Jost Turner’s Firearms: The Great Equalizer

The following essay was written by Jost Turner, an American Viet Nam veteran, who founded a White folk community – NS Kindred in the Mountains of Northern California. Jost worked briefly in the open American White Nationalist “movement” but he became very disillusioned with the selfish, dysfunctional people in “The Movement”. Jost sought to discover and live authentic, Indo-European religions as practices by Indo-Europeans in India, Persia, Greek areas of modern Turkey and Europe during the last golden age. This article has been edited, recognizing the American negative bias associated with anything related to German National Socialism. – Jack Ryan

Firearms: The Great Equalizer by Jost

Clearly, violations of the laws regarding possession and use of firearms have been responsible for sending more White racialists to prison than anything else. There are probably thousands of different firearms laws in this country, all varying from state to state, county to county and city to city. Most of these laws are blatantly ill-written, but enforced with the fervor of an inquisition. Petty firearms violations were used as the government’s justification to attack both Randy Weaver and the Waco Davidians. Without a doubt, possession of firearms is the greatest danger to White racialists in general, and to Folk-communities in particular.

Nevertheless, we strongly encourage all (White Americans), especially our women and even our children, to be armed and highly skilled in the use of firearms. This is because the country is being invaded by hordes of criminals and gangs from Non-White countries notorious for violence and savagery. Neither the government nor the police are making any real effort to protect the public from these lowly evolved creatures, and so it is quite likely that we all will have to deal with them ourselves sooner or later.

Being armed is very effective against criminals and gangs. This was dramatically proven during the Los Angeles Rodney King riots. Invariably, the mere presence of a firearm was enough to send the rampaging gangs in the opposite direction – actually firing the weapon was unnecessary. This is because criminals ang gang members are by nature extremely selfish, indulgent and really quite cowardly. Hence, they prey only on the weak. However, they do not look on a man or woman with a firearm as “weak prey”. A firearm is really nothing more nor less than a very effective “equalizer”. It makes you equal to virtually any adversary, even a whole gang. Unless their courage is propped up with an enormous amount of dope or alcohol, you can be sure that even in mass these gangs are not likely to stick their necks out after looking down the barrel of a confidently held firearm. Looking towards our dismal future of lawlessness, violence and gang-land feudalism, we recommend that (White Americans) endure the real dangers in order to ensure the safety of their families with a firearm in the home.

The Most Effective Weapon: Your Skill

In general, a rifle is designed for attack and a pistol for defense. Although less wieldy, a shotgun is also a good defense weapon and requires less skill than a handgun to use effectively. Many people advocate the so called “assault rifles” (semi-automatic rifles with large magazine capacities) for defense. We discourage buying assault rifles. They are very expensive, not anywhere near as effective as one would believe, and, legally speaking, they are far more dangerous as virtually every day new laws are being passed restricting their possession. The same can be said of the large magazine capacity semi automatic pistols and “assault shot guns”. Frankly, any simple firearm, rifle, shotgun, or handgun – even a .22 plinker is perfectly adequate for defense. What is important is not your choice of weapon, but your ability to use the weapon effectively! I’ve witnessed it myself: a simple, single-shot weapon in the hands of a skilled marksman is far more deadly than a troop of mediocre riflemen armed with the latest “assault rifles”.

Necessities: Training & Information

To become a skilled marksman, you need to fire at least 20 rounds a week form the off-hand position. Handle your firearm often, so that using it is almost second nature. Learn something about human and animal anatomy. Learn where to place your shots to effectively stop and disable any adversary – including one out of his mind on dope. Be aware of all federal, state and local firearms laws. We recommend joining the National Riffle Association. They will keep you informed of all new laws and they are working hard fighting in the federal and state legislatures, as well as in the courts, to stop the flagrant disarming of the public. The liberal anti firearms hysteria is driving the NRA more and more in our direction. We are happy to report that the November issue of the American Rifleman, the NRA’s monthly magazine which circulates in the millions, carried an excellent feature story on the Randy Weaver tragedy, noting his “White separatist” religion with no derogatory connotation. They also endorsed Kirk Lyons multimillion dollar lawsuit of the Waco survivors against the government – and they know full well where Kirk stands! Firearms owners need all the support they can get. The NRA’s information legislative, and legal service are an important asset.

Defense Against Government Attack

While we feel that the growing lawlessness, violence, and gang-culture in this country warrants the possession of a firearm for defense, we do not advocate keeping firearms to defend against the police or the government. It doesn’t matter how well armed you are, you are not likely to win. You might get one or two of them (four in the case of the Davidians), but you won’t last long. The government had an inexhaustible supply of men, ammunition, and advanced technology (the best that tax-payer money can buy). Taking on the government would be like trying to fight a charging elephant with a .22. When an elephant attacks and you only have a .22, your best recourse is to run, hide and sneak away until you are out of danger. Shooting an elephant with a .22 will only make it mad. And if it’s mad, it will be much more difficult for you to get away. As both the Weaver and Davidian tragedies graphically illustrated, shooting it out with the government just isn’t practical.

