Reds Out of Florida

Last Thursday, a communist group from Florida State University called Students for a Democratic Society spit on, stomped on, and burned a Confederate Battle Flag at the Florida State Capitol on the 150th anniversary of Appomattox. The group was protesting a Klan group that had distributed literature in Tallahassee.

As soon as we heard about this, the Florida League of the South started to privately discuss what our response should be. We knew that SDS was going to be holding their next event, a rally in support of the leftist regime in Venezuela, at the Florida State Capitol this weekend. After talking it over, we decided that we would show up in Tallahassee, confront SDS, tell the communists to get out of Florida, and then spit on, stomp on, and burn the Soviet flag in front of them. That’s exactly what we did this afternoon.

A crowd of about 30 spoiled brats, communists, and trannies chanted for a while, shouted some unimaginative slogans, and gave a few speeches about the tyranny of “cisgender heteronormative privilege” while 13 or us starred them down in bemusement while holding “Reds Out of Florida Signs” and two flags, the Florida State Flag and the Bonnie Blue Flag. We unfurled the Soviet flag, laid it out before them, and took turns spitting on it, stomping on it, and standing on it underneath our boots.

Standing there, it felt like a puff of wind would knock half of them over. It was clear throughout the event who had the upper hand. The organizer, Zachary Schultz, appears to be a homosexual. The jeans he was wearing made him look like a 14-year-old boy. Fittingly, an Indian trannie wearing a dress and bright red lipstick while carrying a purse spoke to the ABC 27 evening news as their representative. We also spoke to ABC 27, but we presented a different face and were delighted with the contrast.

As the event was winding down, I engaged in dialogue several people in their crowd. There was was one guy who was there with a friend to support free speech. He told me that he didn’t agree with a lot of the things that SDS was saying. Several people on their side denied being communists and believed they were protesting the Klan. I also spoke to the trannie who calls himself “Erica” who was at their previous event.

For whatever reason, “Erica” felt it necessary to inform me that she is a woman. This sparked a heated conversation. I calmly explained to “Erica” that he is genetically speaking, in fact, still a man because there is a Y chromosome in every cell of his body. I explained that surgery and hormones are not going to change his genetics. I explained to him the genetics of people who are born “intersex” and how that does not apply to his case. Finally, I compared his predicament to a person who suffers from the delusion that they are Elvis, Julius Caesar, or Napoleon Bonaparte.

Several people in the crowd because visually agitated by this analogy and retorted, “even if you are right, what are we to do about it?” Again, I explained how I could dress up like Napoleon Bonaparte and start telling people that I am the Emperor Napoleon, but that it still wouldn’t be true. In much the same way, there is nothing that “Erica” can do but come to terms with the fact he was born a man. In all situations, we should tell the truth and accept reality as it exists.

After leaving the grounds of the Florida State Capitol, we ate lunch at a local steakhouse and burned the remains of the Soviet flag. Then we sang a chorus of “Bonnie Blue Flag” and went our separate ways. It was a good day.

Note: We came prepared to burn the Soviet flag at the Florida State Capitol, but the Capitol Police asked us not to.

Media Coverage

Tallahassee Democrat

Photo Gallery

Posted in Activism, American South, Dixie, Florida, Southern Nationalism | 38 Comments

Review: Marriage, a History: How Love Conquered Marriage

marriage-a-historyAround the time that Andrew Anglin over at The Daily Stormer started to go MGTOW, I bought some books on Amazon that I thought would be helpful in learning more about the meaning of “traditional marriage” and “traditional gender roles.”

What exactly is “traditional marriage”? How did “traditional marriage” evolve in the West over history? How and why did “traditional marriage” crumble in the West? Is there anything traditional about MGTOW and the men’s rights movement?

After doing some searching online, I found some books that had been written by feminists on the topic of marriage. I was initially skeptical that these books would have any value, but after reading a few chapters, I quickly changed my mind. History, after all, is still history and there is no disputing that we have been born into an age of unprecedented social revolution in sex, marriage, family life and gender roles.

