Jews have been shown by Social Research to be much more likely to support Abortion than any other American Racial Group. Moreover, they have become legendary for having a disproportionate impact on politics and culture.
For these reasons I decided to do a study to test whether having a larger percentage of Jews in a State correlates with it having a higher Abortion Rate.
First I got the Fraction of Jews by US State from this website:
www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/US-Israel/usjewpop.html
From the Census I got the equivalent figures on the percentages Non-Hispanic White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian for all 50 States and the District of Columbia.
I got the Abortion Rate by State here:
Finally, I ran Pearson Correlations on the Abortion Rate of a State and its Racial Composition, and found:
Correlation with Abortion
Percent Jewish +0.764
Percent White -0.655
Percent Black +0.537
Percent Hispanic +0.317
Percent Asian +0.268
One thing that stands out here is that every race except Non-Hispanic Whites will make a State’s abortion rate go up.
This is consistent with Whites, on average, having a greater ability to plan out for the future than other races do.
The other thing that stands out is, of course, the sheer strength of the positive correlation between Percentage Jewish and the Abortion Rate. A correlation that is remarkably high given that Jews only make up 2.1% of the American Population!
Clearly, it isn’t Jews aborting Jewish babies that is driving this result, there simply aren’t enough Jewish women for that to even be a possibility. Rather it seems more likely that Jews are using their Political and Cultural power in a State to promote Abortion, trying their best to make it as legal and acceptable as possible.
Also it could be that they promote Sexual Hedonism, and then after people fall for the trap of thinking its the “Cool” way to behave they’re left with unwanted pregnancies that end up terminated by abortion.
But here is the thing that is almost incomprehensible. Even though Blacks are widely known to have by far the highest Abortion Rate of any Group, and even though there are almost 5 Times as Many Blacks in America as there are Jews, the Percentage of Jews in a State has a stronger Correlation with the Abortion Rate than the Percentage of Blacks in the State does!
Let me give you a monent to let that sink in. (I think it’s one of the most intense effects relative to cause size discovered in the History of Demographic Research.)
Twitter
Facebook
Flickr
YouTube
This is an echo of what Jews do on the larger scale by aborting the birth of our people in history. We as white people are a new species being born. We are a people in the middle of the process of changing into a new species. Like a baby, we are vulnerable in this stage of our development. At some deep biological level, Jews detect the signs of where we are headed. Our destiny is opposed to their destiny as a people. They react to these characteristic patterns in us with intensive destructive motivations. Once we get where we are headed in our development, they will not be able to stop us any longer. You cannot kill babies that are fully born… especially difficult if they reach adulthood.
The modern anti-abortion movement was started by a Jewish former abortionist. The modern anti-abortion movement is basically all Whites that are Catholic or Protestant, with a few Black Churches thrown in. Abortionists tend to be heavily Jewish from what I understand (but I could be wrong about that). Certainly non-Hassidic Jews are famously pro-abortion.
You see, in the old days, if a teenage couple went “too far” they would simply get married. Now, the family pays money to kill the baby when the condom breaks. They are even pushing for allowing abortionists to abort teenage girls without their parents even knowing.
Even if you are pro-babykilling, you have to admit that having healthy young White women having abortions instead of raising children is hardly eugenic.
I think it has to do with large urbanized population centers. Large urbanized population centers attract jews, and also young/liberal/secular people, the type that has abortions. Whites who are opposed to abortion, mainly devout Christians, tend to live in small towns and rural areas the most, places jews don’t like living. Blacks have lots of abortions and tend to live in cities, but a large portion of them live in the south, where lots of christian whites live, so that’s why the black population doesn’t correlate as much as the jewish one.
Jews do promote sexual degeneracy and attack Christianity (from which most opposition to abortion comes from), but this is mainly through the national entertainment media. State laws (from state & local jewish political activism) wouldn’t have much effect, as since 1972 when Roe v Wade came out any state law that impairs the ability to get an abortion in general has been invalidated.
Even if you are pro-babykilling, you have to admit that having healthy young White women having abortions instead of raising children is hardly eugenic.
I think in many cases it is in fact eugenic, since a single woman with a kid will have a much harder time finding a man, and will probably have to settle for a lesser one. The old days when people would get married after an accidental pregnancy are largely over.
