Chicago, IL – it’s late August here in Chicago. The Chicago Cubs are 31 games under .500, 29 1/2 games out of first place. Even dire hard Chicago Cub fans have sadly, come to the realization that….
This wasn’t the year.
The last time the Chicago Cubs won any baseball championship was 1945 – the year we dropped the A bomb on Japan; all of the able bodied, young American men were in military uniforms, not in Chicago Cubs uniforms. It was a 4F, old men season, maybe there will be another one… next year. There’s always next year for Cubs fans.
In a similar vein, this was not the year that Ron Paul or any other Liberatrian, economic conservative broke through and was elected President of the United States – Ron Paul will not be ending the welfare state, reversing the Great Society, the New Deal, ending Medicaid and Social Security, privatizing the entire US public school system, enacting right to work laws in all 50 states, breaking the Teamsters Union, the UAW, the United Mine Workers Union and allowing “American” businesses to hire and fire whoever they want, with wages determined by “free markets”, and the American labor force opened up to 2 billion 3rd world workers, under Libertarian free market principles of open borders immigration.
Ron Paul and his never say die Libertarian supporters made a valiant effort to reach out to Blacks, Hispanics, even Muslim immigrants associated with Al Qaeda 9-11-01 terrorists. Ron Paul was the only GOP presidential candidate to back the Ground Zero Mosque and explain that the 9-11-01 mass murder of our people was an understandable Islamic response to the USA’s mistreatment of the Palestinians and the US having military bases in Saudi Arabia.
All of Ron Paul’s outreach/pandering to Muslim immigrants didn’t result in winning Ron Paul the nomination. Neither did Ron Paul’s pledge to set free all Black African Americans in prison for trafficking in hard drugs like crack cocaine and heroin. Ron Paul and other Libertarian economic Conservatives were polling less than 1 percent amongst Black voters… maybe these Black voters haven’t read enough Austrian free market economics books… or maybe they don’t read any books.
Yeah, this wasn’t the year for Libertarian, economic conservative Presidential candidates or the Chicago Cubs.
American nationalist leader George Rockwell stated in 1966 that Libertarian/economic conservative Presidential candidates were doomed to fail. After the ’64 Goldwater debacle, Rockwell stated with 100 percent assurance that no Libertarian economic conservative Presidential candidate would ever win the support of poor and working class White voters.
But, 45 years later we’ve had to suffer the failures of Jack Kemp, Phil Graham, Steve Forbes, Ron Paul and other Libertarian Party Presidential candidates that no one can remember.
Who ran as the Libertarian Presidential candidate in 1992? Who was the second string catcher for the 1977 Chicago Cubs? Who cares?
No this wasn’t the year for the Chicago Cubs or Libertarian, economic conservative Preidential candidates.
Oh well, there’s always next year. This is for sure….. they’ll be back.
“Well PBR there is dumb and then there is dumb, most folks aren’t dumb they are mentally lazy. ”
Exactly. Who are we really kidding here? Most of us aren’t smarter than the average whitey, just better informed. The top 80% of the white bell curve is capable of grasping what is discussed here, it’s just that they are either too comfortable to bother, or are hopelessly barking up the wrong trees.
Oh, and I know this is unrelated, but Neil Armstrong was buried today.
Rest easy Mr. Armstrong.
@ Chris,
Wanna bet?
Serious money, not Detoilet mortgage.
Wednesday, November 7, 2012
Yesterday saw the most irrelevant election ever held in American history. Barack Piano slightly edging out Mitt Romeo as the two most popular representatives of Detoilet and Chicago. Votes from the South are still coming in but are not expected to change Ameripolitics, by order of the US Supremely Court of Jews. Justifiably, dissenters shall be taken out and shot, as will those few who refuse to submit to his Honor Barack’s relief on their faces. No witnesses will be called but Mr. Romeo is expected to verify the African’s version, that the translation be intelligible.
