Occidental Dissent

Dec 8th, 2009 by Hunter Wallace

Via Racism Review.

Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5

Tags: Anti-Racism, Anti-White, Christianity, Hate Speech, The Jewish Question, White Privilege

Posted in Anti-Racism, Anti-White, Christianity, Discourse Poisoning, Films, PC, Religion, The Jewish Question

91 Responses to “Mirrors of Privilege”

on 09 Dec 2009 at 12:21 am1ParlerWhite

This sort of thing may work on young high school and college kids in a high peer pressure environment, but there’s not two White adults in ten that would not simply be offended, if not outraged, by this.

*This* is exactly where the JQ can be introduced to Whites, who do you think is behind this “white privilege” nonsense?

Does anyone really think this kind of propaganda is effective on most White people? Without social pressure it’s the opposite of effective. In fact this may be one of our best tools to promote White awareness - just show them videos like this, and tell them who is promoting it.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 12:30 am2Hunter Wallace

Whiteness is an “interior prison state.” The revolt against whiteness is the “operation of grace in my life.”
on 09 Dec 2009 at 12:37 am3Hunter Wallace

Tim Wise:

Rejecting whiteness is “reclaiming our humanity.”
on 09 Dec 2009 at 12:47 am4Hunter Wallace

I was especially touched by Andrea Rabinowitz’s account of being a “privileged white woman.”
on 09 Dec 2009 at 12:49 am5White Preservationist

Here is a video you can post to rile up Whites; a Black intellectual calls for the worldwide extermination of Whites - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IN5StQAr7n0
on 09 Dec 2009 at 12:52 am6Hunter Wallace

Guess what? “Mirrors of Privilege” was produced by one Shakti Butler, a “Filmmaker and Facilitator of Diversity Dialogues.”

http://www.speakoutnow.org/userdata_display.php?modin=50&uid=45

http://www.speakoutnow.org/img/pic/ShaktiButler.jpg

Dr. Shakti Butler is a multiracial African-American woman (African, Arawak Indian, and Russian-Jewish) whose work as a creative and visionary bridge builder has challenged and inspired learning for over two decades.

Who could have ever predicted that?
on 09 Dec 2009 at 12:54 am7Hunter Wallace

“One thing we don’t talk about very much is the pathology of white people … there is a real pathology there … “
on 09 Dec 2009 at 1:05 am8FeminizedWesternMale

“Dr. Shakti Butler is a multiracial African-American woman (African, Arawak Indian, and Russian-Jewish) whose work as a creative and visionary bridge builder has challenged and inspired learning for over two decades.”

Her ugliness could scare turds out of an outhouse. If I had to look at that in the mirror, I’d probably be a bitter, net-destroyer, also. Her head looks like an edematous voodoo doll, for crying out loud! Bet she can walk on all four without arching her back.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 1:11 am9Hunter Wallace

“What is the legitimate role of white folks in social justice and race … My initial motivation actually when I got this job teaching was that I wanted to teach these white kids that they were racist. That’s another stage in white identity development .. you want to blame your own group. It’s a way of connecting with some sense of purity in myself is by rejecting my own community which is the white community. And we see white people caught in that.

In other words, I had established my goodness by being embedded in a black community, Hispanic community, Asian, Native community. And I also demonstrate by distance from whiteness by rejecting my own group.”
on 09 Dec 2009 at 1:23 am10ParlerWhite

This is a good example of ritual shaming propaganda. The way it usually works is you get children or young adults at a school in a classroom or auditorium, prep them with a speaker or two, then show the video. It would be best to have one or two black kids there you can manipulate into being either sad or angry (always embarrassed) which then triggers sympathy and guilt in the white children. Far from being mean little racists, white children often go out of their way to include (assimilate?) the “other” and bullying triggers sympathy from all those “altruistic typed.”

There are more sophisticated versions for college kids, and a different sort for the corporate world. The propaganda almost never works without the framing, the group peer pressure, the leadership/teachers, and ultimately, the implied and sometimes threats of explicit consequences for not toeing the line.

This propaganda is not some crazy idea from some liberal, this has been developed and rigorously tested on large subject populations of youth and adults by highly paid specialists in academia and corporations.

Of course this is crude and unconvincing compared to the much more sophisticated propaganda in advertising and Hollywood.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 1:52 am11White Preservationist

It is important to understand that the funding for propaganda like this comes entirely from Jewish sources.

This rabid anti-White activist Shakti Butler obviously wouldn’t have a ‘career’ in the anti-White propaganda ‘film business’ if it wasn’t for the monies she received from anti-White Jews to create this disgusting tripe.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 2:06 am12Z.O.G.

“Racism Review”? LOL Where do you find these goofy sites?
on 09 Dec 2009 at 2:29 am13Z.O.G.

Dr. Shakti Butler is a multiracial African-American woman (African, Arawak Indian, and Russian-Jewish)

So in other words, she’s a Jew.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 2:40 am14Z.O.G.

