<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Occidental Dissent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.occidentaldissent.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.occidentaldissent.com</link>
	<description>White Racial and Cultural Preservation</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 08:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Liberal Race Realism by Kunthjol</title>
		<link>http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/07/02/liberal-race-realism/#comment-14043</link>
		<dc:creator>Kunthjol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 07:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.occidentaldissent.com/?p=250#comment-14043</guid>
		<description>"We support minority rights, secessionism, all that, just like the old USSR."

So like the old USSR you also support the aims of the old Socialist Reich Party (which was National Socialist)?!?!?!  Oops.  

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_Reich_Party</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We support minority rights, secessionism, all that, just like the old USSR.&#8221;</p>
<p>So like the old USSR you also support the aims of the old Socialist Reich Party (which was National Socialist)?!?!?!  Oops.  </p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_Reich_Party" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_Reich_Party</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Liberal Race Realism by Texan</title>
		<link>http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/07/02/liberal-race-realism/#comment-14042</link>
		<dc:creator>Texan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 05:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.occidentaldissent.com/?p=250#comment-14042</guid>
		<description>Had me until the "Star Trek" reference.  Are we so degraded that even our racial philosophy must contain low culture references, especially to diversity propaganda like Star Trek?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had me until the &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; reference.  Are we so degraded that even our racial philosophy must contain low culture references, especially to diversity propaganda like Star Trek?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Liberal Race Realism by Fred Scrooby</title>
		<link>http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/07/02/liberal-race-realism/#comment-14038</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Scrooby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 04:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.occidentaldissent.com/?p=250#comment-14038</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;This too is racism and it is virtuous because it enhances survival and survival, the “prime directive” of life is virtuous.&lt;/i&gt;  ( -- Desmond)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

... and it is virtuous because it enhances survival &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;without harming anyone or any other race whatsoever&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><i>This too is racism and it is virtuous because it enhances survival and survival, the “prime directive” of life is virtuous.</i>  ( &#8212; Desmond)</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8230; and it is virtuous because it enhances survival <i><b>without harming anyone or any other race whatsoever</b></i> &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Friedrich Braun by Fred Scrooby</title>
		<link>http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/07/02/friedrich-braun/#comment-14035</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Scrooby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 02:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.occidentaldissent.com/?p=251#comment-14035</guid>
		<description>Futhermore, the main reason the North didn't have legal Segregation on the books as the South did is also mentioned in ATBOTL's comment:  the number of Negroes in the North was comparatively miniscule prior to the northward migrations of Negroes following each of the two World Wars:  the North didn't need legal Segregation.  The South did, with its Negro percentages often approaching fifty percent, while the North could get away with &lt;i&gt;de facto&lt;/i&gt; segregation, and did.  Prior to the Jewish Revolt (the 60s) the North was NOT integrated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Futhermore, the main reason the North didn&#8217;t have legal Segregation on the books as the South did is also mentioned in ATBOTL&#8217;s comment:  the number of Negroes in the North was comparatively miniscule prior to the northward migrations of Negroes following each of the two World Wars:  the North didn&#8217;t need legal Segregation.  The South did, with its Negro percentages often approaching fifty percent, while the North could get away with <i>de facto</i> segregation, and did.  Prior to the Jewish Revolt (the 60s) the North was NOT integrated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Friedrich Braun by Fred Scrooby</title>
		<link>http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/07/02/friedrich-braun/#comment-14034</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Scrooby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 02:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.occidentaldissent.com/?p=251#comment-14034</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Prozium, you need to step away from whatever you have been reading about about the history of racial laws and do a little research about what actually happened in the North. I know that you are a Southerner and as such, you struggle to think about the North objectively without blaming it for every ill, but I want you to try anyway. Prior to the migration of blacks from the South, the number of blacks in the North was tiny. There were too few of them to make major trouble. Even still, they were de facto segregated in every aspect of life. That is an objective fact whether you like it or not. I don’t care what you read about obscure laws, blacks did not live in white neighborhoods, go to white schools, marry whites or have non-menial jobs except in rare cases. They were allowed to vote but there too few of them in any one place to elect and blacks to office in the North, even at the local level.

Please stop repeating your claim that the North has been racially egalitarian since the 19th Century.

( -- ATBOTL)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Correct.  Prozium please take note.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Prozium, you need to step away from whatever you have been reading about about the history of racial laws and do a little research about what actually happened in the North. I know that you are a Southerner and as such, you struggle to think about the North objectively without blaming it for every ill, but I want you to try anyway. Prior to the migration of blacks from the South, the number of blacks in the North was tiny. There were too few of them to make major trouble. Even still, they were de facto segregated in every aspect of life. That is an objective fact whether you like it or not. I don’t care what you read about obscure laws, blacks did not live in white neighborhoods, go to white schools, marry whites or have non-menial jobs except in rare cases. They were allowed to vote but there too few of them in any one place to elect and blacks to office in the North, even at the local level.</p>
<p>Please stop repeating your claim that the North has been racially egalitarian since the 19th Century.</p>
<p>( &#8212; ATBOTL)</p></blockquote>
<p>Correct.  Prozium please take note.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Friedrich Braun by Fred Scrooby</title>
		<link>http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/07/02/friedrich-braun/#comment-14033</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Scrooby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 02:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.occidentaldissent.com/?p=251#comment-14033</guid>
		<description>Mr. Dithers:  Newt Gingrich is an extreme left-wing fringe radical and fanatical race-replacement advocate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Dithers:  Newt Gingrich is an extreme left-wing fringe radical and fanatical race-replacement advocate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Liberal Race Realism by Desmond Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/07/02/liberal-race-realism/#comment-14032</link>
		<dc:creator>Desmond Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 02:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.occidentaldissent.com/?p=250#comment-14032</guid>
		<description>The problem is Lindsay is blinded by his arrogance. He sees no value in racism because he cannot see that racism lies on a continuum and like many other things has moral and immoral components. He, however, is so consumed by hatred that he cannot offer the hand of reciprocity to those who are moral racists. It is McCullough's Racial Golden Rule. 

