Bicausalism Type B

Alabama

Here’s a brief explanation of why I lean toward “Bicausalism Type B”:

The short answer is Southern history. Jews have always lived in the South, but Southern Jews only played a marginal role in the downfall of our social institutions. The most obvious example would be the abolitionist movement, the War Between the States, and the destruction of the Confederacy.

Jews were never perceived as the major threat to slavery by antebellum Southerners. Try real hard to think of the Jews who were behind the abolitionist movement. Prominent Jews like Judah Benjamin of Louisiana and David Yulee of Florida resigned from the Senate when their states seceded from the Union. Jews fought for the Confederacy in the War Between the States.

During Reconstruction, Southern Jews joined the Ku Klux Klan. Montgomery was redeemed from Reconstruction by its first Jewish mayor, Mordecai Moses, who ran as “the true White man’s candidate.” Throughout the Jim Crow era, Southern Jews were part of the commercial elite in cities like Montgomery and Selma, and never seemed to have any problem accommodating themselves to segregation and white supremacy.

When the Civil Rights Movement erupted in the 1950s, Southern Jews were embarrassed by the sheer number of Northern Jews who came to the South, particularly in Selma and Montgomery, and many of them even joined the White Citizens’ Council. In the South, the Civil Rights Movement was never associated with the Jewish population. It was seen as the work of “outside agitators” – Jews, Quakers, Catholics, Northern Protestants, Unitarians – Jewish and Yankee radicals who arrived in the South from some point of departure in the Northeast or Midwest.

The history of the South is different from the history of the North. The threat to the South’s racial order has always come from the outside – through the existence of the Union – whereas in the North it has always come from the enemy within.

Basically, I don’t see Jews as the primary infection because, if it were not for the existence of the Union, I just don’t see Southern Jews overthrowing slavery, destroying the Confederacy, or rising up to overthrow the Jim Crow system.

Update: Here’s an excerpt from one of the most fascinating books about the Jewish Question in the South that I have ever read, Fight Against Fear: Southern Jews and Black Civil Rights:

“Opposition to Northern intrusion was also indicative of the fact that some southern Jews were intensely skeptical, if not openly scornful, of the need for immediate integration. Over half the interviewees included in sociologist Alfred Hero’s survey of southern Jewry argued that desegregation was proceeding “too fast,” admitting that they felt emotionally ill at ease about integration even when they accepted it as inevitable and in the long run desirable.” The ideological differences between northern and Southern Jews clearly expressed in a letter addressed to the American Jewish Committee by Montgomery, Alabama, Jewish Federation. “The White community in the South is generally opposed to desegregation,” read the letter. “The Jewish community in the South is part of the white community in the South.” …

Al Vorspan recalled one particularly heated discussion with Montgomery’s leaders that took place behind a locked door of a downtown hotel room. Having hoped he might convince his audience that the national Jewish organizations were taking the moral highground in supporting integration, Vorspan was horrified to hear himself and other New York Jews described as being “worse than Adolph Hitler” because of the way they “stirred up anti-Semitism.”

Here’s another revealing excerpt about the integration of Atlanta:

“For Charlie Leb, the Civil Rights Act was the beginning of the end. His intransigence had been a cause of considerable embarrassment to the Atlanta Jewish community. Marvin Goldstein shakes his head as he concedes that Leb was a “rabid” segregationist. “He shouldn’t have been,” asserts Goldstein. “He came from humble surroundings.”

