Official: Romney Wins Nevada Caucus

Nevada

Mitt Romney should win this one in another landslide.

Note: As with Richard Spencer and Matt Parrott, I can’t bring myself to detest Romney. His stance on immigration and remarks about the “very poor” resonate and have blunted a lot of animosity toward him.

It certainly helps that Al Sharpton attacks him every night on MSNBC for endorsing the Ryan plan which would cut over a trillion dollars in spending on “low-income households.” The Reverend Al thinks that cutting the EBT card is a political loser for the Republicans.

In The Forum: In 2011, there were 700 vicious bus attacks on three routes alone in Seattle including an attack on a pregnant teenager, a vicious assault on a White male teenager, and most recently an attack by the Black Undertow with a screwdriver.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-oMPa1w99E]

This entry was posted in BRA Politics, Nevada, Politics, Whiteness. Bookmark the permalink.

65 Responses to Official: Romney Wins Nevada Caucus

  1. Bill Yancey says:

    Landshark, I can understand how someone less familiar with the South would get that impression. Here’s how I see it. HW might also. Presently in the US the problem is being handled in three ways. The South is tolerating BRA but retains the instinct to destroy it. The White instinct in the western regions is to run away from the problem. In the north it is to encourage the BRA takeover. There is plenty of precedent for the western method but it is a gamble on the chance that the problem will be solved elsewhere. The northern method is just suicide. There’s precedent for that too, though mostly only in the northeastern US. The South will, at some point “take their stand”, again. While our way may be sort of a gamble with time, I wouldn’t be surprised at all if, this time, the South actually received that European support they didn’t get last time. That is, from a resurrected Europe unshackled from a bankrupt USA.

  2. Bill Yancey says:

    More on the differing methods from GW at MR:

    Posted by Guessedworker on February 05, 2012, 07:25 AM | #

    What’s missing, and is made screamingly obvious by its absence, is blood as the clear, authentic axial counter to liberalism’s confected self. In its stead we get gestures in its direction but nothing of its primal, vitalistic power and meaning.

    It is difficult to believe that the above gentlemen, particularly Mr Sandel, don’t know they are using avoidance mechanisms when they reify tradition, history, city, etc. In other words, they are still liberals really, and the meanings they wish to confer upon us are still artificial – they just aren’t “chosen”. Better than nothing, no doubt. But we nationalists have this unaccountably stubborn conviction that our tradition, history, place – there is no shortage of ways to avoid the absolutism of blood – come out of the people we are, and constitute, therefore, no more than a resting point for an honest thinker, and never a final destination.

    Let us also be clear that we are, as Europeans, living in our end-times – save, perhaps, for the few righteous children of Noah who may be granted the right to live a technocratic but never plutocratic existence, and see what’s at the end of the rainbow. Liberalism’s authorial rights are the mess of potage being used, knowingly or not, to shuffle us away into bloodlessness while we are swamped by colour.

    Blood is our only line of defence, first from the colour, second from the complex forces of the global future. Or, as the desperate say, first strangle the dog.

    http://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/the_communitarian_critique_of_liberalism_left_and_right#comments

  3. stonelifter says:

    Hate to burst your bubble but the folks with enough money to do so are fleeing Argentina, Uruguay, and Chile

  4. The thing about the South is that most of the counties which are “majority black” and look “heavily black” on the Census maps are rapidly depopulating. It is places like California and Oregon and Washington which are rapidly changing.

  5. Before I got sidetracked with Black History Month 2012, I was working on the Freedom Failed project in West Central Georgia. I have toured Randolph, Quitman, Clay, Stewart, and Chattahoochee Counties.

    In all these counties, you find that the demographics have changed very little over long periods of time. Most of these counties have the same demographics that they did about 100 years ago although the numbers have changed.

    Thousands of blacks left the area in the twentieth century. They never came back. The blacks that are still living there are moving to the cities. There are actually fewer blacks in the area than there have been at any point since the rise of slavery in the Lower Chattahoochee Valley.

  6. Denise says:

    If Obama gets back in – the genocide of Whites starts for REAL.

  7. anon says:

    “But after seeing the Southern States of Africa I have to say if you are white and living down there you are screwed and you don’t know what you are missing.”

    10 against a 100 is much better odds than ten individuals fighting 10 each.

  8. TabuLa Raza says:

    Lew Rockwell And The Strange Death (Or At Least Suspended Animation) Of Paleolibertarianism
    By Arthur Pendleton on May 14, 2008 at 12:00am

    The biggest controversy of Ron Paul’s presidential race was the release of old excerpts from The Ron Paul Letter. During Paul’s congressional races, he had been attacked occasionally for RPL pieces about black crime rates and political attitudes, and he had defended them. But now James Kirchick of The New Republic managed to go through the entire archives and find politically incorrect statements about gay rights, black crime, South Africa, and Martin Luther King Jr.

    Paul caved in a sadly conventional manner (in contrast to Obama when the MSM finally reported the news of his ties to Rev. Jeremiah Wright). He denied he wrote or even knew the articles existed in his own newsletter. He denounced them on no uncertain terms, groveling about how much he loved Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King Jr, and how he thought the criminal justice system is racist.

    Those in the know claimed former Paul chief of staff and president of the Ludwig von Mises Institute Lew Rockwell was the author of the letters. Rockwell has vigorously denied it. And various writers on his heavily-trafficked LewRockwell.com [LRC] denounced all the “racism” in the Paul letters.