The institution of marriage has changed more in the West in last fifty years than in the last five thousand years of history. After reading this book, I was struck by how swiftly traditional marriage and gender roles unraveled in the 1960s. While there were plenty of crises in the institution of marriage in the past, the pace of change was much slower. Marriage in the European Middle Ages, for examples, warranted only two chapters in Coontz’s book, a period that lasted a thousand years, while each decade of the twentieth century seemed to have its own chapter.

According to Stephanie Coontz, marriage in the West can be broken down into roughly three periods:

The Patriarchy, Antiquity-1750

The foundation of the Western institution of marriage was laid in ancient Rome, Greece, and Israel. These were all patriarchal societies, but the Roman marriage was the closest ancestor to our own system. The ancient Israelites practiced polygamy and women in ancient Athens were treated like property, but the Roman marriage was based on consent between the two parties. It required the approval of the fathers of the bride and the groom.

In the Middle Ages, the Roman Catholic Church gradually wrested control of marriage away from the state and the kin group. Incest was strongly discouraged. Divorce was prohibited. Marriage was brought to the church as a religious service, was announced publicly to the community, and involved a priest. Medieval marriage vows and ceremonies were very similar to our own. Also, a valid marriage in the Middle Ages was based on the consent of the two parties. This was a shift toward a more individualistic system of marriage that did not require parental approval.

Still, marriage in the Middle Ages and the Early Modern Era was fundamentally an economic institution. A wife in those times was an economic necessity in a viable peasant household. People lived in villages and worked in common fields on feudal manors. Whether it was family, neighbors, or lords, outsiders had far more influence over marriage than they do today. The pressure to conform to social norms was far greater in the small rural villages and emerging cities of the Middle Ages because marriage was more of a community affair due to the way the economy was organized.

The Love-Based “Male Breadwinner” Marriage, 1750-1960

The Enlightenment and Romantic era brought a new system of marriage into existence: the love-based “male breadwinner” marriage.

In this new system, which was strongly driven by the emergence of the market economy, urbanization, and industrialization in the West, marriage came to be based more on the emotional needs of individuals: it was about romantic love, intimacy, personal fulfillment and finding your “soul mate.” The household, which had previously been the site of shared production in the Middle Ages/Early Modern Era, became the “home,” a place the man returned to as a sanctuary after spending his day working for wages in the industrial economy, and a place the woman often now stayed at alone as a homemaker.

Coontz argues that this model was always inherently unstable and was beset by periodic crises in the 1790s, the 1890s, and the 1920s. After all, if couples married for romantic love, what should they do if those passions ebbed? Why couldn’t couples pursue romantic love outside of marriage? Are children a necessary byproduct of romantic love? The logic of the love-based marriage ultimately leads to decomposition, but Coontz argues the system was propped up for decades by the Victorian doctrine that women and men had “separate spheres” and which exalted women and put them up on a pedestal.

In the Middle Ages, women were seen as depraved sexual creatures who had caused Adam’s fall, and society took a dim view of sex and women’s sexuality. The Victorian era turned the old view of women upside down. Women were now seen as exalted maidens with little in the way of a sex drive. Men saw themselves as chivalrous knights protecting their honor. Women had to be sheltered at home from the evils of the workplace.

By the 1920s, Victorian morals had ebbed enough where a more positive view of sex had emerged, and sexual fulfillment was added to the list of things that made a good love-based marriage. The love-based marriage started to come unglued in the 1920s, but the Great Depression and World War 2 were so disruptive that men and women were focused on the more important problem of survival. In the 1950s, normal times returned, and most people were so grateful and ready to act out their pent up dreams of marriage and starting a family that social revolution was not on their minds.

The Egalitarian Partnership, 1960-Present

In hindsight, what caused the big collapse in the 1960s? A number of things …

1.) First, urbanization, the maturation of the free market economy, and the expansion of government continued to undermine the family. In dense urban cities and brand new suburbs, the social and economic constraints that had preserved traditional marriage over the centuries collapsed. Add to that list government in its newfound role as substitute husband. Women could work for wages and support themselves in the labor hungry postwar economy.