“One thing we don’t talk about very much is the pathology of Jewish people…there is a real pathology there… “
on 09 Dec 2009 at 2:44 am15Hunter Wallace

“One thing we don’t talk about very much is the pathology of Jewish people…there is a real pathology there… “

An obsessive fear and loathing of White people. An extreme feeling of alienation and hostility towards Western culture.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 3:09 am16Fred Scrooby

“It is important to understand that the funding for propaganda like this comes entirely from Jewish sources. This rabid anti-White activist Shakti Butler obviously wouldn’t have a ‘career’ in the anti-White propaganda ‘film business’ if it wasn’t for the monies she received from anti-White Jews to create this disgusting tripe.” ( — WP #11)

Exactly right. Bingo. WP puts his finger on it. Bullseye, dead-center.

Exactly that is the story of all of this. Susan Sontag’s sicko “whites are the cancer of history” is so well-known not because that obscure nobody of a New York Jewish hack “wrote” it but because the universally pervasive, universally intrusive Jewish media picked it up, adored it, an hyped her attack to the skies for decades.

In Sontag’s mind and the minds of the Jews who hyped her genocidal little quip, the “whites” referred to are strictly the white goys. Sontag and the other Jews were in no way attacking Jews in that. Its sole aim was to attack the Jewish tribal enemy — Eurogoys. That whole thing was and is a naked tribal attack.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 3:15 am17Fred Scrooby

It’s Jewish money that funds it and also goy money comandeered by Jews who get positions in government and disburse funds from there (your and my tax money) and get positions in the big foundations (Ford, etc.) and disburse immense funds from there. It’s not true, as Lawrence Auster, Paul Gottfried, James Kalb, and Jared Taylor claim, that all this is the whites doing it to themselves. The bulk of this is a Jewish tribal attack: that’s who the attacker is. Guess who the attackee is.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 3:18 am18Fred Scrooby

As for why whites fall for it, it’s like the old saying: “You can lead a horse’s ass to slaughter but you can’t make him think.”
on 09 Dec 2009 at 3:19 am19Hunter Wallace

This is a good example of the “drip, drip, drip” nature of anti-Semitism. There seems to be a Jewish angle under almost every rock that is overturned.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 3:21 am20Mr. Dithers

Dr. Shakti Butler has some Jewish blood? I’m shocked, SHOCKED! I mean, who would have guessed that the producer of an anti-white propaganda reel is part Jewish? I thought Jews were just interested in making money and only value the color green (like in dollar bill).

Perhaps this Butler creature should learn a thing or two about her own history. Namely, that Israel was founded by genocide and ethnic cleansing of Palestinian Arabs and Christians and maintains a ruthless system of apartheid reminiscent of the bad, old American South. That slavery, tribal warfare and ethnic cleansing are alive and well in Africa. Don’t even get me started on the amerinjuns.

Nobody hold their breath on any documentaries about Jewish privilege in Israel or black murder and oppression of whites in South Africa.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 3:23 am21Fred Scrooby

But it’s not “anti-Semitism.” Acquiescing in the other side’s dishonest terminology is certainly an error, one you’ll regret in the long run.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 3:43 am22Mr. Dithers

It should be noted that most documentaries are break even propositions and the ones that do make money make so little that it hardly makes the effort worthwhile. The express purpose of this hate whitey documentary, therefore, is to spread anti-white propaganda and mount an attack on our racial character and pervert American history. Isn’t this how it all starts (the beginning of genocidal urges against a people)? Oh, that’s only where Jews are concerned and we aren’t that important.

Taylor, Auster, Gottfried and the like would just have you believe that whites simply have taken leave of their senses and that the Jewish role is very minuscule if they even play a part at all. What an insult. Considering the bulk of the media, book and school textbook publishing industries are under Jewish ownership it’s easy to see why whites have lost their collective minds on race issues.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 3:46 am23Fred Scrooby

“I thought Jews were just interested in making money and only value the color green” ( — Mr. Dithers #20)

Of course that’s partly what this is. The Jews are combining tribal war with exactly the kind of money-making get-rich-quick strategy the televangelists employ, preying on the selfsame psychological/cognitive flaw found in the simple folk (the rubes, the dumb goys) which allows them to be duped time and again by the slickers (Jews; televangelists) into parting with their hard-earned dollars for “moral goals,” parting with it in the Jews case not just “Southern Baptistwide” but societywide: the gullible population approves the disgorgement of immense funds for this stuff at the government level, the big foundation level, as well as at the individual donor level. It’s Mark Twain’s “the King” and “the Duke” con men in Huckleberry Finn traveling from town to town up and down the Mississippi duping the simple folk into giving them money for “moral goals.” When that 70-yr-old televangelist’s wife with the purple beehive, three pounds of mascara, and false eyelashes a yard long, all tricked out in a lavender chiffon babydoll-dress-for-geriatrics looks into the camera close-up and starts crying, shedding bitter tears about Jesus or the poor starving children or what-have-you, it’s guaranteed good for millions in contributions pouring in that very same day. The Jews are doing their own version of that but working the race/discrimination angle instead of Jesus, and they’re milking the whole population, the entire economy, not just the Baptists.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 3:46 am24ParlerWhite

“Goy” and “anti-semite” are both offensive terms, create a hostile environment for white people, and are not used in professional situations or polite company.

