HA: Jew Harvey Weinstein Now Being Accused Of Full-Out Rape, White Victims Continue To Emerge

When this story first broke, I was personally sure beyond a shadow of a doubt that were dealing with a top-level “casting couch” Jew more evil than the rest, but I then got a little concerned when a few days went by without all the details emerging.

For a while, all we had were gross comments, groping accusations, and an incident involving masturbation and a potted plant – my guess is that Harvey was following some sort of Talmudic ritual with that.

I suppose the main fear was that (((Hollywood))) would consolidate, close ranks, and defend the creature who did so much in the old days to bring revenue and publicity for causes worthless and degenerate.

But now, oh now the fun’s beginning and my worries have utterly evaporated – this fat Christ-Killing rat might find himself criminally charged if the winds continue blowing in the right direction.

And my guess is that no fellow Tribesmen are going to stand with him due to the tsunami of credible victims, the irrefutable evidence, and the sheer overstretched nature of Jewry as a whole.

New York Times:

When Gwyneth Paltrow was 22 years old, she got a role that would take her from actress to star: The film producer Harvey Weinstein hired her for the lead in the Jane Austen adaptation “Emma.” Before shooting began, he summoned her to his suite at the Peninsula Beverly Hills hotel for a work meeting that began uneventfully.

It ended with Mr. Weinstein placing his hands on her and suggesting they head to the bedroom for massages, she said.

“I was a kid, I was signed up, I was petrified,” she said in an interview, publicly disclosing that she was sexually harassed by the man who ignited her career and later helped her win an Academy Award.

She refused his advances, she said, and confided in Brad Pitt, her boyfriend at the time. Mr. Pitt confronted Mr. Weinstein, and soon after, the producer warned her not to tell anyone else about his come-on. “I thought he was going to fire me,” she said.

Rosanna Arquette, a star of “Pulp Fiction,” has a similar account of Mr. Weinstein’s behavior, as does Judith Godrèche, a leading French actress. So does Angelina Jolie, who said that during the release of “Playing by Heart” in the late 1990s, he made unwanted advances on her in a hotel room, which she rejected.

“I had a bad experience with Harvey Weinstein in my youth, and as a result, chose never to work with him again and warn others when they did,” Ms. Jolie said in an email. “This behavior towards women in any field, any country is unacceptable.”

On Tuesday, The New Yorker published a report that included multiple allegations of sexual assault, including forced oral and vaginal sex. The article also included accounts of sexual harassment going back to the 1990s, with women describing how intimidating Mr. Weinstein was.

If you still have any doubts as to how Jews actually perceive our womenfolk, please take the time to read the article linked above.

Do so on an empty stomach, however, for the very thought of Harvey pulling out his schmekel should be enough to bring up even the slightest bit of food and/or drink.

Several days ago, additional actresses began sharing with The Times on-the-record stories of casting-couch abuses. Their accounts hint at the sweep of Mr. Weinstein’s alleged harassment, targeting women on the way to stardom, those who had barely acted and others in between. Fantasies that the public eagerly watched onscreen, the women recounted, sometimes masked the dark experiences of those performing in them.

The encounters they recalled followed a similar narrative: First, they said, Mr. Weinstein lured them to a private place to discuss films, scripts or even Oscar campaigns. Then, the women contend, he variously tried to initiate massages, touched them inappropriately, took off his clothes or offered them explicit work-for-sex deals.

What we really need to get down to the bottom of is whether Weinstein had accomplices in his sick and twisted activities.

Did he act alone (unlikely), or did he bring in others to take advantage of the already-broken and pliable victims?

And please note that I’m not just talking about other Jews – that much is pretty much guaranteed.

And before you say that this last image just doesn’t fit in the context of this story, please note that we even have Black males saying they were victimized at the hands of the “casting couch.”

For that, however, I’ll just pass on the details – names of the predators will suffice.

33 Comments

  1. It all began with Leo Frank. Never forget, never forgive.

    St. Mary Phagan, virgin martyr at the hands of Christ-hating Jews, ora pro nobis.

    • These women don’t compare to Mary Phagan. A few inspire some sympathy, but none approximates Mary in terms of martyrdom. Let’s keep it real here.

    • It’s literally everywhere in Hollywood, and the sad thing is that what Harvey was doing was the least demented when compared with what other Kikes engage in.

      You’re talking about pedophilia, forced drugging. and other sickness that likely involves snuff films at some level or another.

