The Disregarded Extinction of the European

The detestation for Europeans and those of European descent is more conspicuous within the media, academia, and governmental institutions than most would like to admit. Indeed, the apparent intolerance and self-intolerance for European culture and the European race has increasingly grown over the past decade. This shall, at length, only continue if the European goes about his life refusing to relinquish the immeasurable guilt that Cultural Marxism has relentlessly placed upon his shoulders. Whether this guilt comes in the form of ancestral sin or merely inherited privilege, the European will be taught from a very young age to despise his ancestors, his ancestors’ achievements, and his very own civilization. Sadly, while the European should be prideful in regard to these aspects of his culture, he simply deems them to be reprehensible, evil, and bigoted.

This merciless poison that the European is given by the Marxists (I.E. Jews, Zionists, Bolsheviks) will ultimately lead to his self-destruction—individually, and as a whole. But this is purely the malevolent nature of Cultural Marxism—it erodes him physically and spiritually—race and culture. Both corresponding aspects of the European have together brought wonder, hope, order, joy, unity, art, and scientific achievement into a world of ignorance, violence, and poverty. It is an undeniable fact that the European has aided those of the third-world far more than any other culture or race. Whether it be creating clean water for those suffering in the third-world, donating money and food to nations in need, or generously allowing innumerable immigrants and refugees from the third-world to come into predominately European countries (which has proportionally diminished the European populace), these facts do not occur to the European, nor worry him.

Why is it that the European must be constantly reminded of injustices that his ancestors committed centuries ago? Why is the European not taught about his culture’s past and present accomplishments? Why is the European told that he possesses a unique privilege that other races do not have? Why is it instilled into the European to feel extraordinarily shameful for being European? Undoubtedly, these queries will leave him wondering what is truly transpiring. The truth of this earnest matter is indeed foreboding, and perhaps that is why the European chooses to look in the opposite direction. But regrettably, not facing the real predicament is only a temporary solution—eventually, the European will be perniciously condemned by the extinction of his own race and culture. It is a much wiser decision to confront the issues that are plaguing the European culture and race today—for in the future, his annihilation will be irreversible.

Nevertheless, if the European recognizes that there is a problem today, there can certainly be a tomorrow for his children, his children’s children, and so forth; this is the first step to entirely ending the European’s clandestine genocide. The second step is for the European to gain dignity in his own race. Understanding races’ significance by observing their patterns in history is a highly crucial part. The European must know that naturally, culture and race are in communion—there are no distinctions. From an evolutionary perspective, all races have transfigured from their regions of the world and created many aspects of their culture, which may still be recognized today—this includes philosophy, art, literature, music, architecture, politics, and social order. The European must ask himself where these aspects of his culture originated from. The Marxist agenda cannot explain, nor answer this meaningful and imperative enquiry. Instead, it teaches that race is a social construct and does not exist.

Of course, any sensible individual would argue that this is not true from a scientific and objective viewpoint. Aside from the different physical features, one can compare and contrast behavioral statistics of races, and distinguish them by their DNA makeup. Unfortunately, anyone who willingly chooses to challenge the Cultural Marxists’ statement (race is a social construct) is instantaneously labeled a racist. This is solely why few understand that discerning and accepting differences within race is not equivalent to hating another race—it is only accepting irrefutable facts. Needless to say, if the European is able to acknowledge and hold pride in his natural qualities, this is the second step to overcoming the elimination of his race and culture—thus stabilizing his children’s future.

The European must consequently acknowledge that there is an obvious hostile agenda within the media, academia, and governmental institutions if he wishes to further neutralize the destruction of his race and civilization. Cultural Marxists passionately despise the European, and it is for this reason that they propagate their malignant yearning through television programs, advertisements, news outlets, cinema, theatre, music, literature, electronic games, and art. Cultural Marxists mainly use this form of Marxism because they can quickly and uncomplicatedly reach out to the impressionable minds of the youth. Nonetheless, if the European becomes aware of this, he acquires the capability to more easily distinguish the anti-White propaganda within the media— whether it be internet articles, televised news and shows, Hollywood films, plays, artwork, music, or even books.

