My Awakening
Dec 5th, 2009 by Hunter Wallace
A biographical note.
I didn’t start out as an anti-Semite. The Jews didn’t appear on my radar screen until Fall 2001, shortly after my 21st birthday, when my concern over third world immigration led to my participation in online political forums. At the time, I was reading David Horowitz’s Hating Whitey and Pat Buchanan’s The Death of the West. In the aftermath of 9/11, I began encountering various anti-Semitic arguments in cyberspace, mostly on Age of Kings chatrooms and messageboards.
Growing up in Alabama, I had no real life experience with Jews. There were very few in my local area. As an undergraduate, I didn’t encounter that many at Auburn either. Jews had about as much relevance to my life as Eskimos. Insofar as I thought about Jews at all, I had a vaguely positive attitude towards them. I tended to believe their narrative of victimology and resisted anti-Semitic arguments when I was first exposed to them.
In late 2001, I stumbled upon Stormfront, which had been relaunched as a vBulletin only a few months before. I don’t remember exactly how I got there, but I think it was through a Google search for Buchanan’s The Death of the West. David Duke was arguing that Jews were responsible for 9/11. There were a lot more Neo-Nazis and Third Reich fetishists back then. At the time, Stormfront was still a small internet forum.
When I showed up at Stormfront, I was already a racialist, but not yet an anti-Semite. I took offense at the widespread anti-Semitism there. I argued against it for several months and eventually created my own “free speech” messageboard. It was at Stormfront though that I was first exposed to the theory that Jews were responsible for many of America’s racial problems. I dismissed the theory, but logged it in the back of my mind.
In 2002 and 2003, I began to research America’s racial decline. I read almost exclusively mainstream academic sources in my college library. I stayed away from the anti-Semitic stuff. To this day, I still haven’t read Duke’s My Awakening or Jewish Supremacism. It quickly became clear that there was a Jewish angle to the problem. In particular, I noticed the “New Books” section of the AU Library always seemed to be filled with recently published anti-racist screeds by Jewish authors. I developed the impression that Jews were ubiquitous in anti-racist circles.
Anti-Semitism is like tuning a radio. If you adjust to the right frequency, a distinct pattern emerges. In the daily grind of current events, you begin to see multiple confirmations of Jewish malfeasance. I’ve experienced thousands of these “ooh” and “ah” moments over the past seven years. This weekend it happens to be the Jewish reaction to the Swiss ban on minarets. A week ago, it was Barry Mehler on White Nationalism. A week from now, it will be something else.
The culmulative weight of these moments adds up over time into the attitude that White Americans, racially and culturally speaking, would be better off without the Jewish impact on our society. So that’s how I became an anti-Semite.
How did you?
Note: In 2004/2005, I had a brief relapse while arguing with Neo-Nazis over whether or not the Franklin D. Roosevelt administration was Jewish controlled. I was also beginning to realize that America’s racial decline was complex; that the war propaganda and backlash against the Third Reich played an important role in changing White racial attitudes. While arguing against extreme anti-Semites, I allowed myself to get polarized into taking an equally extreme position.
As the polarization wore off, I came to my senses. The drip, drip, drip of daily Jewish misbehavior solidified my view of the Jewish Question. In the past five years, I have seen nothing out of the Jewish community to give me reason to change my mind, only implacable hostility toward racially conscious White Americans. While there are arguably a handful of pro-White Jews, they have no influence over the wider Jewish community which remains committed to our destruction.
“I argued against it for several months and eventually created my own “free speech” messageboard. ”
Dr. Frankenstein.
President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Jewish Cabal
Some of these Jews were directly responsible for plunging America into WWII by deliberately alienating America from anti-Communist countries such as Germany and Japan long before the outbreak of hostilities. These Jews also pioneered the idea of Big Egalitarian Government in America; some of them were later discovered to have been spies for the Soviet Union.
Franklin Delano Roosevelt (photo at right), president of the United States of America, 1933-1945, was himself partly of Dutch-Jewish ancestry.
1. Bernard M. Baruch — a financier and adviser to FDR.
2. Felix Frankfurter — Supreme Court Justice; a key player in FDR’s New Deal system.
3. David E. Lilienthal — director of Tennessee Valley Authority, adviser. The TVA changed the relationship of government-to-business in America.
4. David Niles — presidential aide.
5. Louis Brandeis — U.S. Supreme Court Justice; confidante of FDR; “Father” of New Deal.
6. Samuel I. Rosenman — official speechwriter for FDR.
7. Henry Morgenthau Jr. — Secretary of the Treasury, “unofficial” presidential adviser. Father of the Morgenthau Plan to re-structure Germany/Europe after WWII.
8. Benjamin V. Cohen — State Department official, adviser to FDR.
9. Rabbi Stephen Wise — close pal of FDR, spokesman for the American Zionist movement, head of The American Jewish Congress.
10. Frances Perkins — Secretary of Labor; allegedly Jewish/adopted at birth; unconfirmed.
11. Sidney Hillman — presidential adviser.
12. Anna Rosenberg — longtime labor adviser to FDR, and manpower adviser with the Manpower Consulting Committee of the Army and Navy Munitions Board and the War Manpower Commission.
13. Herbert H. Lehman — Governor of New York, 1933-1942, Director of U.S. Office of Foreign Relief and Rehabilitation Operations, Department of State, 1942-1943; Director-General of UNRRA, 1944 - 1946, pal of FDR.
14. Herbert Feis — U.S. State Department official, economist, and an adviser on international economic affairs.
15. R. S. Hecht — financial adviser to FDR.
16. Nathan Margold — Department of the Interior Solicitor, legal adviser.
17. Jesse I. Straus — adviser to FDR.
18. H. J. Laski — “unofficial foreign adviser” to FDR.
19. E. W. Goldenweiser — Federal Reserve Director.
20. Charles E. Wyzanski — U.S. Labor department legal adviser.
21. Samuel Untermyer — lawyer, “unofficial public ownership adviser” to FDR.
22. Jacob Viner — Tax expert at the U.S. Treasury Department, assistant to the Treasury Secretary.
23. Edward Filene — businessman, philanthropist, unofficial presidential adviser.
24. David Dubinsky — Labor leader, president of International Ladies Garment Workers Union.
25. William C. Bullitt — part-Jewish, ambassador to USSR [is claimed to be Jonathan Horwitz's grandson; unconfirmed].
26. Mordecai Ezekiel — Agriculture Department economist.
27. Abe Fortas — Assistant director of Securities and Exchange Commission, Department of the Interior Undersecretary.
28. Isador Lubin — Commissioner of Labor Statistics, unofficial labor economist to FDR.
29. Harry Dexter White [Weiss] — Assistant Secretary of the Treasury; a key founder of the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank; adviser, close pal of Henry Morgenthau. Co-wrote the Morgenthau Plan.
30. Alexander Holtzoff — Special assistant, U.S. Attorney General’s Office until 1945; [presumed to be Jewish; unconfirmed].
31. David Weintraub — official in the Office of Foreign Relief and Rehabilitation Operations; helped create the United Nations; Secretary, Committee on Supplies, 1944-1946.
32. Nathan Gregory Silvermaster — Agriculture Department official and head of the Near East Division of the Board of Economic Warfare; helped create the United Nations.
33. Harold Glasser — Treasury Department director of the division of monetary research. Treasury spokesman on the affairs of United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration.
34. Irving Kaplan — U.S. Treasury Department official, pal of David Weintraub.
35. Solomon Adler — Treasury Department representative in China during World War II.
36. Benjamin Cardozo — U.S. Supreme Court Justice.
37. Leo Wolman — chairman of the National Recovery Administration’s Labor advisery Board; labor economist.
38. Rose Schneiderman — labor organizer; on the advisery board of the National Recovery Administration.
39. Jerome Frank — general counsel to the Agricultural Adjustment Administration, Justice, U.S. Court of Appeals, 1941-57.
40. Gerard Swope — key player in the creation of the N.R.A. [National Recovery Administration]
41. Herbert Bayard Swope — brother of Gerard
42. Lucien Koch — consumer division, N.R.A. [apparently-Jewish]
43. J. David Stern — Federal Reserve Board, appointed by FDR
44. Nathan Straus — housing adviser
45. Charles Michaelson — Democratic [DNC] publicity man
46. Lawrence Steinhardt — ambassador to Soviet Union
47. Harry Guggenheim — heir to Guggenheim fortune, adviser on aviation
48. Arthur Garfield Hays — adviser on civil liberties
49. David Lasser — head of Worker’s Alliance, labor activist
50. Max Zaritsky — labor adviser
51. James Warburg — millionaire, early backer of New Deal before backing out
52. Louis Kirstein — associate of E. Filene
53. Charles Wyzanski, Jr. — counsel, Dept. of Labor
54. Charles Taussig — early New Deal adviser
55. Jacob Baker — assistant to W.P.A. head Harry Hopkins; assistant head of W.P.A. [Works Progress Admin.]
56. Louis H. Bean — Dept. of Agriculture official
57. Abraham Fox — research director, Tariff Commission
58. Benedict Wolf — National Labor Relations Board [NLRB]
59. William Leiserson — NLRB
60. David J. Saposs — NLRB
61. A. H. Meyers — NLRB [New England division]
62. L. H. Seltzer — head economist at the Treasury Dept.
63. Edward Berman — Dept. of Labor official
64. Jacob Perlman — Dept. of Labor official
65. Morris L. Jacobson — chief statistician of the Government Research Project
66. Jack Levin — assistant general manager, Rural Electrification Authority
67. Harold Loeb — economic consultant, N.R.P.
68. William Seagle — council, Petroleum Labor Policy Board
69. Herman A. Gray — policy committee, National Housing Conference
70. Alexander Sachs — rep. of Lehman Bros., early New Deal consultant
71. Paul Mazur — rep. of Lehman Bros., early consultant for New Deal
72. Henry Alsberg — head of the Writer’s Project under the W.P.A.
73. Lincoln Rothschild — New Deal art administrator
Now watch kikeman try to deny the facts and say that FDR’s administration wasn’t drowning in Jews, and that it’s just an “anti-Jew conspiracy theory”.