Leb had always insisted that his business remained segregated only out of respect for the sensitivities of his white customers. This was nothing if not disingenuous. Situated on the same street as Leb’s was another restaurant called Harrod’s, which had desegregated before the sit-ins ever began. Almost every day, those who tried to eat at Harrod’s had to first pass through a Klan picket line. By contrast, the Klan posed no threat to Charlie Leb. As Charles Wittenstein explains, “He was getting a lot of admiration and attention and was the hero of the white race and that segregationist crowd, and he bought into it and continued to do so.” On January 27, 1965, a dinner was held in honor of Martin Luther King, Jr., who had recently been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. Among those who organized and attended the dinner were many of Atlanta’s Jews. Outside on the street, Klansmen paraded in protest. Marching alongside them was Charlie Leb. …”

Here’s another excerpt from Mississippi:

“This might initially appear a rather contentious remark. We have already seen that Jews ordinarily joined the Citizens Council not out of any ideological conviction but as a means of deflecting attention from their true feelings on the race issue. Yet in Jackson itself one of the most articulate spokespersons in defense of segregation was indeed a Jew, Al Binder. Binder, an attorney, was closely associated with the power structure, not only in Jackson, but throughout the state. It was he who led the prosecution of the Freedom Riders in 1961. “Al’s one of us,” asserted the leader of Mississippi’s massive resistance movement. “He’s our Jew.”

About Hunter Wallace 8857 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent

51 Comments

  1. Dixie’s blood and cultural ties to the UK do not warrant support for the RAF’s horrific and murderous ruination of one of Europe’s great countries and dozens of Europe’s greatest cities

    And Poland, a country of no value to the Southron people,

    Are you a hyphenated American? What the fuck makes Danzig a great city and Gdansk “no value”?

    wasn’t even liberated at the end of it.

    You just wrote Hitler shouldn’t be faulted for failing to accomplish his objectives during the course of the war yet apparently the western Allies should be. Looking at a map and reviewing the amount of cheap peasant materiel Stalin had at his disposal (he was in Poland by ’43 fighting his ex-ally) should make it clear that it was going to become part of the Soviet sphere of influence. Poland was also undeniably better off due to the terms Stalin consented to at Yalta than it would have been as a German province.

  2. Hmm.

    Lots of European Jews immigrated to South Africa (and the American North) in the twentieth century and brought with them their tradition of leftwing revolutionary politics from Central and Eastern Europe.

    Slovo, Suzman, First, and Sachs were red diaper babies whose parents had immigrated to South Africa from Eastern Europe. They were the South African equivalent of the Kristols and the Podhoretzs and the Horowitzs and Emma Goldberg.

  3. “Whether the Jewish population of the American South would have remained loyal to the Jim Crow system (if in fact they *were* loyal to it) is unknowable.”

    I wonder about this as well.

  4. In the South, the Jewish population during the Civil Rights Movement were largely the descendants of Jews who immigrated to the New World in the 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries.

    The New York and New Jersey Jews who live in the Atlanta suburbs, NOVA, and South Florida are transplants. The same is true of the Yankees who live in Florida, Georgia, and Virginia.

  5. Why would a southerner call Germany a great country? Germany was the continent’s answer to BRA, a secular federal state rampaging against its culturally superior neighbors. That Germany even exists today is a small tragedy. It must perish.

  6. Sorry, Occi-Jew. I’m an old-time contrib here for years. Been reading HW off and on since The Phora days. Everyone here knows my views are pretty nuanced in spreading around the fault to whites, jews, muslims and others. Ain’t going anywhere. I do plan to take time out of schedule to beat you down, though. Kikes like you are as predictable as cockroaches under a glass.

  7. If the Jews of Charleston, Richmond, New Orleans, and Montgomery were such a threat to the Southern way of life, why didn’t the White population in the South identify them as the primary threat to white supremacy?

    • It’s true that Jews were very active in the Civil Rights Movement – Northern and Western Jews, not the Jews who had lived in the area for centuries, who never challenged segregation and white supremacy.

  8. Lew,

    I don’t care if you were reading and contributing since Moses. You’re not going to get away with calling this site “Type A only.” Go ahead and put me on trial. I’ll happily leave if I get the thumbs down. Until then, your immature rants and diversions don’t mean jack shit, and I’ll make my arguments as I see fit.

    As soon as I see a vocal “no-fault of our own” white getting traction in the real world, I will reconsider my position. Until then, I’ll state unequivocally that you all sound like a bunch of world class idiots and I’ll state the truth as I see it, and those with ears will listen, and with any luck I will drive them towards a better understanding of the responsibility of being white.

