The battle lines are being drawn.
On one side, Charlie Cuck, Benny Johnson, Michael Knowles and Conservatism, Inc. are accusing Nick Fuentes tonight of being a vile hatemonger, a racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, xenophobic, anti-Semitic, alt-right, Holocaust denying, bigoted white supremacist.
On the other side, Nick Fuentes and his supporters are accusing Benny Johnson and Conservatism, Inc. of being a bunch of closeted liberals and homosexuals, professional losers and worthless grifters who are puppets of Jewish donors whose job it is tone police the Right and suck up millions of dollars while accomplishing absolutely nothing of value for their social base.
Benny launched his attack on Twitter:
THREAD*— Benny (@bennyjohnson) November 19, 2019
Recently, there has been some confusion about who Nick Fuentes is.
It’s time for the authoritative deep-dive on Fuentes.
Disturbing videos of Fuentes have surfaced. Fuentes claims he is being “smeared” & “taken out of context.”
Let’s let Nick speak for himself:
Fuentes is a Racist:— Benny (@bennyjohnson) November 19, 2019
Fuentes was at the Charlottesville white supremacy and Nazi march
Fuentes posted just HOURS after Heather Heyer was killed that the event as “incredible” and said “You will not replace us” and that “a tidal wave of white identity is coming”
Fuentes Believes in Racial Segregation:— Benny (@bennyjohnson) November 19, 2019
On Jim Crow Segregation: “It was better for them (African Americans) too — They had to drink out of a different water fountain, big f*cking deal. Oh no, they had to go to different schools. Who cares grow up”
Watch him say it.
Fuentes is a Holocaust Denier:— Benny (@bennyjohnson) November 19, 2019
Fuentes has compared Jews killed in the Holocaust to baked cookies and has questioned the actual number of victims killed in the Holocaust adding that “the Math doesn’t seem to add up there”.
Fuentes Is Deeply Anti-Semitic and Racist:— Benny (@bennyjohnson) November 19, 2019
When asked if he is hurt in his daily existence by Jews, Fuentes replied:
“I told you yes, absolutely”
He also said it would be “degenerate” for a white person to have sex with a black person. pic.twitter.com/6THBfypAfH
Fuentes Is Unabashedly Sexist:— Benny (@bennyjohnson) November 19, 2019
Are you a woman?
Well, Fuentes doesn’t think you should have political opinions and doesn’t believe you should have the Right to Vote.
He is also perfectly fine using disparaging remarks like “slut” and “bitch” to describe women. pic.twitter.com/FztgbSGuF5
Fuentes on Rape:— Benny (@bennyjohnson) November 19, 2019
“It’s just so not a big deal”
Fuentes Runs The Alt-Right 2.0— Benny (@bennyjohnson) November 19, 2019
Fuentes has attempted to distance himself from Alt-Right Leader Richard Spencer, however, he agreed with him on many things.
He Called the “White” in “White Nationalist” “Redundant” implying it doesn’t change the meaning of the word. pic.twitter.com/3Opr9YQzHK
Fuentes Was Upset When Trump Disavowed White Supremacy:— Benny (@bennyjohnson) November 19, 2019
After Charlottesville, Nick said it was “very cucked” for President Trump to disavow White Supremacy and told @DineshDSouza to “go to hell” for talking about it. pic.twitter.com/mWTevj15aq
That Is Because Fuentes Is A White Supremacist:— Benny (@bennyjohnson) November 19, 2019
In a similar style analogy, Fuentes talks about how he is a “White Board Nationalist” and expresses his distaste for “Black Boards” pic.twitter.com/fQnQmYzt1n
Fuentes Is A Believer In Leftist Authoritarianism And Identity Politics:— Benny (@bennyjohnson) November 19, 2019
Fuentes said that if Antifa were waving the banner of Mussolini or calling for Fascism, he would be “joining them” and that it would be a “great thing” for them to storm DC and take over the country. pic.twitter.com/v1schAotvQ
Fuentes – Leader Of The Alt-Right 2.0:— Benny (@bennyjohnson) November 19, 2019
Nick Fuentes basically admits that he shares views with the original “Alt-Right” & that he said they can be “fellow travelers” but he doesn’t want to call himself the “worst political brand”
He admits he’s trying to mainstream their ideas pic.twitter.com/ioTjMJyUOt
Perhaps some conservatives do not yet fully understand the vile hatred Fuentes represents — hopefully this thread has made it more clear who he is and what he believes.— Benny (@bennyjohnson) November 19, 2019
Others have avoided comment. We’re passed that. To ignore the full truth would be a horrible mistake.