”So that’s how I became an anti-Semite. How did you?” ( — from the log entry)
You’re using the other side’s terminology. You’re not an “anti-Semite.” You’re trying to use the term the way the Jews do but to them any Eurogoy who still breathes, who hasn’t yet assumed room temperature, is “an anti-Semite.” You think I’m exaggerating? Watch how hyper-extreme Jewish ethnocentrists and Eurochristian haters like Abe Foxman use the term.
I would avoid the terms “anti-Semite” and “philo-Semite.”
Do you call yourself a “fascist” and a “Nazi”? Might as well then, if you call yourself the other, because those are also what the Jews call you. (And while we’re at it, I’d avoid the terms “white nationalist,” “racist,” and “racialist.”)
Do not try to adopt the other side’s terminology: you will not win. You will only lose. Their terminology is rigged that way, it’s set up that way. It serves their purposes, never yours. “Racist”/”racism” for example are strictly Bolshevik/Jewish terms of tribal attack which have no place in a Euro’s vocabulary except conceivably for purposes of counterattack.
You are neither an “anti-Semite” nor a “philo-Semite,” whatever those words are supposed to mean. You are a reasonable person who will criticise or approve of Jews or anyone else when they deserve criticism or approval. That’s all. That’s all there is to it.
I have to agree with Fred here, we have to take back the language and symbols of our people as one of the first revolutionary acts we commit. Until we can fight on some kind of stable linguistic ground we have to gain three yards for our enemies every one, and that fight is all but unwinnable.
I still refuse to call myself an anti-semite, though as I said in an earlier comment I certainly share the majority of your concerns of Jews and their unfortunate effects on this country.
My problem, such as it is, is that I know a bunch of Jews who are 110% on our side, is there no hope whatsoever that they can be coaxed onboard the civilization project?
Like you, I had little experience with Jews during my youth. They simply weren’t on my radar, at least not all that much. Some I liked personally, but I do think that I experienced something of an aesthetic repulsion to the few that I met back then. Nothing overly serious, but a vague sense of “the other.” There were additional small happenings that reinforced this sense of “the other,” but nothing sufficient to make me an anti-semite.
Unfortunately, my healthy instincts were counteracted by my passionate libertarianism, which of course features many a jewish writer in its holy canon. Jewish writers that, at the time, I respected.
I accepted the Holocaust story at face value (keep in mind that this was all pre-internet for me, happening mostly in the nineties, so I wasn’t exposed to radical writers). As a libertarian I had bigger fish to fry. But, as I moved through my twenties, it was becoming more and more obvious to me that, true or not (and again, I didn’t doubt its truth at the time), Jews were using the Holocaust in an extremely manipulative fashion. As a history buff, I was of course already aware of innumerable slaughters and persecutions throughout man’s checkered past. Why are we always harping on this one? Who benefits? Why is a Jewish life worth more than a gentile one? Why are Americans being guilt tripped about the Jews, when we paid in blood and treasure to defeat their arch enemy?
Basically, I began to sniff Jewish hyposcrisy and manipulation. Their own holidays celebrate the butchering of rival ethnic groups, yet they demand to be viewed strictly as a victim. And worse, I could see that this blatantly hypocritical and self serving strategy worked! The goyim ate it up!
I began to realize the enormous importance of the Holocaust myth, and the tremendous benefits that Jews were extracting from it, typically at the expense of my own people. From that point on, I had more and more of the “aha” moments that you describe. More and more evidence of Jewish perfidy, more and more examples of Jewish hostility to the survival of my people. This was largely going on during the nineties, when I first saw miscegenation on a large scale and began to fear deeply for the future of whites. It took some time, but gradually I began to put two and two together, and the patterns were emerging. Again, this was pre-internet for me. I’m convinced that the internet would have vastly sped up the process. As it was, I had to figure it out on my own.
During this process my racialism resurfaced in force, having largely been sublimated to my libertarianism. Of course I also noticed that, when one spoke up in defense of whites, the “you’re a nazi” claim wasn’t far behind (assuming you are talking to a lib).
But…but…I wasn’t a Nazi. LOL! I was a libertarian, though becoming less of one by the day. Hell, even if you are too stupid to make the connection, the libs will make it for you! As Linder says, anti-whites know where you are going before you do. I slowly began to understand that Jews equated any desire of whites to survive as a people with anti-semitism. They were entitled to survive, but whites where not.
Over time, the “aha” moments revealed to me the central role that Jewry has played in misinforming our people, suppressing information that doesn’t suit their agenda, not to mention reaping enormous and quite unearned benefits. It pissed me off. Being lied to has that effect on me. Rank hypocrisy has that effect on me.
So it’s not that I came to anti-semitism through revisionism. To this day, I’m not certain as to what actually happened. There is a reason I’m not certain: because honest research and free debate on the subject is not allowed. This is either unique, or damn close to it, in terms of historical events. This was not lost upon me, and it started me on the path. Ceaseless, constant and unrelenting Jewish hostility to my people supplied plenty of fuel for the rest of the long journey.
I’ll also mention that, during the nineties, I ran into jew-wise racialists on a couple of occasions. They didn’t “convert” me on the spot, but they definitely had an long term impact. They certainly gave me food for thought, and just knowing that they were out there was probably significant. The steady stream of “aha” moments did the rest.
Just remember that with most people education is going to be cumulative. It doesn’t happen overnight. Plant seeds. Many will grow in time.
I picked up a paperback book, WANTED! The Search for Nazis in America by Howard Blum over a decade ago. It was published in the mid Seventies so it was already dated. The chapter on the founder of The Romanian Orthodox Episcopate in America, Archbishop Valarian Trifa, intrigued me.
I used my branch library’s inter-library loan system to order histories of interbellic Romania. East European Monographs, distributed by Columbia University, is an invaluable source for rare and expensive academic texts on Eastern European history. I read Religion and Politics: Bishop Valerian Trifa and His Times by Gerald Bobango and not only learned a lot about the history of Judeo Bolshevism in Romania, but also about organized Jewry in post-war America and it’s influence on politics and culture.
The reason Trifa’s story intrigued me originally is because he was a default member of the Iron Guard which is usually written up as having been worse than the Nazis. The story is that Hitler had to rein them in, but of course, this turns out to be crap because until only recently most histories in English of Romania between the wars and in WWII have been written by ex-Communist (often Jewish) refugee academics precision placed in universities throughout the West. The Romania desk at Radio Free Europe is currently entirely Jewish. So, in effect, Gerald Bobango woke me up to the JQ, but this knowledge is a curse and I almost wish now that I had never never stumbled on it.
The Sound Of All Hell Breaking Loose: Our Friends, The Saudis
The Australian;
SAUDI Arabia has seized on a series of stolen British university emails to become the first country to cast doubt on the consensus about man-made climate change ahead of next week’s Copenhagen summit.
[...]
[C]hief Copenhagen negotiator, Mohammad al-Sabban, suggested in an interview with the BBC yesterday that there was now no longer any point in seeking an agreement to reduce emissions.
“It appears from the details . . . that there is no relationship whatsoever between human activities and climate change,” he said.
“Climate is changing . . . but for natural and not human-induced reasons. So whatever the international community does to reduce greenhouse gas emissions will have no effect on the climate’s natural variability.”
His government might be prepared to take “no cost” measures to control emissions but more drastic and painful action would be out of the question until there was “new evidence” about what was causing climate change, he said.
Mr. Scrooby wrote,
“You’re using the other side’s terminology.”
I don’t think he is. The word ‘anti-Semitism’ was coined by Wilhelm Marrih, himself an anti-Semite.
D. Lancelyn
National Rebirth
I had a similar experience defending Jews against an anti-Semite on a general interest website. I knew from the start that Jews were heavily overrepresented in positions of power, and in the end I could see that Jews were especially heavily overrepresented in destructive movements. I agree with the statement: “White Americans, racially and culturally speaking, would be better off without the Jewish impact on our society.”
Unlike you, I had a fair number of Jews in my social circle. Most of them seemed perfectly harmless. I don’t see the point in blaming them for the misdeeds of their relatives. There are also a lot of gentiles with the same attitudes - at this point, if all the Jews disappeared, whites have internalized attitudes associated with them enough (as you have noticed yourself: http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/06/21/true-blood/) that it might not help as much as you think.
I recognize that, in practice, I’m opposed to what most Jews believe in, and they’re opposed to what I believe in, but I just don’t see what value it adds to pick on Jews as a group, when you’re already empirically opposed to 80% or more of them without reference to their Judaism, simply by opposing policies they support. I have no illusions that Jews are going to switch teams if explicit anti-semitism goes away, but I don’t see the point in stiffening opposition and reducing the number of potential allies, few though they might be.
Good point, National. Imagine the average German’s horror at those smelly kaftan-wearing freaks settling in their cities — they were “Semites”. Scrooby forgets the term anti-Semitism was used positively from the first. No reason to wrangle over terminology. Let’s be brief: let’s be anti-Semites.
Anyway, for me it was the lead-up to the invasion of Iraq. My buddy and I were reading a lot of German poetry and noticed all the neocons had those germanish Jew names; after some brief readings in Chuck Pearson (regmeister.net, precursor of VNN), Heretical and The Holocaust Industry, we were confirmed. Everything fell into place, as we say. The poet Heine, one of my favorites, was revealed as the reprobate and irritant to German culture that he was. Anti-music was put in context; television, politics, and so on across the board — Linder’s “skeleton key to politics”, to all modernism.