"Under the Racial Golden Rule all rights are reciprocal and shared in common by all races. All have the right to racial life. All have the right to racial independence, the exclusive ownership of, and control over, their own life, without which their life would have little meaning or purpose except as a means to serve the ends and interests of other races. All have the right to self-determination and sovereign possession of their own territory. The proponents of the Racial Golden Rule claim these rights for their own race and, in reciprocity, recognize them for other races as well.

The Racial Golden Rule is consistent with divergent evolution and the moral racism of the racial compact. It supports racial separation and independence as required for continued racial existence and divergent evolution. It promotes the right of each race to self-rule and self-determination, to shape its own evolution and destiny, free from control, domination, intrusion or interference by other races. It is consistent with the so-called "Prime Directive" on the television series Star Trek , which prohibits interference with other peoples or cultures, including any attempt to give aid or advice, or otherwise influence their development, and respects their independence and their right to make their own choices and follow their own destiny. [...]

The Racial Golden Rule asserts the right of every race to racial freedom through racial separation and independence. To secure racial freedom and separation it respects the requirement of every race for its own exclusive racial territory or homeland, its own independent and sovereign government. It declares for every race the freedom to follow its own path, to control its own life and existence, to determine its own course of development and to pursue its own happiness and evolutionary destiny. It is a declaration of racial independence, freedom and diversity, holding it to be self-evident that all races were created different, and have a right to be different, to be themselves, with equal rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of their own happiness."

This too is racism and it is virtuous because it enhances survival and survival, the "prime directive" of life is virtuous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is Lindsay is blinded by his arrogance. He sees no value in racism because he cannot see that racism lies on a continuum and like many other things has moral and immoral components. He, however, is so consumed by hatred that he cannot offer the hand of reciprocity to those who are moral racists. It is McCullough&#8217;s Racial Golden Rule. </p>
<p>&#8220;Under the Racial Golden Rule all rights are reciprocal and shared in common by all races. All have the right to racial life. All have the right to racial independence, the exclusive ownership of, and control over, their own life, without which their life would have little meaning or purpose except as a means to serve the ends and interests of other races. All have the right to self-determination and sovereign possession of their own territory. The proponents of the Racial Golden Rule claim these rights for their own race and, in reciprocity, recognize them for other races as well.</p>
<p>The Racial Golden Rule is consistent with divergent evolution and the moral racism of the racial compact. It supports racial separation and independence as required for continued racial existence and divergent evolution. It promotes the right of each race to self-rule and self-determination, to shape its own evolution and destiny, free from control, domination, intrusion or interference by other races. It is consistent with the so-called &#8220;Prime Directive&#8221; on the television series Star Trek , which prohibits interference with other peoples or cultures, including any attempt to give aid or advice, or otherwise influence their development, and respects their independence and their right to make their own choices and follow their own destiny. [...]</p>
<p>The Racial Golden Rule asserts the right of every race to racial freedom through racial separation and independence. To secure racial freedom and separation it respects the requirement of every race for its own exclusive racial territory or homeland, its own independent and sovereign government. It declares for every race the freedom to follow its own path, to control its own life and existence, to determine its own course of development and to pursue its own happiness and evolutionary destiny. It is a declaration of racial independence, freedom and diversity, holding it to be self-evident that all races were created different, and have a right to be different, to be themselves, with equal rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of their own happiness.&#8221;</p>
<p>This too is racism and it is virtuous because it enhances survival and survival, the &#8220;prime directive&#8221; of life is virtuous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Friedrich Braun by Fred Scrooby</title>
		<link>http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/07/02/friedrich-braun/#comment-14031</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Scrooby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 02:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.occidentaldissent.com/?p=251#comment-14031</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Scrooby is arguably the biggest oddball on the Internet.&lt;/i&gt;  ( -- Friedrich Braun)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I'm sure there's a compliment in there somewhere.  Now if I can only figure out where.  Let's see ... well, to be the biggest anything on the internet takes some doing, so there's that .... and I'm sure I can wring more stuff out of this ........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><i>Scrooby is arguably the biggest oddball on the Internet.</i>  ( &#8212; Friedrich Braun)</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s a compliment in there somewhere.  Now if I can only figure out where.  Let&#8217;s see &#8230; well, to be the biggest anything on the internet takes some doing, so there&#8217;s that &#8230;. and I&#8217;m sure I can wring more stuff out of this &#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Liberal Race Realism by Tanstaafl</title>
		<link>http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/07/02/liberal-race-realism/#comment-14028</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanstaafl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 00:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.occidentaldissent.com/?p=250#comment-14028</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I don’t sense any duplicity in his writings that wafts off the likes of Lawrence Auster (Jew) or Ian Jobling&lt;/i&gt;.

He's of a different nature, sure, but his "White ethnocentric" hatred for "haters" makes him, in my view, both duplicitous and an enemy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I don’t sense any duplicity in his writings that wafts off the likes of Lawrence Auster (Jew) or Ian Jobling</i>.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s of a different nature, sure, but his &#8220;White ethnocentric&#8221; hatred for &#8220;haters&#8221; makes him, in my view, both duplicitous and an enemy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Independence Day by Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/07/03/independence-day/#comment-14025</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 23:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.occidentaldissent.com/?p=252#comment-14025</guid>
		<description>Looks like we're due for a second Independence Day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like we&#8217;re due for a second Independence Day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