    You don’t like it, well, that’s one thing that definitely isn’t my fault.

  9. Thanks for the kind words, Lew.

    That Germany even exists today is a small tragedy. It must perish.

    Jeez, that’s a bit harsh. And here I thought the squareheads were having a particularly good week. Unlike Britain, France, Sweden and Russia, Germany managed to go an entire 7 days jihad-free.

    In the 2013 Country Ratings Poll, more than 26,000 people were asked to rate 16 countries and the EU on whether they had a positive or negative influence on the world. Guess who won? That’s right, The Land Where The Chosenites Learned Their Manners. Germany was rated mainly positive by 59% and mainly negative by only 15%. It’s enough to make Abe Foxman cry.

    http://www.globescan.com/commentary-and-analysis/press-releases/press-releases-2013/277-views-of-china-and-india-slide-while-uks-ratings-climb.html

    Meanwhile, Foxman’s favourite country was rated as mainly positive by only 21% and mainly negative by 52%, finishing fourth from the bottom.

    Possibly the two biggest events of the European sporting calendar were held this weekend. In yesterday’s all-German Champions League finals, Bayern Munich beat Borussia Dortmund. In today’s Monaco Grand Prix, German drivers Nico Rosberg and Sebastian Vettel finished 1-2. So not only do the krauts rule Europe politically and economically, they dominate in the fields that most Europeans *really* care about, football and auto racing.

    It’s bad enough that the assorted euroweenies must bow and scrape before Her Most Exalted Majesty, Angela the Austere, She-Kaiser of the Europäische Reich. But accepting the master race’s total sporting domination of the continent, that must really be humiliating. 🙂

  10. The Union were/are self chosen Yankees set upon the course of conquest. If the civil war and the two wars world in the 20th century miracles been averted The Union would have been margilinzed: no civil rights movement. no aushwitz. And no American empire.
    Battle of the hymn; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QG1PvQHCTPI

  11. Jeppo,

    It seems Germany isn’t getting anything in exchange for bankrolling the EU. They still have the same 29 votes they started with in the EU council and are more or less saddled with the burden of keeping the other countries economically healthy to keep their own currency strong. If I thought the EU empowered Germany I’d be anti-EU.

  12. The truth of Type A Bi-Causalism is indisputable if you narrow the data for the United States to about 1910 forward. I’ll be surprised if Chechar, HW and the other credible critics of monocausalism disagree with this.

  13. But that’s precisely the ideological trap, Lew: starting to count from the times when the Jews took over America and not from the times that the entire West caught HIV.

  14. Are you a hyphenated American?

    No on both counts, I am a Southron.

    What the fuck makes Danzig a great city and Gdansk “no value”?

    What difference does it make to Southrons if Poland exists as an independent state or reverts back to its previous condition of being partitioned by its neighbours? We are not related to the Poles and – culturally, politically, and racially – Poland’s neighbours to the west and the east have traditionally been superior to it. The Yankees of Chicago and New York can worry about Poland’s fate. It means nothing to Southrons.

    You just wrote Hitler shouldn’t be faulted for failing to accomplish his objectives during the course of the war . . ..

    I did not write that. I said it was the RAF, not Hitler, who turned Germany to rubble. It was also the USAAF.

    Blaming Country A for what Country B does is blame-shifting, especially when considering that Country B waged unprovoked war on Country A.

    Looking at a map and reviewing the amount of cheap peasant materiel Stalin had at his disposal (he was in Poland by ’43 fighting his ex-ally) should make it clear that it was going to become part of the Soviet sphere of influence.

    Yet, half of Poland being taken by Germany (including areas populated by Germans) is all the justification needed by France and the UK to wage war on Germany. The USSR invaded eastern Poland two weeks later and received no declaration of war from France and the UK (of course not, the western Allies supplied the USSR). Poland was just an excuse.

    Why would a southerner call Germany a great country?

    Are Southrons not supposed to recognise greatness? Germans have produced remarkable cultural accomplishments.