2.) Second, America’s brand new consumer culture made many traditional gender roles superfluous. A man no longer needed a woman to prepare his meals, sew his clothes, preserve his food, and so on. Simply put, America and other Western countries had become so prosperous that marriage was no longer an economic necessity, which is why the number of single households has exploded to an unprecedented level.

3.) Third, Americanism, which glorifies liberty and equality as the only things that are good in life and celebrates the perpetual expansion thereof, predictably invaded and undermined the family. Women’s suffrage followed in the wake of abolitionism. Feminism followed in the wake of the Civil Rights Movement.

4.) Fourth, one of the biggest factors was undoubtedly the rise of the mass media, especially television in the 1950s, and how film, radio, and television began to collectively reshape popular culture. Jewish influence isn’t addressed in this book, but Freud and countless other Jews played a major role in reshaping expectations of marriage.

5.) Finally, the logic of the love-based marriage ultimately doomed it to failure, as conservatives had always warned would happen. The slippery slope predictions made by critics of the love-based marriage eventually came true. If you don’t love someone, why not divorce them? How long does it take to find “true love”? If you aren’t satisfied with your marital intimacy, why not get a divorce? Why can’t you love someone outside of marriage? What if your soulmate happens to another man or woman rather than a member of the opposite sex?

The 1960s and 1970s ushered in an age of unprecedented social revolution in sex, family life, and gender roles: among other innovations, interracial marriage was legalized, singleness and cohabitation ceased to be taboo, workplace discrimination was outlawed, illegitimacy was abolished, premarital sex became the norm, no fault divorce became legal and divorce rates skyrocketed, abortion was legalized, head-and-master laws were repealed across the West, and above all, the advent of birth control decoupled sex from reproduction for the first time in history.

Marriage was transformed in the West into an egalitarian partnership held together only by bonds of affection. It became a purely private and personal civil contract between two free and equal individuals. Men were stripped of all authority over their wives. With most husbands and wives now in the workforce, stress within the household exploded, and most marriages started to end in divorce.

Ultimately, Cootz doesn’t have much to say about the future of marriage, and seems to assume the existing state of affairs is a permanent change which we must adjust to. I was disappointed that she didn’t address the demographic winter issue: how, after all, is the contemporary system of marriage supposed to survive when women’s liberation is inverting the age pyramid in so many countries? How are so few young people supposed to take care of so many old people in the long run?

I expect there will be even greater changes ahead in the nature of marriage in my lifetime.

Posted in Books, Family, Feminism, Men's Issues, Women | 10 Comments

South Africa: Boer Youth Attend Military Training Camps To Prepare For Race War

Twenty years have now passed since the tragic decision was made to entrust South Africa’s government to the whims of semi-feral Negroes, and the situation could now hardly be any worse for the embattled Whites of that once-prosperous land.

The “Rainbow Nation” of convicted communist terrorist Nelson Mandela, only brought about due to both internal subversion and external agitation, has now sunk to the level of the rest of the “Dark Continent,” with rampant incompetence, poverty, rape, and violence the norm.

However, groups of brave Boers have now deemed it necessary to stand up for what is theirs, for the odds of escaping the rampage of the hordes are growing far more slim with each passing day.

Such grueling training for the final racial conflict, aided by hardened veterans of the Afrikaner Resistance Movement (AWB), has continued to spread among the beleaguered population, demonstrating to all of us that there can still be fight left in the soul of the White Man, if he only sheds the fear instilled in him since birth.

Well organized, determined, and tough beyond description. Not to mention the fact that they are steadily growing in experience and strength.

Well organized, determined, and tough beyond description. Not to mention the fact that they are steadily growing in experience and strength.

Daily Mail:

Deep in rural South Africa, a terrifying white supremacist movement is brainwashing teenagers to rise up in defiance of Nelson Mandela’s hard-fought dream of a Rainbow Nation.

