Jews to Israel, and then support Iran’s desire to wipe Israel off the map. No Jews, just right.”

    14 Svigor on 20 Jun 2009 at 10:51 pm

    “I say deport the Jews to Israel, and then support Iran’s desire to wipe Israel off the map. No Jews, just right.

    “I say you’re screwing every white every time you link white racial awareness to genocide of anyone, especially the Jews. Maybe politics isn’t your thing.”

    http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/06/19/just-another-day-part-4/

  15. *Some more gems from the psychotic troll –

    7 Yosemote on 30 Jun 2009 at 10:12 pm

    “Honestly, Prozium, with all the merits of your blog, it still boggles my mind that you continue to give a platform to such crypto-Semites as Guy White and Ian Jobling. Why give them the oxygen of publicity? Why link to them? Why advertise for them? Why give them a voice? Why let them spread their philosemitic message?

    “We need to follow a NO PLATFORM policy towards Jews and Jew-ennablers.”

    10 Yosemote on 30 Jun 2009 at 11:21 pm

    “I would say 100 percent of Jews. The few Jews who even claim to be against white race-replacement are merely trying to use whites to fight our Muslim allies. It’s merely an excuse to secure a safe environment for Israel, and to protect Jews from the growing (and justified) antisemitism of the black race. The Jews are indeed our misfortunate, and the only solution is to fumigate the entire nation so that every Jewish and jew-ennabling parasite can be obliterated.”

    24 Reader on 01 Jul 2009 at 5:09 pm

    “Em, is it just me or does something about “Yosemote” seem a bit odd? Namely, obvious insincerity + calls for violence? A rookie infiltrator?”

    http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/06/30/guy-white-again/#comment-13842

  16. *And yet some more –

    20 Yosemote on 30 Jun 2009 at 8:51 am

    “There is a difference between avoiding talk of Jews in propaganda aimed at the masses and adopting a Jew neutral ideological understanding.”

    “The European nationalists are most emphatically NOT neutral. They are explicitly pro-Jewish. Griffin has said that the Holohoax happened and six million Jews were “murdered” by the Nazis (a laughable statistic). He says that Jewish members are “welcome to stay” and the BNP even has Jewish councillors. He has said positive things about Israel.

    The European nationalists on the continent are even more fanatically pro-Jewish — take, for instance, Geert Wilders, or the Vlaams Belang.

    These people, by welcoming the Jew, deserve to be tried and shot for treason.

    http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/06/29/guy-white-moderate/#comment-13754

  17. *And yet more –

    30 Yosemote on 01 Jul 2009 at 12:35 am

    “Griffin wrote a document entitled “Who Are The Mindbenders.””

    “He also repudiated that very document, and has said ever since that (1) six million kikes were “murdered” by the Nazis in the Holocaust, (2) Jews are welcome in the BNP, (3) he has a positive assessment of Israel, (4) Jews are not the enemy, but Moslems.”

    “The truth is that the Holocaust is a hoax, Jews should be EXPELLED not only from the BNP but also from all other political parties and the nation at large, that Israel is an evil apartheid state that oppresses the Palestinians, and that Moslems are our friends and and allies in the struggle against organised Jewry. We are at a time when we should be uniting with the Moslem people, not shunning them.”

    http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/06/29/guy-white-moderate/#comment-13805

  18. …a confused, Hapa-Mischling like yourself.

    Get this through your Asiatic head: Nobody, but NOBODY here likes you in the least…

    LMFAO 😀

    You got ‘schooled’, ‘Yo-Semit-e Sam’!

