Gary Johnson – Libertarian True Believer Traitor to Our People

Libertarian True Believer - Rainbow Nation.... Plus Mass Muslim Immigration

New Mexico

We’ve introduced OD readers to Wilmot Robertson’s brilliant analysis of America’s political and cultural racial wars (the Dispossessed Majority) listing 5 types of White American traitors:

1) Pussyfooters (most common)
2) Gracchites (rich elitists championing the NW masses)
3) Trucklers (lower class Whites going with the NW flow for wealth and power)
4) Old Believers/True Believers (spreading THE TRUTH to bring peace and prosperity to the entire world!)
5) Proditors (violently obsessed with destroying their/our own people)

Today we will focus on #4 – the True Believer, in this case the Libertarian True Believer Gary Johnson. In case you haven’t heard, or like 98% of Americans – you just don’t care – former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson is the Libertarian Party’s candidate for President of the United States. Though Gary Johnson’s 100% Libertarian program was a big flop in the 2012 GOP Presidential primaries, Johnson is running 3rd party for President in November ; Johnson wants to spread the one, true Libertarian gospel of:

free markets, free trade, less government or better yet, no government as individuals should be free to choose the goods and services and personal lifestyle they want, free of any collectivist loyalty or obligations to some group. Group “collectivism” is supposedly very bad and racial group collectivism is supposedly the world’s greatest evil and America’s greatest sin.

Under Gary Johnson’s Libertarian new American world – fundamentalist Muslim immigrants from Pakistan will somehow live in peace and harmony in our United States with homosexual marriage equality activists – as massive immigration from the entire world will be a great positive to our country, once we scale back the welfare state and end government regulation of environmental laws, labor laws.

Occidental Dissent readers should suspect that a Libertarian true believer like Gary Johnson would have crazy, treasonous views on immigration – and his Playboy Magazine interview confirms – Johnson is an immigration loony!

Open the border; flood of Mexicans would become taxpayers

Q: What is your view of the immigration issue?
A: Hispanics who immigrate care about their families like other Americans care about their families. They’re living in poverty in Mexico and can come to the US and do a lot better.

Q: By–according to some–taking away jobs.
A: They work the lowest-paying jobs. And they are taking jobs that other Americans don’t necessarily want. They’re hardworking people who are taking jobs that others don’t want. That’s the reality.

Q: Would you open the borders and make it easier to immigrate legally?
A: My vision of the border with Mexico is that a truck from the United States going into Mexico and a truck coming from Mexico into the United States will pass each other at the border going 60 miles an hour. Yes, we should have open borders.

Q: Many Americans fear the flood of immigrants that would follow.
A: They would become taxpayers. They’re just pursuing dreams—the same dreams we all have. They work hard. What’s wrong with that?

Source: David Sheff interview in Playboy Magazine , Jan 1, 2001

What a $*&%*#(@#*!

Since True Believer Gary Johnson has renounced all cultural and racial loyalty to our White, Anglo American people, he assumes that the invading millions of low IQ, unskilled Mestizo Mexicans will do the same, instead of promoting the power of their group, LaRaza – block voting to elect a Mexican like Antonio Villaraigosa mayor of Los Angeles.

True Believers differ from Old Believers in that they aren’t trying to turn back the clock and restore some fallen White American world of the past. Most Libertarian True Believers are supportive of the cultural/social changes of the 1960s and they don’t want to restore the 1950s, bring back Christian patriarchy, much less racial segregation. How do we deal with Libertarian True Believers? Don’t waste your time trying to argue or use reason with these types – as they insist they have a monopoly on reason (Libertarian REASON Magazine). Instead, it’s just best to ignore them – DON’T FEED THE LIBERTARIANS, certainly don’t let them come in to your home or THEY WILL NEVER LEAVE. It’s best to let Nature take its course with these types – with some luck, they’ll get caught on the same airplane with some Islamic Jihadist, or die in an automobile crash with some DUI Mestizo immigrants.

50 Comments

  1. tell me again why we should vote for paul and other libertarians? Seems to me boss hog libertarians worship money so as long as business goes on all is right in the world

  2. There’s another factor. Maybe it fits in with one category or another.

    When a white guy moans about this or that niggardlything he’s saying: “I’m not a born winner.” keeping up the appearance of being on top of everything is a strong element in the delusion of the GOP. Women don’t want a guy sobbing on their bosom, acknowledging the threat of the undertow is a blow to prestige and confidence.