The far-right Afrikaner Resistance Movement (AWB) is training thousands of youths in military-style bootcamps northwest of Johannesburg to fight for a separate white state.

By day, they are pushed to their physical limits with assault courses and self-defence lessons, all the while being told of the danger from ‘the millions of blacks trying to kill you’.

Then by night, they are subjected to vile racist indoctrination which many hoped had disappeared from South Africa for good.

‘South Africa is bleeding,’ he says. ‘And this is why we have to train our people to be prepared.

‘There’s millions and millions of blacks around you, smothering you… and killing you.

‘So you have to implement certain systems to survive and that’s why we say the only system we can go now for is not apartheid. That’s second prize. First prize is freedom.’ 


Later, members of the camp are filmed burning the South African flag while holding the Afrikaner one.

‘No one will force us to stand under this flag,’ they say. ’We Afrikaners want our freedom. We want our own country.’

Such a course of action, as laid out in the above sentences, will likely prove to be the only worthwhile goal to achieve in the near to midterm future. One can only aim for separation, independence, and freedom, as the powers that be cannot suffer to negotiate or compromise with Whites seeking to rule themselves under a traditional Christian template.

Take the plight of these people to heart, as one can almost gaze into the future status of Southern regions, along with other White enclaves, if the current situation of being shackled to a decaying American corpse continues.

Remember Rhodesia? Switch the main players, especially aggressors, around, and you have the likely scenario of a future America where Whites, especially Southerners, are the demonized minority

Remember Rhodesia? Switch the main players, especially aggressors, around, and you have the likely scenario of a mid-century America where Whites, especially Southerners, are the demonized minority.





Posted in Africa, American South, Anti-White, Multiculturalism, Negroes, South Africa, Southern Nationalism, United States, White Survivalism, Zimbabwe | 17 Comments

West Virginia: University Features Marxist “White, Male, Christian Privilege” Display

Wow! How edgy and rebellious. Towing the official American government line against the White Man.

Wow! How edgy and rebellious. Towing the official American government line against the White Man is the pinnacle of cultural vibrancy.

The cancer that is modern-day Leftist ideology continues to rear its head in the most unlikely of places, with even the most traditional rural areas now in the spotlight for allowing behavior worthy of institutionalization and/or mandatory hard labor.

In the case of West Virginia’s Marshall University, we now face the emergence of yet another vile example of the anti-White agenda, with the posting of a display ranting over the alleged “privileges” held by those of European Christian descent, a foolish doctrine derived from the raving hysterics of filthy Jewish agitators such as Tim Wise, as well as initiatives pushed by the San Francisco college community.

When placed under scrutiny, the author of the mini-billboard, a young, and allegedly White, female student named Jessie Swiger, defended her actions by citing “education” and “training” from undefined sources, while sticking to the sort of immature rambling typical of many impressionable youngsters exposed to subversive rhetoric.

Ms. Swiger, who has likely never dealt with aggressive subhumans, has apparently set her social media profiles to private since being exposed.

Ms. Swiger, who has likely never dealt with aggressive subhumans, would benefit quite a bit from debating ideas with one of us.


A resident adviser (RA) at Marshall University in West Virginia has placed a poster in a freshman dorm that attacks heterosexual Christian students by defining them as “privileged.”

Senior RA Jessie Swiger hung her poster in Freshman North, a co-ed dorm. Campus Reform reported the story and presents screenshots of the poster, as well as Swiger’s Facebook post defending her poster and a tweet in which Swiger justifies, “It’s not shaming. It’s educating. Privilege exists as a result of racism, sexism, ablism, & classism engrained in society.”

The poster itself, which is handwritten, equates privilege as “not being asked ‘how does sex work for you?’” and “’flesh colored’ matches your skin tone.”

Examples of “privilege” Swiger provides on the poster are “white, male, Christian, cisgender, and heterosexual privilege that you’ve probably never realized or thought about.”

In a Facebook post, Swiger said, “I’m thankful to have been able to go through training and take classes that have helped me to understand and recognize privilege, what it is, and how it affects our brothers and sisters of the world.”