    This song fits you just perfectly:


    Half-breed, that’s all I ever heard
    Half-breed, how I learned to hate the word
    Half-breed, she’s no good they warned
    Both sides were against me since the day I was born …

    http://www.livevideo.com/video/7A2A2A1F436F4FF2895ADD1514D87901/cher-half-breed-.aspx

  19. Robert Campbell,

    McCulloch’s a great servant of his people and if he were born a hundred years earlier events may have transpired significantly differently. For me his value lies in the racial truth he laid out (I refer to his earlier works, not Racial Compact — which as a work, while not without value, exposes his weakness as a tactician or strategist). The thing about that truth, though, is that it makes upwards of ninety percent of people who encounter it reflexively recoil from it. Just as the Bible (iirc) claims the sight of God would destroy a man, exposure to the full extent of unvarnished racial reality (something which even very few racialists, such as readers of this blog, truly grasp) can sink a man so deep into depression he is effectively disabled; some people intuitively suspect this is the case and thus avert their gaze, perhaps pleading with reality, “No, no that. Let life be about anything else but that!”

    Take you, for instance. I recently read you bewailing the fact of a steadily increasing average cephalic index among your kind. Okay, fine; but because you’re not yet King, you might wish to consider the practical effects of that analysis (ie of the analysis itself, completely aside from any policies it might suggest). If the average is 77 that means some people are substantially lower and some are substantially higher, perhaps even venturing into the dread realm of brachycephaly. Now this is problematic because you’re establishing that being in possession of a certain set of features is the greatest thing in the world, essentially implying that life is scarcely worth living unless in possession of them. If one grants your premises your desire for racial ‘hygiene’ and guiding your kind along the Upward Path is understandable; the problem is the number of people willing to grant you your premises is vanishingly small. And the reason for that is that you violate the implicit social bargain modern society has struck: You pretend that the differences between us are unimportant and I’ll pretend that you haven’t noticed them. You’re now saying that, no, no, the differences are important, extremely important; verily they’re of life-and-death importance. Well, that leaves way too many people out in the cold, and they won’t like it, and too many of your own point blank refuse to leave them out there. I’m sorry Campbell, you’re going to have find another way. Thankfully, such a way exists (or so I believe).

    In C.S. Lewis’ tale the Ice Queen’s downfall results from her ignoring a Deeper Magic than the Deep Magic she appealed to which delivered her ancient foe (Aslan) into her hands. There is also a more profound human truth than the evolutionary tale McCulloch weaves and which racialists such as yourself insist on. Racial other-appreciation is possible, and it is what is currently being practised. Take me: I liberally sprinkle epithets and link to Niggermania, so you’d guess that few people have ever hated anything as much as I hate niggers, right? Wrong. While not neglecting the challenges they present, I’m actually very appreciative of a wide variety of aspects of blacks’ traits (New World blacks’, anyway), both cultural and racial. That’s racial appreciationism, the opposite of the revulsion that typically motivates racialists (whether initially, or eventually coming to rest on it after intellectual and temperamental differences are comprehended). But I’ve always understood that that’s them and I’m not one of them, and there exists a line which mustn’t be crossed; today I’d put it as “Diversity is a dish best served distant” and “Appreciation of diversity is an exponential function of one’s distance from it” — a flat tire at dusk in niggertown, diversity doesn’t look so good; thousands of miles away across the Pacific viewing the Superbowl, blacks look fantastic. Or a more recent example from closer to home: driving through the city last night past endless, endless streams of gooks and blackassed desis, the future taking shape before my eyes — supremely alienating; sitting at home reflecting on an ‘old-style’ diversity in which disparate groups have their own Quarter (eg Jewish quarter, Armenian quarter etc), the people for the most part sticking to their own, peacefully going about their lives — diversity seems much neater. The takeaway point is this: by ignoring the reality that people actually experience, your appeals are going to fall on deaf ears, and your cause will be further imperiled; by acknowledging their reality you open the door to them considering yours, and potentially cooperating with you in implementing measures designed to secure racial futures and to increment group strength.

  20. Silver,

    True diversity is indeed something noble and worthy of safeguarding; however, what is framed for us as “diversity” and “multiculturalism” in public discourse is, in actuality, the opposite: the process of leveling the population through the destruction of meaningful ethno-cultural boundaries.