I’d read Mein Kampf when I was sixteen and revisited. There it all was, first to last. Even he rejected it at first, refused to believe they could be responsible for these immense social disorders — “only after very great soul-torments” did he come around, I believe were his words.
For a few years thence life was passed as though under a heavy black raincloud. They haunted me in everything. Was always outraged, wanted to lash out somehow. Finally I lost steam and apparently became a Jew myself, according to you guys.
I first had contact with Jews in a private school. The school was Christian-based and named after a saint. We didn’t make religion part of our everyday routine but we did have a ’service’ every Friday morning. We would also have special events for the holidays. Well, a good number of Jews attended this school because it allowed individual children to learn at their own pace. I didn’t realize it at the time but whenever a Jewish holiday approached, despite the fact that Jews were perhaps 5% of the children, we had to celebrate that as well.
Now, I didn’t know anything about race or history when I was 12, but I did know that most of the Jews tended to be emotional and foul-mouthed. I think the first time I heard the word ‘bitch’ was when a Jewish boy goaded a group of us into reciting it, to prove we weren’t wimps or something. There was also a Jewish girl who had constant fits of depression and rage. One day one of us made a friendly joke about her mood swings and she began fuming and stormed away. There was also a boy named Zimmerman who seemed totally austistic. He would respond defensively to almost every statement. My best friend at the time was a Jew. I went to his house frequently. His parents were nice people who enjoyed having me over and they kept a very nice house in a very nice area. His older brother went to Israel at some point. I eventually drifted apart from this friend because I would go to his house and he would play computer games while I sat there trying to find something to do. He was also an incessant whiner whenever his parents asked him to do something like take out the trash.
When I went to High School I didn’t know any Jews, although I’m sure there must have been a few. During that time I became interested in Marxism for some reason. I began using online forums to discuss the topic and I quickly noticed that all the leading Marxists were Jews. But then I thought, surely, Jews are also disproportionately bourgeois? Marx, Engels, and Lenin were all members of the upper-bourgeoisie. Well, pointing this out did not make me popular with any of the Marxists. It certainly seemed odd but my interest in the question waned and I stopped thinking about it.
Years later in 2005 the world witnessed Hurricane Katrina. Until then I had been mostly race-blind in my worldview. The aftermath of Katrina forced me to investigate racial differences. Why, after every disaster against White people, did they band together and help each other? Why did the blacks choose to loot and destroy and kill one another instead? This led me to American Rennaissance. From that point on I came to view the racial question as being of the utmost importance in world events.
I then began to wonder why the West went from ‘white-supremacist’ to our current pro-diversity stance. Well, I looked across the board and ruled out religion, even though different sects had always been egalitarian they did not manage to change our culture. I also ruled out capitalism, even though it eroded national consciousness and constantly searched for means of exploiting cheap foreign labor. While I still feel that captialism has done incredible harm to the West, it generally works within the system to achieve its goals, rather than changing the system.
Then I looked at the Jews. In every nation they go to they foment upheaval and revolution. When they arrived in America they immediately began to undermine both the culture and the institutions of White society. I already wrote about this topic in “Jewish Activists and White Institutions.” It seems crazy that one group, a minority, could be responsible for so many changes, but the evidence proves it.
#9: Whoever coined it, I’m talking about how the term is used and who uses it that way.
“It seems crazy that one group, a minority, could be responsible for so many changes, but the evidence proves it.” ( — Sam Davidson)
Correct. You either dismiss the evidence or interpret it some other way, on grounds the conclusion in question is too unlikely, or you accept the evidence and what it appears to imply, and see what it tells you about the way society works assuming it’s true. The first path is most people’s initial reaction (most who see it and think about it at all). The second is the way to go, it turns out. And once you go that way, as Wintermute said one time and as “Uh” refers to above with his term “the skeleton key to politics,” all falls into place (including past events that had baffled you at the time) and you can make extremely accurate predictions of the future based on this new understanding.
“skeleton key to politics and to [virtually] all modernism” ( — Uh)
Bullseye by Linder (quoted above by “Uh”). That’s exactly what it is, the skeleton key to understanding/explaining a huge amount of otherwise unexplainable stuff in those domains.
An update on FB’s hero Michael Levin:
I’ve said everything I think I have to say on race, and I see no point in repeating myself. [. . .] More important, perhaps, the country’s reaction to 9/11 made me think that the push for racial egalitarianism was far from the worst problem the country faced, and liberal egalitarians far from the worst and most dangerous people. Liberal egalitarians began to seem to me to be sentimental fools, whereas conservatives were obviously malevolent and murderous. [. . .]
AR: In your view, have race relations improved, deteriorated, or stayed the same since the mid 1990s, when you were writing about race?
ML: My sense is that race relations have improved. On a personal level, I find I can jog through Harlem without being bothered, something unthinkable fifteen years ago. At the same time, my sense is that whites are becoming more comfortable dealing with blacks on a day-to-day basis, as day-to-day interracial contact becomes more common.
AR: What are you impressions of Barack Obama, and of the outpouring of enthusiasm that greeted his election?
ML: He impresses me very favorably. He is obviously extremely intelligent. It is a pleasure listening to him, after his stupid, bullying predecessor.
HW, may I suggest that you continue your education by not only reading Duke’s excellent books, but also by reading Griffin’s book THE FAME OF A DEAD MAN’S DEEDS. However William Pierce may have impacted White nationalist thinking, and it was huge, the fact remains: he was a racial genius, bar none.
As regards my racial awakening, all it took in my case was personal exposure to 24 carat Negroes in the raw, as a teenager in high school. I knew then that we were living a regnant lie. The JQ was rather obvious to me, as their mendacity and duplicity has always been there for anyone sentient enough to open their eyes and take off the blinders. The hypocritical WWII propaganda lies that the Anglo-Judeo establishment peddled, convinced me of their deceit. Their nation wrecking influence today, in occupied America, is testament to their ingratitude and contempt for their proxy “shabbos goyim”. How the average clueless White American can be oblivious to such an obvious state of maleficent affairs, is an indication of the depth of their mind adulteration, and willful ignorance.
By the way, the Jews aren’t the percentage of the U.S. population everyone claims. They’re at least twice that and probably more than twice.
“By the way, the Jews aren’t the percentage of the U.S. population everyone claims. They’re at least twice that and probably more than twice.”
Probable. The Minneapolis-St. Paul area is crawling with Jews, no exaggeration, but try to find census info about that and you’ll be scratching your head. The fact is that they downplay their real numbers to stay under the radar and to give themselves an air of great power and influence for all their small numbers which are, in fact, not that small at all.
Anti-Semitism is like tuning a radio. If you adjust to the right frequency, a distinct pattern emerges. In the daily grind of current events, you begin to see multiple confirmations of Jewish malfeasance. I’ve experienced thousands of these “ooh” and “ah” moments over the past seven years.
This is pretty much my story as well, as I’m sure it is for many others. One would have to be more than a little dull to be a race-realist and yet fail to notice a pattern of ethnically-motivated anti-white Jewish behavior.
I was also given a big assist in my journey from Larry Auster. About three years ago or so I was a regular reader of VFR and Majority Rights when some of the MR bloggers got into a spat with Auster about anti-semitism. Auster’s reaction to reasonable criticism of organized Jewry was illuminating. There was a lot of flailing about and name-calling from his camp, but nothing in the way of actual arguments. This was standard Auster on Jews, the type of behavior that Tanstaafl has documented at length on his blog. The dishonesty and hypocrisy of the philo-semites made everything the anti-semites had been saying come into much clearer focus for me.
Related to that point, I always knew the Jewish character thanks to my close proximity to them. So I guess I didn’t have really an “awakening” because I knew so many Jews from a young age. However, their overall pernicious effects on society did not become clear to me until around the rise of the neocons during the Bush presidency. At that time I began reading more about them. But I actually didn’t come across racialism until around 2007 or so, altho’ when I think of it I was always somewhat aware of racial differences, it seemed obvious despite the PC environment and where I grew up racism was not really frowned upon. When I was younger though I was a liberal, then in my early twenties I was sort of a libertarian. It happened in reverse to me, I guess, in that I was aware of the JQ before I really knew much about race. It all sort of came together for me, race, the JQ, liberalism, etc around 2008.
Coldequation: “I just don’t see what value it adds to pick on Jews as a group”
Are you saying you don’t see why we should “name the Jew” ? I think it is legitimate to try to end the Jewish over-representation in the media and institutions. Besides, if we make people realize that much of the anti-white activism and race-replacement activism are inspired by Jewish racial animus, the resistance will increase. We should not be too afraid to hurt Jewish feelings.
F.Scrooby: “(And while we’re at it, I’d avoid the terms “white nationalist,” “racist,” and “racialist.”)
Do you like “white separatist” better?
Armor, what do the Jews pushing race-replacement call themselves, “genocidalists”? No, they present themselves as the innocent normals (”only a sicko Nazi would question immigration or projected white minorityhood”) and us as the wacko, sicko fringe crazies. We should do the same in reverse: whatever word we use for ourselves we should portray ourselves as the non-descript more or less nameless normals and the other side as the crazies who need a special name because they’re so insane. I wouldn’t use the three names for us that I mentioned there, no. I don’t like any of them. As for what would be better, we could discuss that. No, I would no more use “white separatist” for ourselves than the Jews “Christian-hating genocidalists” for themselves, though both of those are perfectly accurate (the one for us and the one for Jews).
There’s a growing disconnect between individual Jews and Jewish organizations.
http://ezralevant.com/2009/12/calgarys-official-jews-try-to.html
This is a quick list of Jews in the Obama administration i came up with. I wanted to see how his cabal compares with FDR’s. I edited out all of the “married to a Jew,” and “Israel friendly” office holders that anti-Illuminists like to pad their lists with. For the umteenth time, FDR, John D. Rockefeller and Lassie weren’t Jews!