The constant smearing of diverse European peoples with animal-based slurs like “cattle” and “sheep” is an extremely offensive examples of anti-White prejudice.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 3:49 am25Fred Scrooby

The point being the Jews are pocketing huge amounts of cash from this racket, exactly as the Rod Parsleys and Reverend Schulers are doing but in a much bigger league.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 3:54 am26Fred Scrooby

#24: you’re right — I’m suggesting avoidance of “anti-Semitic” by others while using “goy” myself. That’s right, I do that. But the difference is I use “goy” sarcastically/satirically while HW uses “anti-Semitic” for real. He’s serious. I wouldn’t mind if his use of it were sarcastic/satirical like mine. But it isn’t. He actually means it.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 3:56 am27Fred Scrooby

HW is not an anti-Semite nor are the positions he recommends anti-Semitic positions. He should stop calling them those things regardless of what the Jews call them. He should call them what they are, which isn’t those terms.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 4:07 am28Grimoire

For liberals this type of video is fried chicken - not just satisfying but fingerlicking good. Things like these are made by a formula.
The inconsistent logic is almost rhythmic. A talking head describes their experience of racism for a minute or two - then you see the interviewee pause and strain to find words, and produces something completely inane. No reflection or pause on this. Two or three cuts of these inanities in a row, from different heads - then a cut to interpretive dancing, we doubt the dancer has any idea what her rubber stretching and curb stepping is supposed to mean. The other three actors are like something left on the beach at lowtide.

It’s called ‘chickensoup for the soul’….yid schmaltz. Anyone who has had to sit through a girlfriends weeknight drama class has seen several iterations of this propaganda kit.
This stuff works on Liberals. Some of us should get together with a video camera and produce a documentary using the same rhythms, the same sublogic or lack of, maybe a white interpretive dancer doing a ‘pygmies rip my butt’ in slo-mo….as in this documentary.

The stuff works on people you want to reach. True, you might/would be called brainless assholes by non-liberals. But this film uses ‘art’ in a sense in inoculate itself from rational criticism. You should look at films like these and see an opportunity.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 4:09 am29Hunter Wallace

I don’t have a problem with using the term “anti-Semitism” to describe my views. It means “hostility or prejudice against Jews. Discrimination against Jews.” I wish to exclude Jews from a White ethnostate. I’m biased against the Jews.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 4:23 am30Fred Scrooby

“I’m biased against the Jews.”

No you’re not. That’s not bias. Bias carries connations of lack of justification, connotations of unreasonableness. This isn’t any such thing.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 4:26 am31Matamoros

Even considering the advanced state of our highway system, I have to admit we’re running out of lampposts for the traitors. What ever shall we do?
on 09 Dec 2009 at 4:28 am32ParlerWhite

@Fred Scrooby

HW is not an anti-Semite nor are the positions he recommends anti-Semitic positions. He should stop calling them those things regardless of what the Jews call them.

That’s a good point, I am no “anti-semite” or “goy” or any such thing, and to characterize my opinions by these “smear labels” is offensive. Of course I understand your sarcasm, I’m sure you understand mine.

I am not any sort of “anti-semite” (whatever that means) and speaking out against Jewish attacks on our diverse European people is simply a natural impulse for people of our tribe.

Especially in the context of this hateful propaganda video.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 4:31 am33Hunter Wallace

Matamoros,

What happened to the essay you had up the other day? It was taken down before I had the chance to read it.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 4:38 am34Fred Scrooby

“speaking out against Jewish attacks on our diverse European people is simply a natural impulse for people of our tribe.” ( — Parler)

Natural and wholly justified. What the Jews will claim in calling it “anti-Semitic” isn’t that such protests are unjustified where you’ve fingered the right culprit, they’ll simply claim that in this case 1) you’re fingered the wrong culprit — they’re innocent, it isn’t them doing it (they absolutely deny Kevin MacDonald), and 2) what made you finger the wrong culprit, namely them, is your anti-Semitism.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 4:41 am35Fred Scrooby

The ones they and everyone else see doing it who, it can’t be denied, are Jews, they call not Jews but “liberals” and see as indistinguishable from generic garden-variety “non-denominational” liberals, identical to Euro liberals, and therefore it’s “anti-Semitic” to discern a Jewish pattern instead of a generic non-denominational “liberal” pattern.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 4:43 am36Fred Scrooby

Of course there IS a Jewish pattern fundamentally distinct from the “generic liberal” pattern and it’s on that basis that our side rightly calls them on it.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 4:45 am37Fred Scrooby

Calling them on that is NOT anti-Semitic.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 5:19 am38Mark

“Here is a video you can post to rile up Whites; a Black intellectual calls for the worldwide extermination of Whites - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IN5StQAr7n0“

If Jews really thought of themselves as white, why wouldn’t they interpret that as another Holocaust? Yet, no reaction.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 6:20 am39Z.O.G.