  3. Muslims have sounder insights into human nature than Libertarians do. Persia isn’t exactly know for its pride parades and “anti-racist” marches. Of course if I had to pick one as a neighbor…I’d probably pick the White one.

  4. There are many responsible, decent White gay people. My neighbor is one – though I wish he didn’t fly that Rainbow flag.

    One point I try to make over and over is that White Libs can’t have it both ways – can’t have White Western ideas of personal liberty with women’s rights, gay right and AND also support mass Muslim immigration, the two are mutually exclusive. The Dutch Libs led by Geert Wilders understand this simple truth, but in our wacked out PC, multi cult, BRA the American Left tries to make NW Muslim immigrants in to their Lib/Min victim group alliance to gang up on White Gentiles/White Conservatives/White Christians – and it actually does result that the NW Muslim immigrants vote for Obama, but the multi cult alliance just doesn’t hold.

    In such situations I support inciting the NW Muslim immigrants – put out propaganda that the Islamic prophet Mohammed was a queer along with being a pedophile.

  5. queer disqualify being decent; esp if you give a rats ass about our traditions. Let one slide then there is no reason keeping any of them

  6. I understand your position Stonelifter – but, it’s just a different reality living in urban, university areas for so many years as I have.

    Reponsible White “gays” who keep up their property, pay their assessments and keep their private lives private are 100% better than low life non Whites.

    My White gay neighbor doesn’t have 7 AFDC Black teens/terrorists under his roof destroying my life.

    I am still going to fight super hard against Illinois’ homo marriage equality law, but all things are relative.

  7. L. is supposed to be based on individual rights. What if the trash coming in don’t believe in rights? What if they openly announce they want to establish theocracy? Does anyone have the “right” to entry even if they openly say they hate the West? And so on. Do Libertarians (modern version) admit that their view is IDENTICAL to the NWO?

    btw There was a conference held by the Journal of Libertarian Studies (1998). Only one- joo Walter Block- came out in favor of full open borders.

    When they hop over the fence won’t they be landing on someone’s private property and therefore be trespassing?

    The whole movement has been joo infiltrated for three decades.

    There is no one libertarian view. Rothbard favored the Bell Curve and wanted voluntary separation (racial).

    The basic idea is- society should be voluntary. That is it. This stuff about “only individuals exist” was appended without any reason. I want society to be voluntary. I and my White friends have the right to voluntarily avoid niggers and jews. Communities may be established and FENCED. The unwanted, trying to enter, would be trespassing. It is possible to have group property. (Gated, contractual communities, for openers).

    The late libertarian John Hospers- “The Case Against Open Borders”:

    http://mises.org/journals/jls/13_2/13_2_3.pdf

  8. “A: They would become taxpayers. They’re just pursuing dreams—the same dreams we all have. They work hard. What’s wrong with that?”

    Q:Whats to stop them from just voting for all the welfare programs that they like so much?

  9. So in your world it’s gang vs gang, Muslims vs Christians, gays vs straights? This promotes nothing but violence and the constant fighting between one group and another.

    Why not a world where we treat each other equally; where people are not used as a means to an end, but rather, are the end in themselves?

  10. I’ve never cared for Johnson. His statement on immigration pretty much seals the deal. I would never support someone who is in favour of Third World immigration.

  11. Typical of anyone buying into a jewish philosophy. It is poison. Collectivism is bad for goy, but just fine for Jews.

  12. Hunter Wallace says:
    July 9, 2012 at 5:29 pm

    Gary Johnson is a nutty libertoon. Not exactly breaking news.

    Jack Ryan replies:

    True. The point of my post is to (nearly) complete all the examples of Wilmot Robertson’s White Traitors – the 4th category is “True Believers”.

    White Americans like Gary Johnson go off the deep end and become “True Believers” – in this case, true believers in the cult of race denying Libertarianism.

    These Libertarian True Believers really do believe that hundreds of Millions of low IQ Mestizo Mexicans, Pakistani Muslims can come in to America, work hard and achieve the American dream and all these millions of new Americans from the 3rd World will make our country a better place and any problems associated with the arrival of tens of millions of these 3rd world people of color will be caused by too much government regulation, too high marginal tax rates etc.

  13. “Why not a world where we treat each other equally; where people are not used as a means to an end, but rather, are the end in themselves?”