    But regardless of whether or not Rockwell actually wrote the offending articles, the fact is that he was once willing to breach all the taboos that the newsletter violated. Unfortunately, however, in the last few years Rockwell and his LewRockwell.com circle have come full circle and embraced much of the leftist agenda that they once bemoaned.

    http://www.vdare.com/articles/lew-rockwell-and-the-strange-death-or-at-least-suspended-animation-of-paleolibertarianism

    The Rockwell site has a joo webmaster named Eric Garris. Eric’s mother was a communist.

  9. stonelifter says:

    Negros are not evenly distributed in the South. 2 counties over from me and it’s almost 50% black while they are under 12% of the population in my county. My folks in the hills only see negros on the highway.

  10. LandShark says:

    The blacks and whites in the South are as tied together as that black and white guy in Star Trek. Forever entwined. You will face your destiny together, one way or the other. We face our destiny in certain parts of the West with no blacks for a thousand miles, and certainly none with whom we are culturally entwined.

    The deck is stacked heavily against the South. Heavily, monstrously stacked against the South. You’re friendly people, and your weather is great. But if you think you’re going to escape the Africa in your midst, you’re dreaming.

  11. If you drive through the black majority counties in the South, you will find many places like West Central Georgia and Southwest Georgia that are stuck in a time warp.

    Nothing much has changed there in fifty years … demographically speaking, with the exception of one thing. The rural counties are depopulating and fewer blacks actually live there now than at other point since the spread of slavery through the Southern lowlands.

    Instead of like 5,000 or 6,000 blacks, many of these counties now have around 1,500 or 2,000 blacks. The blacks who used to live there a hundred years ago now live in places like Michigan, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey.

    For most of American history, the vast majority of blacks lived in the South, and the North and West were racially homogeneous. Race was a Southern problem. Not anymore.

    California went from being the Golden State to a majority non-White state in four decades while Tennessee, Mississippi, and Kentucky remained virtually unchanged. Oregon and Washington were over 90 percent White in the 1970s. In thirty years, the Pacific Northwest has taken on the demographics of Arkansas, while Arkansas hasn’t changed much.

    The demographic situation is actually more dire for Whites in Illinois, New York, and New Jersey than it is for Whites in Alabama or South Carolina. The Northeast is also rapidly becoming non-White … much more so than large parts of the Deep South.

    Massachusetts is 76.1 percent White. Tennessee is 75.6 percent White. Which state has changed more in the last fifty years? Massachusetts or Tennessee?

    The only reason there is a White Nationalist movement in America and why the majority of the readers of this blog are non-Southerners is because the North and West have become more like Alabama whereas Alabama really hasn’t changed much in terms of its demographic ratio.

  12. Ain't Had Fried Chicken Since Lester Maddox Closed Up says:

    TabuLa Raza wrote, “Paul caved in a sadly conventional manner … ” LandShark wrote, “The blacks and whites in the South are as tied together as that black and white guy in Star Trek.” Hunter Wallace wrote, “… the North and West have become more like Alabama while Alabama really hasn’t changed much in its demographic ratio.” Blacks, women, and young people have migrated to the cities, especially the white cities. White people have undergone a slow population implosion, while non-whites have undergone a population explosion (except for Orientals). Contraception, abortion, pornography, and lack of racial and cultural awareness are destroying white people. Money has replaced Christianity, and liberalism has replaced pro-white awareness. I think there are only two alternatives: turn the white mindset back to 1950, 1900, or 1850 A.D. or else find a radically new basis for white survival. What are the spiritual and material possibilities?
    “Few men have virtue to withstand the highest bidder.”
    http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/George_Washington
    “Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
    http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/John_Adams
    “Merchants have no country. The mere spot they stand on does not constitute so strong an attachment as that from which they draw their gains.”
    http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Thomas_Jefferson
    “Man who preys both on the vegetable and animal species, is himself a prey to neither. He too possesses the reproductive principle far beyond the degree requisite for the bare continuance of his species. What becomes of the surplus of human life to which this principle is competent? It is either, 1st. destroyed by infanticide, as among the Chinese and Lacedemonians; or 2d. it is stifled or starved, as among other nations whose population is commensurate to its food; or 3d. it is consumed by wars and endemic diseases; or 4th. it overflows, by emigration, to places where a surplus of food is attainable.”
    http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/James_Madison
    “It is to be regretted that the rich and powerful too often bend the acts of government to their selfish purposes.”
    http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Andrew_Jackson
    “What is right and what is practicable are two different things.”
    http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/James_Buchanan
    The civil rights movement aimed at political, social, and economic equality — the political part is one thing, but the social and economic parts actually destroy the traditional rights of white people, as George Wallace and Lester Maddox pointed out.

  13. stonelifter says:

    My desire for a free and independent South is not solely about our race problem. It’s about being rid of foreign occupiers and free of damnyankee influence. Depending on the news source, the current governor of my state received as much or more campaign money from jew York than she did from the folks of NC. We all know that means she is beholding to big city damnyankees and not the citizens of our state.

    My hope is, once we are free, we will be able to do as we see fit on every topic important to us. Most important to me protecting and reestablishing our culture. Thing’s will fall in line once we’ve deprogrammed and liberated generations of Southern men from the damnyankee/ cultural marxist indoctrination.

  14. LandShark says:

    Agree completely on all.

  15. LandShark says:

    Still, all those blacks stress the crap out of me and look like a big stumbling block to forwarding the rest of the agenda. I’m scared for whites in the south. I really am.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>