Okay, guys, it’s time for the First Annual Occidental Dissent J.A.P. Beauty Contest. This year’s contestants are Tamar Jacoby and Shakti Butler. Who will win? I couldn’t possibly judge this contest! It’s just too close!

http://cache4.asset-cache.net/xc/71309045.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=17A4AD9FDB9CF193875DCB1DD8387ABBC6EA5428F374A93B39F71A9C9BC19C35

http://www.ncore.ou.edu/images/2008/shakti2.jpg
on 09 Dec 2009 at 6:27 am40Crypto-Aryan

Unlike you, Fred, Hunter is being refreshingly candid when he calls a spade and spade and admits he’s an anti-Semite. When he cheerfully adopts the the term, he is just as transgressive against the Jews and much less phony than you . You sound like a dishonest …

Edit: Flame deleted
on 09 Dec 2009 at 7:01 am41Mark

“anti-
A prefix whose basic meaning is “against.” It is used to form adjectives that mean “counteracting” (such as antiseptic, preventing infection).”

Anti-Semitic, preventing politically correct infection.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 7:06 am42Grimoire

Scene1

A woman, in her late 40’s, early 50’s (babyboomer) struggles with a question, tears in her eye, wincing as she brings back painful memories to the surface…..

“I was 15 when mom brought Mahummad Jefferson Uhmbaatzini back to our house with my sisters. She told us he was a Nigerian millionaire in exile. I remember the way he looked at us… like we were……(struggles to recall the memories….but only tears come to the surface)
Later he would bring us strange clothes….plastic high heels and leopard print spandex hotpants….and said he wanted us to put it on……….(woman has to stop to deal with emotions ……there is a long pause)

CUT TO:
woman dancer with twirling interpretive scarf bends over backward till her hands rest on the floor. Straightens and begins gyrating with increasing abandon. Background music is tribal conga drums along the lines of ‘Natives Are Restless’ theme.

CUT TO:
An older man, 50’s. I was 12 when they moved to our neighborhood. It was a good place for working class people. So they said these people were ‘boat people’, i was too young to have done ‘crack’ before……
on 09 Dec 2009 at 8:02 am43Robert Campbell

I have such unpleasant memories of being forced to sit through these types of videos that I respond to them much like victims of the Ludovico treatment respond to Beethoven’s 9th Symphony on Kubrick’s adaption of the Burgess novel, Clockwork Orange.

One of my undergraduate Professors is a professional “anti-racist academic.” He was on the PBS special, “Race: The Power of an Illusion” and he’s featured as an “expert” on their page here:

http://www.pbs.org/race/000_About/002_04-experts-04.htm

After much arguing, I got this guy to admit that serious genetic differences do exist between populations of man, that these cleavages can be quantified scientifically, etc. He begrudgingly admitted this truth while adding, “however, that is ethnicity, and not race.” I replied, “So we’re not talking about a used car, but a quality, pre-owned vehicle. You can use whatever euphemism you want, Professor ___, but racial differences are real and the efforts of social engineers like yourself will never change that.”

Needless to say, this Professor and I did not get along very well, and it was an unpleasant semester. It was a required course (American History 2), and not part of some ethnic studies program or anything, but this guy treated it like a lesson at the Highlander Training School. I still have the syllabus and occasionally show it to friends who don’t believe how insane this guy is.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 8:41 am44Grimoire

SceneII

CUT TO:

A man sits kneading his fist into one hand. he looks up at the camera with a look of frustration and suppressed rage.

“I have such unpleasant memories of being forced to sit through these types of videos that I respond to them much like victims of the Ludovico treatment respond to Beethoven’s 9th Symphony on Kubrick’s adaption of the Burgess novel, Clockwork Orange………..”
The man takes a drink of Jack Daniels and begins a tale of quiet horror.

CUT TO:

spotlight on two overweight black woman in black leotards and one skeletal asian dressed in brown stand facing a medium white woman in a white leotard who is down on her knees on a stage. The backdrop is a large Diego Riviera mural of an industrial holocaust scenario.

“Black,Brown,Black,Brown,Black,Brown,Black,Brown,…….whitey ain’t got no
Black,Brown,Black,Brown,” the colored women chant at whitey

CUT TO:
black hands beat the “natives are restless” theme on bongo drums
on 09 Dec 2009 at 1:28 pm45Fred Scrooby

#40: The term “anti-Semite” is fraught with all kinds of baggage implying unreasonableness, prejudice, Jew-hatred-supposedly-”because-when-you-were-seven-the-priest-told-you-they-killed-Christ-and-you’ve-hated-them-ever-since.” Adopt the term, adopt its baggage.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 3:35 pm46Junghans

You are quite right, as usual, Fred. Jewry has hijacked Marr’s term, and through repetitive propaganda and ‘programming’, have turned it into an ideological weapon in their arsenal. ‘Jew Wise’ is much more logical than the emotionally loaded Jewish canard of so-called ‘anti-Semitism’. Semites are a language group, including Arabic of course, so this term should be kept in perspective.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 3:52 pm47OldRight

Jews are the cancer of history. To eradicate jewness is so self evidenly desirable that only an utter reprobate could oppose it.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 5:02 pm48Chuck U. Farley77

“I have such unpleasant memories of being forced to sit through these types of videos that I respond to them much like victims of the Ludovico treatment respond to Beethoven’s 9th Symphony on Kubrick’s adaption of the Burgess novel, Clockwork Orange.”

Oh yeah have had to sit through non-sense like this at the job I have on a Jew-niversity campus!

Alot of this stuff that is going on in the ‘Diversity seminar’ realm is eerily similar to how my East German relatives described Communist brain-washing techniques!

This totalitarianism must be fought!