    A nice thought that does not represent reality. I’ll give a flying flip about gay marriage equality when activist gays and the “silent majority” gays denounce and repeal hate crime laws and stop supporting anti-family courts.

    Johnson is your typical utopian libertarian and is pretty much an idiot on economics.

  14. Very insightful article about the state of present-day American culture at :
    ” alternativeright” (.com) website.
    Entitled: “Everyone A Harlot : Am I hot, or not? “*
    Author : Jack Donovan.
    * I didn’t come up with the title, so don’t blame me please. And no, I don’t think I’m hot stuff. I’m just a curmudgeon and I like it that way.

  15. SnowDog says:
    July 9, 2012 at 5:14 pm (Edit)
    So in your world it’s gang vs gang, Muslims vs Christians, gays vs straights? This promotes nothing but violence and the constant fighting between one group and another.

    Why not a world where we treat each other equally; where people are not used as a means to an end, but rather, are the end in themselves?

    Jack Ryan replies:

    Because SnowDog – unless you are John and Yoko Ono – are multi, multi millionaires living in The Dakota on Central Park West in Manhattan – the wealthiest City in the world, you don’t have any chance of living this John Lennon “Imagine” world.

    The rest of us have to live in the….

    Real World.

    In the real world, there are real nations, different kinds of people, with really different ways of thinking, acting, working or (Jessie Jackson, Sharpton) not working, fighting, raping, rioting, conceiving 20 plus illegitimate children, killing, eating people.

    It’s just painfully obvious to any honest person living in the real world that the people living in Liberia, Haiti, Detroit, East St. Louis are living in different ways than say people in Japan or Switzerland or some nice, still all White upper middle class suburb of St. Paul Minnesota.

    The things that you say you want are only conceivable in White, Indo European countries or the highest, homogeneous areas of East Asia (Korea, Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore).

    If you think you are going to “Change the world” make the entire 3rd world think and act like tolerant, upper middle class White Liberals/Libertarians – you’re just not being realistic.

    Look what happened to the US humanitarian intervention in Somalia – our do gooder, feed the starting Somalian troops got shot down, mutilated dead US troops dragged through the streets of Mogadishu.

    Are the Taliban live and let live? They blow up 1,000 year old Buddhist statues, pack soccer stadiums to cheer on the execution of women who dared show their faces in public. These NW Muslims are invading Europe, making once tolerant PC Dutch, Swedes consider supporting the extreme Nationalist Right.

    So how about joining the rest of us in…..

    The real world?

  16. Snowdog, people don’t want to be treated equally. An unmarried white or Asian woman may be fine with a little innocent flirting as may her male family members. But I don’t recommend you flirt with a Muslim woman around her male family members. White people generally are far more accepting of constructive criticism than black people. Criticism of blacks even if only implicit is far more likely to provoke a hostile or violent reaction than if the same criticism were directed at whites. People don’t want to be treated equally but respectfully and the later is determined by culture which if you have not heard is different.

  17. John Lennon was a naive dork who got shot because he was a soft target.

    If he had of been packing and made it known he was a NRA member this probably wouldn’t have happened. Do you think something similar would happen to Ted Nugent?

    My favorite Lennon video ….

    “John Lennon blows his top at Al Capp (Montreal, 1969) ” 9:40 min

  18. This is precisely why I now longer call myself a libertarian, it sounds great on paper but it all turns out to be a big pile of crap. Free markets and individualism and open borders sound fine and dandy in an abstract sense, but anyone with a functioning brain will say it does not work, period. This Johnson idiot is from New Mexico, he should know better and it’s not like any Mexican is going to vote for him to begin with, if they don’t get their damn handouts. The great majority of libertarians could care less if our culture and country went to pot, as long as the money rolls in. The only way free markets and individualism could possibly work is if everyone is of the same culture and race, otherwise it just doesn’t work at all.

  19. Homosexuals have a life that exists outside reproduction for the most part. Unless they bring in a surrogate or get a female beard. They are not part of the life of a nation unless, they act as extremely productive individuals in some industry or other.

  20. I’m not hoste to gays but they can be a complete pain in the arse with the woe is me routine.

    They opted out to some extent. I don’t understand their desire to do middle class things like marriage. Marriage is there to confer legitimacy and property to offspring.

