The unrest of late and the increasing volume of ever-present demands to confiscate white wealth give one cause for consideration of an ancient truth of English history. The surrender of sovereignty only begets the basis for more demands to surrender sovereignty. In this article, we will learn about the state of American sovereignty through economics, in the sense of the redistribution of real goods and services. It paints a dire picture of where we are headed in terms of our ability to satiate an alien and invader populace in our own midst while struggling to survive ourselves.
But first, a lesson in history. For a time, what we today would call England struggled with a population of Danes in its territory, conducting raids and military actions against towns, monasteries, and anything else they could find. Seeking to spare themselves bloodshed, many English nobles and smaller kings set up a “tribute” system in order to satiate the vikings’ love of gold, silver, and grain they didn’t plant or reap themselves. We refer to this as the “danegeld.”
The word in itself contains a notable double-entendre. To the English, the word “geld” meant “tribute,” sharing a common root with the Latin “geldum” and reflected in other languages as the Frisian “jild” or “jield,” the Gothic “gild,” and what now we might call “yield” when we ask whether a field yielded any crops. The second meaning comes from the Norse “gelda,” the Gothic “gilþa,” and the old Norse “geldingr.” You might recognize this in its modern English form of “gelding.” That is to say: somebody else has your balls. And so the term poetically illustrates the rationalization for getting trampled underfoot by the tramplee while hinting at the mindset of the laughing trampler. England suspected, as Kipling noted, “Once you have paid him the Danegeld, you never get rid of the Dane.”  But, mercifully, that wasn’t quite true. It took centuries of war on England’s part to banish the Dane to Denmark after King Alfred the Great undertook the process of uniting England and campaigning against the Danes. But eventually, England broke free of the yoke.
Possibly the worst part of the Danegeld was the acceptance of colonies and military outposts on England’s soil itself as to make it easier for Denmark to wage war on the English – should tribute not get paid. Even so, we’ve done the same thing with the Kangs-geld. We’ve provided them with Section 8 forward operating bases from which to launch raids on our formerly white communities in the suburbs. We’ve accepted them into our military and created positions in which virtually no risk is faced and no work is required, so they might reap the benefits reserved for our warriors at no real cost. We have ushered them into all levels of our government so that they might have control of our affairs. And even with our acquiescence, they still conduct raids with eye-rolling predictability on our populace. In both instances, the payments were given by cowed “leaders” under threat of harm and innocent people going about their business suffered the undue brunt of the harm.
The Kangs  have been increasingly unwilling to keep up their end of the bargain, although the amount of tribute we deliver increases every year. Riots, rapes, robbery, and murder skyrocket under the “Trayvon Effect” where all pretense of law and order has evaporated and given way to the sentiment among the colored barbarians and their allies that adhering to the original bargain struck is a form of white supremacy. Unfortunately for blacks, we will soon find ourselves in a position where we cannot maintain our tribute either. An article on the Alternative Hypothesis lays out that blacks are a massive tax drain on the economy, to the tune of $7,700-$10,000 per capita per year while whites are a tax boon of $1,200-$2,800 per capita per year.  In simple terms, virtually all wealth (i.e. property and money not under lien of debt as well as goods) blacks own is tribute from whites. Astoundingly, rather than hoarding wealth and maintaining it, it appears that blacks have reached the point where our pernicious elites cannot confiscate wealth quickly enough from white men to meet the rate that blacks spend it. The black median wealth (over half of all black families) will be zero by 2053 or sooner.  That means that over half of all black families will have not a single penny to their name and debts beyond any and all of their property.
Many young whites also have a net worth of zero, however, this has traditionally eased off by the time whites get into their late 20’s and is largely an effect of college debts, something blacks typically do not have. I view the 26 year estimation as overly optimistic with blacks getting prodded more and more towards college and with a burgeoning Hispanic population eating at the resources reserved for the black tribute. As our economy continues to plunge and the barbarians with their hands out increase in number, we find ourselves in a situation described best by W.B. Yeats in his poem, “The Second Coming.” “Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold; mere anarchy is loosed upon the world, the blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere the ceremony of innocence is drowned.” 
In other words, the bread and circuses can’t last when Jayquondus and his bitch (his words, not mine, as many moments in life, I hold dogs in higher esteem) can’t afford malt liquor, mcnuggets, and the electricity bill. The barbarian will make good on his threat to raid and pillage. Indeed, he already has. But this time he will march in force on the blighted and impoverished whites who labored so hard to provision them for so long with wealth they have squandered, wealth that belonged rightfully to us and “our posterity,” wealth that could have been used to build a nation of virtue, prosperity, and Godly religion.
But, alas, that was not meant to be. We are men of hard times and we keep watch for a second coming. Where are you, Alfred, and when will you unite us against the Godless barbarians who steal bread from our children, spit on our religion, and defile our soil?
Term taken from the dubious and unsubstantiated afrocentric declaration that blacks were “Kangz” in ancient Africa and had some sort of complex society.