Indeed it is one of the reasons that have sparked me to becoming more active in White Nationalism and kick back some (soon to be worthless) ZOG Bux to the Occidental Observer anonymously. Wish I had a type of job I didn’t have to go sneaking around like some Crypto-Jew though but I try to do my part.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 5:34 pm49TabuLa Raza

It’s not self-evident. That’s why the need for sites like this.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 7:46 pm50Svigor

“Gentile” is a slur, too. It’s basic etymology is “heathen.” I notice KMac has stopped using the word.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 7:50 pm51White Preservationist

Junghans:”‘Jew Wise’ is much more logical than the emotionally loaded Jewish canard of so-called ‘anti-Semitism’.”

Lately I have somewhat preferred the term ‘Judeoskeptical’ (or ‘Jew-skeptical’) for some reason.

One can always simplify things by just writing or saying ‘anti-Jewish’ in lieu of ‘anti-Semitic,’ though.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 7:56 pm52Svigor

Make that “Its.”
Adopt the term, adopt its baggage.

I’m no linguist, so I don’t know the extent of the down side (I can make a few educated guesses), but I know the up side in our being agile and ever-evolving in our use of language is that we turn the Jewish campaign to control the language into a big black hole of money.

It’s the same with symbology. When an American uses NSDAP symbols, he’s paying a dividend to the Jewish campaign. Basically, he’s making the billions invested by Jews into this campaign pay off. The rub is we can’t be quite as fast-moving with symbols because they need a degree of permanency to be useful.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 7:59 pm53White Preservationist

Svigor:”“Gentile” is a slur, too. It’s basic etymology is “heathen.” I notice KMac has stopped using the word.”

Yes, ‘Gentile’ is definitely a slur. I’ve never used it and I’ve always hated that term, even before I knew hardly anything about Jews — it was like I was instinctually against it or something.

Even though the slur ‘Gentile’ is technically of Latin extraction, in my eyes using that word means stooping down to using Jewish-dictated terminology, seeking to neatly separate all of humanity in to only two categories: ‘Jew’ or ‘Gentile’ (non-Jew)

I’ve always preferred ‘non-Jew’ to that very irritating word ‘Gentile,’ and I think others should as well.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 8:01 pm54Svigor

Jew-wise
Jew-aware
Judeo-skeptic
etc.

But I think the easiest way is to go Fred’s route and simply characterize it as normalcy (though healthy, not normal, is more accurate), and use jargon to describe those who don’t qualify (”philo-semite,” etc.).
on 09 Dec 2009 at 8:07 pm55Svigor

I’ve always preferred ‘non-Jew’ to that very irritating word ‘Gentile,’ and I think others should as well.

I’ve always felt that the most apt is “human vs. Jew,” but I don’t employ it because it’s so easily misinterpreted. To reactionary philo-Semites (majority of our folk) it means “Jews ain’t hyooman,” when what I mean by it is a sort of just reaction to what Jews really mean (especially historically) by Jew vs. gentile.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 8:12 pm56Greg Johnson

We have to start living like free men sometime, and the one thing immediately within our power is our language.

We have to accept that any word or euphemism we use to describe ourselves will be targeted by our enemies for stigmatization. There is no way to dodge that.

It is as useless as trying to dodge raindrops, and it is as unworthy of a dignified adult. If you are caught in the rain without an umbrella, it is better to maintain one’s dignity and get a little wet but keep moving forward to one’s destination rather than to scurry around, dashing from one bit of shelter to another. You will get wet anyway, waste your time, be distracted from your goals, and lose your sense of dignity to boot.

I am a racist and an anti-Semite and a white man (not a “European-American”). Our enemies have done their best to stigmatize these terms. We need to do our best to make them badges of honor and enlightenment.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 8:33 pm57Greg Johnson

RE “Gentile”: I try not to use that term, and I discourage my writers from using it. I prefer “non-Jews,” as in “Jewish hatred for non-Jews.”

RE “Jew-wise”: This is my preferred term. I did not invent it, but I have been trying to popularize it recently, with some success, I think. I will not dodge the label “anti-Semite,” and I will often use it in appropriate contexts to describe myself. But I prefer “Jew-wise” because it is more specific (because it names the Jew) and has a positive connotation (who would not want to be wise?).

I do not like the term “philo-Semite” because it is non-specific and has a positive connotation. I instead prefer to speak of people who have a fondness for Jews (it sounds vaguely unsavory), a preference for Jews (it sounds vaguely immoral as well as unsavory, like having a “preference” for little boys) or, more often, people who are tools or dupes of the Jews. It is less economical, but more specific and carries the right connotations.

Instead of wasting time defending ourselves from the charge of anti-Semitism, why not think of ways we can put the patriotards on the defensive? I would love to see those people arguing that they are not dupes or tools of the Jews. “Rush, why do you have such a strong fondness for Jews?” “Senator, why do you prefer Jews to your own people?” “Congressman, why do you put Israel first?” “Sean [Hannity], when are you going to wise up and stop being a tool for Jewish propaganda?” “Do Jews pay you to tell these lies, or are you actually naive enough to believe them?”
on 09 Dec 2009 at 9:05 pm58Svigor

We have to accept that any word or euphemism we use to describe ourselves will be targeted by our enemies for stigmatization. There is no way to dodge that.