  21. You only have two ways to live and work with other people: you can treat them as moral equals, or you can conquer them before they conquer you. The first leads to voluntary cooperation. The second leads to gang warfare.

    Democracy is gang warfare incarnate. We tell ourselves, we need to protect our property and keep ourselves safe. So we create a government, which is the only institution we allow to take anyone’s property, for whatever reason, and in which we allow to enslave whomever it chooses, for whichever sundry purpose it finds. It’s not surprising that governments have killed more people in the 20th century than everyone else, put together, in all the previous centuries of civilization.

    It’s this inconsistency in our reasoning that we need to correct.

  22. What the libertarian never considers or conveniently forgets:
    If men were angels, no government would be necessary.
    James Madison

    They are too clever by half.

    Regarding gay marriage, simple logic dictates that society should not elevate a sterile union to the same status as a fruitful one. Unless said society has a death wish.

    Gay marriage is profoundly stupid. Its only purpose is to undermine traditional Christian values in our society. Quite naturally it is widely supported by YKW.

    Deo Vindice

  23. Traditional Christian values in our society were flushed down the toilet in the 1960’s by white heterosexual Americans who wanted/demanded/got divorced in droves. And after 1973, aborted their white children in droves. Even married women : The great many with the blessings of their husbands.

  24. Yes Joe. The sixties, were, on the whole, a rather poor decade.
    Why divorce and abortion is the fault of the group white, hetero, non drug taking, hard working, church going, family raising people that clung bitterly to institutions like marriage itself is a mystery. My parents married in the seventies and mum never got an abortion and raised four kids and now have 9 grandkids. Obviously the droves of niggers and pakis in the UK are their fault somehow. No divorce either. Your ability to lay Blame at the foot of the ordinary person who is getting sideswiped by the bus is really galling.

  25. Well, Jack, if we had little or no government, wouldn’t it be left up to the locals to decide who gets to live in their city, town or neighborhood? Wouldn’t that create the opportunity to sort the whole country out so that the queers are all in places that don’t mind queers, and that the Blacks and Browns all move to areas where there isn’t a bounty on their ears?

    Sounds like a good deal to me.

    I can understand why a lot of Whites are concerned about Mestizos taking their jobs. The least intelligent two-thirds of American Whites have an average IQ of 92.5, whereas the Mestizos have an average IQ of 90. They are virtually interchangeable. That is why the corporate race-traitors endorse people like Romney and Obama who will never undermine their quest for maximum profits.

    Once again, without our huge central government, both our disreputable business boys and the Brown workers they crave could be subjected to re-education through any means the local folks decide upon.

    So I will be casting my worthless vote for Johnson. Little or no government is a pipe dream, but it’s a dream that doesn’t involve mongrels or Mormons.

  26. I’m libertarian, but not an open borders libertarian. Limited government is best all the time. And yes, the majority of blacks, but also many Americans are truly too stupid for freedom anyway. I’m sick of being looted though and don’t have much motivation to work hard.

  27. Semi-libertarian constitutionalism without open borders (Ronpaulism) would be beneficial to us. Imagine no more welfare and subsidies, bankstering, mandated insurances, etc. etc.

  28. Ronpaulism is very close to the true conservative position, much closer than Neo-“conservatism.”

  29. Full-fledged conservatism is better of course, and nothing short of the best thinking is required in present crisis.

  30. Well, I guess the old “at least they’re not niggers” argument can work for gays as well as Mexicans, Muslims, Chinese, drug dealers, prostitutes, pedophiles, or you name it.

    It is all relative, after all. Relative to how much or how little value you place on traditional white civilization. In BRA we don’t place much value on white civilization, anyway. That might explain why we want to give it away to the others for free.

    Anything you can get for free doesn’t really have much value.
    Which also might explain why free negroes are worthless.

    Democracy is the system where the 51% vote to steal from the remaining 49%.

    Deo Vindice

  31. You can’t take any supposed political positions seriously.

    People adopt them in relation to whatever circumstances they are in. In a homogenous society, many would no longer be libertarians. In such a society, with one’s sub-ethnic group, for instance, many more would probably not mind socialism of some form.

    The multi-racial environment turned many into “libertarians”—- for the freedom of repealing forced interactions.

    in another climate, they would be something else

  32. Excellent insight, Dixiegirl.

    Especially when you consider that the Libertarian Party only came into existence in 1971 after the excesses of the Great Society in the 1960’s.