  2. Palrow is Jude. Arquette is Jude. Jolie – most likely Jude. “Godrèche was born in the 17th arrondissement of Paris. Her father is a psychoanalyst and her mother a child therapist. Her paternal grandparents were Jewish Holocaust survivors from Poland and Russia who changed their surname from “Goldreich”. Watch out for “Europeans” named “Jewdith”

    • That’s probably why they’re hammering Harvey.

      He started going after the wrong girls, and lost the help of his peeps for that.

      • Marcus – I don’t know if it is just the jew females. This kerfuffle is too big for just scthupping women. Tha Jewdith “actress” – she’ll take off her clothes for a bagel with lox. She’s practically a porntress. Big time shekels must be involved. Weinstain probably jewed some other macher out of 6 billion shekels. Jews only get this enraged over money.

    • Paltrow converted to Judaism in 2014 and is apparently raising her kids jewish. Her father already was one, but she’d been raised to celebrate both Christian and Jewish holidays. The Arquettes were half jewish too, don’t know what their latest status is although one went tranny years ago. Jolie’s mother might be part jew, and Jolie might get points for adopting Africa and Asia. Then the blondish lesser known jewess who could pass for aryan is there.

      Tough to figure what’s really going on, but it’s likely more than just guarding the jewish princesses, although that might factor in somehow.

    • Hollywood is full of Jewesses, and I bet this creep molested or raped one too many of THEM, not white actresses. They are swept under the filthy red carpet, like the one Roman Polanski sodomized when she was thirteen years old. He st least cannot set foot other U.S. ever again because there is an warrant for his arrest still out on him.

  3. I’ve no doubt that this Schlomo is a perv, just like the rest of them, and is very likely guilty of what he’s being accused of, but my only question is WHY ARE ALL OF THE BIG-TIME JEWISH MEDIA GOING AFTER THIS ONE SO HARD??? I mean, normally they’d down-play something like this involving one of their tribe a bit…, but, with this particular jew, they are “holocausting” him! Is it just me, or is something “off” here?

    • @Jim

      Simple, ever hear of the term scapegoat. This guy fits the bill because of all the high profile connections. He’s tied to presidents, crazy Hillary, all the big Hollywood, all the fresh start Hollywood, foreign fames, etc. Why wouldn’t they throw him under the bus?

      What I don’t understand is his response. In 2017 America where up is down and white is black…..he could have simply said everything was consensual. The taped phone call he could have said he was in a bad mental state. I mean, in an age where people get away with murder and rape with help from the court system, why go down for this??

  4. I wonder if they have to goods on a rightwing figure. Why are they going at it like this?

    Perhaps they are seeing Weinstein as a whitey?

    • Something’s up, but I don’t know what. Maybe he’s pissed off the wrong Mega Jew, and being a perverted Big Jew himself isn’t enough to protect him? Or is this case damage-control for something else?, something that hasn’t surfaced yet? I know that jews often do have their own internal battles with one another, but the Mega Media Jews are really slamming this scum-bag…

      • I believe you are correct, JB. Weinstein is being hung out to dry by his fellow tribesmen NOT because of his disgusting behavior but because they want revenge for something he did to them. Jews are always jewing each other over, they just do it behind closed doors where the goyim can’t see what’s going on.

        • It makes you wonder if the Jews as at least somewhat of a collective understand that petty Hollywood Kikes mean little in the grand scheme of things.

          I think some of the younger ones realize that the last battle is about to be fought, and that they’re subsequently starting to focus on politics, social media, and other more important venues – drop the dead weight and prepare for the fight of the ages.

          • Kikes don’t turn on each other in public, unless it’s a. for strategic purposes to convince the goy kikes aren’t united against us or b. for different strategic purposes, i.e. some believe manipulating us in one direction to be more expedient than another direction some other kike advocates for.

            They only disagree about exactly how to retain control over us, and never publicly unless there is some strategy behind the airing of kike laundry, which is all filthy.

            The MSM is running with this expose on Weinstein, which means some bigger kike approves of it for some larger kike agenda.

            Can’t figure out what that might be. There might be various agenda angles being worked.

          • To sum up, BEWARE. When a public bloodletting of this nature happens involving a jew as powerful as Weinstein there is a JEW AGENDA being served.

  5. More than anything, this article and its writer does show the sheer moral degeneracy, hypocricy and racism of the so-called self-described “white people”. So if this creep was only abusing Jewish actresses, then you beasts would have no problems with it at all, in fact you would probably be encouraging it .It leaves no doubt that every single one of you is just as bad as him, or even worse and would do the same thing to both “white ” and Jewish women. You would have no problem molesting or abusing a young Jewish girl of a woman, just for the joy of causing her pain and seeing her suffer. You all really are no better than him.

