Twitter Lifts Quality Filter Shadowbans

I take it Jack Dorsey didn’t want to have to explain the QFD shadowban next week to irate Republican members of Congress looking to capitalize on the growing Techlash:

Don’t pop your champagne just yet.

Twitter is still getting away with blatant political censorship:

About Hunter Wallace 9679 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent

10 Comments

  1. Just LOOK at that gay homo soy fed face. Looks like he just came out of a bath house in the SF gay district and he’s still thinking about all the fellas he was with there.

  2. I don’t expect anything is going to change as far as shadowbanning and arbitrary suspension of social media accounts goes. Internet monopolies like Google, Facebook, Twitter, Amazon and YouTube have a great deal of wealth and power. They are transnational and accountable to no one. Only a determined and well organized mass uprising could stop them. Either that or Internet 2.0 arrives on the scene just in time to save the day.

      • Even the authors of the study refuse to entertain that it may be conspiracy. They just don’t understand the entity they are dealing with.

        • “For more than a century, ideological extremists, at either end of the political spectrum, have seized upon well-publicized incidents, such as my encounter with Castro, to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal, working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists,’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”

          ~ David Rockefeller, Memoirs, 2002, p. 405

          Should we take him at his own words or continue with our self-delusion?

  3. @spahnranch1969

    Thing is Spahn, the First Amendment restrains the general government from censoring political/religious ideas. It doesn’t apply to NGOs, who can block or censor anybody they want.

    Now, with the doctrine of incorporation, the SCOTUS might argue that they can stop NGOs from censoring political expression.

    But we’ll see, if this ever goes to court.

    • That will all depend on whether they can attack this thing from a Trust Standpoint. it is clear that Google, Facebook, Twitter violate all of the AntiTrust Legislation on the books!

Comments are closed.