1. Rahm Israel Emanuel (Jew/White House Chief of Staff)
2. Benjamin Shalom Bernanke (Jew/Federal Reserve (the FED) Chairman)
3. Sheila Bair (Jew/FDIC Chairman)
4. Karen Mills (Jew/Administrator, Small Business Administration (SBA)
5. . Paul Volcker (Jew/Economy advisor/twice FED Chairman)
6. Mary Schapiro (Jew/SEC Chairman)
7. Douglas Shulman (Jew/Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Commissioner)
8.. Lawrence (”Samuelson”) Summers (Jew/NEC Director)
9. David Axelrod (Jew/Senior Obama Advisor)
10. .Jason Furman (Jew/Director of Economic Policy)
11. Alan Blinder (Jew/Obama Economic Adviser)
12. Robert Rubin (Jew/Obama Economic Adviser)
13 .Dan Shapiro (Jew/NSC Middle East desk)
14. Ross (Jew/Envoy to Iran)
15. Puneet Talwar (Jew/NSC Middle East Desk)
16. Jared Bernstein (Jew/Biden Economic Policy Adviser)
17 .Richard Holbrooke (Jew/Afghan-Pakistan Envoy)
18 .Ronald Klain (Jew/VP Biden Chief of Staff)
19. Peter Orszag (Jew/Head of Budget)
20 .Eric Landers (Jew/Science & Technology Advisory Council Co-Chair)
21. Elena Kagen (Jew/Solicitor General)
22. .Gary Gensler (Jew/Commodity Futures Trading Commission Chmn)
23 .Steven Rattner (Jew/Treasury Adviser-Auto Sector)
24 .James B. Steinberg (Jew/deputy Secretary of State)
25 .Jacob Lew (Jew/deputy Secretary of State)
26. Jared Bernstein (Jew/Chief Economics Policy Adviser to VP Biden)
27. .Jon Leibowitz (Jew/FTC Chairman)
28 .Julius Genachowski (Jew/FCC Chairman)
29. Margaret Ann Hamburg (Jew/Commissioner - Food and Drug Agency)
30. Joshua M. Sharfstein (Jew/Deputy FDA Administrator) - FDA head has always been a Jew since Clinton era.
I don’t know what the word is for me. I don’t like the connotations of “anti-semitism” or “racism” for that matter. I believe we should simply make appropriate judgments and evaluations of groups, not be afraid to defend traditional majorities, elites, and their status, and recognize that minorities of all kinds have a distinct interest and agenda from that of the majority, even when it’s couched in universalist terms. I discuss this at length in my latest blog post.
I do think since the Nazis were genocidal and un-Christian and frankly complete unjust in many ways–i.e., why mass murder rural Polish Stetl Jews and their children for what Bolsheviks were doing 2,000 miles away–that it has overshadowed reasonable criticism not just of Jews, but of minorities of all kinds, who behave badly when they are given a cloak of moral invincibility from all criticism and reasonable generalization. Anti-semitism is unfortunately used for everything from Nazi mass murder to Ivy League quotas and wanting to have prayer at high school graduations, and thereby is itself an unjust and innacurate canard for folks that are simply trying to appraise reality and defend their people and a known way of life.
I respect your honesty in this post, and hope you check out my latest:
http://mansizedtarget.com/2009/12/05/the-bait-and-switch-of-universalist-liberalism/
I was just out of high school and was working at Radio Shack when 9/11 happened. Our store was filled with televisions and sound systems, all of them tuned into different channels as the event unfolded. Like most Americans, I only had a vague idea about terrorists and the Middle East and stuff, but I made a commitment while (virtually) surrounded by the chaos and carnage, to completely understand how this happened, why it happened, and how to assure that it didn’t happen again.
Before that, I was a militant atheist and libertarian who was really just excited about science. Being racially aware was merely a natural extension of my interest in evolutionary science and anthropology. Reading the Bell Curve only further corroborated my materialist worldview. I was inclined to parrot banalities like “East Asians are actually more intelligent” and “Ashkenazi Jews are the most intelligent of all”.
That’s when I learned the astounding extent of Jewish influence, power, and control over our foreign policy, our political machines, our media, and our entertainment. For a while, I was bitter about it in a way that could be appropriately characterized as anti-Semitic. Ironically, it was diving into the “fascist” works of Evola, Guenon, and Traditionalist Catholics that brought me to recognize the true root cause lying in the failure of our own managerial elites and own GES/tradition/religion/memeplex.
test
Whodareswings: number 5 on your list, Paul Volcker, often included in such lists, isn’t Jewish. I’ve looked him up a number of times. (I don’t have any links at my fintertips.) It does our side no good to compile lists of “Jews” which include gentiles. Of course the “Dwight Eisenhower, FDR, and Winston Churchill were Jews” sorts of lists are beyond insane but plenty of less extreme claims are common internet fare, such as Gen. Wesley Clark and French President Sarkozy “are Jewish.” (Neither is.) When Walter Cronkite passed away the other month I saw online where someone asserted with total confidence he was Jewish. I said to myself, “That’s interesting, I never thought he was Jewish, but knowing now that he was, his politics are consistent.” Then a few months later I looked it up: he was not Jewish. Annoying when people put that kind of false information (that kind of lie, really) on the ‘net or elsewhere in public. It does not help our side at all. What helps our side is truth and good sense.
Trainspotter:
Their own holidays celebrate the butchering of rival ethnic groups
I for one would like to see a comprehensive treatment of this subject. Nothing too deep, just an overview using common sources.
Just remember that with most people education is going to be cumulative. It doesn’t happen overnight. Plant seeds. Many will grow in time.
So true.
coldequation:
I don’t see the point in blaming [Jews] for the misdeeds of their relatives.
Neither do I, but it’s not as simple as that. How much money does organized Jewry get from “rank and file” Jews? Sending twenty bucks to the ADL doesn’t make you Abe Foxman, but it puts you on the field.
John Hartung, in Shiksa: Biblical Roots of Racism:
Suppose you put the JQ to those blameless Jews. Would you encounter an open mind, or a staunch defender of the tribe? Who raises the kids who become the Abe Foxmans?
There are also a lot of gentiles with the same attitudes - at this point, if all the Jews disappeared, whites have internalized attitudes associated with them enough
I think this is nonsense. Obviously, it’s all speculation on either side. But there’s such a huge gulf between Jews in this regard, and non-Jews. Who gives the lion’s share of the political money in the big game in America? Jews. Does anyone here honestly think non-Jews are going to fill that vacuum?
http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/1509/
http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/1510/
How would the outcomes described in those links have been different sans Jews? Would non-Jews have taken up the banner, filled the breach? I think the answer is obviously “no.”
Jews are the active ingredient, so to speak. A Jew and his extended phenotype are not equivalent or interchangeable. If they were, non-Jews would be doing all (or at least, a lot more of) the work, because Jews are smart enough to know to keep at arm’s length when possible.
I’m not saying Jews are a sufficient factor, but they are a necessary one, per KMac. They are, without doubt, the brains of the operation. There are operators, and there are useful idiots, and the proportion of the latter among non-Jews is way too high for them to be trusted to lead the operation.
I just don’t see what value it adds to pick on Jews as a group, when you’re already empirically opposed to 80% or more of them without reference to their Judaism, simply by opposing policies they support.
In my case, it was realism vis-a-vis Jewry that made me into an ethnopatriot. If not for the need I perceived for my people to defend itself against this hostile group, I’m not sure I ever would have crossed the Rubicon.
I have no illusions that Jews are going to switch teams if explicit anti-semitism goes away, but I don’t see the point in stiffening opposition and reducing the number of potential allies, few though they might be.
I don’t see it that way. I prefer ethnopatriotism be marketed under a variety of brands, so shoppers can pick the ones that work for them. Clearly the Jew-aware brand worked for me, and I submit that there is an entire strata of white men who, like me, are rigorous thinkers not cowed by the prospect of thinking “incorrect” thoughts, and likely to have their senses of justice and tribal identity inflamed by a realistic treatment of the JQ.
I find my own background unusual compared to the stories I read online; I seem to be in the distinct minority of ethnopatriots who were raised with a degree of ethnic patriotism. Stranger still, the vast majority of my friends and acquaintances from my parents’ wider social circle* were somewhat racially aware as well.
*Well-to-do good ole boys, mostly. This is a social strata I’ve never seen referred to in the popular culture, but definitely exists in the south.
The whole thing is hard to explain to someone who hasn’t experienced it. The first thing to remember is that “cool” race-realism is very common in southerners, especially males. We grow up elbow to elbow to blacks, like our forebears, so no one is much interested in trying to whitewash that particular rotten fence. But by the same token, we’re brought up knowing we have to maintain a modus vivendi with blacks, so “hot” ethnopatriotism just isn’t done. The second thing is general southern identity, which makes for a sort of libertarian, iconoclastic attitude about conventional wisdom.
And unlike where HW’s from, a very cool form of anti-Jewish sentiment was common in my circles. Added to that was my father’s Jew-awareness; he was very much aware of the Jewish power over Hollywood, and watching credits for -bergs, -baums, -steins and the like was mother’s milk. It wasn’t something I had rammed down my throat, rather, it was the sort of thing that went in the file with all the other things a perspicacious father teaches his son about the world that he wouldn’t get anywhere else (before the rise of the Internet, of course); e.g., my dad taught me about “planned obsolescence” and that sort of thing. The closest he ever came to drilling something into me was “think for yourself.” I got a rudimentary education in critical thinking from him that I consider priceless.