Well, there you have it folks. We now have children, even those of our own racial group, betraying long-standing values and culture in the name of “brotherhood” with those who would only reduce society to the lowest common denominator.

Do they actually believe for even a split-second that a land dominated by the Colored peoples of the Third World would be as conciliatory and respectful of mentally-disturbed viewpoints?

If they truly do, then let them live with the consequences if their worldview triumphs over that of normalcy and common decency.

Here are some of the "brothers and sisters" of Ms.

Here are some of the “brothers and sisters” of Ms. Swiger. They likely won’t take too kindly to a White, or Jewish, person displaying solidarity with their tribal vibrancy.




Posted in Americanism, Anti-Racism, Anti-White, Diversity, education, Liberalism, Multiculturalism, West Virginia | 14 Comments

On 150th Anniversary of Appomattox, Communists Stomp On, Spit On, and Publicly Burn Confederate Battle Flag At The Florida State Capitol

In Tallahassee, e-activism flops

In Tallahassee, e-activism flops

Update: Tallahassee SDS is holding their next meeting on April 15 and their next rally on April 18 at the Florida State Capitol.

This is an absolute disgrace … what follows is a rant and a call for change.

Yesterday, a group of about 60 communists led by Tallahassee SDS and a number of small leftwing groups marched from the Florida State University campus to the Florida State Capitol where they stomped on, spit on, and publicly burned a Confederate Battle Flag on the 150th anniversary of Lee’s surrender at Appomattox.

Yes, communists … here’s the punk wearing the red shirt below who organized the event. His real name is Zachary Schultz and he runs Tallahassee SDS. His co-organizer’s real name is Regina Joseph. That’s her above wearing the green hat.

Organizer Zachary Schultz (Image courtesy of Facebook)

Organizer Zachary Schultz (Image courtesy of Facebook)

Organizer Regina Joseph pictured far right (Image courtesy of Facebook)

Organizer Regina Joseph pictured far right (Image courtesy of Facebook)

Galling, isn’t it? Why didn’t anyone know about this beforehand?

Apparently, a Klan faction had been on a recruitment drive in the Florida Panhandle. They’ve been on an epic flier distribution as of late. While I was in Missouri last month, I heard that the Klan had been distributing fliers in Auburn where I went to college as well as in Selma during the 50 year anniversary of Bloody Sunday. In Alabama alone, they’ve also distributed fliers lately in Anniston, Montgomery, and Tallassee, so this little Klan flier distribution in Tallahassee was nothing remarkable and was just a part of an ongoing nationwide recruitment campaign.

Even though lots of us were vaguely aware of the Klan’s flier campaign, no one outside the group has been paying much attention to it. When they distributed their fliers in Tallahassee, it remained pretty much a local news story. Hardly anyone had any inkling that the flier distribution had even happened or that a backlash against the Klan was brewing among the local communists in Tallahassee. Virtually no one had any idea that the communists were going to pull a stunt like this.

The only exception was the self-described “ghost activist” Pale Horse over at the Pioneer Little Europe Facebook page:


A few weeks ago, I stopped following the Pioneer Little Europe Facebook page after this Pale Horse had a big, ugly public falling out with Matt Heimbach of Trad Youth. Yesterday evening, I was browsing Facebook and in a complete fluke went over there out of sheer boredom, where I learned that these communists were massing to hold a public rally at the Florida State Capitol in Tallahassee two hours later. It took me a while to figure out that the ROF Militia was going to be there.

By then it was too late … it was up to Pale Horse to mobilize his e-army of thousands of masked “ghost activists” to counter-protest this group. The photos below vividly illustrate how “e-activism” works in practice. As far as I can tell, not one single damn e-activist in the State of Florida, even a masked one, showed up to oppose this … a bunch of hipsters and crossdressers wearing lipstick, burning the Confederate Battle Flag.