So say if an attractive 20 year old white girl gets pregnant by one of the characters which are being discussed in several recent threads, she has two options:
1. Have the kid. Drop way down on the attractiveness scale. Become either a single working mother with 1 kid for the rest of her life, or have to settle for the type of guy she would have paid no attention to before she became a single mother.
2. Don’t have the kid. A few years down the road, meet a good middle/upper class guy, get married and have a few kids with him.
H. Rock White: The young single pregnant White woman has another, better option. Put the child up for adoption. There is a large demand for healthy White infants, such that covert baby selling has become formalized in some states. When this first came to my attention about a dozen years ago, White girls were getting $15,000 for a healthy infant. I’m sure it’s much more now.
I think some are disregarding that many of the women who get abortions are impregnated by Blacks and Browns, or have fetuses with congenital defects (i.e. Down’s Syndrome, etc.).
I do not endorse abortion. But, in today’s context, abortion is one of the best things for the White percentage in American demographics. It is not a White Race Killer, in our context.
If anything, it is now actually delaying our transition to extinction in North America.
Huh, never knew about that, thanks for the info Discard. Probably most women don’t know either, since unfortunately it is illegal.
“I think some are disregarding that many of the women who get abortions are impregnated by Blacks and Browns, ”
correction: I think some are disregarding that many of the White women who get abortions are impregnated by Blacks and Browns,…
H. Rock White: There are lawyers who specialize in adoption. I imagine they are concentrated in the states where the practice is tolerated. Essentially, the lawyer is a broker who introduces a pregnant woman to a prospective adoptive couple. If the parties agree, the couple supports the woman and pay all her medical bills. You can imagine how expensive “support”might be. Since baby selling is illegal, the couple cannot force the mother to turn over the kid. On the other hand, they can refuse to take the baby if it’s not suitable. The couple bears all the financial risk of the agreement, so for a young woman, it’s a good deal. She can, BTW, get visitation rights, but I don’t know that they can be enforced in all states. Generally, I think the moms just want to get regular updates on how their child is doing with its new family.
I think that visitation rights are BS, what kid needs two moms? But I think that keeping the mother informed is only decent.
PS Even if it’s illegal in your state, as far as the final paperwork is concerned, it’s just an adoption that took place in another state.
H. Rock White: This is how it works in California. No doubt other states have similar possibilities.
I ought to emphasize, the benefits to the mother are more than getting to live in a nice White neighborhood in California for nine months, with an allowance. She gets to choose the sort of people who will rear her child; no state social worker will give it to a couple Jewish lesbians. Since it is between her and the lawyer, she can set any criteria she wants. If she wants her baby to grow up Baptist, it’s done. She wants the new father to be a scientist, or a teacher, it’s her call. It’s a seller’s market, and she’s selling what everyone wants. It’s good for her, and it’s good for our race.
Reginald Thompson and Steven E. Romer you are both working at the level of genius. Keep it going.
Great post.
Incredible,
This should be expanded, made into a scientific paper and sent into a peer-reviewed journal like Evolutionary Psychology or Ethnopolitics or something else.
IT MUST BE turned into a weapon! It must not be forfeited! And it has all prerequisites for that. Ask Kevin Macdonald for advise.
It can be expanded including historic perspective, by looking at county levels and controlling for all kinds of variables.
I wonder who these “Non-Hispanic Whites” mentioned in the posting might be. I don’t know anyone who calls himself or herself a “Non-Hispanic White.” It’s odd to see a posting on this web site refer to us by a negatively defined name. Can you imagine a Jewish person calling himself a “Non-Arabic Semite”? Or a Mexican calling himself a “Non-White Hispanic”?
And I see that there is no need to add any characteristics to the label “Non-Hispanic Whites.” Here is what the author thinks of us: “One thing that stands out here is that every race except Non-Hispanic Whites will make a State’s abortion rate go up.”
So he makes it clear that “Non-Hispanic Whites” is a complete name. We don’t get “American” attached. We don’t get “persons” attached. We’re just a negative label without personality, just an amorphous grouping.
There is no such thing as “Non-Hispanic Whites” — the label is the malign concoction of Jewish wordsmiths at the US Census, not any name we have for ourselves.
If becoming a fully-realized, tribally-aware peoples is our goal (among others), then we have to ask: When will we start demanding names, labels, definitions, and descriptions that grant us a decent sense of self-respect?
I’m pretty sure ‘non-hispanic white’ means a white who is not a native speaker of spanish or a white who is not from mexico, argentina, puerto rico, etc (yes there are white people in mexico)…it’s pretty self evident to me, at any rate.
