Slippery Slope: Montana Man Plans To Fight For Polygamy Marriage Rights

Once this is hammered through the corrupt courts, something that will likely meet less resistance than faggotry, the way will be open for the big push towards legal pedophilia.

By Marcus Cicero

As was reported on Majority Rebellion, a Montana lover trio has begun the battle for the acceptance of polygamous wedded couples, citing the demented decision of the United States Supreme Court to fully legalize the union of homosexual degenerates.

According to Nathan Collier, an excommunicated member of the Mormon Church, the need to coddle his specific brand of weirdness stems from the concept of “equality” now propounded as infallible gospel throughout the country.

In a series of interviews with curious media, Collier has expressed his intention of filing multiple lawsuits against the government if not granted legitimization through the courts, who are sadly taking the time to give the request full and dedicated attention.

Yahoo News:

A Montana man said Wednesday that last week’s U.S. Supreme Court decision legalizing gay marriage inspired him to apply for a marriage license so that he legally can wed his second wife.

Nathan Collier and his wives, Victoria and Christine, applied for the license at the Yellowstone County Courthouse in Billings on Tuesday in an attempt to legitimize their polygamous marriage. Montana, like all 50 states, outlaws bigamy — holding multiple marriage licenses — but Collier said he plans to sue if the application is denied.

“It’s about marriage equality,” Collier told the Associated Press Wednesday. “You can’t have this without polygamy.”

County clerk officials initially denied Collier’s application then said they would consult with the county attorney’s office before giving him a final answer, said Collier.

Yellowstone County chief civil litigator Kevin Gillen said he is reviewing Montana’s bigamy laws and expects to send a formal response to Collier by next week.

“I think he deserves an answer,” said Gillen, but added that his review is finding that “the law simply doesn’t provide for that yet.”

One has to have pity for the young children coming of age in this horrendous parody of a society, as they will be forced to reap the consequences of a generations-long slip into chaos and sinful anarchy.

Taking current trends of “progression” into account, there is a sizable chance that our children and grandchildren will inherit a civilization tolerant of bigamy, faggotry, bestiality, and pederasty.

Did they ask for this sort of “diversity?”

And we have just jumped up another stair on the long path of multicultural bliss. Soon all will be equal.
And we have just jumped up another stair on the long path of multicultural bliss. Soon all will be equal.
About Marcus Cicero 593 Articles
Proud White Man, devoted husband and father, and Occidental Dissent contributor.

10 Comments

  1. More power to him. At least there is precedence for polygamy in the Bible and ancient societies. Show me the precedent for Gay marriage historically and Biblically.

  2. I am not absuteky opposed to polygamy on moral grounds.

    The problem is that it creates too many celibate men. One man one woman helps to spread the chance of satisfaction and romantic love. This makes western societies attractive.

  3. The girl on the right looks a bit like the 26 year old girl that wedded Charles Manson. Anyway, the smug sense of self-satisfaction and ‘nah-nah-nub-boo-boo’ coming off that picture says it all. The children of today will inherit a society far more ridiculous than the one inherited by GenX. I, for one, am no longer fond of hearing how lazy, stupid, spoiled, unmanly, etc., young people are coming from the boomers- at all- the liberated ones especially, but also the non-libtarded ones who refused to shepherd their society, because you know- freedumb.

  4. Well, I suppose all the Mormons who have been secretly practicing polygamy all along will start coming out of the closet now.

    • Even they just want it decriminalized, and really could care less about governments condoning the practice.

  5. Well…. I agree White plural marriage is a bit different. But, from the persecutive of a White guy in ultra lib University Obama land where the White women are all sexless post graduate students for life that ain’t marrying or having sex or even making a sandwich for a straight White guy – I would have to say this Montana plural marriage Mormon family is better than what we have here.

  6. easy prediction: change the definition of words has consequences. I am glad I have no Grandchildren.

  7. Oh Mr. Weaver….You really want that many women? 500? I can barely handle one over the last 40+ years. I bow to your enthusiasm. ( and fantasy)

Comments are closed.