Usually, in these branches of entertainment, the European is portrayed as weak or unintelligent, while one of a different race is exhibited as stronger and more intelligent. Moreover, these branches of entertainment will mock or demonize traditional aspects of the European’s culture—this particularly includes his morals, religion, accustomed holidays, and most importantly, family. These essential aspects are replaced by the promotion of foreign holidays, foreign religions, drug use, pornography, adultery, sexual perversions, single parenting, same-sex parenting, feminism, anti-masculinity, progressivism, materialism, multiculturalism, etc. Their goal is to erase the magnitude of the European’s true cultural aspects, because with the death of these features comes the fall of the brilliant European society. The process is long and subconscious, but manifestly works. Without moral beliefs that unify society, special days that bring families close together, and the family itself, the European civilization will crumble in utter misery.

The European must also understand the deceit that he is being indoctrinated into throughout all of the Western world’s academia—this includes being taught to feel leaden guilt for his ancestors’ sins (slavery, colonization of uncivilized third-world countries, etc.), being taught that he is more privileged than other races, being taught that he has accomplished nothing important throughout history, being taught that he is responsible for systemic racism, oppression, and xenophobia, and being taught to have self-hatred for simply being a European. If the European can extinguish these false notions, it will enable him to be proud of his race and culture.

Furthermore, the European must become aware of the anti-White agenda within governmental institutions. In the United States, the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act allowed immigrants from anywhere in the world to come live in America. During this time, the population of European descendants in the United States was 90%. Secretary of State Dean Rusk, and other politicians proclaimed that this legislative act would not significantly impact the majority of the population. However, as of 2015, those of European descent are now 62% of the population. It is estimated that by 2044, the European-American in America will no longer be the majority. President Barack Obama has even stated himself, “If you stopped all immigration today, just by virtue of birth rates, this is going to be a browner country.” Indeed, one must ask if the results of the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act were premeditated by the ruling elite of the United States.

Additionally, the current migrant crisis that is insidiously infecting European countries has also projected plausible speculations of the European ethnic majorities’ future. In Germany, it is estimated that the native German populace in the 20- to 30- year-old range will become a minority by 2020. In Britain, it is estimated that ethnic minorities will make up one third of the total population by 2050. In Sweden, native Swedes have been estimated to become a minority by 2031. In Norway, it has been estimated that Norwegian children will become a minority within their own schools in 2021. Unfortunately, this list continues onward. But with the genocide of the European race and culture will also come the genocide of his virtues. As has been demonstrated time and time again, the migrants from the Arabic and sub-Saharan regions have brought with them a culture of destruction, rape, violence, and murder.

Astoundingly enough, these untamed savages show no remorse after they commit their unutterable atrocities against the European. And yet, even more surprisingly, the governments of these countries have done little to cease the unmerited crimes committed against their very own people—the very people who they are supposed to protect and preserve. Clearly, these illustrations prove that the Cultural Marxists have infiltrated high positions in Western governments. The European should know that mass, non-European immigration into his nations is in fact a cunning scheme coordinated by the Marxists. When this is realized by the European, he must gather his family and think about the future that he actually wishes for his children and his race.

With the former and latter understood, the European must find a way to counter the plan of the Cultural Marxists, and enlighten his brethren, of whom are completely uninformed. When the seriousness of the European’s quiet genocide becomes the second main focus of his life (the first being family), he will seek ways to permanently halt the Marxists’ devious plans. In order for the European to do this, he must acknowledge that democracy and all democratic constitutions have failed to protect his race, culture, and family. If such policies and governments had not failed, then this would have never been an issue to begin with. Therefore, a new political ideology, which would succeed where democracy has been unsuccessful, should be thoroughly planned and established.

The European must only look to the past for study—he must see which parts of various political ideologies work and do not work—and doing so will aid the European with gaining his bearings in the realm of politics. It should be known that to establish a new government, which protects the European’s future, means something beyond the words written on a meager document. It is about finding concurring individuals who will remain loyal until the end—the diffusion of awareness—the awakening of the masses, who have not only fallen asleep under the deception of the Cultural Marxists, but have also become their deadly instruments. The concept of raising consciousness of the European’s undetected extermination should reflect a doctor curing the epidemic of a lethal illness—thus meaning everyone who has a concern on this issue should go about and vaccinate the disease-ridden masses, and infuse them with a reasonable and concise clarification of the European’s cause—after which, their audience too will continue to convey the message.