    Deo Vindice

  33. @John
    I shall say a mea culpa in honor and memory of Andy and Aunt Bee and Opie for pointing out some truth that seems to perturb you so much you actually took my comment personally. I assure you @ John I did not have you in mind when I wrote the post. Nor was I thinking about ” droves of niggers and pakis in the UK” when I wrote the post. I didn’t mention anything in my post about “droves of niggers and pakis in the UK”. How you came to the conclusion my post was about “droves of niggers and pakis in the UK” is beyond me. Very off-the-wall conclusion you came to about my straight-forward and truthful post.

  34. “In a homogenous society, many would no longer be libertarians” but rather we would/should ALL be conservative of our FREEDOM, and NOT ANYONE’S slaves!

  35. Some of you may be interested in this. It’s a libertarians solution to many problems that you share. If solutions are not decided with a federal, national, government, then they are solved locally. Here is a city of 100,000 people with business districts, industrial districts, neighborhoods, parks, lakes, etc., and there is no government. All rules are agreed upon by the landowners. The difference is that when a rule is broken, no one is threatened with violence. Because the rules are agreed upon by the landowners, then the landowner will get a notice in the mail, and the issue will be resolved in civil court.

    http://www.freemanch.com/the-woodlands-a-city-without-government/

    It’s a libertarian solution, and it allows everyone to live in the environments they choose.

  36. Libertarianism, like liberalism, is nonsustaining. When put into practice it does not survive first contact with reality. Why? Because both are “theories”, that require certain assumptions to be met before they can work. But unfortunately for them, reality doesn’t play by their rules or subscribe to their assumptions. The “traditional family” and race-based traditions work and survive through it all because they are natural formations like the pattern of a tree root they form the way they do because those that do not, do not survive.

  37. I got here from a Twitter link, and I don’t think I’d be a fan of this site.

    But, I’ve done a “bit” more than others as far as trying to do something about libruhtarians and immig.

    From 2003 to 2010, I left hundreds of comments at Reason showing how they were wrong. I was greeted by the vilest smears imaginable, but I never got any backup from anyone else. I’ve also shown how they got things wrong on my site and on Youtube, and I’ve only rarely gotten any help with that. Consider changing that: when someone takes on Reason etc., back them up.

    As far as GaryJo is concerned, I briefly chatted with him on Twitter, barraging him with a series of Q’s of which he only answered a couple. Just recently, I’ve harangued reporters who only asked him light Q’s, trying to get them to ask him the Q’s he didn’t answer. As with Reason, help is nowhere to be found.

    Discrediting libruhtarians doesn’t just happen, you have to go out and work at it.

  38. 24AheadDotCom thanks for finding us here on OD – I guess we should thank… “Twitter”

    🙂

    And I strongly support your courageous activism in standing up to know-it-all Libertarians at Reason Magazine who are traitors, idiots on immigration.

    God bless you and all those like you…

    Now go take a fun White gal partner dancing and leave the over educated, Libertarian idiots at Reason Magazine and their no fun, sexless feminist womyn writers/readers alone.

    14 words.

  39. Typpycull LibberToons — (From 1995-98)

    X-Sender: smaf-toonians@cmsu2.cmsu.edu
    X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.3 (32)
    Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 08:59:58 -0700
    To: mlindste@clandjop.com
    From: typical libbertoons (smaf-toonians@cmsu2.cmsu.edu)

    Get over yourself!
    Haven’t you realized you’re the only person who thinks you have
    any sort of intelligence.

    — Goofhead & Wuss

    ===============================================

    I haven’t heard from these fools for over a year.

    I sort of wonder what brought this on. Probably these
    SMAF-‘Toonians read something critical on one of my many WWW pages
    as being critical of them. And so it was, although it didn’t
    mention them by name, only by type.

    I can see by the e-mail address above that these people are
    living exactly the same way they did in Springfield, Missouri.
    The location may change, but they never do. Where they be —
    there be an outpost of sanctimonious white trash.

    For example, the wife is still seeking a degree to teach in
    publik skrules. Having no mind at all, they wish to get a job
    destroying the minds of innocent others in the public sector.
    They have no child of their own, not that it would matter if they
    did. Publik skrules are good enough if they offer employment.
    Yet they are LibberToons, concerned with smaller gubbnmint.
    And if that cannot be realized through a contraction of the
    public sector, it certainly can be fervently wished for while
    inhaling hallogenic clouds of blue smoke.