I think you’re contradicting yourself here. When someone targets you, the best way to avoid being hit is to dodge. Pathologizing words costs money. Switching to a new word is free. Say Jews switch to targeting “Jew-wise.” Well, once they’ve spent enough money, we move on to “Jew-aware” or whatever. Besides, wouldn’t you rather the ADL use “Jew-aware” in place of “anti-Semitic”? I would. What if we start using “smart” as our code word? What, the ADL’s going to start calling us smart?

Guerrilla warfare works just as well intellectually as it does militarily.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 9:14 pm59Svigor

Seen this yet HW?

Dr. Lasha Darkmoon: Anti-Semitism: The Case of Honduras
on 09 Dec 2009 at 9:24 pm60Sam Davidson

I agree with Greg Johnson. I am a racist anti-semite. If I called myself anti-Zionist the left would still label me an anti-semite. It doesn’t matter what you call yourself because your enemies will call you what they want. This is why so many American conservatives get called racists for opposing illegal immigration. Alot of these conservatives are actually race-mixers, like Lou Dobbs and Chris Simcox - but they still get called racist.

Presently I’d rather let people know my views in the most direct manner possible. I’m not trying to convert my enemies but rather reach out to those who aren’t aware of what’s going on. The best way is to draw a straight line. “The Jews run our mass-media, financial sector, and control significant parts of our government. They hide the damage caused to our nation by non-whites in an effort to weaken the current White majority.”
on 09 Dec 2009 at 9:25 pm61TabuLa Raza

jews consider themselves the only true humans, so it should be humans vs. humans. Reminds me of spy vs. spy. Isn’t MAD magzaine a jewish publication?
http://cache0.techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/spy-vs-spy_tofu_prv_2.png
on 09 Dec 2009 at 9:26 pm62Hunter Wallace

I prefer “racialist” to “racist.”
on 09 Dec 2009 at 9:45 pm63Mark

You should use language that has the desired effect, obviously. During your conversations with people find out which terms are understood the best and accomplish your goals. I’ve found that race realist works well with the average person.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 9:53 pm64Henrik

Greg Johnson has made an excellent comment.

It brings to mind Confucius’s Rectification of names.

He argued that “social disorder often stemmed from failure to perceive, understand, and deal with reality. Fundamentally, then, social disorder can stem from the failure to call things by their proper names, and his solution to this was the rectification of names.”

In our context, we can see how “the failure to call things by their proper names” has contributed to racial disorder, decline, and dispossession.

This duplicitous appropriation of our language, our control over naming, and our culture, has led us to conflate interests, loyalties, and identities.

As Greg Johnson said, it’s time to stop wasting time on the defensive and to start calling things by their proper names.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 10:31 pm65Greg Johnson

RE Svigor: If somebody throws sticks and stones at you, of course you should try to dodge them. But it is as undignified to dodge words as it is to dodge raindrops.

We are going to have to face a lot more than harsh language if we are going to win this battle. Ask yourselves if you want a man who is afraid of harsh language next to you in a foxhole.

Again, we have to start living like free men sometime. Begin here.
on 09 Dec 2009 at 10:49 pm66Greg Johnson

RE Sam Davidson: You are absolutely right to remind us that we are not trying to convert leftists. We are trying to convert open-minded people in the vast muddled middle. There are various ways of doing this, and we should have as many approaches as we can, tailored to all different constituencies, and a whole spectrum of organizations and ideologies, a set of rungs by which the brightest and bravest can climb up to full enlightenment. But nobody will get there unless at least some of us say what full enlightenment really is: clearly, unambiguously, without euphemisms and soft soap and playing patty cake.

Most racialists I know come out of the right wing in America. I certainly did. It is a huge burden, though, because the whole ethos of the American right is set by some of the stupidest, most cowardly, deep-dyed dishonest people on the planet. It is so corrupting that those of us who come out of that ethos need a thorough delousing.

I remember one occasion where I listened to two right-wingers, both of whom I knew to be atheists, passionately discussing theology, one of them impersonating a Catholic, the other impersonating a Calvinist. What made this a tragedy rather than a mere farce is that they both would have reacted in terror and lashed out at me if I attempted to confront them with the absurdity of the situation.

Level up or die people!
on 10 Dec 2009 at 2:48 am67Svigor

If I called myself anti-Zionist the left would still label me an anti-semite. It doesn’t matter what you call yourself because your enemies will call you what they want.

What you’re saying is that if a court is going to find you guilty regardless, you might as well plead guilty, even if you’re innocent. Nonsense. If someone hurls a false accusation at me, and I accept it, everyone assumes it’s true. If I reject it, some will believe me, or at least give me the benefit of the doubt.

Why this should be an issue of contention between literate adults is beyond me.

This is why so many American conservatives get called racists for opposing illegal immigration. Alot of these conservatives are actually race-mixers, like Lou Dobbs and Chris Simcox - but they still get called racist.

Do they go around calling themselves racists?

What if the media started referring to you as a child molester? Are you going to start self-identifying with the label? Using your logic, you’re going to follow along with their lie, for God only knows what reason.

