New York Times
Would you “defer” to the authority of David Brooks, Tom Friedman, or Paul Krugman? That’s the funniest thing I have heard all day.
“Maybe before we can build great monuments to leaders we have to relearn the art of following. Democratic followership is also built on a series of paradoxes: that we are all created equal but that we also elevate those who are extraordinary; that we choose our leaders but also have to defer to them and trust their discretion; that we’re proud individuals but only really thrive as a group, organized and led by just authority.
I don’t know if America has a leadership problem; it certainly has a followership problem. Vast majorities of Americans don’t trust their institutions. That’s not mostly because our institutions perform much worse than they did in 1925 and 1955, when they were widely trusted. It’s mostly because more people are cynical and like to pretend that they are better than everything else around them. Vanity has more to do with rising distrust than anything else. . .
To have good leaders you have to have good followers — able to recognize just authority, admire it, be grateful for it and emulate it. Those skills are required for good monument building, too.”
Perhaps this is a symptom of the widespread belief – most recently echoed by “Jeb,” another establishment favorite – that “we’re in decline.” Maybe ordinary people are second guessing following the lead of our great sages like David Brooks because they have seen enough to discern where we are headed?