In 1999 or 2000 or thereabouts, I got a computer and a modem for the first time. I’d been a “cool” ethnopatriot and race-realist, as well as interested in how the world works, for most of my life. So it was only natural that I was like a kid at an amusement park. A portion of my reading was race-realist stuff. Then along came 9/11, and I determined to find out just how deep the rabbit hole goes. A year later I decided I was in deep enough to not care if joining Stormfront (which I considered to be home of quite a few wackos) put me on some kind of list.
I should add that my rudimentary education in critical thinking meant that, in that early period around 2000, I found the common attempts on message boards to censor un-PC ideas to be evidence of their truth. This isn’t a good state of affairs for our masters.
Wikitopian:
but I made a commitment while (virtually) surrounded by the chaos and carnage, to completely understand how [9/11] happened
Bingo, this is how it happened for me, though it took me a few weeks to make that committment.
What’s up with the posting? I posted a comment replying to some of the comments here prior to posting my “ethnopatriotic origin story.” When it didn’t show I posted it again, and got a “duplicate message” notification, but it still hasn’t shown up. Does the code here hold comments with links in them, or what?
test
Trainspotter:
Their own holidays celebrate the butchering of rival ethnic groups
I for one would like to see a comprehensive treatment of this subject. Nothing too deep, just an overview using common sources.
Just remember that with most people education is going to be cumulative. It doesn’t happen overnight. Plant seeds. Many will grow in time.
So true.
coldequation:
I don’t see the point in blaming [Jews] for the misdeeds of their relatives.
Neither do I, but it’s not as simple as that. How much money does organized Jewry get from “rank and file” Jews? Sending twenty bucks to the ADL doesn’t make you Abe Foxman, but it puts you on the field.
John Hartung, in Shiksa: Biblical Roots of Racism:
Suppose you put the JQ to those blameless Jews. Would you encounter an open mind, or a staunch defender of the tribe? Who raises the kids who become the Abe Foxmans?
There are also a lot of gentiles with the same attitudes - at this point, if all the Jews disappeared, whites have internalized attitudes associated with them enough
I think this is nonsense. Obviously, it’s all speculation on either side. But there’s such a huge gulf between Jews in this regard, and non-Jews. Who gives the lion’s share of the political money in the big game in America? Jews. Does anyone here honestly think non-Jews are going to fill that vacuum?
Jewish vs. Euro-American Voting Patterns
By Their Deeds Ye Shall Know Them!
How would the outcomes described in those links have been different sans Jews? Would non-Jews have taken up the banner, filled the breach? I think the answer is obviously “no.”
Jews are the active ingredient, so to speak. A Jew and his extended phenotype are not equivalent or interchangeable. If they were, non-Jews would be doing all (or at least, a lot more of) the work, because Jews are smart enough to know to keep at arm’s length when possible.
I’m not saying Jews are a sufficient factor, but they are a necessary one, per KMac. They are, without doubt, the brains of the operation. There are operators, and there are useful idiots, and the proportion of the latter among non-Jews is way too high for them to be trusted to lead the operation.
I just don’t see what value it adds to pick on Jews as a group, when you’re already empirically opposed to 80% or more of them without reference to their Judaism, simply by opposing policies they support.
In my case, it was realism vis-a-vis Jewry that made me into an ethnopatriot. If not for the need I perceived for my people to defend itself against this hostile group, I’m not sure I ever would have crossed the Rubicon.
I have no illusions that Jews are going to switch teams if explicit anti-semitism goes away, but I don’t see the point in stiffening opposition and reducing the number of potential allies, few though they might be.
I don’t see it that way. I prefer ethnopatriotism be marketed under a variety of brands, so shoppers can pick the ones that work for them. Clearly the Jew-aware brand worked for me, and I submit that there is an entire strata of white men who, like me, are rigorous thinkers not cowed by the prospect of thinking “incorrect” thoughts, and likely to have their senses of justice and tribal identity inflamed by a realistic treatment of the JQ.
Trainspotter:
Their own holidays celebrate the butchering of rival ethnic groups
I for one would like to see a comprehensive treatment of this subject. Nothing too deep, just an overview using common sources.
Just remember that with most people education is going to be cumulative. It doesn’t happen overnight. Plant seeds. Many will grow in time.
So true.
coldequation:
I don’t see the point in blaming [Jews] for the misdeeds of their relatives.
Neither do I, but it’s not as simple as that. How much money does organized Jewry get from “rank and file” Jews? Sending twenty bucks to the ADL doesn’t make you Abe Foxman, but it puts you on the field.
John Hartung, in Shiksa: Biblical Roots of Racism:
Suppose you put the JQ to those blameless Jews. Would you encounter an open mind, or a staunch defender of the tribe? Who raises the kids who become the Abe Foxmans?
There are also a lot of gentiles with the same attitudes - at this point, if all the Jews disappeared, whites have internalized attitudes associated with them enough
I think this is nonsense. Obviously, it’s all speculation on either side. But there’s such a huge gulf between Jews in this regard, and non-Jews. Who gives the lion’s share of the political money in the big game in America? Jews. Does anyone here honestly think non-Jews are going to fill that vacuum?
Jewish vs. Euro-American Voting Patterns
By Their Deeds Ye Shall Know Them!
How would the outcomes described in those links have been different sans Jews? Would non-Jews have taken up the banner, filled the breach? I think the answer is obviously “no.”
Jews are the active ingredient, so to speak. A Jew and his extended phenotype are not equivalent or interchangeable. If they were, non-Jews would be doing all (or at least, a lot more of) the work, because Jews are smart enough to know to keep at arm’s length when possible.
I’m not saying Jews are a sufficient factor, but they are a necessary one, per KMac. They are, without doubt, the brains of the operation. There are operators, and there are useful idiots, and the proportion of the latter among non-Jews is way too high for them to be trusted to lead the operation.
I just don’t see what value it adds to pick on Jews as a group, when you’re already empirically opposed to 80% or more of them without reference to their Judaism, simply by opposing policies they support.
In my case, it was realism vis-a-vis Jewry that made me into an ethnopatriot. If not for the need I perceived for my people to defend itself against this hostile group, I’m not sure I ever would have crossed the Rubicon.
I have no illusions that Jews are going to switch teams if explicit anti-semitism goes away, but I don’t see the point in stiffening opposition and reducing the number of potential allies, few though they might be.
I don’t see it that way. I prefer ethnopatriotism be marketed under a variety of brands, so shoppers can pick the ones that work for them. Clearly the Jew-aware brand worked for me, and I submit that there is an entire strata of white men who, like me, are rigorous thinkers not cowed by the prospect of thinking “incorrect” thoughts, and likely to have their senses of justice and tribal identity inflamed by a realistic treatment of the JQ.
Trainspotter:
Their own holidays celebrate the butchering of rival ethnic groups
I for one would like to see a comprehensive treatment of this subject. Nothing too deep, just an overview using common sources.
Just remember that with most people education is going to be cumulative. It doesn’t happen overnight. Plant seeds. Many will grow in time.
So true.
coldequation:
I don’t see the point in blaming [Jews] for the misdeeds of their relatives.
Neither do I, but it’s not as simple as that. How much money does organized Jewry get from “rank and file” Jews? Sending twenty bucks to the ADL doesn’t make you Abe Foxman, but it puts you on the field.
John Hartung, in Shiksa: Biblical Roots of Racism:
Suppose you put the JQ to those blameless Jews. Would you encounter an open mind, or a staunch defender of the tribe? Who raises the kids who become the Abe Foxmans?
There are also a lot of gentiles with the same attitudes - at this point, if all the Jews disappeared, whites have internalized attitudes associated with them enough
I think this is nonsense. Obviously, it’s all speculation on either side. But there’s such a huge gulf between Jews in this regard, and non-Jews. Who gives the lion’s share of the political money in the big game in America? Jews. Does anyone here honestly think non-Jews are going to fill that vacuum?
http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/1509/
http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/1510/
How would the outcomes described in those links have been different sans Jews? Would non-Jews have taken up the banner, filled the breach? I think the answer is obviously “no.”
Jews are the active ingredient, so to speak. A Jew and his extended phenotype are not equivalent or interchangeable. If they were, non-Jews would be doing all (or at least, a lot more of) the work, because Jews are smart enough to know to keep at arm’s length when possible.
I’m not saying Jews are a sufficient factor, but they are a necessary one, per KMac. They are, without doubt, the brains of the operation. There are operators, and there are useful idiots, and the proportion of the latter among non-Jews is way too high for them to be trusted to lead the operation.
I just don’t see what value it adds to pick on Jews as a group, when you’re already empirically opposed to 80% or more of them without reference to their Judaism, simply by opposing policies they support.
In my case, it was realism vis-a-vis Jewry that made me into an ethnopatriot. If not for the need I perceived for my people to defend itself against this hostile group, I’m not sure I ever would have crossed the Rubicon.
I have no illusions that Jews are going to switch teams if explicit anti-semitism goes away, but I don’t see the point in stiffening opposition and reducing the number of potential allies, few though they might be.
I don’t see it that way. I prefer ethnopatriotism be marketed under a variety of brands, so shoppers can pick the ones that work for them. Clearly the Jew-aware brand worked for me, and I submit that there is an entire strata of white men who, like me, are rigorous thinkers not cowed by the prospect of thinking “incorrect” thoughts, and likely to have their senses of justice and tribal identity inflamed by a realistic treatment of the JQ.
Trainspotter:
Their own holidays celebrate the butchering of rival ethnic groups
I for one would like to see a comprehensive treatment of this subject. Nothing too deep, just an overview using common sources.
Just remember that with most people education is going to be cumulative. It doesn’t happen overnight. Plant seeds. Many will grow in time.
So true.
coldequation:
I don’t see the point in blaming [Jews] for the misdeeds of their relatives.
