Blue’s Clues Kicks Off Pride Month Early

This is f**king perfect.

This is a rip off of “When Johnny Comes Marching Home” which is a civil war song.

Who could have ever predicted this?

“Nothing in the signs of the times exhibits in stronger relief the fact, that free society is in a state “of dissolution and thaw, “of demoralization and transition, than the stir about woman’s rights. And yet it is time to work …

The people of our Northern States, who hold that domestic slavery is unjust and iniquitous, are consistent in their attempts to modify or abolish the marriage relation. Marriages, in many places there, are contracted with as little formality as jumping over a broom, and are dissolved with equal facility by courts and legislatures. It is proposed by many to grant divorces at all times, when the parties mutually consent. The Socialists suggest that the relation should be abolished, private family establishments broken up, and women and children converted into joint stock. The ladies are promoting these movements by womens right’s conventions. The prospects of these agitators are quite hopeful, because they have no conservative South to oppose them. It is their own affair, and we will not interfere with its regulation.

We shall deplore the day when marriage and Christianity are abolished anywhere, but will not interfere in the social and domestic matters of other people. …”

All modern philosophy converges to a single point – the overthrow of all government, the substitution of the untrammelled “Sovereignty of the Individual,” for the Sovereignty of Society, and the inauguration of anarchy. First domestic slavery, next religious institutions, then separate property, then political government, and, finally, family government and family relations, are to be swept away. This is the distinctly avowed programme of all able abolitionists and socialists; and towards this end the doctrines and the practices of the weakest and most timid among them tend. Proudhon, and the French socialists generally, avow this purpose in France, and Stephen Pearl Andrews re-echoes it from America. The more numerous and timid class are represented by Mr. Greeley and the Tribune, who would not “at once rush,” like French revolutionists, “with the explosive force of escapement, point blank to the bull’s eye of its final destiny,” but would inaugurate social conditions, that would gradually bring about that result. Mr. Greeley does not propose to do away at once with marriage, religion, private property, political government and parental authority, but adopts the philosophy and the practices of Fourier, which promise gradually to purify human nature, and fit it, in a few generations, for that social millennium, into which the bolder and more consistent Andrews urges society at once to plunge.

… The other and bolder party, feel themselves “called” as special instruments,to give at once the coup de grace to the old world, and to usher in the new golden age, of free love and free lands, of free women and free negroes, of free children and free men. …

The Socialists promise that when society is wholly disintegrated and dissolved, by inculcating good principles and “singing fraternity over it,” all men will co-operate, love, and help one another.

They place men in positions of equality, rivalry, and antagonism, which must result in extreme selfishness of conduct, and yet propose this system as a cure for selfishness. To us their reasonings seem absurd. Yet the doctrines so prevalent with Abolitionists and Socialists, of Free Love and Free Lands, Free Churches, Free Women and Free Negroes – of No-Marriage, No-Religion, No-Private Property, No-Law and No-Government, are legitimate deductions, if not obvious corollaries from the leading and distinctive axiom of political economy – Laissez Faire, or let alone. …

They hold that all men, women, and negroes, and smart children, are equals, and entitled to equal rights. The widows and free negroes begin to vote in some of those States, and they will have to let all colors and sexes and ages vote soon, or give up the glorious principles of human equality and universal emancipation.

The experiment which they will make, we fear, is absurd in theory, and the symptoms of approaching anarchy and agrarianism among them, leave no doubt that its practical operation will be no better than its theory. Anti-rentism, “vote-myself-a-farm” ism, and all the other isms, are but the spattering drops that precede a social deluge.”

George Fitzhugh, Sociology for the South: Or, The Failure of Free Society, 1854

Note: If you want to see how bad YouTube has gotten, check out which videos are age restricted below.

About Hunter Wallace 11099 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent

12 Comments

  1. When Admiral Mike Mullins imposed homosexuals on the heterosexual US Military…you can be absolutely certain that Admiral Mike Mullins had bigger plans for American Society….Admiral Mike Mullins knew the homos were going to go after the children after homo normalizing the US Military…

    What a filthy fucking cockroach Admiral Mike Mullins is….

      • And OUR agenda, should be to re-instate public stoning for immorality.
        Biblical Law. Corporate ownership of said Law. Purging evil from our midst.
        Natural deterrent to abominations.

        End of story.

        “…such deserve to die.” – St. Paul Epistle to the Romans 1:32

    • Every day is Holocaust and Gay Pride day. Then for no reason at all other than pure hate the Germans stopped it.

      • Hitler and even Himmler were too kind towards their enemies. We are going to need someone like Heydrich or Dr. Kammler to straighten things out.

  2. Same usual suspects running both sides the dialectic toward the final phase of an incremental coup against the several sovereign Republic’s of America to goal of global communistic empire and monarchy

    • There are three sides to every issue in the US today. There’s the right side, the left side and the side that plays on both the other two sides.

  3. As much as I philosophically disagree with Islamofascism, and, not to say necessarily if I approve or disapprove, I can imagine the possibility of the right finding common cause with Muslims in a fight against the degenerates of the left.

    Islam has led historically to stultification of societies, but that can be overcome more easily than the complete lawlessness and cultural degradation the left is now spreading throughout the Western world.

    • it’s exactly what the totalitarian right is going to get rapped around to communism (far left and far right shake hands ie. IngSoc totalitarianism, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ingsoc_logo_from_1984.svg ,
      just as the WEF posited: “You will OWN NOTHING (aka communism, but some are more equal than others” ) and you will love it!”

      again: Same usual suspects running both sides the dialectic toward the final phase of an incremental coup against the several sovereign Republic’s of America to goal of global communistic empire and monarchy. Unfortunately some of our European kin are all in for this BS!

    • “Islamofascism” was an invention by (((Charles Krauthammer))), a speech writer for Dubya, and the Iraq War and “War on Terror” (= war against Israel’s enemies) agenda. It’s literally made up shit by Jews for the counter-jihadism time. And when it comes to the most radical islamic elements, the US/UK, KSA and Israel sponsored them, made them big, trained them and armed them – especially against the USSR and then later in Libya and Syria. Maaaybe justifiable in the Cold War, but incredibly short sighted and criminal. Totally inexcusable later on.

      SS Handschar and the Grandmufti of Jerusalem have very little to do with it. There were some connections of the Muslim Brotherhood to the Taliban, but not to the 3rd Reich or Mussolini. Really ironic move of KSA and the UK especially. But it looked so romantic in Lawrence of Arabia!

3 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. American Greatness: The New Secession Crisis – Occidental Dissent
  2. New Rising: The Life Threatening Consequences Of Elite Jargon – Occidental Dissent
  3. NY Mag: The Delusions of the Radical Centrist – Occidental Dissent

Leave a Reply