The European cannot force one to agree with his opinion, but those, over which the Marxists do not yet have full control, will join the European in his conquest to destroy the Cultural Marxists and rebuild from their ashes. As the numbers of comrades increase, the European’s plan will become more organized and powerful—the European must especially reach out to those in the militaries of the immoral governments—gaining power is extremely necessary. Eventually, the Cultural Marxists will notice and take offense to what is happening. They will be sly, and attempt to destroy the European’s movement at all costs. It is crucial that the European recognizes who these Marxists are—they are bankers, international financers, politicians, lobbyists, celebrities, professors, historians, investors, and so on and so forth. The European must not allow any of these people into their movement—the European must not accept money from these people, unless donated—the European must ignore the lies that these people will spread regarding the movement—the European must use every legal action in the book to prevent these people from restricting any momentum—for the Marxists are without clemency and will be rather unremitting.

To lay the foundation for a sanctuary state for the European means hardship, discipline, perseverance, courage, allegiance, love, faith, and one common goal. Since humankind has a freewill, only those who genuinely share the same longings will join the movement, and those who do not agree will merely not become a part of the European’s movement—no one shall be forced to join. However, those who stand as a hostile obstacle in the path of the European’s movement will always be remembered as an enemy. It is a fundamental necessity for the European to know that there will exist many counter movements in response to his own movement. Violence shall only be used at full capacity in cases of self-defense, because it must be known to the world that the European’s movement is very serious and will not tolerate aggression imposed by the opposition.

With loyalty, respect, a coherent strategy, and power, proceeds the opportunity to found a new, sanctuary state for the European culture and race. When this has finally been undertaken, the issue of the European’s genocide will forever cease to exist, so long as the European always despises and remembers who the Cultural Marxists are. The ultimate achievement would be the preservation of the European sub-races and race as a whole; the Nordic, Mediterranean, and Alpine—the preservation of European culture as a whole; the art, music, literature, history, science, languages, foods, architectures, and philosophies of all European nations, as well as nations of European descent. If the European could accomplish this, their race and civilization could continue to strive upon the earth without living in guilt and fear. Of course, the European must acknowledge that this endeavor will not be an unproblematic task, but with an understanding, he will have been forewarned of the menaces that will pose threat to his crusade against a world of abhorrent evils.


  1. God.

    You forgot about God.

    Nations that revere God have high birth rates, manly men, feminine women. They have law abidance and have less need for a heavy-handed government.

    Isaiah 60:12 For the nation and kingdom that will not serve you shall perish; those nations shall be utterly laid waste.

    Europe already collapsed in the 20th century and it was the godly people of the United States that saved them, propped them up. As America turns from God, so are we collapsing.

    If you are hard set against the concept of “God”, consider the ancient Aryan concept of “Arta”, which, when personified, is approximately God and which comes to us via the following lineage: proto Indo-Europeans, proto Indo-Iranians, Zoroastrianism, Exilic Judaism, Christianity.

    Arta, living on in English as Right, Order, Art with also the meaning of Truth, was derived from observation of the natural world, especially the apparent circular motion of the stars around the Axis Mundi. It has echoes in the three major world views of white people: monotheism as God/Logos; paganism, where the Vedas say “it is above even the gods” and whom the gods serve and uphold; and naturalism, Arta’s original source; and thus can unite all three.

    • Yes, I am indeed aware that Jews are the ones pulling the strings. I added their name in parentheses just now.

  2. One thing to do out on the left coast is get the Asian shooting clubs and sportsmen to identify as Republicans at the minimum and as allied the whites at optimum.

    These chink judges blocking the Trump immigration proposals are shitting the bed for this possibility. I’ve run into some phillipinos who are handy with pistols at shoot meets and they all seem to idolize Trump and Duturte. Strange dudes in many other respects though.

  3. Why do Jews hate Gentile Nationalism? Same reason a man with a sword hates your sword.

    Even though Jews love Israel and Jewish nationalism(aka Zionism), Jewish power really resides in gentile nations, especially the US and nations of EU. Since the survival and viability of Israel depend to a large extent on the support of Western nations, Jews feel they must ensure the loyalty of gentile nations to the Jews and Israel. In other words, white gentiles must favor Jews over themselves.

