New York Times Now Openly Praising Al-Qaeda As Valiant Freedom Fighters

Don’t get me wrong, non-Arab Jews are still very dangerous creatures due to an intelligence roughly equal to that of a Western White, but when you get them off-balance, they start to make mistakes.

Like take the media ones as an example – due to the constant hammering, they’re starting to stumble and starting to produce serious errors in their propaganda calculations.

No longer do we see carefully-placed articles laden with intellectual and verbal gymnastics meant to produce sympathy for things like White Genocide, mass immigration of Brown filth, and perpetual war in the Middle East.

It’s just violent and stupid lashing out now, and I find it hard to believe anyone with an IQ over 100 would fall for the nonsense at this point.

RT:

A New York Times report warning of an impending bloodbath in Idlib downplays the fact that the Syrian province is controlled by Al-Qaeda affiliated terrorists, portraying the “rebels” as humanitarian-minded administrators.

“Millions of civilians are dreading what comes next” in Idlib, the New York Times reports, after presumably consulting with most of the province’s estimated three million inhabitants. In a true masterpiece of euphemism-infested journalism, the Times has turned the operation to liberate Idlib from a US-designated terrorist group on its head, bemoaning the uncertain fate of the “rebel fighters and their civilian supporters who rose up more than seven years ago demanding regime change.”

Scroll about 20 paragraphs down and the Gray Lady notes with a dismissive air that Syria’s deputy prime minister called these brave fighters “terrorists” (scare-quote credit: NYT) during an interview with Russian (yes, Russian!) television on Saturday. The paper then provides crucial context to help counter this cynical Kremlin soundbite, pointing out that while it’s true that Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), “which is affiliated with Al-Qaeda,” has controlled much of Idlib since 2015, there’s more to Al-Qaeda affiliation than meets the eye. After all, the State Department-designated terrorist group has dutifully acted as “a de facto governmental authority, facilitating trade across the long border with Turkey and organizing aid deliveries.”

Seventeen years after the September 11 terrorist attacks, the New York Times is now writing articles commending Al-Qaeda affiliates for their aid-delivering abilities. No mention of reports of their chemical weapon stockpiles, however.

Five paragraphs later, the New York Times nonchalantly discloses that HTS – characterized as “rebels”, “fighters”, “rebel fighters”, “rebel forces”, and “Syria’s strongest rebel faction” throughout its mind-melting article – has been “officially declared” a terrorist organization by the United States, European Union and even Turkey.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, for many of these “fighters” – especially “foreigners who have moved to Syria to help defeat the government” – surrender is not an option, the Times informs us.

A “fighter” who spoke to the paper said that he and his comrades were frustrated because “we came for jihad” and not “to have truces and to kneel before the Turks.” The terrorist – sorry, “fighter” – only provided his first name to reporters, “out of fear for his safety.”

And of course, the paper inserts the obligatory swipe at Russia, quoting Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov’s comment that Idlib is a “festering abscess” that needs to be drained. No mention of Lavrov’s efforts to negotiate a humanitarian corridor that would ensure the safe and orderly evacuation of civilians, however.

This is a pathetic piece of journalism that could be improved on by a high school kid, more than likely.

We’re literally seeing Reaganite regurgitation – minus the existence of a “Soviet Empire” or any sort of popular support for the toppling of a secular government by Moslem terrorists.

But this is exactly what you get when you keep pressure on the Jews – a weak and rage-filled enemy incapable of any creative thoughts.

About Marcus Cicero 593 Articles
Proud White Man, devoted husband and father, and Occidental Dissent contributor.

6 Comments

  1. Al-Qaeda was always a tool to overthrow Socialist governments in the Middle East by appealing to the most backward elements of the lumpenproletariat and peasantry. That was the role it played in Afghanistan, Libya, Syria and so on. The idea that Comrade Saddam Hussein was a supporter of al-Qaeda was absurd since they have always been a CIA/Israeli/Saudi tool and mortal enemies of Ba’athist governments.

  2. The best analysis of who these Islamic extremists in Syria and Iraq were/are was done by an honest secular liberal writer that somehow managed to get published in the Atlantic Magazine after Zionist Jews took over my favorite honest, secular Liberal political magazine – The Atlantic Magazine.

    What ISIS Really wants by Graeme Wood

    https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/03/what-isis-really-wants/384980/

    “Our ignorance of the Islamic State is in some ways understandable: It is a hermit kingdom; few have gone there and returned. Baghdadi has spoken on camera only once. But his address, and the Islamic State’s countless other propaganda videos and encyclicals, are online, and the caliphate’s supporters have toiled mightily to make their project knowable. We can gather that their state rejects peace as a matter of principle; that it hungers for genocide; that its religious views make it constitutionally incapable of certain types of change, even if that change might ensure its survival; and that it considers itself a harbinger of—and headline player in—the imminent end of the world.”

  3. I have a strict policy against getting any news about the Middle East from jew-controlled sources. Especially the Gray Yenta.

  4. In a remotely related story-the British government is concerned about another Manchester style terrorist attack occurring on home soil, so have taken steps to reduce the risk by deploying 440 British troops…..to Afghanistan. Not onto British streets where they’re needed, but to fucking Afghanistan! WTF? And this will achieve what exactly, apart from prolonging their presence there and further reflecting badly on the British people-who are still seen as ‘colonizers’. Put the army on streets at home where they’re needed you traitorous libtards! I’m just lost for words.

    • It has nothing to do with preventing terrorism and everything to do with opium. Of course Trump also claims to be concerned about the opioid crisis, while continuing to bomb Afghanistan to keep the poppy fields open.

  5. NYT is now.a.terrorist.rag. They need to be charged with a.hate crime; they are inciting violence.
    Jew.filth. Strip.their assets, try for treason and.expel to the Arctic. Bye filth.

Comments are closed.