We’ve been told that “leaderless resistance” and total disorganization and anonymous networks of “secret agents” and e-activism and the like are superior to the old methods of the pre-internet era. Well, I for one don’t believe it. In the old days before the internet and smartphones, hundreds of people would have showed up to oppose this on a moment’s notice, and now we don’t even hear about it until after the fact.

Photo Gallery

Posted in Activism, American South, Americanism, Anti-White, Diversity, Dixie, Homosexuals, Progressives, Race Relations, Racism, White Advocacy, White Nationalism | Tagged , , | 55 Comments

The Cost of the Union: Small Town Mosques


Thanks to the United States’ immigration policy of open borders to the Third World small Southern towns, once all but religiously homogeneous (and ethnically divided between Whites and Blacks), now are home to mosques and other alien religious centers. The mosque pictured here is located in Rock Hill, South Carolina, a former stronghold of Confederate general-turned-governor Wade Hampton (known as the Savior of South Carolina for overturning the Reconstruction regime and restoring White Southern conservative rule to the State).

Posted in Americanism, Immigration, Islam | Tagged , , , | 20 Comments

Republicanism, Americanism, and the Demise of Traditional Marriage

The following excerpt comes from Stephanie Coontz’s book, Marriage, a History: How Love Conquered Marriage:

“During the eighteenth century the spread of the market economy and the advent of the Enlightenment wrought profound changes in record time. By the end of the 1700s personal choice of partners had replaced arranged marriage as a social ideal, and individuals were encouraged to marry for love. For the first time in five thousand years, marriage came to be seen as a private relationship between two individuals rather than one link in a larger system of political and economic alliances …

Especially momentous for relations between husband and wife was the weakening of the political model upon which marriage had long been based. Until the late seventeenth century the family was thought of as a miniature monarchy, with the husband king over his dependents. As long as political absolutism remained unchallenged in society as a whole, so did the hierarchy of traditional marriage. But the new political ideas fostered by the Glorious Revolution in England in 1688 and the even more far-reaching revolutions in America and France in the last quarter of the eighteenth century dealt a series of cataclysmic blows to the traditional justification for patriarchal authority …

The people who pioneered the new ideas about love and marriage were not, by and large, trying to create anything like the egalitarian partnerships that modern Westerners associate with companionship, intimacy, and “true love.” Their aim was to make marriage more secure by getting rid of the cynicism that accompanied mercenary marriage and encouraging couples to place each other first in their affections and loyalties.

But basing marriage on love and companionship represented a break with thousands of years of tradition. Many contemporaries immediately recognized the danger this entailed. They worried that the unprecedented idea of basing marriage on love would produce rampant individualism.

Critics of the love match argued – prematurely, as it turned out, but correctly – that the values of free choice and egalitarianism could easily spin out of control. If the choice of a marriage partner was a personal decision, conservatives asked, what would prevent young people, especially women, from choosing unwisely? If people were encouraged to expect marriage to be the bet and happiest experience of their lives, what would hold a marriage together if things went “for worse” rather than “for better”?

If wives and husbands were intimates, wouldn’t women demand to share decisions equally? If women possessed the same faculties of reason as men, why would they confine themselves to domesticity? Would men still financially support women and children if they lost control over their wives’ and children’s labor and could not even discipline them properly? If parents, church, and state no longer dictated people’s private lives, how could society make sure the right people married and had children or stop the wrong ones from doing so?

Conservatives warned that “the pursuit of happiness,” claimed as a right in the American Declaration of Independence, would undermine the social and moral order …”

Note: This is getting really good.

Posted in Americanism, History, Women | 4 Comments

Defective Diversity: Puerto Ricans Collect Disability Checks For Inability To Speak English

Well, I suppose an exception for disability benefits could be made for this fine equal. I mean, mental retardation is a serious condition.

Well, I suppose an exception for disability benefits could be made for this fine equal. Severe mental retardation is a serious condition, right?

At this point in America’s long descent into the graveyard of civilizations, one often has little to no time to observe the numerous incidents of government waste and/or social benefits fraud, as far more serious issues continue to rise to the top of the heap.