Neither do I, but it’s not as simple as that. How much money does organized Jewry get from “rank and file” Jews? Sending twenty bucks to the ADL doesn’t make you Abe Foxman, but it puts you on the field.
John Hartung, in Shiksa: Biblical Roots of Racism:
In-groups sandwich an outline for animosity, an organizing principle for prejudice, between layers of social support. Whether Christian or Muslim or Jewish, every extremist is supported by a small number of less extreme admirers and each of those supporters is buoyed, in turn, by a larger group of sympathizers. These connections are continuous right down to the bottom of the pyramid, where vaguely sympathetic in-group members are offended by the very extremists who would have no base, and no basis, without them. It is that vague sympathy which needs to be examined.
Suppose you put the JQ to those blameless Jews. Would you encounter an open mind, or a staunch defender of the tribe? Who raises the kids who become the Abe Foxmans?
There are also a lot of gentiles with the same attitudes - at this point, if all the Jews disappeared, whites have internalized attitudes associated with them enough
I think this is nonsense. Obviously, it’s all speculation on either side. But there’s such a huge gulf between Jews in this regard, and non-Jews. Who gives the lion’s share of the political money in the big game in America? Jews. Does anyone here honestly think non-Jews are going to fill that vacuum?
http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/1509/
http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/1510/
How would the outcomes described in those links have been different sans Jews? Would non-Jews have taken up the banner, filled the breach? I think the answer is obviously “no.”
Jews are the active ingredient, so to speak. A Jew and his extended phenotype are not equivalent or interchangeable. If they were, non-Jews would be doing all (or at least, a lot more of) the work, because Jews are smart enough to know to keep at arm’s length when possible.
I’m not saying Jews are a sufficient factor, but they are a necessary one, per KMac. They are, without doubt, the brains of the operation. There are operators, and there are useful idiots, and the proportion of the latter among non-Jews is way too high for them to be trusted to lead the operation.
I just don’t see what value it adds to pick on Jews as a group, when you’re already empirically opposed to 80% or more of them without reference to their Judaism, simply by opposing policies they support.
In my case, it was realism vis-a-vis Jewry that made me into an ethnopatriot. If not for the need I perceived for my people to defend itself against this hostile group, I’m not sure I ever would have crossed the Rubicon.
I have no illusions that Jews are going to switch teams if explicit anti-semitism goes away, but I don’t see the point in stiffening opposition and reducing the number of potential allies, few though they might be.
I don’t see it that way. I prefer ethnopatriotism be marketed under a variety of brands, so shoppers can pick the ones that work for them. Clearly the Jew-aware brand worked for me, and I submit that there is an entire strata of white men who, like me, are rigorous thinkers not cowed by the prospect of thinking “incorrect” thoughts, and likely to have their senses of justice and tribal identity inflamed by a realistic treatment of the JQ.
Well, I can’t figure it out. I’ve tried posting it about ten different ways and it just won’t post.
Trainspotter:
Their own holidays celebrate the butchering of rival ethnic groups
I for one would like to see a comprehensive treatment of this subject. Nothing too deep, just an overview using common sources.
Just remember that with most people education is going to be cumulative. It doesn’t happen overnight. Plant seeds. Many will grow in time.
So true.
coldequation:
I don’t see the point in blaming [Jews] for the misdeeds of their relatives.
Neither do I, but it’s not as simple as that. How much money does organized Jewry get from “rank and file” Jews? Sending twenty bucks to the ADL doesn’t make you Abe Foxman, but it puts you on the field.
John Hartung, in Shiksa: Biblical Roots of Racism:
Suppose you put the JQ to those blameless Jews. Would you encounter an open mind, or a staunch defender of the tribe? Who raises the kids who become the Abe Foxmans?
There are also a lot of gentiles with the same attitudes - at this point, if all the Jews disappeared, whites have internalized attitudes associated with them enough
I think this is nonsense. Obviously, it’s all speculation on either side. But there’s such a huge gulf between Jews in this regard, and non-Jews. Who gives the lion’s share of the political money in the big game in America? Jews. Does anyone here honestly think non-Jews are going to fill that vacuum?
majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/1509/”>Jewish vs. Euro-American Voting Patterns
majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/1510/”>By Their Deeds Ye Shall Know Them!
How would the outcomes described in those links have been different sans Jews? Would non-Jews have taken up the banner, filled the breach? I think the answer is obviously “no.”
Jews are the active ingredient, so to speak. A Jew and his extended phenotype are not equivalent or interchangeable. If they were, non-Jews would be doing all (or at least, a lot more of) the work, because Jews are smart enough to know to keep at arm’s length when possible.
I’m not saying Jews are a sufficient factor, but they are a necessary one, per KMac. They are, without doubt, the brains of the operation. There are operators, and there are useful idiots, and the proportion of the latter among non-Jews is way too high for them to be trusted to lead the operation.
I just don’t see what value it adds to pick on Jews as a group, when you’re already empirically opposed to 80% or more of them without reference to their Judaism, simply by opposing policies they support.
In my case, it was realism vis-a-vis Jewry that made me into an ethnopatriot. If not for the need I perceived for my people to defend itself against this hostile group, I’m not sure I ever would have crossed the Rubicon.
I have no illusions that Jews are going to switch teams if explicit anti-semitism goes away, but I don’t see the point in stiffening opposition and reducing the number of potential allies, few though they might be.
I don’t see it that way. I prefer ethnopatriotism be marketed under a variety of brands, so shoppers can pick the ones that work for them. Clearly the Jew-aware brand worked for me, and I submit that there is an entire strata of white men who, like me, are rigorous thinkers not cowed by the prospect of thinking “incorrect” thoughts, and likely to have their senses of justice and tribal identity inflamed by a realistic treatment of the JQ.
I guess it was just too long, because those three comments were rejected as a single post.
“Does the code here hold comments with links in them, or what?” ( — Svigor)
My experience is: one link, the comment posts; more than one, it “awaits moderation.” Gets posted later.
If you need to post more than one link, my guess would be do it in separate comments, each with one link.
Does anyone here honestly think non-Jews are going to fill that vacuum?
The simplest way I can put this is, non-Jews don’t really mean it. Theirs is a weak, adulterated form of the ingredient. Jews are the true believers, because it’s in their interests. Without regular injections, it would fade from Euros, because it’s not in their interests.
Consider Hollywood. Does anyone here really think Hollywood would continue to serve Jewish interests to anywhere near the extent it does now without Jews running it?
In the hands of captured Euro intellects, all sorts of “incorrect” behaviors would emerge, like the silly Euro habit of applying themes and processes universally. Bad idea.
Scroob: Ahh.
Oops. Don’t bother posting all that stuff obviously, HW.
Similarly, look at the network of institutions working against Euro identity (minus the media Leviathan, which is far and away the most important). Subtract the Jewish institutions and the Jewish funding, and you’ve just gutted most of it. What, Euros are going to take up that slack?
Some Overlooked Jewish Obama Czars
Dept. of Homeland Security
Special Representative for Border Affairs, Alan Bersin (Jew)
Special Envoy for Climate Change
Todd Stern (Jew)
Advisor to the President and the Vice President on Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Issues
Lynn Rosenthal (Jew)
US Department of State Special Envoy Guantanamo,
Daniel Fried (Jew)
Office of Management and Budget
United States Chief Performance Officer and Deputy Director for Management, Jeffrey D. Zients (Jew)
Office of Science and Technology Policy Director,
John P. Holdren (Jew)
White House Medical Czar
Ezekiel Emanuel (Jew)
Ambassador-at-large
Richard Haass (Jew)
Chief of Staff to Vice President Biden
Ron Klain (Jew)
Deputy Secretaries of State
Jacob Lew (Jew)
James Steinberg (Jew)
Deputy White House Chief of Staff
Mona Sutphen (Jew)
Federal Trade Commission
Chairman, Jon Leibowitz (Jew)
Face it, we live in Occupied Territory.
Why are idiots here shocked that Jews oppose White Nationalism when historically speaking ethnocentrism on the part of Whites has always ended in pogroms or expulsions? Viewing our unhappy history, one easily understands why Jews hate ethnonationalism and try to undermine manifestations of racial solidarity or ingroup outgroup dynamics. It’s all perfectly explainable by evolutionary psychology. It’s not that Jews are evil (a bullshit analysis if there ever was one) but because they’re rational actors. All of you stupid whiners envy Jews their organizational skills and intelligence. One cannot fault a people for looking out for their interests.
Asians are the real threat
FB, how is it in the interest of Jews to destroy the societies where they have achieved the most? South Africa and Israel traded nuclear materials and the Jews still destroyed it. The United States was initially very open to the Jews until it became clear that they were the brains behind the Bolshevik Revolution. Jews like the Rosenbergs sold nuclear secrets to the USSR and Jewish congressmen like Celler and Javits opened our borders! It’s not any more ‘rational’ than blacks burning down their own neighborhoods is rational.
Ecology 101.
Parasitism is the exploitation of large groups by small groups.
Predation is the exploitation of small groups by large groups.
Free association and ethnonationalism mean allowing small groups to be large groups in their own territories or to continue to be small groups in other territories that wish to include them. They imply not only the desire to not prey upon certain small groups, but also to avoid even the risk of predation upon certain small groups.
Small groups that ignore or disrespect large groups’ desires to exercise free association, ethnonationalism, etc., and demand inclusion and free movement, depend upon or seek to engage in parasitism. And even if they don’t depend upon or seek to engage in parasitism at that point in time, by insisting inclusion they disregard large groups’ rights to protect themselves from the risks of suffering parasitism in the future.
FB, how is it in the interest of Jews to destroy the societies where they have achieved the most?
Organisms are adaption executors, not fitness maximizers.
Jews have never been mistreated in the United States. They were accepted as White. They have always enjoyed all the rights and privileges of other citizens. The same is true of Canada.
