Britain: Woman On Trial For Anti-Semitism Redefines The Meaning Of BASED

If I was in a courtroom facing prison time for my material, I think there would be a chance that I would erupt into a Nationalist rant – especially if I got angry enough at the proceedings.

But to sit there in the dock with a smile on my face before breaking into songs easily equal to some of our guys’ best material?

That’s a level of courage that I think would be hard for many Nationalists to summon up.

RT:

A self-proclaimed ‘Holocaust revisionist’ sang along with one of her anti-Semitic songs as she appeared in court over the “grossly offensive” tunes. The songs had been posted on YouTube.

Alison Chabloz, 53, from Derbyshire, posted a video on her blog in June 2016 containing a song which mocked prominent Jewish figures persecuted by the Nazis, including Nobel Peace Prize winner Elie Wiesel, as well as Anne and Otto Frank.

I think her mockery of Irene Zisblatt was the best of all – that Jewess really did claim that she swallowed and pooped out her diamonds every day for years.

Chabloz appeared to mouth along to the tune, titled (((Survivors))), as it was played for Westminster Magistrate’s Court on Wednesday.

Some of the lyrics in (((Survivors))) are: “Was it just a bunch of lies? Seems that some intend to pull the wool over our eyes. Eternal wandering liars haven’t got a clue, and when it comes to usury, victim’s always me and you.”

Are these Jews denying the factual nature of these lyrics?

Are they claiming that they are NOT rootless cosmopolitans with a penchant for lying, sneaking, and money-lending?

The video features her singing along to another song named ‘Nemo’s Anti-Semitic Universe,’ where she describes Nazi-run concentration camps as “theme park for fools.”

Both songs were sung during the London Forum event held at Grosvenor Hotel in London in September 2016, and uploaded to YouTube days afterwards.

A third song, ‘I Like The Story As It Is,’ describes the Holocaust as a “damn fine tale,” and was uploaded to YouTube in September 2017.

Karen Robinson, prosecuting, said this was “an extraordinarily offensive description of perhaps the most traumatic event in Jewish history.”

She said the songs “are anti-Semitic, targeted at Jewish people as a whole. They use content and tone to ensure offence. The songs are designed to provoke maximum upset and discomfort.”

Listen to them for yourself – they’re actually hilarious and educational at the same time.

I would just like to congratulate Ms. Chabloz on a fine musical project, and to express my admiration at her determination to stop these rotten parasites from annihilating our countries.

May a million more brave women rise to emulate her.

21 Comments

  1. Certain features have been disabled for this video

    In response to user reports, we have disabled some features, such as comments, sharing and suggested videos, because this video contains content that may be inappropriate or offensive to some audiences.

  2. Will this woman really go to prison for singing songs that jews dislike? For songs lacking the obligatory reverence?

    I want the term “the free world” banished along with “the rule of law.”

    Could she sing her songs freely in Iran?

    • I am going to bet on 6 months in prison and years of probation that will probably effectively nullify her passport. If (((they))) hadn’t shut down Father Coughlin and Charles Lindberg I don’t think this would be British reality today. Censorship and deplatforming is a powerful weapon.

  3. These are The End of Days, and The Righteous are being Persecuted by the (((Antichrist))) as was prophesied two millennia ago. Be strong, endure to the end, and you will receive your award, which is to partake of the victory of Christ over (((Satan))) and the Destruction of (((Babylon the great NYC USA)))

  4. DEAR JUDAISTS, PLEASE STOP PROSECUTING PEOPLE FOR DEBATING THE HOLOHOAX.

    The cat is out of the bag.

    Everybody knows the holocaust is a hoax. Because it is a FRAUD ON ITS FACE given the contradictions and the bizarre tales in the official holocaust narrative.

    Even the name raises suspicion. Why only this particular event is called holocaust, and no other.

    The more you terrorize the public into accepting this holohoax, the more other people will get suspicious as to why you have to FORCE people to accept your scam. It must be because it is not true.

  5. “Karen Robinson, prosecuting, said this was “an extraordinarily offensive description of perhaps the most traumatic event in Jewish history.”” So what? The 1994 novelty hit “Short D*ck Man” was offensive to a lot of men, but that doesn’t mean it should be banned.

    I really think this sort of prosecution is going to have a negative counter-effect. When you arrest people for opposing points of view, it signifies your argument can’t be very good.

  6. No one has to personally deny the narrative, science can disprove it. Protect yourself and say that you personally do not deny this narrative, but science does.

  7. Hate to say it folks but none of this jew stuff, even though100% true, is going to do a damn thing to stop White Genocide. I don’t deny her bravery but just imagine how effective she’d have been quoting the Mantra instead?

  8. It sounds like this woman has more cojones than a lot of so-called British “men” do. If hope if she goes to prison they don’t pull a “Jack Ruby” on her.

  9. TRUTH is always anti-Semitic, to these people, they cannot live with their guilt for many things, so try to hide it behind the rant of “anti-semite!”

Leave a Reply