Do you remember when Pat Buchanan was fired from MSNBC for promoting ideas that were “unfit for the national dialogue”?
“Choosing not to vote for the president or choosing anyone but him — such as a nominal candidate, or a convicted felon on West Virginia’s ballot — is an affirmative act, said Lara Brown, a political science professor at Villanova University. . .
Obama rejects this narrative, Brown said.
“For him, the issue is not class but race and ethnicity,” she said. “He and the Democratic Party have decided that the best way to ‘win the future’ is to win over ethnic and racial minorities because whites are shrinking (in number).
“In short, they are trying to create a new map that allows them to win every state that has a large and growing immigrant population and/or a large percentage of African-Americans. Doing so would, of course, make Obama a historically important figure in terms of the Democratic Party.”
But, she noted: “He has to win a second term to claim this legacy.”
Obama’s issue isn’t class. It is race and ethnicity.
The Democratic Party is the anti-White party: it wants to flood White areas with non-White immigrants, enfranchise as many non-White voters as possible, and raise taxes and expand the size of government in order to destroy White freedom and redistribute the wealth of White people to non-White racial voting blocs.
Note: The existence of the Union is what makes the Obama strategy possible. If Dixie was an independent nation, the border would be secured, the welfare state would be dismantled, the negro would be disenfranchised, we wouldn’t have to spend our entire lives worrying about any of this, and our major cities might actually become habitable again.