Trump Focuses on Economy, Terrorism, and Law-and-Order In Big Policy Speeches

In all three speeches, Trump’s has tried to get back on message and signal to the White middle class suburbanites who are sinking his campaign:

1.) In the economy speech, he talked about how he was going to lower their taxes, cut regulations, repeal Obamacare, and open up our energy resources. All of this was red meat for a certain type of White conservative who lives in the suburbs and is standard fare in any Republican presidential campaign.

2.) In the terrorism speech, he recounted the litany of recent terrorist attacks, and he made a point to soften the Muslim ban, again, by defining “extreme vetting” as an ideological litmus test which will be used in conjunction with banning immigration from problematic regions. It would be much easier to simply ban Muslims from coming here, but that also causes too much heartburn for White middle class suburban conservatives.

3.) In the law-and-order speech, he talked about how he wanted to win over blacks by promising to send more police into their neighborhoods. This was the clearest sign yet that Trump was talking to White middle class suburban conservatives, not blacks, who want to empty to the prisons and demonize the cops.

Anyway, I can see the polls and understand why he is doing it. He’s losing all the Rubio and Kasich voters who live in the suburbs. I guess we will see if this works. It seemed to be working through June and July until the Khizr Khan fiasco.



About Hunter Wallace 12380 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent

9 Comments

  1. Trump’s speech was all about laying down the law. He used references to what Giuliani did in New York. Rudy was there. It was all about laying down law and order. Keeping the criminal element down.

    This message might increase his vote with some Blacks but the vast majority will see this as nothing more than oppression.

    Here is what White cucks heard – Create security so that Blacks can thrive and create businesses and create a Black renaissance. Fiction sure but this is what cucks believe and no amount of evidence will deter them.

    I think it worked. This morning on Fox, Brian Kilmeade was on there praising Trump for speaking directly to Blacks. He was saying How Trump needed to take his message to the Black community and all this…..he was orgasmic.

    • Or, its just “We gotta do/say SOMETHING.” Politicans, media, cucks are flummoxed by the irrationality of black rioting and criminality and want to believe MOST blacks don’t like it either. Wheres the evidence that MOST blacks are against that behavior? It wouldn’t happen if they were.

      I liked the part of Trump’s speech that was the important (IMO) part: making an issue of the cashing in. Hillary can’t say anything about that. No one’s cashed in like her and her husband.

      • Agreed. The anti-establishment part of the speech was the best. It was spot on.

        Trump called them all out on both sides.

    • When a D party political terrorist grouplet like BLM does its thing the cucks are expected to address the BLM with the usual boilerplate and from there the political theatre deteriorates into the usual gibs me dat.
      Trump just went around them all with his rhetoric and so did Scott Walker. Yes they want law and order in their communities (some do don’t laugh).
      “We want to help them for their own good” the virtue signaling white supremacists (yes they are) eat that up.

    • ‘Here is what White cucks heard – Create security so that Blacks can thrive and create businesses and create a Black renaissance. Fiction sure but this is what cucks believe and no amount of evidence will deter them.’

      So true.

  2. I thought the Khizr Khan fiasco made the Demonrats look bad, not Trump. Those two wogs were truly repulsive. And their ties to the Clinton Foundation and the Saudi Regime exposed them as being nothing more than operatives and mercenaries.

    Trump’s (((critics))) said his speeches were short on deets and so he provided them. Naturally they don’t acknowledge that.

  3. This is good stuff for The Donald, I think. Nixon and George Wallace both got quite a bit of mileage out of the law and order issue. This is wining thing if he sticks with it.

Comments are closed.