The Jews began to get involved in subversive movements in the late nineteenth century/early twentieth century. Franz Boas had launched his crusade against race in anthropology; Otto Klineberg in psychology. Jews were involved with the formation of the NAACP and the Communist Party USA. Tellingly, Jews led the opposition against the Immigration Act of 1924.
This was going on decades before Hitler and NS Germany. It can’t be explained by “persecution.”
Sam, I’m under the impression that a White ethnostate would expell Jews. True or false? Why in God’s name should Jews not undermine White Nationalism when it’s hostile to their ethnic interests? All of you losers are blaming Jews for not supporting their marginalization or worse. Jews are on top of the food chain in the West, why would they want a change in status quo? The only threat to Jewish hegemony is Islamism, not White Nationalism - a phantom movement uniquely present on blogs and chat boards and a few harassed publications. That’s it. Islamists have access to money and international organizations and networks of determined men. W.N.s are mostly well-read isolated introverts and some young costume fetishists. That’s the W.N. “movement” in a nutshell.
So what’s your explanation, HW?
Apparently, FB didn’t read “The Alliance” thread. The Swiss ban on minarets was condemned by Jews in France, Switzerland, Germany, Britain, Canada, and the United States.
I’m more interested in a solution than an explanation. Jews have proven themselves a menace. They played a leading role in undermining racialism and traditional moral values. Why should they be included in an White ethnostate?
What’s your point, HW? Jews were persecuted since time immemorial on account of their religion. How did you expect Jewish organizations to react?
In theory, Jews were supposed to assimilate like other European ethnic groups.
Not only have Jews been preyed upon by their hosts, but they have also exploited and undermined their hosts since time immemorial on account of their vulnerable and precarious position. How did and do you expect Whites to react?
Of course Jews should be included in a White ethnostate. I don’t see why they shouldn’t be if they self-identify as White. The Jews are a driven and intelligent lot and definitely an asset to any society. Those hostile and subversive Jews are another matter. However, many liberal Whites are also hostile to White interests. I wouldn’t have an issue with a Michael Levin, for example. I’m a eugenicist above everything else. Well-disposed Jews are a gigantic plus to any state.
But you wouldn’t have a problem with independent, sovereign, jew-free White ethnostates, would you?
“Why are idiots here shocked that Jews oppose White Nationalism?” ( — FB)
I think part of the shock, where shock is an issue at all, is at the realization that Jews oppose simple white survival, never mind white nationalism (whatever “white nationalism” is supposed to mean, if other than simple white survival). Jews don’t want whites to survive. That’s a pretty shocking realization. (Is wanting whites to survive “white nationalism”? If so, why the fancy name if that’s all it is?)
Richard Poe once said he was not in sympathy with those who “put race first.” But in the context under discussion there’s no difference between putting race “first” and putting it “at all.”
If your sine qua non is survival of the race, how do you put that “second in importance” and still accomplish it? You can’t, by definition: insisting on white survival means rejecting whatever overrides it. If you want to call that “putting race first,” go ahead; I’ll call it “putting race at all.”
If you are wrong to stipulate survival of the white race as a sine qua non, we are entitled to ask, “OK, what other race is next to be extinguished? I vote for the Jews. They go next. Does that meet with everyone’s approval? Then after the Jews the Negroes, then the Orientals, then the Mexicans, and so on down the list of races to be extinguished in order to not be guilty of ‘putting race first.’ ”
“Wait, I’m a Negro, and I don’t agree with extinguishing the Negro race.”
Sorry, you’re guilty of “putting race first” which is illegitimate. There are no grounds for opposing Negro-race extinction among folk who put race second, which is the right place to put it: second. Likewise for Jewish race extinction, and so forth. We don’t like “race-firsters” around here.
If there is potential for significant representation of Jews in the ranks of those opposed to white race-replacement there have been no signs yet of that potential being realized. I see a number of reasons for Jews to oppose white-race extinction purely on grounds of Jewish group self-interest.
For example, Jews are in a sort of gene-exchange equilibrium with Euros that started a couple of thousand years ago and I think significant numbers of them would strongly prefer not to be in that sort of slow, low-level gene-exchange relationship with a race than whites: they want to be what they are, namely part-Euro, and not start becoming part-Chinese, part-Negro, etc., which is what will happen with whites out of the picture. Also Jews appreciate Euro-race culture and many will not want to switch to another racial culture such as yellow or one of the browns (you can’t really call black a culture though some anthropologists try, without fooling anyone). Then there’s Israel’s protection: are the Negroes, Mexicans, and North African mulattoes going to protect Israel from, let’s say, China’s nukes? Will Jewish schmoozing the Chinese protect Israel? Will Jewish and Israeli trade links with China protect Israel? How about Israeli threats to nuke China back if China does a first strike? Any chance of that working as a threat given China’s population of a billion and half and land mass a couple hundred times the size of the Jewish state?
There are additional reasons one can come up with for Jews, purely on grounds of Jewish group self-interest, to prefer not to extinguish white people. But there’s no sign yet of a significant Jewish voice opposed.
I don’t see any grounds for Jewish inclusion in a White ethnostate.
1.) The Jews have played a major role in wrecking the United States: pushing America in an anti-racist, cosmopolitan, multiculturalist direction. Hence, the need for an ethnostate.
2.) The Jews played a major role in subverting the American conservative movement.
3.) Jews are opposed to anything that smacks of White racial consciousness. This includes Lou Dobbs style nativism.
4.) There are only a handful of arguably pro-White Jews. I’ve said before that collectively they couldn’t fill half of an Applebee’s restaurant. They are statistically irrelevant and have zero influence over the wider Jewish community.
5.) Jews have proven their inability to assimilate into Western liberal democracies. How would they assimilate into an explicitly White ethnostate?
You keep saying that there’s only a handful of Jewish racialists. Tell me about the number of White racialists. Let’s keep in mind Whites are 65% of the population and Jews 3%.
One can’t see what Braun is arguing for: he keeps saying if whites drop “anti-Semitism” Jews will end their push to race-replace whites. But aside from that being a “which came first, the chicken or the egg?” question (are whites mad at Jews for trying to harm whites, or are Jews trying to harm whites because whites are mad at them?) Jews don’t care about anti-Semitism. They’re tough people who aren’t so bothered by others disliking them that they’ll deviate from what they see as their interest. If they see a certain path, or course, or alliance as in their interest they’ll just overlook any associated “anti-Semitism” that crops up and continue on course, as they do with Negro anti-Semitism, Moslem anti-Semitism, Aztlan anti-Semitism, and far-left anti-Semitism.
I can’t see what Braun wants whites to do.
I have lots of Jewish friends, and they are not opposed to white survival. Some of my Jewish friends really anti-christian and Zionist, but not anti-white. They come off as being white liberals who support Israel, and not anti-white conspirators.
If he wants whites to stop telling the truth, that’s a non-starter, obviously.
In the U.S., there are millions. About 20% of White Americans oppose interracial marriage.
What about Chinese anti-semitism?
FS,
That’s funny. “The Alliance” thread shows otherwise. The Jewish community supports Muslim immigration to Western Europe.
What about the Chinese? I don’t wake up every day to hear about some new way that the Chinese are screwing over Whites.
20% of what age group of whites?
The Chinese are becoming really pissed at Jews. The intellectual elite in China believes that the Jews caused the current economic recession. With China maybe becoming a superpower, this very important to the foundation of Jewish power.
I thought you were referring to racial theorists. Using that yardstick, historically speaking Jews were far more endogamous than White Gentiles. By the way, I will follow from now on the great Jared Taylor and refer to Ashkenazi Jews as fellow Whites. Fundamentally, HW, if you have a problem with me you also have a problem with AmRen and Taylor. Notice that Nordishists accept Ashkenazi Jews while excluding greaseballs. Ashkenazis are certainly of greater racial value than a gesticulating SE swarthoid, a step removed from a self-detonating idiot Arab.
Name them, this is news to me.
Despite the fact that they cluster closely with Jews.
Occam’s Razor states that Braun has his nuts in a vice by the Feds.
That or he simply has stroked from any variety of causes.
Richard Mccullough, the grand old man himself.
Larry Auster woke me up. Thanks Larry.
“Notice that Nordishists accept Ashkenazi Jews while excluding greaseballs. Ashkenazis are certainly of greater racial value than a gesticulating SE swarthoid, a step removed from a self-detonating idiot Arab.”
Dude, that was a low blow. Silvio Burlesconi is amazing. Italians actually elected the grand daughter of Mussolini to Parliament. I have meant many Greeks who are far more nationalistic than every blond guy I know. And the Mafia was far cooler than any gang that any black dude could think up. Don’t be dissing Southern Europeans, Braun, or you may find a horse head in your bed
Some of my Jewish friends really anti-christian and Zionist, but not anti-white.
Anti-christian is anti-white.
@Fred: Sarkozy’s mother is at least part Jewish — Ottoman (Greek)-Sephardic Jewish.
HW #73: I don’t know what I said that you’re replying to there. I am aware that Jewry very strongly supports both the Islamization of Europe and the race-replacement of all Euro-race peoples inhabiting that continent with Maghreb mulattoes and Sub-Saharans. Have I said something else?
Eileen #84: his mother was half-Jewish on her father’s side (with a French Catholic mother). She, the mother of Sarko, was raised Catholic from birth. Sarko’s father was entirely Christian (Hungarian family background, I think Protestant). Sarko was raised Catholic from birth.
Braun said: “Of course Jews should be included in a White ethnostate. I don’t see why they shouldn’t be if they self-identify as White.”
I might self-identify as a banana, but that doesn’t make me a banana any more than you are.