However, with the revelation, likely only the tip of the iceberg, that at least several hundred vibrant Puerto Rican creatures have indulged themselves through the collection of disability payments for their lack of English-based skills, one must at least say something to at least bring awareness to such insanity.

Apparently identified through an audit by the Office of Inspector General (OIG), the fact that freeloading non-Whites, coming from an invasive wreck of a culture in which English plays a subordinate or non-existent role in the vast majority of lives, can cash in on the White Man’s fruits of labor over illiteracy in Anglo realms is shocking to say the least.

Oh, my. Well, New England, it was nice knowing you. Actually, not really...

Oh, my! Well, New England, it was nice knowing you. Actually, saying that would be a bold-faced lie.

Washington Free Beacon:

The Social Security Administration (SSA) approved disability benefits for hundreds of Puerto Ricans because they do not speak English, despite the fact that Puerto Rico is a predominantly Spanish-speaking territory.

According to a new audit by the Office of Inspector General (OIG), the agency is misapplying rules that are intended to provide financial assistance to individuals who are illiterate or cannot speak English in the United States. Under the rules, Puerto Ricans are allowed to receive disability benefits for their inability to speak English as well.

“We found the Agency did not make exceptions regarding the English-language grid rules for claimants who reside in Puerto Rico, even though Spanish is the predominant language spoken in the local economy,” the OIG said.

The audit said a person applying for disability in Puerto Rico who cannot speak English “may increase his/her likelihood of receiving disability benefits.”

The agency does not currently have a system in place to keep track of the number of beneficiaries who receive disability insurance for not being able to speak English.

Last year Sen. Jeff Sessions (R., Ala.) raised concerns that the Obama administration was broadly applying the education rule under the Social Security Act to allow individuals to receive disability payments solely because they cannot speak English.

He noted that the Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) rolls swelled 230 percent between 2000 and 2010, while the U.S. population only grew 9.7 percent.

Former SSA judges have also testified that individuals have been approved for disability in the United States without having to prove they cannot speak English.

Do you see this yet, American of untainted European descent? While you toil and struggle to provide for home and family, primitives already set to drive you from neighborhoods built by your ancestors drain your lifeblood more and more with each passing day.

This is a trend that will only grow worse as the racial kin of these feral Hispanics flood our cities, our towns, and our countryside, and slowly but surely wrap their limited cognitive abilities around the concept of yet more handouts at the expense of ourselves and those who come after us.

Why are these subhumans in my country to begin with? Keeping their island may prove to be one of the more idiotic decisions of the last century.

Why are these subhumans in my country to begin with? Keeping control of their island may prove to be one of the more idiotic decisions of the last century.



Posted in American North, Economy, Hispanics, Immigration, Liberalism, Puerto Rico | 9 Comments

The Death of Walter Scott

Not "Sir" Walter Scott. This black guy.

Not “Sir” Walter Scott. This black guy.

In this case, I will say that it genuinely does look like this White police officer in North Charleston, SC murdered an unarmed black man. He was charged with murder after the video below surfaced on the internet.

Perhaps there is more to this story, as there was in the cases of Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown, but I doubt it. Whatever the case, the justice system seems to be working fine, and everyone should wait for more information to come to light before jumping to conclusions, playing Nancy Grace on the internet, or burning down cities.

Posted in American South, Crime, Diversity, Dixie, Negroes, Race Relations, South Carolina | 155 Comments

Wealthy Jewish Oligarchs Are Buying US Foreign Policy

Oh yeah … in other news, wealthy Jews are buying our foreign policy again:

“WASHINGTON — As the proposed agreement over Iran’s nuclear program is debated in coming weeks, President Obama will make his case to a Congress controlled by Republicans who are more fervently pro-Israel than ever, partly a result of ideology, but also a product of a surge in donations and campaign spending on their behalf by a small group of wealthy donors. …”

Note: See also Rand Paul’s “long and thorough quest for the kosher stamp of approval.” He’s about to announce he is running for president.

Posted in Foreign Policy, The Jewish Question | 13 Comments