Why Did Alabama Give The Go-Ahead To Destroy Yesterday’s Digital Voting Records?

What we have here is a very interesting issue that may or may not extend to things far more insidious – the details behind what you are about to read essentially leave several points open for anybody willing to go full conspiracy theorist.

Again, this is not even something that would fall under an Alex Jones level of tinfoil retardation (just for the record, I don’t want to do such a thing), but I do want people to question why the State of Alabama wouldn’t want to preserve digital voting records that cost next to nothing to store on secured hard drives.

The election last night was very, very close, and while I do think that Doug Jones pulled off a legitimate victory at the end of the day thanks to virtue-signaling suburban CUCKS, any accusation of suspected fraud and/or rigging should be taken seriously until everything is sorted out beyond a shadow of a doubt.

Tech Crunch:

Following an eleventh-hour order instructing voting officials in Alabama to keep the digital ballots generated in Tuesday’s controversial Senate election, the state’s Supreme Court has issued a stay to block that decision.

The order to preserve the records was issued by the Montgomery County Circuit Court on Monday afternoon — less than 24 hours before voting was set to begin — and the stay that will effectively nullify that order was issued late Monday night.

“All counties employing digital ballot scanners in the Dec. 12, 2017 election are hereby ordered to set their voting machines to save all processed images in order to preserve all digital ballot images,” the Montgomery County order stated.

Alabama Secretary of State John Merrill and Alabama state election administrator Ed Packard are named as defendants in the suit, which was brought before the Montgomery County court by four Alabama voters. Initially filed on Thursday of last week, it cited the state-level election system hacking that the Department of Homeland Security notified 21 states including Alabama of this September in arguing that the state should hold onto the digital record of votes for at least six months rather than destroy them.

According to AL.com, “at 4:32 p.m. Monday, attorneys for Alabama Secretary of State John Merrill and Ed Packard, the state administrator of elections, filed an ’emergency motion to stay’ that order, which the state Supreme Court granted minutes after Merrill and Packard’s motion was filed.”

A full hearing for the case is set for December 21, but the state has a green light to continue destroying its digital voting records until that time.

If this turns out to be something damaging to Roy Moore, it would just be another confirmation of what we’ve been saying for over a year – the Establishment GOP is just as much an enemy of the White Man as the most rabid Leftist parading through the streets of Berkeley or Charlottesville.

To them, we are just chattel meant to passively elect hacks and corrupt elitists to high positions, and when we get someone even remotely similar to us in belief, all weapons must be deployed to prevent any sort of victory.

19 Comments

  1. Truth never fears investigation.

    It was rigged. Greater black turnout for Jones than Obama?! (((Headlines))) either blame white women for voting for Moore, or for not voting for him?

    Speaking of conspiracy realities, James Tracy is appealing his loss to FAU on the grounds that the jewish judge made discriminatory decisions pre-trial, probably to pack the jury with jews and toadies. His lawyers haven’t stated anything beyond challenging the judge’s bias or whatever, but that’s likely what happened. I believe FAU’s attorneys dragged in Tracy’s association with Jim Fetzer as a ‘Holocaust Denier.’

    Rigged – the entire system.

    • The women vote was only off like 8%. If you restricted voting to 110 IQ or the ability to solve 10 simple algebra problems this would be resolved in one election cycle.

      • You wouldn’t even need algebra, all you’d need is long division done with pencil and paper. Hell, multiplication would probably work.

        • 110 IQ Women probably tend to end up in college at the low end. Highly likely to fall Jedi mind tricks once there.

      • Constitutionally, you can’t limit voting in that way but you CAN make it a regular practice of posting the winner of the HS graduate vote in each election and seeing that the news gets around until people are used to seeing it and start saying, Yes but I wonder who won the HS graduate vote? The right never DOES anything other than grouse. No wonder our ship is sinking.

        • Yes you can. The Federal Courts ruled that you can’t but a larger than 50% majority of Congress could strip them of the ability to take any cases having anything to do with voting qualifications at the State level.

          They also ruled at another time that there couldn’t be region based seats, like the ones in the US Constitution,(the Senate),. They said only population based seats would be permitted. They should also strip the Justices from deciding this. It would balance power between cities power and rural areas in the States if the States so choose to do so. If they did so it would have an enormous effect on stopping the spread of Leftism in the whole of the government. Big time effects but I don’t expect the stupid party to bite.

    • The left always wins because it never gives up. Let Roy Moore be the exception that turns things around. Screw Trump and Ivanka and her hedge fund hubby.

  2. THE DEMOGANGSTERS PROBABLY RIGGED IT; MOST ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES REMOTELY CONTROLLED AND DATA DOWNLOADED.

    Why is there not a law on the books that all voting records should be preserved for 10 years?

    Why do people have to go through the court system and depend on the vagaries of the Judges? Why did they destroy it if they had nothing to hide?

    I believe strongly that this election was probably stolen. Just like Harry Reid stole the election back years ago.

    Electronic voting machines are easy to hack. Many are made in foreign countries by Jewish companies and are probably remotely controlled from some foreign country by the Judaists.

  3. This action alone tells me it was rigged.

    It is now up to us to destroy the Republican Party in any way possible. Leave only ashes.

  4. hows about all you fearsome hardRights

    STOP VOTING

    then you don’t have to worry about “rigged elections”.

    (brief historical review):

    the Red Jews took over the demoncrat pty during the 1930s-40s, and have owned it ever since.
    the neo-con Zionist Jews took over the Repbliscam pty during the 1980s-90s, and have owned it ever since.

    all you accomplish by voting in uniparty fake elections is

    validate the (((system))).

  5. When Perot ran the first time I actually checked and was told the paper ballots were kept in Alabama. I was told they were securely locked by law. They must have changed the rules. (((Wonder why they changed.)))

Comments are closed.