Leaving the stage, Mr. Romeo expressed his will as “Let us be understood, we are a two-headed party and do not entertain opposition. I congratulate my partner.”
@Bill Yancey
Romney’s going win the election, and the South will never rise again.
You stupid Confederatard.
313Chris
Yes sir Mr Yancey, there is no way we can over come such superior reasoning as demonstrated by 313Chris. His debating skills are sublime
“I don’t think people would think I was being honest with them if I said I was Mexican-American,” Romney said during a Univision interview in January. “My dad was born in Mexico and I’m proud of my heritage, but he was born of U.S. citizens who were living in Mexico at the time. He was not Hispanic. He never spoke Spanish nor did his parents, so I can’t claim that honor.”
http://gma.yahoo.com/mitt-romneys-mexican-roots-033457860–abc-news-politics.html
and this is the guy we’re told we should vote for? Because he’s White? A man who thinks being mexican american is an honor? No thanks. The deceased Jessie Helms looks like a better option every couple of days
Stoney, our biggest mistake is attributable to our parents and grandparents (not boomers, HW), carrying these parasites and cooperating in their pee wee craved ‘system’. It ain’t blacks or browns or moslems who’re killing us, it’s the similar looking but remarkably less intelligent idiots that Americansm has declared to be our own that has cancerously inhibited us. ‘The Grand Ole Party.”
Look at the places from whence they proudly hail, if they’re still alive the ext morning.
@ Playing Roots Backwards says:
Go to certain parts of Appalachia and you will find entire regions where the Whites are as dumb as niggers. Their mean IQ is not 100. They are like those Bushmen in Africa who have a mean IQ of 50, even though the rest of of the sub-Saharan Africans have that big 70 IQ….
Idk— I know some really smart people in Appalachia.
What an anti-white thing to say.
313Chris says:
September 1, 2012 at 7:33 am
“Romney’s going win the election, and the South will never rise again. You stupid Confederatard.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RiajXQUppYY&feature=youtube_gdata_player
IT but well worth watching. Why is it that racist whites don’t express themselves as cleverly as this great thinker?
JimmyGears says:
September 1, 2012 at 12:45 pm
What an anti-white thing to say.
313Chris says:
September 1, 2012 at 7:33 am
“Romney’s going win the election, and the South will never rise again. You stupid Confederatard.”
What more can be expected of one dedicated to his homey town of Detoilet?
I’m becoming more and more convinced that Chris is not what he proports to be.
Ideology is bunk, wordism is death.
Is Ron Paul good for whites? It really is a simple question, but NO, the assembled masses would rather waste their time quibbling the nice safe details of useless abstract non-sense.
“Why is it that racist whites don’t express themselves as cleverly as this great thinker?”
Because very few people are as brilliant as he is?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Scruton
Dixiegirl: So, you know some really smart people in Appalchia, huh? Are they really, really smart or are they really just kind of smart? That’s really the question. Really.
Here’s the real question. I know a guy who keeps a retired thoroughbred race horse in a pasture with his goats. Does that mean that the goats can run fast? Proximity doesn’t create likeness.
“Ideology is bunk, wordism is death.”
What good is thinking, anyhow? Just act your instincts (said ironically)!
Hippie motto: “Act now, analyse later.”
What good are ideas and principles? Convictions and principled consistency are foolish, aren’t they?
Ron Paul is not good for Whites and by all appearances he’d rather suck up to negros, mexcians and hajjis then pitch his case to White men. Hunter and others have made a couple of list of Paul’s minority vote seeking stuff
Jack Ryan replies: You’ve heard this one: 1st guy: “I follow the son of a Jewish carpenter.” 2nd guy: “I follow an Austrian painter”
Misleading and not at all amusing. The Book says “son of GOD” but “supposed” by unbelievers to be the son of Joseph the carpenter, or some Roman soldier, according to the Talmudists. The Austrian painter made serious mistakes, the son of God has no fault.