It seems to me only a few states have a high Jewish population: New York, Florida, California, New Jersey, maybe PA and Illinois.
H.Rock White – re your #2 option for a girl who is knocked up and doesn’t want to be.
http://www.thinkinghousewife.com/wp/2010/01/emmies-future/
Reginald- quality post, keep it up.
Two related questions:
- Are there any data on the race/ethnicity of those receiving abortions? If they are disproportionately non-white, do we really care about abortion-on-demand?
- What is the effect of past abortions on the current population structure in the U.S.? What fraction of the declining white fertility rates can be attributed directly to abortions (vs birth control, etc. a hard thing to parse, no doubt)?
The most prolific abortionist in the western U.S. is Edward Allred, former husband of loudmouthed TV lawyer Gloria Allred. He travels at all times with at least one bodyguard. The most prolific abortionist in the eastern U.S. is an Orthodox Jew — skullcap, fringes, the whole nineyards — named Moshe Hachamovitch. In my opinion, this is simply a logical extension of the fact that Jews are gifted businessmen and are entirely amoral in their dealings with gentiles. If there’s a market for something — porn, usury, abortions — they’ll step in and provide it where a gentile would hesitate.
The stance of white nationalists should be pro-motherhood, anti-”feminism”, pro-child for ourselves, and neutral for everyone else.
White children should have the right to life; who cares about the others.
Has anyone determined what percent of abortionists are Jewish? Certainly it is elevated by the fact that (almost certainly) a disproportionate percent of doctors are jewish. If this is controlled for, would the number of Jewish abortionists still be elevated?
It could be that Jews, blacks, and hispanics might (by values) have more in common. As such, it is possible it would make sense for them to form their own communities, or even a country or territory of their own. They could form 100% white free nations or areas where they would be free to be themselves and express themselves without our hostile influence.
Somehow I doubt many (any?) whites would mind.
Reginald- quality post, keep it up.
Thanks Oats and Honey,
Are there any data on the race/ethnicity of those receiving abortions? If they are disproportionately non-white, do we really care about abortion-on-demand?
It’s important to understand that the legalization of abortion had two main effects:
1. It made people far more sexually reckless, especially low IQ people, because they figured they had the “back-up” of abortion. (This is reflected in the explosion of STDs and single motherhood which occured after Roe V. Wade.)
2. It made it so more people could get actual abortions. (Though a lot of them didn’t actually go through it, which is the only reason why abortion on demand didn’t have far more of an effect on the birth rate than it did.)
Now the mistake people nearly always make is to only think about the second effect, while ignoring the first.
Now it is true that Blacks get much more abortion than Whites, by a factor of Whites having rate of 12 per 1,000 childbearing age women as compared to a rate of 31 per 1,000 childbearing age women for Blacks.
But the thing to understand is that the legalization had far more of an effect on the sexual habits of Blacks than on the sexual habits of Whites.
It caused much more of an attenuation of sexual restraint and contraceptive use among Blacks than among Whites.
This is because Blacks average out to having a lower IQ, and lower IQ people have more time preference.
This explains why the legalization of Abortion was followed by nearly as great a drop in White fertility as in Black fertility in spite of Blacks being so much more likely to get abortions.
From Roe V. Wade (1973) to the average 5 years after it, the White TFR in America declined by 5.4%, and in the same time span the Black TFR in America declined by 7.6%.
This is a much smaller difference than you’d expect based on how much more likely Blacks are to get abortions, and reflects the simple fact that legal abortion greatly increases the number of conceptions that lower IQ women go through.
What is the effect of past abortions on the current population structure in the U.S.? What fraction of the declining white fertility rates can be attributed directly to abortions (vs birth control, etc. a hard thing to parse, no doubt)?
I’ll get back to you on this, but research I did a while ago indicates that greatest cause of declining fertility rates by a wide margin was the flight of young women into the workforce.
This was itself partly caused by modern forms of contraception being legalized, especially the pill.
Also the legalization of Pornography seemed to have a very strong correlation with reduced fertility even after accounting for the flight of women into the workforce and the timing of the pill being approved by the FDA.
Abortion also seemed to have a negative effect on White fertility, but was much less than that of careerist Feminism and legalized Pornography.
I’ll try to post something on these issues in a week or so.
Pingback: How Then Shall We Live? | Spirit/Water/Blood