About Hunter Wallace 9671 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent

30 Comments

  1. Yesterday, commenter ‘GrahamB’ linked to a blog article by a ‘Wong’ who cleverly REVERSES ‘the Mantra’: ‘Anti-White is anti-RACIST, because whites ARE racists and deserve to be destroyed, die out’ etc. Imagine the possibility of ‘reverse Mantra’ signs appearing next to Mantra signs.

  2. Re: rhetorical ‘devices’:

    ‘God made men upright, but they have sought out many devices’. Christian revival must precede white renewal. No other way or means.

  3. Mosin Nagant says:
    Christian revival must precede white renewal. No other way or means.

    And the reassertion of the historical reality stated in the American constitution preamble that the country was created as an ethno-state, “FOR US AND OUR POSTERITY.” A fact taught in the U.S. Public schools (the best in the world at that time) before 1965.

    Many used positions, their “public” paychecks in u.s. governmental offices to “change” what Generational U.S. children —who at that time ALL used their GREAT public schools— are told about their history and heritage, WHILE the Law Changers insisted THEIR KIDS have various “home schools,” or “parochial schools,” or shuls (code words for the catholic and jewish schools whose advocates USED changed LAWS to insist THEIR schools remain unchanged EVEN AS THEY changed the message for the Generational American Children.

    The re-assertion of the reality of the founding of the country would not make them look very good in the public eye—- and so they fight it tooth and nail.

    But the re-assertion of the reality of the founding as a Northwest European almost categorically Protestant Ethno-state, with a constitution DEEPLY TIED to their experience in Europe, especially of persecution and Genocide, is the only thing that makes the country make common sense.

    Generational Americans have given up much in the attempt to “assimilate” other Europeans. Their families have paid dearly.

    Isn’t it time the other groups give a nod to that attempt on the part of the Generational Americans whose families really created the freedom the others have so enjoyed? Isn’t it time the others learned about the real sacrifices of those people? Rather than obscure their documents, history, hardship, and simply in order that they can “take power” over them?

    The Reality of the Generational Americans true history will not be forgotten. It is too interesting, of too much benefit to the common working white people.

  4. Mosin,

    Other “white” groups will only “lose” power by admitting there are many christianities, by admitting theirs have not hardly been “lily white,” or by admitting the real history of the united states as seen by the americans who founded it (in reality).

    They will say, over and over, that real history is not necessary. As much as they rail against Troskyite revisionism, they are the first in line to do it.

    As is sometimes said, “They want what they want.” Nor can they connect that low character to the low life the nation has today, imo.

    The Generational Americans need a land area for their culture, without any doubt.

  5. Christianity will not save America. Christianity is not a political system. It is a personal message of salvation for all mankind to accept or reject. Our country could be greatly helped by turning to Christian values, but it has no inherent philosophies to counter act the massive immigration. It welcomes strangers. This is why we have such a powerful Christian lobby for legalizing all illegal immigrants even within the evangelical community.

    At our local church in small 70%+ republican town of Crestview Florida the pastor stands and tells the congregation he longs for the day when the benches are filled with people from all over the world and the church has a Spanish service. Disgusting but true, I was there.

  6. Douglas,

    You have to personally do something when you witness tax exempt pastors pushing immigration treason under some false “Christian” cover.

    Boo, whistle, get in the face.

    It’s OK to spread rumors that the immigration traitor is full blown corrupt in all cultural Marxist ways. Don’t let these types maintain the respectability of Conservative Christians who just happen to facilitate all out 3rd world immigration. Go

  7. Jack is right. Churches IMO are little but women lead charities, key being the word “women.” Women basically cannot tolerate critique, a little critique goes along way, the left thrives on this.

  8. Stayed in Birmingham two weeks ago to split the drive from TN.

    I swear I thought I was in africa.

    What a shithole.

  9. “Yesterday, commenter ‘GrahamB’ linked to a blog article by a ‘Wong’ who cleverly REVERSES ‘the Mantra’: ‘Anti-White is anti-RACIST, because whites ARE racists and deserve to be destroyed, die out’ etc. Imagine the possibility of ‘reverse Mantra’ signs appearing next to Mantra signs.” – They should be open about how they feel, it would be the dumbest thing they could do.

  10. I think I get what the slogan is trying to say, but it is a confusing statement since racism does exist. With racism being hating someone because of the color of their skin, whether black, brown or white. Despising a trash culture, I get it, but that is a broad spectrum as well and it coves all the races too. Some trash cultures have more participants than others, but a trash culture is a trash culture.

  11. @rjp,

    We only stopped for the night to break up the drive back from vacation in Gatlinburg for our two small children, one of whom is disabled. My in-laws were also travelling with us & footing the bill for the entire trip so I obliged them. I knew how dangerous B-ham was & “packed” accordingly…
    We had dinner around 6pm on Saturday night at the O’Charley’s in Homewood. The staff & customers must have been 70% black. I’d never seen my MIL so unnerved.
    I casually pulled up the Birmingham demographics on my phone & showed them to her. I do believe she had an epiphany of what life in America is going to be like for her grandchildren.
    After arriving back at the hotel she thanked me for taking my carry weapon to dinner. When I asked her how she knew I was armed, she told me when I ordered sweet tea instead of having a beer she knew.
    I don’t think she’ll be travelling through or stopping in B-ham ever again. Nor will we.

    -Lex

  12. Question for DixieGirl:

    If the Founders wanted America to be reserved only for those who were already in America at the time of the Founding, and their descendants, then why didn’t they ban or restrict immigration?

  13. Rudel says: “why didn’t they ban or restrict immigration?”

    This should be Washington D.C.’s theme song.

    ‘Gimme money’, says Jerry Lee.

  14. E C says:
    October 26, 2013 at 11:55 pm
    Question for DixieGirl:

    If the Founders wanted America to be reserved only for those who were already in America at the time of the Founding, and their descendants, then why didn’t they ban or restrict immigration?”

    Jack Replies:

    The answer is that they just didn’t think about this issue at that time. The American Founfing Fathers, The US Constitution, Declaration of Independence etc. – they are not that relevant to our situation now – there weren’t airplanes at that tome, weren’t millions of non Whites coming in and out on airplanes.

    It’s like White Americans in the 1950 s Cold War, they were mostly obsessed about The Russians, not really thinking about losing the USA to Mexicans, Muslims.

  15. Jack:

    DixieGirl’s point, as I understand it, was that the Founders wanted America to be not just a white nation, but specifically a Northwest European Protestant nation. If that were the case, then why didn’t they ban or restrict the immigration of Irish Catholics, German Catholics, and Southern and Eastern Europeans?

    Under DixieGirl’s standards, the many Irish-American and Italian-American posters here would not belong in America.

  16. EC, founding stock DID protest the invasion of Irish and Italians by the hundreds of thousands, mostly imported for cheap labour.

  17. The “founding stock” might have protested about Irish and Italian immigration, but the original Founders did nothing to block immigration.

    The “founding stock” is not necessarily a good representation of the Founders themselves. Many of the “founding stock” wanted a Christian theocracy, but the Founders established a secular republic. One of the great accomplishments of the Founders was their rejection of the tyranny of the majority.

Comments are closed.