We’ve published some articles on Occidental Dissent on what to do if you, or someone you support is smeared with the career destroying smear “You’re RACIST”. Today, I would like to ask and try to answer the question:
Q: In this year 2012 – what’s a RACIST?
Peter Brimelow – editor and publisher of the immigration restrictionist web site (my favorite) www.vdare.com gives this definition of “a RACIST”.
“A Racist – someone who is winning an argument with a Liberal, or, sadly, winning an argument with a Libertarian”
Not bad.
James Edwards – the populist Southern nationalist leader and “The Political Cesspool” radio host, takes it a bit further and states that all White Americans are now considered “RACISTS” by the corrupt “powers that be”; Edwards argues that the “RACIST!” smear is just used to silence and intimidate White Conservatives and White Americans should stop backing down and trying to plead to the Liberal/Leftists that “they’re not racists”.
James Edwards states:
“It’s been getting increasingly obvious, for years now, that “racist” doesn’t mean someone who hates members of other races and wants to harm them (which is the definition most white people think of when they hear the word). Instead, it has become nothing but a racial slur directed at white people in order to shame us into voting, believing, or behaving a certain way. In other words, liberals and non-whites use the word to “keep us in our place.” And boy, have we learned our place!”
(James Edwards, “Racism Schmacism” as quoted by Vdare)
I have my own definition of “a RACIST” that works just fine for me:
“A Racist is someone who has some loyalty to his people and someone who is not a complete idiot and/or not a complete traitor”.
So in questions of crime, mass immigration, affirmative action, proposed wars against other White Indo European nations, church affiliations, sports teams to follow, charities to support – I go with the idea that it is perfectly fine to have loyalty to my/our people (some arguments here on OD as to who are “our people”) and just not be a complete idiot or a complete traitor.
By my definition – 99% of the Japanese are “RACISTS” – not idiots, not traitors. The Japanese don’t do idiotic/treasonous things like welcome mass immigration of non Japanese immigrants to Japan, grant the non Japanese invaders preferential affirmative action over indigenous ethnic Japanese – and why don’t the Japanese do the same idiotic, treasonous things Americans and British, Western European governments do?
The Japanese are RACISTS – not idiots/not traitors to their people. Why don’t we do the same?
So whenever you here the smear “RACIST!” (usually with a hisssssssssing sound), just substitute “not an idiot/not a traitor”.
Example:
Q: “Only evil RACISTS oppose open borders mass immigration of Mexicans, Muslims, Haitians – are you a RACIST”?
A: “So you’re really asking me if I’m a complete idiot/traitor and support the mass immigration invasion of tens of millions of unskilled, hostile alien 3rd word people that will destroy my nation and my people – to answer your question/smear NO, I’m not a complete idiot/traitor to my people. Next question, next smear.
Accuser comes back – “So you’re really a RACIST, an EVIL RACIST”.
A: “I prefer the term not a complete *#@&$*#@ idiot and not a traitor to my people. You can call it whatever name/smear you like, it’s not changing anything.”
So can some of OD’s readers think of some examples of White Americans who are or who are not:
A) Idiots
B) Traitors
Just paraphrasing: Racism is the monstrous and immoral idea that the white race, a unique biological subspecies that is in long-term danger of extinction, deserves the same protections as snail darters, spotted owls, and California condors.
I too resent it when I am called a “racist”. I am not a racist. I just don’t like niggers.
Proud Globalist Race Traitor, I mistakenly took you seriously at first. Now I see it’s all tongue in cheek and satire, albeit at our expense.
You’re really too funny, LOL. I look forward to your comments. Please stick around.
Most folks here are not describing what I’d call a racist world view. There is no White supremest/non Whites are not human to their thinking. very soft and muddled thinking
<i."Most folks here are not describing what I’d call a racist world view. There is no White supremest/non Whites are not human to their thinking. very soft and muddled thinking"
I must respectfully disagree on that particular point. From a scientific perspective other races are fully human in that they have the same number of chromosomes and mixed race offspring are fully fertile. The Black/White/Asian mix Tiger Woods is an example of this.
It would be more accurate to describe the different races as subspecies or breeds of Homo sapiens rather than as separate species.
A racist is someone who has a bumpersticker on their car that says “My Rhodesian Ridgeback is smarter than your Kenyan President.”
lol.
“”….I must respectfully disagree on that particular point. From a scientific perspective other races are fully human in that they have the same number of chromosomes and mixed race offspring are fully fertile….””
Yep, but classification of species by chromosomes and fertile offspring is largely matter of agreement not scientific law. In physics we can not include new elements in Earth Gravitation. It was, it is and it will be 9.81 m/s2 but in biology with development of genetics we may well consider that fertile offsprings and chomosomes are not the only ones what matters.
LOL, we’ll just go on disagreeing Rudlel. I understand your point and mindset. I have no issue with you/ it
It’s funny because I knew you would.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1012/82111.html
“Racist” is euphemism for “white Supremacist,” whether REAL or erroneously and deceptively perceived.
In this scenario, even a non-white being accused of being “racist” is, in fact, being accused of being akin to a “white Supremacist.”
The white Supremacist is the enemy to ALL liberationist movements be they black, brown, homosexual, dyke, jihadist, Jewish, anarchist, libertarian, Objectivism and whatnot.
Third addy writes:
“The white Supremacist is the enemy to ALL liberationist movements be they black, brown, homosexual, dyke, jihadist, Jewish, anarchist, libertarian, Objectivism and whatnot.”
Jack Ryan replies: I agree and well said.
My definition is a bit easier to understand for the common man who doesn’t understand what objectivism and libertarianism is all about. It’s just simple and good:
Someone who has loyalty to his people and someone who isn’t an idiot or a traitor.
Mr. Ryan,
And so the radical liberationist is self-evidently one with NO LOYALTY. So to be a true radical liberal is to be fundamentally disloyal, unfaithful and traitorous.
So the memetic effect of crying “racism” is the attempt to coercively deceive one into becoming disloyal, unfaithful and traitorous.
This should be easy to reject when seen in this light.
Another aspect we need to understand is that the charge of “racism” is a CRY against the white man’s autonomy. Think of it as analogous to your child in a candy store. He cries. And makes you do things. Like buy him candy. This in turn has him crave more candy. Now he cries at home for the candy store. So, you either put a stop to the CRYING or YOU ARE MADE to do things for the crier. And more things for crier when cries even more. This equates to greater autonomy for the child and less autonomy for the father. The crier of “racism” either meets a white man who puts the stop to the crying or he meets a white male who cedes greater autonomy to the crier of “racism.”
^^^ And more things for [the] crier [means he] cries even more.
Man… I mangled that sentence somehow.