Fred: “Eileen #84: his mother was half-Jewish on her father’s side (with a French Catholic mother). She, the mother of Sarko, was raised Catholic from birth. Sarko’s father was entirely Christian (Hungarian family background, I think Protestant). Sarko was raised Catholic from birth.”
Yes, so that leaves Sarko as part ethnically/genetically Jewish — 1/4 Jewish.
One should understand the context of Scrooby’s definition of Jewish. When he says someone isn’t a Jew, he means one who doesn’t practice Judaism. For instance, Sarkozy has Jewish ancestry, a grandparent, but was raised Christian. I suppose this is at least partially due to his own identity, since Scrooby has Jewish ancestry but doesn’t identify as a Jew, rather as a white Christian.
So by his definition, Mark Potok and Tim Wise would not be Jewish, they’re just white liberals.
61Hunter Wallace
In theory, Jews were supposed to assimilate like other European ethnic groups.
I agree and we allowed them to, but they chose to remain apart, as they have for millennia. Even if we were to pursue a philo-Semitic assimilationist stance they would still perceive that as anti-Semitic (as they do to Christans). They want to remain a distinct ethno-religious group.
Mark said: “When he says someone isn’t a Jew, he means one who doesn’t practice Judaism.”
Oh, well, there’s your problem!
“So by his definition, Mark Potok and Tim Wise would not be Jewish, they’re just white liberals.”
No, they’re members of the tribe. (And their motivation isn’t “liberal” but JN.) I’m not a member of the tribe and neither was either of my parents.
Scrooby, how about your sisters and your brothers-in-law and their children, your nephews and nieces? Are they members of the tribe out to destroy Euros? What do you do to stop them?
I leanred the truth about Die Judenraus on Stormfront, as well. I found SF right after 9/11/01. I was searching the Web, looking for “patriotic” sites. I thought every-one on SF was NUTS! The Klan members were glad; they wanted the Government to fall. There were Muzzie-haters, and Mexican-haters. I understood that. But the Jews? EVERY-ONE was piling on them. “Why does every-one hate the poor Jews?” I wondered.
I moved on….but kept coming back. I used to defend Jews. I got FLAMED. Naturally! I used to rail about the Muzzies…………and I read. I read every-one’s comments. I read the Koran years ago. And of course, the Bible. I used to compare and contrast. Finally, a wonderful member with the nic of “Messiah” asked me if I ever read any Jewish texts. I said, “Not really - just the Old Testament, etc”. He told me to check out the Talmud. He sent a link to the Talmud. I did not use his link, as he is a “racist”. I went to a Chabad Lubavicher site, (and scanned the comments about them feeding trief to the Goy). I pulled the copy of the Babylonian Talmud from that site. I still have it stored, and I got it for free. HA!
That was how I learned about the Demonic Satan Seed, infesting the Earth, that calls itself “Jew”.
So - Jews- STORMFRONT ennabled me to learn the truth about YOU - form your own words and your own beliefs. Now don’t blame SF, or any other website, for telling the TRUTH about your Demonic nature. BLAME YOURSELVES. You are a Race of DEVILS.
FB - JEWS ARE NOT WHITE. Jews are Satan Seed. NO White must EVER allow Jews ANYWHERE near them AGAIN, Whites must stop JEWS. NOT the other way around. How DARE you post your Anti-White HATRED on this site!
Jews have NEVER been “persecuted”!!!! Jews have been CAUGHT! Jews have created every situation that has happened. And you monsters have gotten a lot LESS than oyu deserve. The truth is emeriging. It’s world wide. You will not stop it.
And a Millennial Reckoning is DUE.
And it’s coming.
Sucks to be YOU.
FB,
It’s true that most White Nationalists would expel Jews from the West. I don’t blame Jews for not wanting to be expelled. I blame them for gaining a monopoly on our media, damaging our culture, and ushering in what will most likely be the death of the West.
Denise, are you CI?
Sam, why do you “blame” Jews for being successful? That’s highly irrational. Jews will always defeat W.N. with a hand tied behind their back.
“No, they’re members of the tribe. (And their motivation isn’t “liberal” but JN.)”
Potok was raised as a white Christian. Both Potok and Tim Wise are against Zionism.
Sarkozy looks and acts like a PURE JEW. His lineage proves that even the slightest infusion of Jewblood is a DISASTER.
He was elected by the idiotic French, be cause the Jew Deceiver ran on a Le Pen Lite campaign. The implication was that he would wittily, sophisticatedly boot out the Mohammedans. As per would be expected, of the Jew Wise, the first thing he did was screw over France. His first act was to award Uber Jew Hag Barbra Jew-sand a “Most Fabulous Jew” award, of some kind, for being particularly odious and corrisive Jew (”You got the Goy to buy all your records, with a vibrato you could drive a truck through, and yo ustarred in all those movies, with that schnozz, and that horrible voice, and those crossed-eyes? Super Jew!). The next thing he did was demand that French schoolchildren worship fictitious Dead Jew Hatchlings in Fictitious German Camps. He’s been busily feeding and breeding more African Muslims, in France, ever after.
The French have gotten what they deserved. Any-one that does not see the Jew for the Escaped Demons from Hell, that they ARE, deserves whatever they get.
Finally - Hitler was the good guy.
Braun, I think its obvious, your he would have one of these icons at the end of his post
or maybe lol.
No. I am White, and hip to the Hebe Hellions. I condemn them by THEIR words and deeds.
Denise, tell me honestly, what do the Jews really deserve?
“Sarkozy looks and acts like a PURE JEW. His lineage proves that even the slightest infusion of Jewblood is a DISASTER.
His son looks even more Jewish, with the curly mop and the scimitar nose. He looks like he walked straight out of a yeshiva.
Denise, do believe in the Holocaust.
FDR was a Crypto. His family were Dutch Jews, and were listed as such, when they infested America in the 19th Century.
Churchill’s mommy was Jennie Jacoby from Brooklyn, NY. Do I need to elaborate?
Or better yet, was the Holocaust awesome in your opinion, Denise
I wonder how many people believe in the holocaust on this site right now. I also wonder if they find awesome, if they do?
Hunter Wallace, whats your opinion of the Holocaust?
The Holocausts of the Persians, greenlighted by a total traitor, in favor of the Jew Whore of Whores Esther, was a tragedy. A horror, an a tragedy. The Armenian Holocaust, and the Russian Christian Holocaust, both perpetrated by The Jew Devil - the same.
I’m not trying cause problem, I’m serious with this question. This website is not Canada, so will not mock you if do not believe in Holocaust.
Got to be a spoof, Braun ;).
Wrong, FB. I am deadly sincere.
The Jews deserve to be removed from Human Society. And must be removed, so Human Society can heal, and flourish.
You are trying to draw me into stating something along the lines of murdering all Jews. I am not saying that. I am not typing that.
Actually I find being called Swede for more insulting. People always think I’m Swede because I’am blond and blue eyed. But I’am actually half Czech, a quarter French Canadian, with one-eighth Russian, and lastly one-eighth Swedish ancestry. Those Swede genes most have real punch, for me to mistaken for Swedish ancestry while only being one-eighth Swede.
The WORST THIN - the VERY WEORST THING - that can be done to Jews, is to force them to face their own beliefs, and history, and actions.
I believe they are congenitally unable to do so. Look at the responses here. I’ve seen worse. No matter what evidence is provided, no matter what montrous deesa are detailed - all Jews do is screech and spit, and deny, and whine about “Anti-Hebe-ism”
I believe that if Jews are FORCED to confront what they are, and tell the truth - I believe that they all will spontaneously combust, on the spot, and go back to their Daddy.
I find Swede and other Nordics to be bad singers and too liberal for my blood.
Are you a Jew, RPisHforN?
That would be the WORST.
Denise, that was called Seinfeld, and it did not work
I haven’t read McCollough’s work (vaguely familar with his premise) but on a genetic basis Jews are not nordid, and only marginally European.
And again: you mention Arabs as being on the low end of the racial totem pole, yet it is fact that Arabs and Jews cluster close together genetically due to having essentially identical origins.
One cannot accept Jews on a racial basis while denying the same to Arabs.
No, because I hate bagels and can not afford lobster while still being able to eat :).
I wonder how many of you got that joke?
Should have put it at the end.
Denise are you secretly Muslim?
I got the joke.
Ummmm…that joke proves you are not a Yid.
No. I am a Methodist.
Where are the other people?
So by his definition, Mark Potok and Tim Wise would not be Jewish, they’re just white liberals.
The difference being (a difference that eviscerates your straw man) that Potok and Wise walk like ducks, quack like ducks, swim like ducks, whereas Scroob walks like a swan, quacks like a swan, swims like a swan, etc.
Kinda hard to miss, IMO.
@Crypto Jew Advocate
Jews deserve to be told to shut up and go bother their own people. Aren’t there some anti-White Jewish groups you could be convincing to stop being anti-White?
Donald, I’m not a race materialist myself but I think McCullough was talking about those Jews whose phenotype is Nordish. I suppose he had Jews like Gwyneth Paltrow in mind.
‘ so that leaves Sarko as part ethnically/genetically Jewish — 1/4 Jewish.’
If sociopathic ambition and disregard for human rights are genetically transmitted, that might be dangerous.
Then again, I wouldn’t want to live in a “Gattaca” style police state.
Mark #98: you’re saying Potok isn’t Jewish? This is the first I’ve heard of that. Everything I’ve seen says the opposite but I’ve never specifically “looked up his background.”
If you’re saying he’s Jewish but at one point was raised Christian, so was Abe Foxman. And? Your point with that is?
As for Zionism: some Jews aren’t. That doesn’t cancel their tribal membership.
Greg Johnson made a fine point in his recent interview with Tom Sunic. He said that we must distinguish between good Jews and bad Jews. A good Jew is a Jew that lives in Israel.
Locking this thread.