Federal Judge Strikes Down Mississippi Gay Adoption Ban

A federal judge has struck down the last state ban on gay adoption in Mississippi:

“It’s now legal for couples in all U.S. states to adopt children — regardless of the couple’s gender — after a federal judge struck down Mississippi’s ban on same-sex adoption late Thursday.

Overturning a law that had stood since 2000, U.S. District Court Judge Daniel P. Jordan III said the ban violated the U.S. Constitution’s equal protection clause. Mississippi’s ban was the last of its kind in the U.S.

“I’m a happy camper. Our clients are beyond happy campers. They are more than thrilled,” the plaintiffs’ lead attorney, Roberta Kaplan, tells Mississippi Today.

The lawsuit challenging the law was filed back in 2015 by four same-sex couples; it’s also backed by two advocacy groups, the Campaign for Southern Equality and the Family Equality Council. …”

This story symbolizes the collapse of TruConservatism.

At this point, why should anyone believe TruConservatives are capable of conserving anything? Why should anyone respond to stale patriotic appeals to “consistent constitutional conservatism” … when the Constitution is manifestly incapable of restraining even the most radical social innovations?

About Hunter Wallace 9458 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent

38 Comments

  1. The only thing that cuckservatives are adamant about when it comes to conserving something or an institution is Israel, nothing else.

    • Meh. They respond to what direction the butter and perks come from. Like most people. What can rural country folk do for them? When you answer that, you should have the beginnings of a clue as to what the real problem is. And I’m not talking about fantasies of armed coup by the rubes.

      What can you do for a federal judge?

      Nothing.

  2. Some years ago the Australian Broadcasting Company did a puff piece on a gay couple adopting a baby boy from a foreign country and how wonderful this was. They scrubbed the article (though screenshots remain) when it was discovered that these guys were raping the poor kid daily until he was rescued at age five.

    This ruling effectively legalizes pedophilia, because pedos can now adopt children by pretending to be gay.

    • I agree. “Legalized” pedophilia is coming next, something NAMBLA has been pushing for a long time. And of course, the anti-child abuser lobby and “true conservatives” will do nothing but remain silent.

      • When Christ accused the Pharisees of His day of being Satan’s spiritual children, He fully realized what they were capable of. Second century Rabbi Simeon ben Yohai, one of Judaism’s very greatest rabbis and a creator of Kabbalah, sanctioned pedophilia—permitting molestation of baby girls even younger than three! He proclaimed, “A proselyte who is under the age of three years and a day is permitted to marry a priest.” 1 Subsequent rabbis refer to ben Yohai’s endorsement of pedophilia as “halakah,” or binding Jewish law. 2 Has ben Yohai, child rape advocate, been disowned by modern Jews? Hardly. Today, in ben Yohai’s hometown of Meron, Israel, tens of thousands of orthodox and ultra-orthodox Jews gather annually for days and nights of singing and dancing in his memory.

  3. Campaign for Southern Equality.

    Let me guess. This organisation is not headquartered anywhere in Dixie. Like Battleground Texas, which is located in Ohio, for some reason, yet claims to be concerned with politics in Texas. It’s always Jews and their stooges, none of whom are from the South. Except for Moriss Dees, none of the characters at the SPLC will admit where they’re from.

  4. Legality doesn’t equate with Normality. Never has, never will.

    Ballots (Trump) or bullets (war)

    War is coming. Never forgive, never forget.

    ” It were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he cast into the sea, than that he should offend one of these little ones.” – Lk. 17:2

  5. As angry as I am about this, I am even angrier at how the so called Right has given moral authority to a bunch of moral reprobates.

    • Then that simply harmonizes with the democratic leftist liberal establishment at every level where they are situated.

      They are now integral to Social Hierarchy

  6. The only political question that counts is, what are you going to do for White Americans?

  7. Can we offer anything besides being pro-white, and reciprocity to others?

    Yes, I think we have something to offer all people, which is to say that as we conserve our race, we also conserve our species against genetic tampering as well as displacements by robots and AI.

    The rationale behind each of these is the same, we all have a right to perpetuate ourselves and the conditions in which we can prosper. We have no obligation to scourge ourselves for a myth of “Progress” (which is essentially cuckoldry).

    Much like a rejection of pure laissez-faire economics in favor of a safety net based around continual employment at a decent wage, this would be an enormously popular philosophy; and a philosophy most people didn’t realize that they already adhered to because it is so primal that it almost doesn’t need articulation, except in our thoroughly debauched age.

    • They are being blackmailed into compliance. Watch the “true conservative” politicians cave instead of fight for their “principles”.

  8. What kind of gays would want to adopt a kid? Gay men lead lives of self absorption that only the most affluent of heterosexuals who can afford nannies to look after their kids can mimic. Some hollywood liberal was on Leno talking about taking the wife and kids sightseeing to “The Castro” district in San Francisco and how the militant homosexuals were sneering their subculture’s curse “Breeders” at them. Just watch Al Pachino’s “Cruising” to see what they are really like and ask yourself why on earth they’d want to complicate their lives with a kid when, unlike straight men who get forced into it, they have a choice.

  9. Fact of the matter is that the kids getting adopted these days are largely crack baby types taken away from abusive minority households by the DFS. Not really babies but older children who are probably already quite messed up. Who else other than a bunch of Lesbians would want the chaos that comes from such a situation?

  10. Just amazing how 1 federal judge can remove God’s Laws in Mississippi. Why? Because my state is afraid of the federal government. Any rebellion in the name of Christianity would result in the FEDS cutting off federal money in my state. That would include Social Security and everything else. Any rebellion after the FEDS cut off funding would result in another War of Northern Aggression! You know like the “Civil War” back in the day? The American Empire rules by Tyranny. No care for God or our Constitutional Rights including the 10th Amendment. We must work together for the survival of our Faith and People. WPWW !

  11. I think I see now why homosexuality was outlawed. They wish to recruit members by molesting children and making them as perverted as they are. How else can they increase their numbers with all the plagues and hardly any reproduction?

      • This is an extremely well circulated NS meme. People begin to identify Yids when they come out from under their rocks to push some kind of moral depravity, racelessness, Marxism etc.

  12. No surprise there then. the outcomes fro the adopted Child aren’t ultimately always good for that Child. There is much evidence to show that.

    This with the North Carolina coming under Political / Consumer pressure from LGBT , Faceberk and Big Business

    The moral collapse continues

  13. What they should have done is reformed the Articles of Confederation, and made its stronger, instead of replacing it with the Constitution which Anti-Federalist warned us would degenerate into rule by Judicial fiat and confiscatory taxation.

  14. Federal Courts are really becoming nothing more than kangaroo courts. The equal protection test for this particular controversy is rational basis. That is to say, if the Court can find a single reasonable basis for the law, then it must follow that the law is constitutional. It is the easiest legal hurdle to overcome, and until very recently, was met in almost all instances. But when it comes to gay rights, what the liberal judges and justices are saying, in these cases, is that the entire political system, from the voters to their elected and appointed representatives are irrational and that there is not a single rationale basis for the law, and that all the people who disagree (in many cases the majority of people in a particular state) are simply acting out of irrational fear and prejudice. Overturning legislative acts on such flimsy legal reasoning has, regrettably, become the norm, in America 2016.

  15. It is time for the citizens of the states to realize that the rulings of reprobate judges only apply to your state if you accept that judges have the right to make decisions for you. Suppose MS were to reject this ruling. What would the consequences be? As others mentioned the federal government could suspend aid to the state. In that case MS could point out that the state is 40% black and therefore the federal government would be burdening a large underprivileged population. That would be racist.

Comments are closed.