    Germany was the continent’s answer to BRA, a secular federal state rampaging against its culturally superior neighbors.

    So says the guy who makes excuses for Communist conquest.

    That Germany even exists today is a small tragedy. It must perish.

    Sure thing, Mr. Kaufman.

  15. Poland was just an excuse.

    I should add to that that Poland was just an excuse for the traitors in London and Paris to wage a war so devastating to Europe that 68 years later European survival is in serious doubt.

    It is a strange victory indeed in which Englanders and Frenchman lost almost their entire empires and feel like foreigners in their own cities.

    The war whose outcome you celebrate was liberalism’s greatest triumph.

  16. The Jewish media seems to hate Yankees just as much as it does Southrons . . ..

    We must be watching different media. The dumb, toothless, inbred Southerner is a predictable theme in the Yankee-centric Jewish media.

    Stockholm Syndrome. Southerners are probably the most patriotic Americans. More Stockholm Syndrome.

    You’re right about that.

  17. The liquidations of Empire were very carefully stage managed by the US and the USSR. Vietnam for example. India was Roosevelt’s predondition for full support.

    The US had to eat up the French and British empire or it would have gone to war with both at some later point.

  18. A glance at the devastation that stretches from the coast of Florida to the border of Uruguay is sufficient to reveal the damage that White people motivated by ideology are capable of inflicting upon themselves.

  19. Are Southrons not supposed to recognise greatness? Germans have produced remarkable cultural accomplishments.

    So have Yanks. The accompanying national mythoi ie “Deutscher” and “American” are not justified on account of cultural accomplishments. Cultural accomplishments and in the case of Germany, primordial theories are not enough to sustain a healthy nation state. Carving Germany into so many Hollands, Switzerlands and Austrias would have had a Europeanizing effect. Instead Germany lumbers on just like Weimar, a culturally degenerate changepurse for real European countries. The Greeks just decided Germany owes them massive reparations for WWII, you listening “Golden Dawn”? 🙂

  20. Check this out:

    “The Supreme Court ruling (Brown) had, it seemed, united every element of American Jewry – every element, that is, except southern Jewry. Southern members had, for instance, successfully delayed the ADL from filing an amicus brief in the Brown case. No sooner had the ADL publicized its support for school desegregation than B’nai B’rith groups in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Virginia lobbied the organization to reconsider its position.

    Southern Jews were thrown into turmoil by the support that the national organization gave to the Supreme Court decision. Over the next several years, intense internecine squabbling threatened to tear organized Jewry in two. With Miami its only Southern base of operations, the American Jewish Congress emerged relatively unscathed. As the two organizations with the most substantial southern membership, the American Jewish Committee and B’nai B’rith were the most seriously affected. Recriminations and resignations ruled the day. In the words of journalist Hodding Carter, there was a “very blunt” exchange of opinions.”

  21. So have Yanks.

    I’ve travelled through Germany and through Yankeedom, and to compare the two in terms of cultural greatness (past or present) is laughable. The works of J. S. Bach alone trump Yankeedom’s net contributions to Western culture.

    Ultimately, I’m not at this site to discuss Germany or German nationalism, so perhaps you would be interested in finding a German to discuss those things with.

  22. Hunter, my apologies if your answer to this is buried somewhere on this blog, but what do you suppose accounts for Southern Jewry’s less hostile behavior?

  23. It seems Germany isn’t getting anything in exchange for bankrolling the EU.

    Well, they’ve got a 5.4% unemployment rate and about 2% in southern Germany. They’re running a huge trade surplus and a modest budget surplus. The DAX stock market is at an all-time high. So I’d say their economic position within the EU and eurozone seems to be working out pretty well for them.

    If I thought the EU empowered Germany I’d be anti-EU.

    No-man’s idealized Europe:

    http://www.sdheroes.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/map_europa1.jpg

  24. I’m sure it is one of the many wonders of “the domestic institution of African servitude.”

    In the South, there were huge numbers of black slaves, so traditionally far more cultural importance has been attached to whiteness. Compared to the Northeast, the South’s racial caste system had the effect of diminishing class, religious, and ethnic tensions among White people.