“Hunter and others have made a couple of list of Paul’s minority vote seeking stuff” and then they all voted for one of the truly white conservative NEOCONS who would NEEEEVER fail to “pitch the case” for the white male, states’ rights, etc.
Admit it: Paul was rejected because he is not on board with the unjust global war program.
yea because there is no way folks reject Paul for solid reasons…..
Jack Ryan says:
Jack Ryan wrote: “Sept. 11 th is not the day to try to lecture White Americans that we need to understand the Arab Muslim’s just opposition with American foreign policies….”
Mosin replies: To the contrary, it is the best possible day for Ron
Paul or anyone to speak the truth on those unjust wars.”
Jack Ryan comments:
Mosin is showing strong signs of being….
A true believer, insisting on speaking “THE TRUTH” on September 11th, that American foreign policy, military policy is EVIL. Ron Paul made this (politically suicidal) argument on the 10th anniversary of the 9-11-01 Muslim terrorist attack.
Hard core, true believers are not always a bad thing for our people, if the true believers believe in the 14 Words and will work and fight for the legitimate rights of our people.
Unfortunately, in this case we’re talking about the unshakeable, true belief in the race denying cult of Libertarianism. This horrible, race denying Libertarian cult seems to ensnare very many high IQ young White people. No other race seems to go in for Libertarian nonsense. The Jewish race often pushes libertarianism in Diasporah countries, but not in the Jewish ethno state of Israel. Jews aren’t stupid or suicidal in Israel.
Again, Libertarianism is just another race denying cult, in it’s worst forms it is very similar to the worst forms of Liberalism. Both excuse the worst crimes of Black African Americans and Black Africans as not the fault of Blacks, but the result of cruel political and economic systems. Both Liberalism and Libertarianism seek to “save” all the poor Blacks in America and in the world and share the prosperous good life of upper middle class White Americans.
If you or anyone you know and like starts falling down in to this race denying Libertarian cult, get help and get out.
Mosin Nagant writes:
“Admit it: Paul was rejected because he is not on board with the unjust global war program.”
Jack Ryan replies:
That and the fact that Ron Paul ran for President on a Libertarian, economic Conservative platform and he lost, lost badly the same as every other Presidential candidate who ran on a Libertarian, economic Conservative platform for over 100 years.
Libertarian Presidential candidates and the Chicago Cubs, not so lovable losers, year after year… after year, after year.
And all OD readers should know.. they’ll be back, insisting on spreading the Libertarian TRUTH, insulting and alienating poor and working class White Americans, White veterans, White New York City Fireman, White police officers, insulting and alienating around 95 percent of White Americans who aren’t in this Libertarian cult.
It’s a documented fact Romney voters are the dumbest and least educated voters in the electorate.
“Unfortunately, in this case we’re talking about the unshakeable, true belief in the race denying cult of Libertarianism. This horrible, race denying Libertarian cult seems to ensnare very many high IQ young White people.”
A complete mis-reading of my position stated clearly in many prior comments. The Libertarian side of Paulism has been noted consistently as the weakness, the fault, the failure of his position. The strength of his position is his strict constitutionalism — including restoration of states’ rights (including the right to secede), dismantling the “Fed” and IRS, ending the “women, minorites and other socially disadvantaged groups” welfare and legal support system and all kinds of bureaucracies and regulations that steal our liberty….and not the least: ending unjust “humanitarian” global warfare.
True conservatives do believe certain TRUTHS, that are self-evident, and eternal.
Our religion that we “cling to” is one of those, not the least.
Great analogy Stonelifter.
Our biggest hurdle is convincing people of the root cause of our problems. I wish this nation was still run by the old “racist” white guys who saw blood and soil as the primary foundation of our existence.
Lew,
What you are saying is a misrepresentation. The dumbest?
that award surely must belong to the blacks voting for Obama!