@NickJFuentes should not be protected or coddled by the conservative movement— Benny (@bennyjohnson) November 19, 2019
We should disavow this tiny Angry man standing in front of his tiny green screen
If we don’t disavow hatred, racism, identity politics and open antisemitism — how are we any different from the Left?
We don’t care about any of this faggot shit though.
We’re not trying to conserve the -isms and -phobias of political correctness. We don’t care what the mainstream media thinks either. The whole point of our politics it to get rid of these cultural norms. We should be embracing authoritarianism and organic nationalism.
Michael Knowles of Daily Wire took some shots at Nick tonight at Q&A:
First question at Knowles Q&A is about his photo opp with Lady Maga, he first looks unhappy about it, then goes on to say:— Huncho Jack (@NickerNation) November 19, 2019
– There are more unsavory people than Lady Maga (obvious shot at Nick)
– Defends Lady Maga insisting he is actually quite traditional
Not joking pic.twitter.com/YP1pNEPhZt
Conservative Inc have their strategy locked in. They will run these smears at every turn.— Methnostate Mel (@MethnostateMel) November 19, 2019
But this bit here extra was sneaky
Watch as Michael Knowles waits for the questioner to leave, so he can’t respond, before dropping multiple lies about @NickJFuentes.
What gutless worm! pic.twitter.com/zuClCIIFzQ
Knowles when faced with the demographic voting trends question has a long and rehearsed answer, focusing on three things:— Huncho Jack (@NickerNation) November 19, 2019
– Whitest states went blue
– Exceptions to the rule (first generation legal immigrants, Cubans in Florida)
– Insists the main issue is education pic.twitter.com/1r0tNy4cY6
Knowles sticking up for Shapiro and Kirk, saying their views were misrepresented when with regards to America simply being “a set of ideas”— Huncho Jack (@NickerNation) November 19, 2019
Seems he is more charitable with the benefit of the doubt depending on the ideologue pic.twitter.com/LKnxLObEWi
Based soft spoken groyper puts Knowles in his place and clears Nick’s name— Huncho Jack (@NickerNation) November 19, 2019
Knowledge becomes noticeably irritated when the groyper explains that Nick is not bigoted and Knowles has slandered Nick’s name
Really well done pic.twitter.com/JTRR9D9JCD
Knowles in full smear mode- claims Nick Fuentes has denied the h*locaust and supports Jim Crow (both untrue) pic.twitter.com/gHXf6hO9zf— Huncho Jack (@NickerNation) November 19, 2019
The homosexual atheist Brad Polumbo has written another article at the Washington Examiner attacking Michelle Malkin as a racist.
“Can a self-described “little brown woman” be a white nationalist? It’s understandable to instinctively think, of course not.
But it’s not such an easy question. In light of Michelle Malkin’s recent antics, it seems she is, at the very least, sympathetic to white nationalism. Malkin is just as bad as those reprehensible alt-right actors who openly peddle white nationalism, despite the way she embraces classic leftist tactics and uses her racial identity to shield her from critics. Consider the reply she uses to accusations of racism: “Do I look like a white nationalist?” …
Yet her ethnicity and skin tone aside, Malkin’s views and actions support racism. Take Malkin’s recent defense of openly anti-Semitic, homophobic, and racist alt-right commentator Nicholas Fuentes. She called him a “New Right Leader” and blasted conservative pundit Ben Shapiro for condemning the anti-Semite. Watch for yourself.”
This snot-nosed lemming from the “conservative” Washington Examiner recycles brazen lies & smears from SPLC/HuffPo/Soros and his editors call it “journalism.” It’s clickbait virtue signaling for Beltway donor class. This is what’s become of Con Inc media:https://t.co/jjK1Kl2I5C— Michelle Malkin (@michellemalkin) November 19, 2019
I’m still here, Junior Gatekeeper snot. What are you going to do? Coordinate with SPLC and Silicon Valley? This isn’t about Fuentes. It’s all about control. https://t.co/C3ORqOqTVS— Michelle Malkin (@michellemalkin) November 19, 2019
You failed to answer serious questions by patriotic students about free speech, identity politics & demographics. Your response then & now is to smear those who put #AmericaFirst & actually MEAN it.— Michelle Malkin (@michellemalkin) November 19, 2019
Conservatives need to know the difference.#GatekeepersExposed #OpenBordersInc https://t.co/MG3bW0GiMZ
I’m glad that Conservatism, Inc. is stating its values.
The choice couldn’t possibly be more clear. It is a racket that stands for homosexuality, drag queens, transgenderism, tax cuts, deregulating corporations, the American Empire and Zionism. It is conserving liberalism and nothing that else that voters actually care about. If you believe homosexuals, liberals and grifters who want to conserve political correctness and multiculturalism should be leading the Right, you are going to line up on their side.