    I do not believe that I fall under the “Revulsionist” category, as delineated on your blog. Like you, I could not care less about the residents of Papua New Guinea, and similar peoples, and to the extent that I find myself feeling hostile to them (non-Whites) , it does not extend beyond a desire to remove them from my living space. As Spengler said, “Proximity without necessity breeds hatred.” I have a tremendous amount of respect and appreciation for various non-Western cultures, most notably the Japanese. While I can’t think of anything particularly positive to say about African “culture,” I don’t despise negroes in any way. They cannot change who they are (half devil, half child, as Kipling said) and it’s hard not to pity them at times. The Jews are another matter entirely, but I digress.

    I did not bemoan the reduced cephalic index among HNs (although it’s certainly not a positive development to see the classic Nordic type evaporating); I simply pointed out that many of my Scandinavian comrades do, whereas most Southern European WNs are completely unwilling to address such matters openly and honestly. I should note that my experience with said Scandinavians may not represent a cross-section of their respective Nationalist communities. Two of my friends were founders of the Society for Nordish Physical Anthropology, for example.

    You are obviously aware of the issue I broach regarding S. Euros. As you once wrote on your blog, “they [Southern European White Nationalists] all want to be Germans, and if they can’t be Germans, they don’t want to be racists anymore.” This is a sad state of affairs and it would be great to see more of these people stick with it until they become comfortable with themselves and assert a genuinely healthy pride in their identity without allowing it to become a single-minded obsession.

    I don’t see how my belief in Nordish preservation precludes effective WN activism. Outside of mate selection (and I already have a mate), it has very little impact on my dealings with others. “After all, I’m from NJ, some of my best friends are __”

    I agree with you that McCulloch’s books are excellent. It is truly sad that they are not more widely read and discussed. He is one of the few people following in the footsteps of Wilmot Robertson, by fighting explicitly and unequivocally for Northernkind. In my opinion, he’s doing an admirable job of it.

    You say that my “appeals fall on deaf ears” because I don’t “acknowledge reality” or attempt to meet people on common ground, and I’d like you to elaborate on that, please. I have been making a concerted effort to do just those things, as I believe posts such as this one make clear:

    http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2010/01/08/elevate-the-argument/

    I have not seen you lay out, distinctly and cogently, this “other way” to which you often refer. It is starting to remind me of Guessedworker’s nebulous, Gurdjieffian “new philosophy.” If you’ve got an abundance of new, wonderful ideas (and you do have some interesting ideas; I’m not condescending) then quantify and codify them for the edification of the gallery. We’ve been waiting patiently.

    P.S. You have said several times that you are “not one of us” and I was wondering whether you’re speaking biologically, culturally, or both. I’m sure you’ve answered this many times before, but please humour me: what ethnicity are you? From your blog, I assumed you were probably an Italian. I grew up around a lot of Italians in North Jersey. They filmed “The Sopranos” in my home town.

  21. And yes, that post of ‘yo-semit-e sam’ you reference is quit revealing, and tells us all we really need to know about those who engage in Talmudic sophistry and sorcery.

    You know, those special and ‘chosen’ ones that think because they claim that ‘two-plus-two=five’ – then it “must be ‘true”!

    Good points.

    Wow, after reading that convoluted explanation of yo-semite’s ‘geneology’ … and how somebody, somewhere out there would want to impersonate an absolute non-entity like himself … it just never ceases to amaze me how there are ‘humans’ in the world out there like ‘him’ who can lie so utterly, and so shamelessly, even when getting completely caught and called on it.

    Here are some choice quotes for congenital liars and deceivers like ‘yo-semite’, who couldn’t tell the Truth because, like his ‘Father’, there is no Truth in him

    Psalm 52:3 You love evil more than good; and lying rather than to speak the truth.

    Psalm 101:7 I will not allow deceivers to serve in my house, and liars will not stay in my presence.

    Isaiah 5:20 Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light
    for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.

    John 8:44 You are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father you will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and stayed not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

    So, instead of trolling the internet and intruding upon other people’s blogs — where you are not welcome — ponder and think about these Scriptures and what they really mean, ‘yo-semite-san’. At the very least, try to save your wretched, lying soul.

Comments are closed.