    So, when Jews say nationalism is a bad thing, what they really mean is that the rise of gentile nationalism poses a challenge to Jewish nationalism. If nationalism means one’s preference of one’s own people over others, it means gentile nationalism will lead to gentiles favoring themselves over Jews. And that may pose a threat to Jewish nationalism and supremacism. China is nationalist and favors Chinese interests over any other. Iran is nationalist and favors Iranian interests over any other. Even though China and Iran may not be overly anti-Jewish, they will not place Jewish interests above their own. So, Jews cannot control those nations to serve the Jews. But Jews have persuaded white gentiles that nationalism — at least in white nations — is evil, a kind of ‘Nazism’. (In truth, it was Polish nationalism, French nationalism, Russian nationalism, Chinese nationalism, and American nationalism that rolled back the tide of Axis Imperialism.) White gentiles, baited with Holocaust Guilt and in awe of Jewish power in media & finance, have become mentally colonized or psycolonized by Jews.

    However, when Jews demean nationalism, it is not ALL nationalisms. Paradoxically, Jews attack white gentile nationalism to shore up and boost their own nationalism. Jews don’t say ALL peoples, Jews included, must abandon nationalism. If anything, Jews justify their own nationalism among themselves on the basis that gentiles are innately evil and wicked.

    At any rate, Jewish fear of gentile nationalism is rational. If nationalism means the favoring of one’s own people to others, then every gentile nationalism will favor the gentile majority to the Jewish minority. This doesn’t necessarily mean ‘antisemitism’ or anti-Jewish discrimination. After all, Russia allows all sorts of freedoms and opportunities to Jews to get rich and pursue happiness & success. But gentile nationalism does mean Jews are not allowed to gain supremacist power in gentile nations, and this denial is no longer tolerable to Western Jews who now feel entitled to supremacist control over goyim. Jews no longer struggle for equality or fairness. They are addicted to maintaining their supremacist control over gentiles, especially whites. They want whites to spiritually worship Jews, financially serve Jews, culturally follow Jews, sexually surrender to Jews, etc. Jews accuse white gentile nationalists of being ‘Nazi’, but if ‘Nazism’ is a form of supremacism, then no people are as Nazi-like as the Jews are in today’s world. Ironically, Jews fear gentile nationalism because gentiles will act like Jews: Favor their own kind over others. Since gentiles greatly outnumber Jews in gentile nations, this can be a real challenge to Jewish power and supremacism if gentiles were to have their own kind of gentile ‘zionism’.

    Nationalism is a political weapon. It is a shield with which to defend one’s own people from others. It is a sword with which to fight the enemies. A swordsman uses his own sword & shield in his fight against other swordsmen with their swords & shields. In battle, a swordsman wields his weapon to disarm his opponents of their weapons. A swordsman prizes his own sword & shield but fears, even loathes, the swords & shields of his rivals. So, it is only logical that Jews, in love with their own tribalist sword & shield, seek to destroy the swords & shields of gentiles. Jews want to be the only ones with the sword & shield of nationalism lording over all others who kneel before the Jewish king and kiss his one and only true sword.

    If we recognize nationalism as a powerful weapon, we can understand why Jews would fear the gentile nationalism of other peoples. If Jews had a nice big nation of their own, they might be content with what they have and tolerate other peoples’ ownership of their own nations. But Jews are a majority in only one nation, the tiny state of Israel. So, unlike Russians, Chinese, Indians, or Iranians, Jewish power isn’t much if located only in Israel. Jews must derive their power and wealth from gentile nations in which they are minorities, and therefore, Jews are keen on suppressing the nationalism of gentile peoples who’ve come under their thumb. Also, no people are as ambitious and arrogant as the Jews. If most peoples are content with control over their own nations and respect other peoples’ control over theirs, Jews like George Soros feel this insatiable desire to remake the entire world in their radical image. Jews are tireless like rats in gnawing away at the national defenses of other peoples. Jews bitch about anti-Jewish hatred or ‘antisemitism’, but they ignore the fact that anti-Jewish hatred has often been defensive against Jewish aggression that gnaws itself into every region on earth to subvert and undermine gentile identity and interests. Even when Jews gain mastery over other peoples, they don’t stand tall and upright as the new masters — which would at least be honest and honorable — but shrug their shoulders and underplay the Jewish nature of their agenda to fool the goyim. They want to be invisible masters, and this is why they rely so heavily on shabbos goyim to serve as Fronts.

    From a purely strategic viewpoint, Jewish hostility to gentile nationalism makes total sense. If Jews want to ensure that gentiles in US and EU will primarily serve Jewish interests, Jewish nationalism, and Jewish supremacism(or Jewish ‘Nazism’), then gentiles must be persuaded and/or pressured to forgo their own ethno-nationalist identities and interests that, if left to grow of their own accord, could turn into obstacles to gentile subservience to Jewish identity and interests.