    The Jew and the Catholic had far less difficulty being accepted into the White power structure in the South. As a result, Jews and Catholics in the South attached more importance to whiteness than elsewhere.

    In a cities like Birmingham or Montgomery, the Jews had nothing to gain from challenging white supremacy and segregation. They were already successful business leaders. They had always been accepted in Southern society.

  25. “In a cities like Birmingham or Montgomery, the Jews had nothing to gain from challenging white supremacy and segregation. They were already successful business leaders. They had always been accepted in Southern society”

    The Mongolian essential bred out of existing with the Chinese.

  26. Chechar,

    So there is no misunderstanding, I’m arguing for Type-A Bi-causalism for 1910 forward in the US, not monocausalism. I want to make it clear for all to see I’m not putting “all” the “fault” on “the Jews.”

    that’s precisely the ideological trap, Lew: starting to count from the times when the Jews took over America and not from the times that the entire West caught HIV.

    No, it’s a premise in your argument that I’m challenging. Whether it is in fact a “trap.” I think you need to explain that, because the issue here is the Jewish contribution to white decline not the decline of the west in general.

    To untangle the Jewish contribution, don’t you think it’s necessary to look at the historical periods or the “data” when Jews had political, economic, or cultural power (or all three) over the society?

    In the periods when Jews had no power over white societies, their contribution to white decline during the period will always be zero. But that doesn’t tell us anything useful, because Jews can’t “cause” anything when they don’t have power.

    So you can’t begin to approach this question without zooming in on pieces of Western history when the Jews were in a position to do damage or not.

    You, HW, Jeppo, No-Man and the other people here with a deeper knowledge of history than I have can correct me if I’m wrong. The South seems a bit of an outlier in terms of the “Jewish effect”; it’s a place where Jews didn’t work to harm the host. But absent more examples, the Jewish period in the South looks like an exception that proves the rule.

    A question like “did the Jews cause the north to attack the south” is meaningless in this contect, because, again, Jews didn’t have power in the north. It’s totally relevant. It’s like asking did the Jews cause the Angles to attack the Saxons. Ok; no, granted, but what the hell is that supposed to tell us when the issue is what Jewscaused?

    The north attacking the south doesn’t show anything that hasn’t been true in 2000 years. Whites get into disputes, go to war, and kill each other in horrible fratricides.

    The relevant questions are: when Jews had power in Spain, Russia, South Africa, and the United States, what did they do? The answers here are clear. They range from cultural subversion, economic exploitation to outright genocide.

    So once you throw out the “bad data” — periods in which Jews were not in a position to cause harm — Type A Bi-causalism emerges as the dominant pattern.

    KMD has said the Jews’ end game this time is a Bolshevik scale bloodletting against whites. It’s not like this question is purely academic. People who want divert attention from Jews are malicious.

  27. “So not only do the krauts rule Europe politically and economically, they dominate in the fields that most Europeans *really* care about, football and auto racing.”

    Better tell the Spanish to give up the World Cup before the Herrenvolk get pissed.
    I reckon it’s the Germans who are responsible for the Islamification of Europe, is it?
    I presume you also think that Thilo Sarrazin is full of shit as well.

    “So I’d say their economic position within the EU and eurozone seems to be working out pretty well for them.”

    You mean to say that Germany under Jewish influence is better than it was under the Nazis? Maybe that occult Jewish mind control you folks find so irresistible ain’t so bad.

    Now that everything is all sunshine and lollipops in Deutschland, I guess that our troubles with this silly little monolithic Jewish mind control thingy are all over.

    jeppo hereby receives today’s award for plasticity of thought. Dickens would be proud.

    “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to Heaven, we were all going direct the other way–in short, the period was so far like the present period, that some of its noisiest authorities insisted on its being received, for good or for evil, in the superlative degree of comparison only.”

