NO KIDS IN FOLSOM STREET FAIR!

Well folks, it’s that time of year again.  The Folsom Street Fair in San Francisco is America’s premiere S&M street show with public sex, beatings, sodomy, and indecency for all to come and see.  Yes that’s right, all.  Mayor Gavin Newsom and Senator Nancy Pelosi thinks it’s just dandy to have kids learn all about this wholesome display of tolerance. Adoptive gay parents also seem to just love bringing their kids to the event.

Especially in dog collars and pleather.

As you folks can probably imagine, the 350,000-400,000 attendees of the festival are 99% white.

Perhaps you even inadvertently support some of the sponsors?

We say that this event in a public street with no ID checks for minors is irresponsible and dangerous.  In the enlightened and tolerant America you are voting for each and every time you go to the ballot box, we don’t even have the mandate to shutdown this event or even you know, restrict it to adults only.  I say that if adults want to engage in some kinky stupidity, then fine, be my guest I really don’t care.  But when you do so on public streets and with kids, you cross the line of acceptability.

We have protested this event for the last two years and you can watch our videos of this here and here.

Help us defeat the Folsom Street Fair by downloading this flyer and distributing it in your local community:

FolsomStreetFairFlyer

Thank you.

21 Comments

  1. I can’t imagine people bringing children to an event like this. Who are these parents? Are they the adopted kids of gay parents or just some idiot liberals who don’t see anything wrong with this? So many of you like to bash Christianity which is one of the main reasons why White Nationalism isn’t taking off among ordinary people. Lack of Christianity leads to a moraless society and you end up with things like the Folsom Street Fair. This is why our civilization is dying.

  2. Long time ago I lived in the Bay Area (not in the city; in Marin County) and this article shocked me. I hate to bring this out but, just as a thought-experiment, I would like the readers of this post to imagine that the scenario of Harold Covington’s Northwest Quartet becomes real. In another OD thread I had reservations to bring to justice the beautiful white nymphs, although not their colored boyfriends, in the day of the rope. Here I am not hesitant at all. I’d bring to justice all of those involved in perverting those little children with S&M shows in San Fran.

    Would you implement such measures too?

    As I said, this is just a thought-experiment. No need to reply publicly (in these times “days of the rope”, however just and necessary, are bad stuff for PR). Just ask yourself that question when shaving as a moral gauge to know who you really are behind that BS facade we use before ordinary people.

  3. Andrew I’m pleasantly surprised to see this type of article on here but given the recent GOP mania of this site aren’t you alienating the Log Cabin Republicans which could in turn cost the neocons some votes in November?

  4. “Ed” You really believe criticism of Christianity is one of the “main reasons” White Nationalism isn’t taking off? You don’t suppose it maybe has just a little bit more to do with the wicked “racism” and “bigotry” of WN being the most reviled ideas in polite western society? Please…

  5. Pat Buchanan can sum this up better than I can:

    Prejudice is prejudgment. And if prejudgment is rooted in the history and traditions of a people, and what life has taught us, it is a shield that protects. Only a fool would reject the inherited wisdom of his kind because it fails to comport with the ideology of the moment.

    “Prejudice,” wrote Burke, “is of ready application in the emergency; it previously engages the mind in a steady course of wisdom and virtue, and does not leave the man hesitating in the moment of decision, skeptical, puzzled and unresolved.”

    Without prejudice, we are tabula rasa, blank slates, upon which any ideology may be written, including what James Burnham called the ideology of Western suicide — liberalism.

  6. Andrew,

    Great job on these street protests – we should protect children from bad things.

    I had a thought for someone who likes to cause a bit of trouble to help the cause.

    Why not have someone spread the word that these S&M Homo perverts, corrupters of children are also going to do some Koran burnings and have folks holding signs saying “Mohammed is Gay” (celebrating some current guy named Mohammed coming out as queer) and the world’s 1 billion muslims will think these perverts are insulting the prophet Mohammed.

    Wouldn’t we all love to see the rich, queer mayor of San Francisco having to back down and apologize to the Muslim community for some perceived insult after enraged Muslims slaughter a few gay S&M paraders?

    🙂

  7. Jack that’s some very Jewish thinking right there. As much contempt as I have for militant homosexuals, it’s tolerance of their activities that’s brought us to this point. Wishing evil on them doesn’t make them us any better than they are. What they need is counseling…………. or an exorcism.

  8. Ed says:
    September 25, 2010 at 1:53 am
    Jack that’s some very Jewish thinking right there. As much contempt as I have for militant homosexuals, it’s tolerance of their activities that’s brought us to this point. Wishing evil on them doesn’t make them us any better than they are. What they need is counseling…………. or an exorcism.

    Jack Ryan replies:

    I disagree. It’s not “jewish thinking” that I propose – instead it is Jewish tactics – inciting other hostile groups to fight each other instead of us.