Violence & Armed Revolution

Beware of those who advocate firearms for any sort of violence or guerrilla warfare against non-Whites, liberals, or the government. First of all, there is a good chance that these individuals work for the government and are interested in sending you to prison. Even if they do not work for the government, it should be apparent that they do not know what they are talking about! We have pointed out that anyone who knows anything at all about revolution or guerilla warfare would certainly be aware that there is absolutely no support for it in this country at this time. Without public support, all violence is counterproductive. This is not theory, it is a cold, hard fact!

Be aware that mediocre strategists always seem to do just what the enemy expects or wants them to do, and the followers of mediocre strategists are doomed to defeat. The government expects you to arm yourselves and be violent. The government wants you to do this. The government would love for lots of new “Order-type” organizations to spring up and lash out in armed violence. In fact, if none come about, the government will do everything it can to create some, as can be seen by the recent government entrapment of White racialist youths in Los Angeles! The government is ready and waiting for armed violence. Don’t fall in to their trap! The greatest of military victories have been won by a disciplined force doing exactly what the enemy never expected – or never thought possible. A brilliant example of this is how the British Colonel Lawrence easily took the Turkish stronghold of Aqaba with a ragged band of Arabs. That’s solution-oriented. A final note on armed revolution: In 1923 Germany was ripe for revolution. A. Hitler had 55,000 registered supporters, professional military officers (even Generals), the active support of hundreds of armed, trained, combat veterans, and public support, the like of which we could not even imagine! On November 8, 1923, he attempted an armed revolution and failed. Think about it. If he failed in such an opportune situation, then why should we consider armed revolution in a country not ripe for it – with no public support, no trained veterans, no leader, no military officers, and no organization with more than a hundred or so registered supporters? Even though in later years Hitler’s support grew and the threat of Marxist take-over increased, he never again considered armed revolution. Instead, like his Marxist adversaries, he carefully build a solid, Folk-based movement which ultimately could not be denied power! This is our task today.

It is our duty to defend our families from an onslaught of violence and lawlessness which the government is allowing and encouraging to proliferate. But as (White Americans), we must do so intelligently and responsibly, training ourselves in the skilled use of simple weapons, while keeping abreast of the changing laws which govern their use and possession. Just as in NS Germany, the next revolution will be a revolution in thought. – Jost

This entry was posted in Gun Control. Bookmark the permalink.

124 Responses to Jost Turner’s Firearms: The Great Equalizer

  1. John says:

    Strangely enough Aparthied fell right after Communism fell. Communism in Russia was an excellent cover for white supremacists in South Africa. They could have kept Mandela in jail forever as a commie if they still had the “credible”threat of the Soviets to scare witless State Department aides with. The inconclusive battles between Soviet backed Mozambique and western aligned SA kept whites in a good position. The fall of the USSR removed excuses that our brothers down there were using to justify their own resistance to black encroachments.

  2. John says:

    what worked? Who won? Wtf are you advocating? What do you think I’m opposing in the mantra?

  3. John says:

    When you are done patting yourself on the back for “defeating” the enemy see Reagan’s lasting legacy on your own doorstep.

    http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Reform_and_Control_Act_of_1986

    Was he a conservative? What did he conserve? Not much as it turns out.

  4. John says:

    Here’s the guy who bears much of the responsibility for California turning third world.

    Peter Robinson, a former Reagan speechwriter, agrees. “It was in Ronald Reagan’s bones — it was part of his understanding of America — that the country was fundamentally open to those who wanted to join us here.”

    Reagan said as much himself in a televised debate with Democratic presidential nominee Walter Mondale in 1984.

    “I believe in the idea of amnesty for those who have put down roots and lived here, even though sometime back they may have entered illegally,” he said. Yeah all three million darkies who’s sons now run California for the benefit of Azatlan.

  5. Rudel says:

    “I didn’t go to Oxford.”

    That’s painfully obvious.

  6. John says:

    Boris Johnson went. So there’s really no meaningful standard.

  7. Of course it does. It’s called brain drain.

  8. Boris Johnson is a hilarious blueblood scoundrel. Truly a dying breed.

  9. John says:

    Boris: Mayor At the moment London ceased to be English.

    Not a good legacy. Not entirely his fault but the Tory party are complicit along with Tony.

  10. Good point. Who is going to pay for Sumayah’s hysterectomy if the French can’t count on a dirty Jew to cough it up anymore? That rat-faced Zionist’s check bounced! He’s probably killing kids in Israel under his Hebrew name by now.

  11. Not entirely his fault

    If you want to blame someone blame Elizabeth, possibly the most pathetic queen in history.

  12. J Spruce says:

    “Reagan said as much himself in a televised debate with Democratic presidential nominee Walter Mondale in 1984″

    The 80s with nafta and gatt and the California amnesty, under the republican watch. SNL, Saturday Night Lynching, made a parody of CEO’S and the latinos crisscross each others at the border ceo’s heading south, and latinos north. Signified the peak of western industrial age of 20th century and the end of cold war. Husher in the NWO, consolidation of all worlds government in the hands of a few, the proud, the elites.” They Live”

  13. Jack Ryan says:

    I encourage OD readers to take a few moments to read (re-read) OD’s comment guidelines.

    http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2010/10/02/comment-guidelines-2/

    Get to know them, they are your friends, they will help the OD community grow and prosper and help educate our people to address the difficult times we now face.