    History has proven time and again that the MOST POTENT force against imperialism has been nationalism. All anti-imperialist struggles were nationalist. Without the rise of nationalist consciousness, the subject peoples failed to unite to fight to overthrow the foreign rulers. It was with the spread of nationalist consciousness that the peoples of world began to regain independence and drive out the imperialists in places like Algeria, Cuba, and Vietnam. Creation of America has been portrayed as a birth of liberty, but it was more the birth of new nationalism against the overweening imperialism of the British. So, even imperialism births nationalism among the colonizers who rebel against it.

    It was the rise of nationalism that finally brought an end to European imperialist domination. In some cases, the Third World nationalism was organic. For example, there really was a Vietnamese civilization going back over a thousands years. In other cases, the nationalism was newly constructed, as in Indonesia and even India, places that gained a sense of common destiny under the imperialism. The narrative of shared tragedy under imperialism forged a political bond. Rise of nationalism made imperialism no longer viable in the Third World.

    Today, it is the West that is under imperialist rule. It is called globalism, and it is essentially Worldwide Jewish Imperialism. All whites are under the globalist imperialist domination of Jewish supremacists. Globalism spares only one nationalism, that of Zionists. Israel gets Passover treatment while all other nationalisms are eventually to be extinguished by Jewish-globalist power. Because gentile nationalism seeks to shutter the window against this poison gas of the Jews — Zio-Klon G — , Jews want to shatter the glass of every gentile window so that the globo-gas will enter every nation(but Israel) and destroy national identity and pride.

    Nationalism has a populist element in obligating the elites of a nation to represent, serve, and defend the people of the nation. According to nationalism, Hungarian elites should represent, serve, and defend Hungarian identity and interests. Japanese elites should represent, serve, and defend Japanese identity and interests. German elites should represent, serve, and defend German identity and interests. This is precisely what Jews fear. Jews want the best-and-the-brightest among the gentiles to serve Jewish identity and interests. Jews want gentile elites to collaborate with Jewish globalist imperialists than to represent and serve their own peoples. It’s like the British imperialists wanted Indian elites to collaborate with the British than represent the aspirations of the Indian masses. And French imperialists wanted Vietnamese elites to collaborate with the French than fight for Vietnamese independence.

    Now that Jews rule the West, Jews want Western gentile elites to serve their Jewish masters than lead and guide their own peoples. (But then, even the white gentile masses have been turned onto rejecting their own identity/interests and to serving Jewish globalism under the barrage of ‘white guilt’ indoctrination, ‘jungle fever’ in sports & rap, decadent faddishness of homomania, and the Cult of Diversity. So many white people have been reduced to virtue-signaling idiots who think themselves righteous because they champion their own demographic demise via mass immigration, race-mixing, and degenerate behavior.)

    When Jews say white gentiles must forgo their national identity and interests, they don’t mean it applies to Jews as well. They mean whites must put down their swords & shields to submit to the sword & shield of the Jew. If ten people have guns and if the Jewish guy happens to be anti-gun, it doesn’t mean everyone INCLUDING THE JEW should surrender his gun. It means everyone EXCEPT THE JEW should give up his gun. That way, the Jew is the ONLY ONE with the gun, and he has the power over the others.

    Indeed, Jewish attitude on gun rights is no different from their attitude on nationalism: It is For-Jews-Only.

    Why do Jews want to take away gun rights in America? Jews have no problem with every Jewish family owning automatic rifles in Israel because Jews are the majority there. Gun ownership in Israel means Jewish power over Arabs. But in the US, Jews are only 2% of the population; therefore, a well-armed nation means many more gentiles with guns than Jews with guns. But then, Jews control the government and elite institutions that control the military and the police. So, if only the government has the power of firearms, it means ONLY JEWS have the power of firearms since nearly all politicians are owned by Jews and nearly all of the judiciary is under Jewish control.

    Whether it’s guns or nationalism, Jews want to monopolize it all. Know your Jew.


  4. Folks – the writer is 17 years old (and is my middle son) – so take it easy on him. 😉 He’s moved to the Alt-Right on his own via studying history, observing current events, etc. I had no idea he was going to submit this article but am glad that he did and that Hunter was willing to publish it.

    We should feel good that young people, who are literate, educated, and inquisitive, are part of the Alt-Right movement.