    I can tolerate responsible White gays and responsible all gays – as long as they don’t push things. These S&M homo perverts in San Francisco inviting little children to see their perversions – that’s not right.

    And since Muslim extremists hate and want to kill most all infidels, White Western people – well if they are that way, shouldn’t we point them in the direction of a certain sub set of corrupted White Western people that – well, if someone has to be terrorized and slaughtered by Middle Eastern and Asian NW Muslim lunatic, extremists… better these S&M Homo extremist exhibitionists in San Fran that some honest, hard working blue collar, regular White guy working in a hardware store in Ames Iowa.

    🙂

  9. This is San Francisco, this is the gay’s own turf, can’t they have one city to themselves? The site of those 70 year old poofs is more humorous than traumatizing.

  10. So you think it’s humorous for children to watch half naked men prancing though the streets with with boa constrictors wrapped around their genitals?

  11. For years I’ve heard the refrain that it’s no one else’s business what two consenting adults do in the privacy of their own bedroom. But deviant behavior in the public streets puts the lie to all that. It’s never been about what people do in the privacy of their own homes.

  12. This is shocking, children should only be introduced to sexuality in private by a priest or close relative molesting them. And then hurry them off to kill peasants and their children half way around the world. Get some perspective on what is really important and what is really damaging to children and society.

  13. Fred said
    “It’s never been about what people do in the privacy of their own homes.”

    Maybe it is. Maybe we should plan around the real possibility that there is an absolute core within the pro-white or WN movement which is absolutistly anti-homosexual and this core is permanent. And it is denying reality to imagine otherwise.

    Also as part of thinking about how to structure the pro-white or WN movement:

    – do people in the anti-homosexual core think there are no homosexuals in the WN movement. We’re the race of truth, so they should face up to the question. If they think there are, then what do they assert should be the restrictions, if any, on homosexuals in the WN movement?

    – This anti-homosexual core shouldn’t be wuss’s, let them show some manhood. I think of a person who was too far right even for some leaders in AryanNations. The guy used the term dickless intellectuals. Although the term is blunt, it is almost like a modern version of the blunt rough style in the poem Beowulf.
    http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2010/09/14/cyndi-steele-meets-the-u-s-government/comment-page-1/#comment-80449

    – Maybe the WN movement should have enough manhood to simply come out and say clearly that homosexuals are not allowed in the WN movement. That way we could have some real competition (the capitalists never tire of championing competition, and sometimes it does indeed produce good results for the consumer). The homosexuals (if any) currently in the WN, along with those who didn’t want to ban homosexuals, could see if they have enough manhood and organizational skill to create a variant WN, and the remaining anti-homosexual part of the WN could go on in a more directed * freer * form, rather than playing a draining, contradictory dual mind game that, on the one hand, there are no homosexuals among WN’s, but just in case there are, let’s publish an article now and then … . And WN’s who aren’t sure which WN to be part of, could explore.

    – Let the two WN’s compete. Let each see what are the strengths and weaknesses.

    – The split might generate publicity, and energy. A few years back, American Renaissance created a split by banning talk about Jews, though after a while they relented a little. At first the split seemed like it would hurt the pro-White movement, and that was briefly demoralizing. But in retrospect the whole thing turned out beneficial.

    – And last point. Maybe each part (the homosexual and anti-homosexual) of the WN should break away from political correctness. Political correctness requires each side to feel totally hostile and defensive toward the other side. Maybe instead of political correctness we should adopt the principle that if you have some feeling about something, you don’t necessarily have to prove it, you can just list it, and do it along with others of both sides listing their judgments/feelings/concerns. People do not have to think that judgments/feelings/concerns differing from theirs forbid theirs. Let it be acknowledged that those various judgments/feelings/concerns belong to various people, because that is the reality, all those varying judgments/feelings/concerns are there. This approach is different than political correctness, which insists on only one judgment/feeling/concern smashing all others. Political correctness is not a truthful description of reality.

    – Maybe some OD articles can have statements of the kind of discussion that is allowed. Through experience, authors will learn what statements to use.

  14. I am a Christian white female and am embarrassed that this is a conversation between my own demographic.
    I am a guest professor this semester in San Francisco and look forward to checking out Folsom Street Festival for myself this weekend.
    Do I believe that parents should bring their kids to this event– absolutely not… do I think parents should make homosexual or racist slurs in front of their children– absolutely not.
    As mentioned I have not yet been to this event and it sounds like everyone on this post hasn’t been either. I imagine though that the comments of violence, homophobia, racism, and proposed manipulation of a instigated terrorist attack on your own countrymen posted on this site, will disturb me much more than a street festival celebrating sexual freedom.

  15. “I imagine though that the comments of violence, homophobia, racism, and proposed manipulation of a instigated terrorist attack on your own countrymen posted on this site, will disturb me much more than a street festival celebrating sexual freedom.”

    As long as you don’t mind seeing buggery and cock-sucking done in public.

Comments are closed.