The least educated? Not so sure. Most white men are quite good with math, tech and money. Not as good with words. A facility with math can lead to a stock broker career without college. A large number of English brokers are recruited between 16-18 and sent to firms and make fortunes by the time they are 20. College is beside the point if you have the brains.
If half of Paul’s ideas were enacted the black population would halve in a generation.
Half of being a libertarian is passing off the nonsense of white guilt, but MosinNagant (an otherwise fine rifle) is here to say that we should be replaced by ideology. Ideology is genocide and Mosin is here to exterminate.
John,
I meant by White standards. Romney voters are generally the dumbest and least educated by White standards. I will pull down the data later.
@ RobRoy: I know what you are saying, or trying to say about the use of “ideology” as a weapon against us. But you don’t understand my position. I have been, and still am, the OPPONENT of Libertarianism as such, and of the tactic of “white guilt”, and of race denial and replacement or substitution of racial identity with false ideologies. However, I recognise the TRUE “ideology,” eternal Truth, which is the foundation of our white civilisation, without holding to which we WILL perish. Furthermore, I believe that reasoning, imagining, theorising, holding to ideals and principles, etc. are ESSENTIAL white characteristics.
Lew, you are correct, according to my experience. The most intelligent TRUE whites in my experience are nearly all Ron Paul supporters, or else find him a better choice than Romney-Obama.
I voted for Ron Paul because he is the only candidate to admit it’s my right to discriminate and that “Civil Rights” laws are unconstitutional.
Forced association with negroes is the bludgeon they use to force everything else on us. The result is whites living in fear since the 60s.
“Ideology is genocide and Mosin is here to exterminate.” Giving in to the temptation of in-fighting is white self-genocide, and dividing against ourselves is to exterminate ourselves.
“I believe that reasoning, imagining, theorising, holding to ideals and principles, etc. are ESSENTIAL white characteristics.” Thinking, reasoning, and ideology as such are not genocidal, but ideologies etc. can be used against us to bring about our genocide or racial suicide. On the other hand, believing in nothing but merely acting on racial instinct is not white.
The most intelligent TRUE whites in my experience are nearly all Ron Paul supporters, or else find him a better choice than Romney-Obama.
Yes, Ron Paul’s supporters are young, intelligent and looking for something different. Romney’s supporters are the exact opposite: old, dull and looking for same thing the GOP has delivered for the last 60 years.
“Brutus,
You’re caricaturing libertarianism. You have had it explained to you very clearly, multiple times, that there are different forms of libertarianism, different factions within the libertarian movement, and more to it than economics and eliminating the social safety net. A white working class person might be happy to do without a social safety net if return he could live in all white local community where whites aren’t taxed to death to subsidize nigs, and where his kids will never have to worry about being jumped by nig flash mobs . You’re not acknowledging distinctions and nuance. I see no reason to continue to dialog with you. I will say nor more so as not encourage you to comment further.”
Yawn. Here we go with the old “yeah, but, but, that ain’t the real and true [fill in the blank,] the real and true [fill in the blank] will work and would make everything all right. If only we had the real [fill in the blank,] and not….”
This is the same line of argument, Lew, the we hear continuously from Christians like the ones on these sites who tell us “if only the real Christianity were used instead of what is being practiced today, then we wouldn’t have all these problems.”
This is the same line of argument we hear from Conservatives about the Constitution.
This is the same line of argument we hear from some people about liberalism.
It was the very same argument used by some advocates and apologists for Communism.
You speak of my not understanding “nuances and distinctions,” but it is not that I or others do not understand these, it is that we see what form is actually practiced. It is useless, for example, to discuss, say, Christian Identity as though that were the particular brand of religion being practiced by the millions of people who go to church today and call themselves Christian. It is useless because that is NOT the particular brand being practiced.
Yes, I know all about the “nuances and distinctions” of Libertarianism, I also know which “nuances and distinctions” are generally actually put into practice, and THAT is what is relevant.