    Nor do these LibberToons have a privately owned Internet
    Service Provider. You see, when I knew them several years
    ago, they couldn’t get a telephone in because they hadn’t paid
    a $600+ telephone bill. They liked to make long-distance
    phone calls while stoned on their weed, but paying for the weed
    always came first before paying their justly contracted debts.

    One’s first impression when meeting both of them is that
    they both are self-indulgent brain-dead dopers. All they talk
    about in poly-ticks is the necessity to legalize smokin’-dope.
    So much for the Decline of the West or the rise of the underclass
    in which they had staked out squatter’s rights long ago. They’d
    vote for Pol Pot in a second upon upon name recognition alone,
    looking forward to the day when they could smoke a bale of marijuana
    for the price they now pay for an ounce. But they still wouldn’t
    pay their phone bill with the extra money. The pocket change saved
    could be more purposefully spent in smoking as many bales as they
    used to spend smoking ounces. After all, first things first.

    They wanted to join up with a militia unit down in Springfield
    Missouri several years ago. While they were amicable enough, as
    long as they felt the aftereffects of the last stash, still it was
    obvious enough to all that they were dopers. Thus it became
    obvious that there were drawbacks to being an “open, public,
    citizens’ militia.” After all, these people seemed to have no
    firm sort of character of their own, only a dependent sort of
    mellowness. What would happen when they got busted by the police?
    After all, if it was obvious to us that these people were potheads,
    then signing up such witless herd-animals in the police food-chain
    could be a serious breach of operational security. We might as well
    invite the cops along for a training exercise with our “dangerous
    assault weaponry.” Just as these LibberToons have their addictions
    which do not bear police scrutiny, creative gunsmithing is the curse
    of the militia classes. In the interests of all concerned we
    certainly didn’t need to “Feed the Bears.” Most militiamen don’t
    have the monomaniacal interests in but one herb that these people
    had.
    Secondly, people who won’t pay their phone bill and who
    don’t have a car because of their consuming interests don’t have
    money to buy a good military-style rifle and 200 rounds of
    ammunition. Even a good, used Chink-Army-issue SKS cost $80
    then and no telling how many ounces of good smokin’-dope that
    amount represented.

    So these Freedom Fighters, these killer-attack ‘Toons, these
    Defenders of Liberty never took to the field with us militiamen, not
    even during the season that the wild sinsemilla was in full bud.
    Serves ’em right for telling us that they didn’t believe in
    violence.

    So now they are in Warrensburg, at another kollidge, learning
    . . . . something or another. And still without a phone or a
    car or a gun. All their money in bongs. (I said bongs, not bonds.)
    Still looking like frumpy lower-lower-lower-middle-class losers.
    Still talking about legalizing smokin’-dope as the end&be-all
    of enlightened self-government. And probably still attracting
    the interest of the police.
    Oh well, having no interest in gainful employment and lacking
    intelligence enough to be publik skrul teechers, perhaps they
    can stick, like the shoemaker to their last — and primary —
    sole means of support in an information age — as informants.

    –Martin Lindstedt, Resistance Political Front
    Missouri Libertarian Candidate for u.S. Senator — 1998
    http://whitenationalist.org/lindstedt/mostoonz.html

  40. “It’s a libertarian solution to many problems that you share. If solutions are not decided with a federal, national, government, then they are solved locally. Here is a city of 100,000 people with business districts, industrial districts, neighborhoods, parks, lakes, etc., and there is no government.”

    County, state and federal government is still there, law-making and law-enforcing, and this supposedly “government-less” and “independent” township government is FULL OF RULES, and fines for breaking them, enforced by county, state and federal government. It’s even multicultural. If this is libertarianism, where is the liberty?

  41. Nevertheless, constitutionalists with libertarian economic tendencies (such as Paul) who will at least enforce immigration laws and uphold the constitutional citisenship requirement are MUCH closer to our position than Neo-supposedly-conservatives.

    This will not be admitted by those of SOCIALIST persuasion, or those who depend on, or revel in endless foreign military adventures.

  42. It’s not natural or right for our people to be slaves. We won’t be enslaved by any king or Congress or “Society,” or any set of RULES AND FINES devised by “libertarians” or any other government that takes our freedom, or liberty. We will ALWAYS fight for it.

Comments are closed.