    Deo Vindice

  28. People who want divert attention from Jews are malicious. – Lew

    But what about saying “Doctors who focus on AIDS and try to divert attention from the pneumonia that’s killing his patient are malicious”.

    Two things here: (1) you combat pneumonia, but fail to kill the HIV virus, your patient will contract another disease nonetheless (e.g., Kaposi’s sarcoma) even after killing the pneumonia bacteria. (2) If you go to the primary cause, the HIV infection, the immunological system of your patient will be restored and it will combat all secondary infections naturally.

    That’s why in the other thread I used the case of the Iberian peninsula and New Spain. Jews were disempowered there thanks to the Inquisition, but the Iberians’ lust for gold was so catastrophic that many of them miscegenated with Amerinds or black slaves. It is a textbook case that demonstrates that even when keeping the subversive tribe at bay whites still have ethno-suicidal issues. (And again, something similar happened in ancient Greece, etc.).

  29. What basically happened is that Yankees got all excited about their pet abstractions during WW2 and the war against Hitler caused a remarkable transformation of racial attitudes up there.

    The South exited WW2 unchanged and as stubbornly committed to segregation as ever before. The “Civil Rights Movement” was part of the same utopian mindset that inspired the “War on Poverty” and the “War on Drugs.”

    The “-isms of the North” were well known to Fitzhugh, Calhoun, Rhett and other antebellum Southern critics of the North’s social system. It would not have surprised them in the least to find out that Yankees would one day attempt to stamp out “racism” and “homophobia.”

    To the Southern nationalists of the 1850s, the North was the incarnation of democracy run amok, a place of excessive equality in thrall to every “novelty” and crackpot idea known to man.

    It was understood at the time that “Black Republicanism” went far beyond anti-slavery. Women’s suffrage, socialism, and Prohibition were already on the radar screen.

  30. “People who want divert attention from Jews are malicious. – Lew”

    To be clear, I’m not interested in “diverting attention from the Jew.” In fact I believe sound White Civilization is based on doing exactly the opposite of what the Jew does. That’s how you build a culture that differentiates whites from Jews immediately. As whites succumb to Judaizing, they become ripe for full scale revolution, because the Jew no longer stands out. I think Jews and white Jew sympathizers are interested in Bolshevik bloodletting here as well.

  31. In the aftermath of the War Between the States, the North inflicted permanent damage on its own cities by repealing all the black codes that had banned free negroes in the antebellum era.

    Blacks were made into citizens with equal rights. Segregation was banned in public schools. Public accommodations were desegregated. Every Northern state except Indiana repealed its anti-miscegenation law.

    In the South, MLK was seen as a dangerous radical, probably even a communist. In the North, MLK was seen as a freedom fighter on behalf of American ideals. His performances on television in Birmingham and Selma (like his stunt at the Lincoln Memorial) were crafted for a Northern audience.

    Northerners couldn’t see anything wrong with desegregation because the North had been integrated for almost 100 years in 1963.

  32. “People who want divert attention from Jews are malicious.”

    Invoking Hanlon’s razor on this latest bit:
    Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

    I don’t really think that anyone here wants anything more than a proper perspective on the situation. Pretty hard to miss out on being informed about the Jews on this site. Perhaps the counterexample offered by the antibellum South has all the “deep” thinkers so flummoxed. I just hate it when everything doesn’t fit together in a tidy little package.

    But then I guess you folks don’t much cotton to arguing in good faith. That would require a belief in personal responsibility and independent thought, which is virtually impossible when you are all completely controlled by the occult influence of superhuman Jews.

    People who want to divert attention away from Southern independence are malicious.
    We just call them Judeo-yankees or if you prefer, secular puritans.

    Deo Vindice

  33. So I’d say their economic position within the EU and eurozone seems to be working out pretty well for them.

    Yes, Jeppo, Germany is supposed to be “stable and productive” re: US occupation policy in 1947 because it was deemed necessary to bankroll a pro-US Europe. That’s why the country exists today. That’s why limited re-industrialization was allowed and the herrenvolk slaves were for the most part returned in decent condition from the UK and France where they masterfully toiled in chains for years.