    • I’m sorry for being churlish. You young son did a wonderful job. Tell him I thank him from my marrow – and to keep writing, and to NAME THE JEW. Sliante!

    • The author is only seventeen years old?! Wow, I would have guessed he was at least seventy years old, because there was such great maturity, thoughtfulness, intelligence and plain old-fashioned elegance in the way he wrote. At the same time, he didn’t write in the annoying William F. Buckley manner of putting the longest most syllabic words he could find to replace that which was simpler to show off how smart he is. And this young man is very, very smart. This post is one of the few essays that I have finished where I did not regret the time I wasted reading it. Please forward my appreciation and gratitude to your son for the time he took to share his thoughts with us and encourage him to keep on writing. He’s awesome.

  5. Denying reality comes naturally to humans. But some people go beyond the usual denial of everyday reality. Thus, denial of reality becomes a worldview and way of life.

    It’s like Melancholy is an emotional state, but Melancholia is a condition. It’s always there. You’re always sad even when there’s nothing bad happening.

    Likewise, the Modern World is living in a kind of Denialia. Everyday, we deny little things for the sake of convenience. It could be lies we tell to others or to ourselves. But for some people, a steady denial of reality turns into ‘denialia’, and people can end up like Diane Selwyn in MULHOLLAND DR or Stephen Glass of New Republic who kept denying and denying his BS. It was beyond lying. It was as if he created his own universe and stuck to it regardless of facts.

    MELANCHOLIA is a terrible movie, but it says something about the current European state of mind. A giant demographic asteroid belt or tidal wave is hitting Europe, but Europeans are living in a state of denial. (Or they’ve become accustomed to a kind of pessimism and defeatism borne of Christianity, Ice Age genetics of Ragnarok gloom-and-doom, WWI & WWII loss of confidence, Holocaust guilt, and decadence/convenience. Decadence/convenience may, in some ways, be most instrumental since postwar prosperity took away the survival instincts of western man. A people, no matter how guilt-ridden by PC, will fight for a piece of bread if they are hungry. Even the most libby-dibby progs will fight with blacks and browns for bread and water if faced with survival or death. It’s like the TWILIGHT ZONE episode where neighbors begin to get Primal when faced with the end of times.)

    It went from denying little facts to a complete delusional denial of the big truth. But, all lifeforms have some survival instincts, and surely, many Europeans, even ones who welcome the Grand Invasion, are subconsciously feeling some kind of dread. But because of PC-colonization of their mind, they must make themselves believe that the enemy is the friend and the friend-and-savior(the populist patriot heroes) is the enemy. But since this pill is difficult to swallow, they naturally wanna puke it ou. But they’ve been told since childhood that PC is good medicine and that it’d be evil to not swallow it. So, they force themselves to swallow the poison while believing it to be medicine.

    People are most passionate about (1) something they truly believe in or (2) something they fear isn’t true but believe to be holy. For (1), the passion is obvious. If you really believe in something, of course you want to root for it. The passion comes naturally and effortlessly. But (2) is more complicated. The passion required isn’t natural. But because PC says you’re a bad bad person unless you show enthusiasm, you must make an EXTRA EFFORT to feel the passion. Thus, you have to struggle with yourself that you really believe in this stuff. Straight people’s support for homos AND secular support for Muslims aren’t natural. But PC promoted homomania and now Islamania as holy, and good progs feel they must be for Homos and Muslims. Since Trump has cozied up to Homos, Progs feel they must now champion Muslims against Trump… but everything secularists believe in don’t jibe well with Sharia or Islam.

    In a way, willed passion is more zealous and aggressive than natural passion since one has to stiffen one’s emotions to support something one doesn’t really care for.

    I think a lot of Europeans feel, deep down inside, that the massive-invasion by non-whites will spell doom for Europe. But they’ve been mentally-colonized since childhood that Diversity is wonderful and, if you disagree, you are a Bad Bad person. But it’s not natural to welcome massive invasion. Being invaded doesn’t feel right. So, you make an extra effort to feel the passion, and this turns coercive and judgmental. In a way, your dogmatic zeal to persuade others is a really a means to convince yourself of something that a part of you still denies subconsciously.

    Also, there is the power of momentum. Once a grand event has been put into motion, it’s hard to change course. Too much has been invested in pride, material, propaganda, and etc. Once WWI got started, it was fight to the end. And when Germany invaded USSR, there was no turning back. And even those who didn’t like the idea had to go along. And same with Japan in war with US.

