Nancy Pelosi Announces House Impeachment Inquiry

Nothing will ultimately come of this.

It will only further ratchet up the partisan polarization. This is actually a gift to Blompf because the polling on it is terrible outside of the Democratic base:

We’re monitoring the situation:

About Hunter Wallace 8823 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent

33 Comments

  1. Deport all Democrats! Democrats have no moral high ground as their party supports the murder of babies. I rest my case….

  2. I wonder how hard the Deep State laughs at the “voting public” when they’re having dinner with eachother at Davos or the Bayreuth Festival. It’s actually impressive the amount of theatrics “they’re” having to resort to to convince people that the sanctity of Democracy is still being upheld.

    Give the Orange Man hell you old WOP cunt!

  3. (Nancy Pelosi) typical trouble maker.
    Wasting time , diverting attention , blocking serious endeavors, like a border fence.

    Contract wi the Hungarians, their fence is 100% effective.

  4. Don’t be shocked if Congressman Jim Jordan body slams a Democrat on the House floor. I can only hope that Jim puts a grip on a Jew or a Catholic. Make ’em scream Holy Mary or Holy Israel.

    • @ Krafty Worker,

      That isn’t going to happen, but if it did, what would it accomplish?

      Would America no longer be Israel’s punk ass bitch? Would all the illegal immigrants be magically deported? Would the Bill of Right be enforced?

    • Russia Insider called it:

      “The Democrats would not be pushing for this if they ddin’t think they have the votes in the House and the Senate to get this done. Ignore the conventional wisdom on this. They were wrong in the UK.

      They will be wrong here, unless Trump has something else up his sleeve.

      His removing John Bolton and refusal to attack Iran is driving the neoconservatives to apoplexy. They want their holy war against the apostate Shi’ites and they will get it. Mike Pence will be their avatar until such time as he can be removed through a sham election in 2020.

      If this wasn’t the case they wouldn’t be risking what’s left of their political future defending a senile old man, Joe Biden, who they don’t actually want to be the candidate anyway.

      It’s a coup folks.And the full court press is on in this coup for your sanity and to radicalize you into violence. They are daring us to strike back here so then they can be justified in going on full lockdown and cancel future elections.

      They have to do this. Their financial markets are in the early stages of collapse. The dollar liquidity crisis has started which will drain Europe of its life blood.

      This has the feel of those months leading up to Bear Stearns’ dissolution which culminated in Lehman Bros. in 2008, which broke the engine of the world.”

      https://russia-insider.com/en/politics/empire-strikes-back-bitcoin-crashes-dems-threaten-impeachment-banks-gorge-fed-cash/ri27764

  5. I can’t half understand anything she says. I might pick out a word or two, but all of the words before and after are slurred.

    The only thing I got out of her address today, was “Sherman” and “Comrades,” or something.

  6. More bread and circuses to set up the false choice to vote Trump because he’s the lesser of two evils.

    Fortunately the state I’m in is solidly red for now. So it doesn’t matter who i vote for, or if I vote at all.

  7. Unfortunately this may get Blumpf over the line in 2020 and then prepare for some major Zionist wars.

  8. This isn’t how the impeachment process works. Nancy “Face Lift Fiasco” Pelosi is simply trying to appease the extreme left wing of her party. Unfortunately Blormp can’t be impeached for betraying the tens of millions of whites who voted for America First and got and an Israel First agenda instead.

    • To quote Mr. Jefferson, “Impeachment is rarely a scarecrow.” Nuff said on that.

      Meanwhile, my guess is that Ms.Pelosi (et al) is actually sincere in her emotion-driven beliefs that Trump’s laundry list of “high crimes and midemeanors” rise to the level of beginning impeachment proceedings against him (which of course, even if pursued full bore in the HoR will result in a dog and pony show that accomplishes nothing but a complete waste of time and the taxpayer’s money, among other things). Part and parcel of what makes all of this so stupid in the first place is that Ms. Pelosi herself (et al) is guilty of many of the same impeachable offenses as is Mr. Trump, and then some. This is one reason Jefferson’s words above ring so true in any age; all of our government officials (with very few exceptions) have blood on their hands, and everybody who is anybody knows it. The Pelosi’s of the world are of course oblivious to their own crimes; she and her ilk are protected though, by colleagues (mostly men) who know perfectly well that they too are criminals and psychopaths, and it ain’t especially wise to open up the proverbial can of worms on this.

    • Biden’s had serious work done, too, and both have also had hair help. Pelosi’s might be natural, I dunno.

      Just saying since men seem to think only women’s cosmetic enhancements matter, or that women’s looks only matter while men’s don’t. I’m not accusing you specifically of this, spahnranch, since I can’t remember your Trumpian record of men imagining themselves above judgment for their looks.

      One oddity is, both Pelosi and Biden look way younger and for the most part naturally, than they are. Does anyone find this problematic? I can’t see anyone over like 74 being president. Trump is already past that. I wonder if he’d have such energy if he really cared about what’s happening.

  9. But there is another reply to this retort. Political excitements will corrupt women tenfold more than men; and this, not because women are naturally inferior to men, but because they are naturally adapted to a wholly different sphere.

    When we point to the fact that they are naturally more emotional and less calculating, more impulsive and less self-contained, that they have a quicker tact but less logic, that their social nature makes them more liable to the contagion of epidemic passions, and that the duties of their sex make it physically impossible for them to acquire the knowledge in a foreign sphere necessary for political duties, we do not depreciate woman; we only say that nature has adapted her to one thing and disqualified her for the other.

    The violet would wither in that full glare of midsummer in which the sunflower thrives: this does not argue that the violet is the meaner flower. The vine, left to stand alone, would be hurled prone in the mire by the first blasts of that history. In the case of the Amorites there was also this wise wind which strengthens the grasp of the sturdy oak upon its bed: still the oak may yield no fruit so precious as the clusters of the vine. But the vine cannot be an oak; it must be itself, dependent, clinging, but more precious than that on which it leans or it must perish. When anything, animate or inanimate, is used for a function to which it is not adapted, that foreign use must endamage it, and the more the farther that function is from its own sphere.

    So it will be found (and it is no disparagement to woman to say it) that the very traits which fit her to be the angel of a virtuous home unfit her to meet the agitations of political life, even as safely as does the more rugged man. The hot glare of publicity and passion will speedily deflower her delicacy and sweetness. Those temptations, which her Maker did not form her to bear, will debauch her heart, developing a character as much more repulsive than that of the debauched man as the fall has been greater.

    The politicating woman, unsexed and denaturalized, shorn of the true glory of her femininity, will appear to men as a feeble hybrid mannikin, with all the defects and none of the strength of the male. Instead of being the dear object of his chivalrous affection, she becomes his importunate rival, despised without being feared.

    – Dabney, Women’s Rights Women

  10. The Democrats are only doing it for the liberal base. It’s all talk and will put each side more extreme against the other. I support Impeachment 100% but it’s not gonna happen. If it did….Republicans would have the next Democratic President impeached. I think regardless Trump is a joke and will never do anything positive for White People. Deo Vindice !

  11. Nancy sounds totally deranged 90% of the time or totally sloshed on gin.
    Maybe it’s a little of both.
    You’d think this crypto hag and the rest of ZOGs california stooges would focus on the out of control epidemic of human feces in the streets of SF..nah

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. The Washington Post Doxxes Coach Finstock – Occidental Dissent

Comments are closed.