“A white working class person might be happy to do without a social safety net if …”
Yeah, they MIGHT.
A white working class man might like to be castrated too, in order to not have sexual urges and so be able to concentrate on more important things. But I doubt many will go for it.
You can argue “nuances and distinctions” all day long, if you please, but again I ask, what do the white working class actually say when you tell them you are taking away their “social safety net,” as you call it? How do they vote for candidates who campaign on that platform?
@Bill Yancey
Ramussen and Gallup both have Romney leading Obama. The next president will be a YANKEE. Deal with it.
“Yes, I know all about the ‘nuances and distinctions’ of Libertarianism, I also know which ‘nuances and distinctions’ are generally actually put into practice, and THAT is what is relevant.”
Maybe I missed something. WHO is actually calling for or supporting Libertarianism on this blog? Libertarianism as such is wrong and harmful, we all agree, and I think we were talking about why so many white voters went for the Neocons instead of Ron Paul in the primaries.
I wonder who would be most adversely impacted by the following policies:
1. End Welfare
2. End military adventurism
The answers constitute two adversaries of many OD readers above.
I’m not a libertarian, but I see value in certain libertarian ideas and strains of libertarianism. I’m willing to defend some libertarian ideas on a limited basis.
313Chris,
Rasmussen? Lol, give me a break.
“This is the same line of argument, Lew, the we hear continuously from Christians like the ones on these sites who tell us ‘if only the real Christianity were used instead of what is being practiced today, then we wouldn’t have all these problems.’ This is the same line of argument we hear from Conservatives….”
The writer who thinks Christianity is irrelevant or impotent appears to be neither Christian nor truly conservative. He seems to think Neo, Mormon, global war hawk “Mitt” by far the better choice of and for the vast majority of “average, blue collar” whites.
Paul you are right.
“Maybe I missed something. ”
Um, yeah, you sure did. There are a couple of strident Libertarian supporters on this thread. In fact, I thought you must be one since I have been condemning Libertarianism on this thread and you attacked me and called me a Republican. Do you not follow a thread, then, and just jump in and contradict posts and hurl names? Since I have never supported Republicans in any way, shape or form on this website I fail to understand why you would think I was a Republican and I certainly have no idea, no idea whatsoever, why you wrote that. That is especially true now that you are saying you are against Libertarianism.
Strange. I can’t believe your last post. Seriously, were you drunk last night or something that you didn’t know what this thread was about and didn’t know who was supporting and attacking whom or what?
“The writer who thinks Christianity is irrelevant or impotent appears to be neither Christian nor truly conservative. He seems to think Neo, Mormon, global war hawk “Mitt” by far the better choice of and for the vast majority of “average, blue collar” whites.”
Are you still drunk today?!!
You need to go back and reread the thread and see exactly what is going on, Mossin. “The writer” wrote no such thing. My meaning should have been clear.
But seriously, you have drastically misunderstood my posts evidently.
“As a person intimately involved with train wreck that was the Ron Paul campaign in 2008, and as someone who watched with detached amusement the Ron Paul train wreck in 2012, I can say that Ron Paul is a steaming pile of horse shit who took all the revolutionary spirit of his fanatics (enough spirit, I might add, for a thousand honest revolutions), and guided it gently to siding in the middle of nowhere.”
– LandShark
I would tend to agree. I almost wonder if RP wasn’t the ‘straw man’ set up by the RINO’s to allow Rand to become MORE than Daddy did, much like Bush, Sr. did for Shrub. That’s almost tantamount to conspiracy theory stuff, but there you are…. after eight years, and a TON of emtional hope, we are saddled with…. Romney.
Misericordie, Domine. But, as Denise has said, Mrs. R. is a LOT better looking than Dyke Michelle O’B.
Playing Roots Backward: I was born and raised in Appalachia. Don’t confuse being uninformed, locally-minded, and poorly educated with unintelligent.