    We have problem with readers riding “hobby horses” ignoring the subject matter of the very good articles posted on OD.

    In this case, the subject of the post is Jost Turner’s very intelligent, reasoned suggestions for White Americans to own and use firearms in a safe, effective manner.

    This subject of this post is not the break up of the Soviet Union, Reagan’s 1986 Amnesty, the supposed all powerful control of Jewish world conspiracies.

    OD does publish articles on these subjects, please make comments that address the subject of the post.

  14. John Thomas says:

    Jost Turner was good article. Everyone is on Russia and Israel now. Maybe next week Yellow Peril Threat. I do not believe that Dr. John Colemans works are Conspriacy Theory—same with Judeo -Masonry and Khazars. Censòrship and Moderation is not Freedom of Speech. You have alot of good articles Jack. Everyone thinks that Martin Lindstedt is wild—but he does know how to deal with people and not get bent out of shape. He does expose false White Nationalist. This is just obervation–dont take it wrong way….

  15. Jack Ryan says:

    I restored most of the deleted comments, many did wade off topic, but I think most of our readers making comments are good people and I get criticism that I am too quick to censor comments.

    So I just request that readers try to stay on topic and adhere to OD’s comment guidelines.

    Thanks everyone.

    JR

  16. John says:

    The occasional flare up doesn’t hurt.

  17. That was but a Team Anglo scrimmage.

  18. Potok: http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/radical_right_well_start_killing_people_if_obama_enacts_gun_control/

    The League of the South, a white supremacist secessionist group based in Alabama, on Wednesday said that “the biggest threat is the U.S. government itself” and described the Obama administration as “a criminal regime.” “Those in positions of power who exceed the limits of lawful authority ought to be made to live in mortal fear of their transgressions,” league president Michael Hill said.

    A day later, Terry Jones, the Muslim-bashing Florida preacher whose burning of the Koran set off violence in the Middle East, sounded similar. “Every generation needs a revolution,” Jones said. “We must resist the disarming of the American people, if necessary, with violent aggressive opposition. The tree of liberty must be, from time to time, refreshed with the blood of patriots and tyrants.”

    Chuck Baldwin, a Montana leader of the antigovernment “Patriot” movement and a pastor, wrote last week, and reiterated yesterday, that semi-automatic weapons were essential to preserve “freedom” and prevent “tyranny.” “Ladies and gentlemen, whatever the consequences might be, and whatever anyone else does or doesn’t do, I am prepared to become an outlaw over this issue! I don’t know how to say it any plainer: I will not register my firearms, and I will not surrender my firearms.” He went on to say that any confiscation attempt would result in a “revolution.”

    It wasn’t only acknowledged radicals reacting. In Wyoming, a state where guns are very much a part of life for many, lawmakers have sponsored a bill that would ensure that “any federal law which attempts to ban a semi-automatic firearm or to limit the size of a magazine of a firearm or other limitation on firearms in this state shall be unenforceable in Wyoming.” Of course, this kind of attempt to “nullify” federal laws dates back to the Civil War and is generally unconstitutional.

    Yeager found a virtual cheering section on the radical racist right as well. “He is saying what needs saying and is ready to rock,” wrote “Fred O’Malleu” on the neo-Nazi Vanguard News Network Internet forum. Elsewhere, he added: “He is saying what we should all be saying, LOUD AND FUCKING CLEAR!! … You fucking idiots, if you let them get away with this shit, you have no life left anyway.”

    “A line must be drawn in the sand, a small spark could set off the power keg of patriots lets hope it blows sky high,” wrote another commenter on Stormfront, which is the world’s largest white supremacist Web forum. “I see Civil War II on the horizon,” said another. A third commenter, “Rosalynn,” put it like this: “We’ve been putting every extra penny aside to buy more ammunition and hopefully in the next couple of weeks we will also be able to purchase a few more firearms. They can kiss my white butt if they think they are getting any of our guns.”

  19. John says:

    Potok.

    Let us first disarm the niggers and strip prominent Jews of their bodyguards and prevent actors from possessing weapons. You first by all means you scoundrels.

  20. John says:

    At this point what whites are going to need to do is incorporate security firms to guard buildings with firearms and licensed bodyguards. Who owns the guard firms? Anyone got a roster of names who stand to profit once whites have to get around the gun laws by becoming licensed armed guards.

  21. Robert Campbell says:

    You should not have edited that essay. Either use Jost’s material or not.

  22. Janes dean says:

    Jack, keep that white trash walrus WHORE Caitlin Rabah the hell away from your kids, she’s a druggie, a pig, bulimic, oh, and steals from her grandma and BRAGS about it. She was saying slot of shit about your kids too.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>