    So yes Germany can have a smart military, so long as it remains an arm of NATO. Germany can have industry so long as it shares the wealth with its Marshall Plan —> EU neighbors. That’s the view that the civilized world holds of Germany and you’d be amazed how quickly the fuzzy philogermanism of Ameritards would dissolve if we let the hun loose.

  34. That doesn’t show ethno-suicidal tendencies. It shows Jews tried to take over in Spain. The Spanish dealt with them before they could consolidate their grip.

    What you’re calling ethno-suicidal tendencies after the inquisition period looks like a universal historical process to me, nothing unique to the whites of that era.

    History is cultures, empires and other great powers rising, falling, disappearing. The Indus Valley civilization came and went. Does that show they had ethno-suicidal tendencies? No, they succumbed to complex historical forces just like the Spanish.

    Spanish decline without Jewish influence doesn’t support your case there is an inherent tendency toward suicide in whites, because many non-white civilizations have also declined and disappeared without help from the Jews.

    I’m sticking with Type A for now.

  35. “In some states like New York, New Jersey, and Vermont, there was never much of a “fall” of racialism because there had never been a “rise.””

    The white working classes in those states are no more fond of negroes than the white working class of any other state. The Italians alone in New York are famous for their common-sense based negrophobia.

  36. I withdraw malicious comment and apologize. Some, not all, who want to divert are malicious is more accurate.

  37. For the record, I don’t agree with Chechar that Duke and Tanstaafl are monocausalists. I’d have to see it in their own words. The number of people who claim **in their own words** it’s the Jews and only the Jews is vanishingly small. Maybe non-existent.

  38. Better tell the Spanish to give up the World Cup before the Herrenvolk get pissed.

    2014 will be here soon enough.

    I reckon it’s the Germans who are responsible for the Islamification of Europe, is it?

    I reckon it was the French more than anyone else. De Gaulle wanted to build up a Euro-Med/Eurabian third force in world politics between the US and the Soviet Union. The thinking was that they could convert the masses of Arab immigrants to French culture and thus spread their influence (and dominance) throughout the Middle East. But rather than Frenchify the Arab world, the immigrants have Islamified France. Oops.

    I presume you also think that Thilo Sarrazin is full of shit as well.

    Your presumption is unwarranted. Not to mention jaw-droppingly stupid.

    You mean to say that Germany under Jewish influence is better than it was under the Nazis?

    No, I mean to say that “[Germany’s] economic position within the EU and eurozone seems to be working out pretty well for them.”

    Maybe that occult Jewish mind control you folks find so irresistible ain’t so bad.

    Seriously, how am I supposed to answer something as nonsensical as that?

    Now that everything is all sunshine and lollipops in Deutschland, I guess that our troubles with this silly little monolithic Jewish mind control thingy are all over.

    If you say so. Though I would merely say that the combination of the Hartz IV welfare reforms and an undervalued euro have done wonders for the export-oriented German economy.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hartz_concept

    Merkel the Merciless now wields the kind of power–real and lasting economic and political power from Gibraltar to the Arctic Circle–that Bismarck, Kaiser Wilhelm and Hitler could only dream about.

  39. “Northerners couldn’t see anything wrong with desegregation because the North had been integrated for almost 100 years in 1963.” – before the indoor heater the north had a much smaller, and much whiter population of blacks, so this is a little unfair to them, even though its true.

    “Spanish decline without Jewish influence doesn’t support your case there is an inherent tendency toward suicide in whites, because many non-white civilizations have also declined and disappeared without help from the Jews. ” – Spain lost out to other european nations. they weren’t practicing free trade with the muslim world. and while the colonies are utterly dysfunctional(the white upper classes not-withstanding), Spain herself is still in a reasonably good position.

  40. “I reckon it’s the Germans who are responsible for the Islamification of Europe, is it?”

    USG e.g. pressuring the EU to accept Turkey.

Comments are closed.