    Once the die has been cast, you find yourself with little choice but to go along… even if you know it will end badly. It’s like Mao and the Cultural Revolution. He learned early on that things were going badly, with Red Guards acting like tards and going beyond what Mao called for. But he let loose the fury, and there was no turning back until the fire burned out some of its own accord. Even Mao couldn’t shut it immediately since he’d told the young nuts to ‘bombard the headquarters’. Likewise, Merkel has called on foreign masses to bombard Europe. Having invested her pride and reputation on the rightness of her decision, she can’t go back. All in all, as horrible as the Cultural Revolution, it was nothing compared to the damage that will be done by the Tribal Revolution as new tribes invade and remake Europe.

    Maybe all this stuff about ‘climate change’ or global warming is a way to channel one’s existential fears elsewhere to a safe space of discourse. The REAL threat to the West is massive invasion, but saying so is taboo, so Western Fears have been shifted to worrying about the weather. So, it is safer to attach whatever is wrong in the world to ‘climate change’. So, if there are mobs, esp non-whites, rioting in some part of the world, it must be the result of ‘climate change’. So, something has to be done about it… like having more non-whites come to the West. This is totally crazy, but when a civilization is in a state of Denialia and cannot speak the truth, it will seek something else to scapegoat as the source of problem.

    PC is such a pile of lie that Denialia has become a condition of the Modern World. We don’t deny little things here and there. We deny huge swathes of reality altogether.

    In a way, gentrification is proof that even globo-elites are onto what’s really up. If diversity is making everything so much better, why are they creating these self-contained oases of privilege APART from rest of society that is becoming more diverse and confused? They talk of ‘sanctuary cities’ to protect the ‘poor illegal dreamers’, but real effect of ‘sanctuary cities’ is to maintain privilege in selective parts of cities(made posh and elegant) by keep a docile class of servant laborers.

    It’s like all those jerks at Middlebury College. They attend some elite college and will aim for affluent jobs after college and will seek to live in urban-affluent sanctuaries but they talk the talk of ‘equality’ and ‘diversity’.



    King Harald the fifth of Norway gave a speech on Thursday 1st of September 2016, in which he claimed that there isn’t really a Norwegian nationality.

    Speaking at the garden party hosted in his Royal Palace he said:

    “Norwegians come from the north of Norway, from the middle, from the south and all the other regions.”

    “Norwegians are also immigrants from Afghanistan, Pakistan, Poland, – Sweden, Somalia and Syria.”

    “It is not always easy to say where we come from; to which nationality we belong.”

    “Home is where the heart is. That cannot always be placed within country borders.”

    “Norwegians are girls who love girls. Boys who love boys. And boys and girls who love each other.”

    “Norwegians believe in God, Allah, everything and nothing. Norwegians like Grieg, Kygo, Hellbillies and Kari Bremnes. In other words: you are Norway. We are Norway”

    Of course Norwegians exist! You know it, we know it, the King knows it.

    Why exactly do elites keep telling us that certain people don’t really exist?

    It’s one of the stages of genocide. They deny that a group exists, so that they can justify the destruction of that group.

    Norwegian are White, and there is a White genocide agenda being pushed in the West. Those in power are trying to get rid of the White majorities in Europe and countries founded by Europeans.

    They call it “no borders” or “globalism” but what they mean is, “no borders for the West.” It’s just White genocide.

    • There seems to be a weird level of national suicide going on, which is difficult to describe, let alone explain. Most people apparently are living in some construct that they’ve created for themselves, and if things don’t fit the template they’ve created they ignore it; reality, common sense aren’t a part of it anymore. It is hard to accept.

      • It is the European who is the greatest enemy of the European. If we manage to create ethnostates we absolutely must not bring the camel into the tent with us. It is discouraging.

  7. If we don’t kill each and every last non white our descendants will curse us because they will only do this again in 100 or 1000 years. I really don’t see any way around it.

  8. The Yiddish words “goy/goyim” generally connote non-Jew, but the literal denotation is “nation/nations”. So when a Jew hears the word “Nationalism” they’re literally hearing “Goyimism” i.e., anti-Jewism. So the very concept “nation” is anathema to Jews.

  9. It is not some Force in the Sky that is causing this to happen. European Self-Hatred is taught and promoted primarily by other Europeans (with a generous dose of topspin from jews, of course).

Comments are closed.