    If a popular powerful white male like Trump or somebody similar was accused of the same things, many “white” males would have no problem sticking up for him and defending him, and acting as a collective doing so. No shaming and tarring an entire ethnic group and dragging it through the mud, suddenly sounds a bit nasty, doesn’t it? But it is time that the same double standard is applied to you people.

    • Of course I can’t speak for everyone, but I can say beyond a shadow of a doubt that I, and those I know personally, would never touch a Jewess.

      Dey nasty…

    • @Anonymous: Some whites are nothing but shit, like that stupid right-wing patriotard who calls himself “West” (His wife is running around with a spade mailman, btw). But most Whites aren’t like that. And few if any would want anything to do with a jewess. Yuck!

    • @ANON — If this “creep”, as you call him, was abusing only jews, you’re right, we’d have no problem with him at all, other than to be surprised the jew was attacking his own tribe. Other than molesting fellow jews, Weinstein is no different than any other degenerate jew. Jewish women are no more worthy of respect or compassion than Weinstein. As far as we, molesting jews, that’s where you’re totally wrong. We do not share this interest with jews. We are White.

      Certainly, if any White were guilty of acting like a sexual degenerate jew, Whites would in no way stick up for that person or defend him. That’s absurd. As far as someone like Trump, he’s a sellout to the jews so why on earth would you think we here would defend him? Of course, we would condemn him. You obviously have no clue, and are yourself a jew, or a thoroughly confused jew worshipper.

      Jews are scum — ALL OF THEM. Dragging all these parasites “though the mud” is accomplished by merely exposing the destruction that jews do. A lower life-form than jews does not exist. There is no double standard here, you ASSHOLE!

  6. Ronan Farrow, Mia’s daughter, wrote an expose with more explicit details of supposed assaults for The New Yorker: https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/from-aggressive-overtures-to-sexual-assault-harvey-weinsteins-accusers-tell-their-stories

    I think she’s claiming she’d been investigating the story for 10 months when NYT published their Oct 5 article.

    One thing that stands out is the re-defining of ‘rape’ and ‘assault’ as the woman giving in without doing everything possible to escape a situation. Not one of these women from what I’ve read so far (about half) have credible claims of actual assault. Refusing to pick your slutty ass up and leave the room when to do so would be totally physically possible and safe is NOT rape or assault.

    Having NOWHERE to run IS. This is a gigantic insult to survivors of true non-consensual sexual assault. One woman even admits to later consenting to Weinstein after he ‘forced himself’ on her orally, even though she could have just left the hotel room. That’s called a casting couch, not a crime.

    I’m still not getting the ulterior agenda, though. I suspect we never will.

  7. DailyMail claims Weinstein’s brother, Bob, was behind the ouster: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4957736/Is-Weinstein-s-BROTHER-sexual-harassment-expose.html

    Ronan Farrow claims in her article for the New Yorker that she’d been investigating the case for 10 months, contrary to the DM’s claims that Bob Weinstein instigated the story via the NYTimes.

    If the Weinstein brothers; relationship has been so contentious for so long, and Harvey has been a sexually harassing lecher from the beginning, why is Bob outing his brother now, at 65?

    I still think there’s more behind the public story.

  8. Breitbart runs with Ann Coulter’s Vegas shooting conspiracy theorizing: http://www.breitbart.com/2nd-amendment/2017/10/11/ann-coulter-media-begging-us-conspiracy-theories-las-vegas/

    Only if jew are terrorists. Breitbart shouldn’t be trusted much more than any other jewmedia outlet, but the point is if you google Las Vegas shooting right now, all the articles from the last day that come up question the timeline problems.

    Some of the timing of Weinstergate must relate to distracting away from the LV shooting, which upon closer scrutiny becomes more and more suspicious. I also wonder if the implications of the ‘severe mental illness’ narrative have to be avoided. It’s one thing to claim Paddock had this nebulous ‘SMI’ but another to consider what will happen when pre-crime intervention measures for it start to be instituted.

  9. DailyMail reports the NYPD aka MOSSAD is now investigating Weinstein, calling him a ‘Super Predator’ after dropping a 2015 investigation into Brazilian model Gutierrez. Gutierrez allegedly taped Weinstein while wearing a wire admitting to having groped her breast and threatening her career, but no case was brought by the NYPD. The article insinuates Jeff Sessions was somehow involved then or now, it’s unclear: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4972446/NYPD-confirms-investigating-Weinstein.html

    Ronan Farrow is a man, Mia’s son.

    NYPD is absolutely and directly run by MOSSAD.

Leave a Reply