This is so simple that my intuition tells me the argument you’re using is not a serious one. You must have another reason, that you aren’t stating for whatever reason.
on 10 Dec 2009 at 2:59 am68Svigor

I’ve found that race realist works well with the average person.

It’s good coinage because it conjoins a deconstructed word with a positive word. It’s also the sort of term our enemies would never willingly use to identify us because it would create unnecessary work (i.e., they’d have to deconstruct a word that carries positive connotations).

RE Svigor: If somebody throws sticks and stones at you, of course you should try to dodge them. But it is as undignified to dodge words as it is to dodge raindrops.

Nonsense. The raindrops analogy sucks. If I reject a raindrop, it still lands on me. If I accept a raindrop, it still lands on me. If I reject a charge of x, I have begun to fight it. If I accept a charge of x, we proceed directly to sentencing.

We are going to have to face a lot more than harsh language if we are going to win this battle.

Moving the goalpost. No one here was talking about having a thick skin vis-a-vis accusations. We were discussing addressing yourself the way an enemy addresses you. According to you, if they start calling us “assholes,” you’ll follow suit, which has absolutely nothing to do with having a thick skin.

I’ve had this conversation about a zillion goddamned times at Stormfront, it’s the sort of thing that drove me away from that place.

Again, we have to start living like free men sometime. Begin here.

Living like a free man is distinct from accepting your assertions about tactics. Living like a free man is viewing our respective arguments and choosing the best course for oneself. Start there.
on 10 Dec 2009 at 3:00 am69Svigor

This has NOTHING to do with being tough, or being free, or being the kind of comrade good enough to be in your foxhole. It’s got to do with you wanting everyone to do things your way. FUCK THAT.
on 10 Dec 2009 at 3:03 am70Parler White

Greg Johnson,

I instead prefer to speak of people who have a fondness for Jews (it sounds vaguely unsavory), a preference for Jews (it sounds vaguely immoral as well as unsavory, like having a “preference” for little boys) or, more often, people who are tools or dupes of the Jews.

Any of the “phobia” terms can be reversed to “philia” with carries unpleasant connotations: Judeophilia, xenophilia, homophilia, etc. They are all perfectly legitimate words of course but sound like hemophiliac or pedophile.

Who was the politician that said “in his youth my opponent was a thespian down at the university, where the boys and girls matriculate together”?

“Rush, why do you have such a strong fondness for Jews?” “Senator, why do you prefer Jews to your own people?” “Congressman, why do you put Israel first?” “Sean [Hannity], when are you going to wise up and stop being a tool for Jewish propaganda?” “Do Jews pay you to tell these lies, or are you actually naive enough to believe them?”

This is nearly mainstream rhetoric on the internet, from both the right and the left, with possible use of euphemisms like “zionist” etc. I’ve long maintained that “liberal” started out as a code for “Jew” - “liberal media” “liberal Hollywood” “liberal trial lawyers” - but that most conservatives had forgotten by the Rush Limbaugh age.
on 10 Dec 2009 at 3:06 am71Svigor

I think it also has to do with National Socialism. I.e., rehabilitating it. More power to you, count me out.
on 10 Dec 2009 at 3:25 am72Fred Scrooby

“I’ve long maintained that “liberal” started out as a code for “Jew”” ( — Parler White)

That sounds plausible. I never thought of that. I bet that’s right.
on 10 Dec 2009 at 3:39 am73Parler White

Scrooby, wasn’t it when the John Birch Society purged Revilio Oliver that the Jewish Question became off-limits to the populist right, and when Buckley purged the Jew-wise whites from the elite right? Isn’t that when all the typical right wing labels for the traditional enemies turned into the generic term “liberal”?

One of the things that made me Jew wise was trying to figure out who exactly these “liberals” were that every kept complaining about.

Scrooby in one of your posts you mentioned a technique Jews use to blunt reactions from whites, first, claim that it’s not Jews but someone non-denominational “liberal” that is the problem, and two, claim you are anti-Jew for thinking it was the Jew. I’ve seen that tactic over and over again, you spelled it out quite succinctly, thanks.
on 10 Dec 2009 at 4:23 am74Z.O.G.

“Judeophilia”

Nice! I think this one could grow legs.
on 10 Dec 2009 at 6:07 am75Grimoire

Judeophilia has the stumps of a severe amputee for legs, it’ll need a skateboard to get around.
Nobody cares about whether or not you hate jews. How many revolutionary or counter revolutionary movements are nurtured by a bunch of cranks burning effigies on internet comment threads?
Answer: zero or about sweet-dik.

Do you jews or liberals are winning because they hang out spitting on sidewalks and repeating the same thing over and over and over again?

Theodor Andorno said his work was part of a larger movement that aimed to place the authorative (or white conservative) personality into a ‘psychic cage’ with no options but a bitterness that would only increase his bonds.

This psychic cage is pretty much what i see here.
on 10 Dec 2009 at 6:11 am76Grimoire

previous comment, 2nd paragraph should be
‘do you think jews or liberals…..’

I was not accusing anyone of bieng a jew. Although it would be good heeb joodoo to try to keep people bitching mediocre digs instead of using their brains for the reason they were given them.
on 10 Dec 2009 at 7:21 am77Z.O.G.

Nobody cares about whether or not you hate jews.

You care. Because you’re a Jew.
on 10 Dec 2009 at 7:22 am78Z.O.G.

The term “racist” is a Jewish Communist agitprop term jointly invented by Leon Trotsky and Max Hirschfeld.
on 10 Dec 2009 at 7:22 am79Z.O.G.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leon_Trotsky
on 10 Dec 2009 at 7:22 am80Z.O.G.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnus_Hirschfeld
on 10 Dec 2009 at 7:25 am81Z.O.G.

Hirschfeld more so than Trotsky. Hirschfeld is the one who really put the the word “racism” on the map.
on 10 Dec 2009 at 7:35 am82Kulaks Never Learn

“Hirschfeld more so than Trotsky. Hirschfeld is the one who really put the the word “racism” on the map.”
__

However, it was the Beast Trotsky who used it with murderous frequency against Russian and Ukrainian nationalists who resisted and did not wish to become part of ‘Homo Sovieticus’, or ‘New Soviet Man’.

It was also used primarily during the 1920’s, before falling out of favor and being replaced with the equally nonsensical smear term ‘Kulak’.
on 10 Dec 2009 at 7:40 am83Kulaks Never Learn

79 Z.O.G.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leon_Trotsky
__

Whew, Trotsky/Bronshtein looks like Lucifer in the Wikipedia picture.

Damn, those hideous Khazar genes, no wonder they want to dilute them and mix with northern European humanoids as much as possible. Jeesh.
on 10 Dec 2009 at 9:06 am84OldRight

Svigor
If I reject a charge of x, I have begun to fight it. If I accept a charge of x, we proceed directly to sentencing.

The jew is evil, collectively the jew combines to create the world cancer called jewry. Every jew who does not fight jewry is part of jewry and shares in jew guilt.

I hate jews. Jews should suffer collective punishment. The leaders of jewry should be hanged. The average jew on the street should be stripped of much of its wealth (much of which it obtained only because of the criminal syndicate that is the jew tribal network) to be paid as reparations to whites and then deported.

I don’t reject the charge, if I did I’d sound like Pat Buchanan protesting that he’s not racist.
on 10 Dec 2009 at 4:56 pm85Sam Davidson

Svigor, you’re assuming I accept false labels, which isn’t true. If anyone accused me of being a criminal I’d take legal action against them. I can’t deny racism or anti-semitism for the reason that I fully believe in superior/inferior races and that Jews need to be removed from positions of influence in the West.

SamDavidson: I oppose the domination of our institutions of government, finance, and media being in the hands of Jews.
Reporter: Mr. Davidson, you realize your statement is totally anti-semitic?
SamDavidson: Of course, do you support the Jewish control of your nation?
B: Well, uh, no but it’s a free country, and why should Jews be discriminated against?
SamDavidson: Hijacking our foreign policy? Subverting our culture? Promoting race-mixing? Refusing to give black-on-white crimes national media coverage? I don’t know, you pick one!
on 10 Dec 2009 at 5:04 pm86Sam Davidson

That post was poorly written, but I think it gets my point across.
on 10 Dec 2009 at 7:25 pm87Svigor

The jew is evil, collectively the jew combines to create the world cancer called jewry. Every jew who does not fight jewry is part of jewry and shares in jew guilt.

I hate jews. Jews should suffer collective punishment. The leaders of jewry should be hanged. The average jew on the street should be stripped of much of its wealth (much of which it obtained only because of the criminal syndicate that is the jew tribal network) to be paid as reparations to whites and then deported.

I don’t reject the charge, if I did I’d sound like Pat Buchanan protesting that he’s not racist.

See, this is an explanation I can accept. It’s not for me, but it doesn’t try to be anything other than what it is, and I don’t see you challenging anyone’s motives or worth if they don’t agree with you.
on 10 Dec 2009 at 7:28 pm88Svigor

Svigor, you’re assuming I accept false labels, which isn’t true. If anyone accused me of being a criminal I’d take legal action against them. I can’t deny racism or anti-semitism for the reason that I fully believe in superior/inferior races and that Jews need to be removed from positions of influence in the West.

I have to repeat here my response to OR; more power to you, but not for me.
on 11 Dec 2009 at 2:59 am89White Preservationist

“NEA’s 3.2 Million Members Gain Access to Online Diversity Training Course”

GAITHERSBURG, MD–December 7, 2009– The National Education Association (NEA) Academy has partnered with the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), the nation’s premier civil rights/human relations agency, to offer the NEA’s 3.2 million members access to the ADL’s online professional development tool, ‘Making Diversity Count.’

- http://www.adl.org/PresRele/Education_01/5668_01.htm
on 12 Dec 2009 at 12:40 am90Steve in the Swamps

Robert Campbell, Comment #43: I read one of the quotes on the website.

“Two random Koreans are likely to be as genetically different as a Korean and an Italian.”

LOL! They truly think we are lacking in basic intelligence.
on 12 Dec 2009 at 1:09 am91Steve in the Swamps

And the website made the same argument regarding 2 Swedes and a Sengalese.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Mirrors of Privilege

91 Responses to “Mirrors of Privilege”

Leave a Reply

About

Pages

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Categories

Archives

Blogroll

Meta

UserOnline