Domain names don’t get much more fancy than inmalafide.com and aliases don’t get much more fancy than Ferdinand Bardamu. So a man could be forgiven for assuming that he’s stumbling onto a pretty fancy blog. So imagine my surprise when my Google Alert notified me that he’s accused me of being an “insufferable mangina” and a “white knight“. But just when I thought it couldn’t possibly get any worse, Ferdinand Bardamu just churned out what may well prove to be the least fancy blog post in the history of the alternative right blogosphere: Saving the White Race with Sexual Degeneracy.
FB uses a bunch of words in this post, taking care to refrain from grammatical errors and arrange them in paragraph form. But this is yet another example of apparent fanciness barely disguising naked vulgarity. The core concept he offers is that prudery is my race’s problem and that sexual debauchery is the cure. To hear him tell it, “…the white race will be outbred into extinction because of the stubbornness and ignorance of the people who claim to want to save it.” Unfortunately, he’s not alone in thinking this. Many otherwise thoughtful and sensible people in our movement harbor this thoughtless and senseless belief.
But what’s stubborn and ignorant is turning to pick-up artist hijinks to turn around our demographic decline when more traditional (prudish) mating patterns have a proven record of actually working. While the number of children conceived by the two competing strategies is probably at par, the prudes win in a landslide once the tons of biohazard bags stuffed with aborted fetuses are subtracted from the equation. My own hometown is currently being overrun by…wait for it…Amish. They’re literally doubling in population every twenty years. Utah is the only state in the union with a promising White birth rate, and that’s not because our missionaries are dropping wicked “negs” at the bar. The FLDS Mormon communities have the highest birth rate of any people in the world. Period.
And yes, while the Jewish intermarriage rates might lead one to believe that we can wait them out, there’s a dedicated nucleus of Orthodox Jews who guarantee that they’ll be around to bedevil us with their wily schemes for millennia to come.
A couple months ago, I was invited to visit a Christian Israelite church, one of them puritanical outfits. I didn’t see anything all that wacky. And while I politely disagree with their religious beliefs, I can’t help but feel that they’re more correct in the aggregate than most skeptics. They certainly don’t have a monopoly on wacky ideas. And even if the man in the pew in front of me did have some wacky ideas, he also had eight well-mannered White children. If there’s a single example, ANYWHERE, of a man accomplishing this feat, of having eight racially conscious White children lined up beside him, through the skillful application of Roissy’s techniques, then I’ll post a picture of myself holding a cardboard sign, 419-style, that reads “I’m Matt Parrott, the World’s Biggest Mangina”.
Agree. Feminism was divide and rule. “Game” is a male version.
“And yes, while the Jewish intermarriage rates might lead one to believe that we can wait them out”
As my favourite preacher says “why was this information produced?” It’s a big fat “hey look how non ethno-centric we are” neon sign and i don’t believe one word of it.
Coincidentally, I addressed this topic at the forum a few days ago. It is typical of Bardamu that he would make a wrongheaded argument like this.
http://www.occidentaldissent.com/forum/showthread.php?t=976
Exclusive territory is more important than birth rates
Sometimes our opponents (like Ferdinand Bardamu) dismiss our concerns about racial preservation by telling us that if we want our race to survive, then whites just need to have more children (or in Bardamu’s case, make non-whites have fewer children). Even some white nationalists misguidedly believe increasing the white birth rate is the most important key to racial survival.
Racial preservation is impossible except through racial separation. No matter what our birth rate, racial destruction is guaranteed in a multiracial society. A rise in the white birth rate (or in Bardamu’s case, a decline in non-white birth rates) would merely slow the rate of our demise, not stop it; even if our birth rate were to significantly increase, our demise would still be inevitable under multiracial conditions. Having an exclusive, defended territory allows a group to weather population declines and drops in birth rates.
This is not to say that we should not encourage whites to have more children. However, it is useful to keep in mind that exclusive territory, not birth rates, is what is most important when it comes to racial preservation.
Keeping this in mind reminds us of the critical fact that separation is necessary for racial preservation, and it helps us refute our opponents who incorrectly claim that racial preservation is just a matter of having more children.
Richard McCulloch on why separation is necessary for racial preservation:
http://www.racialcompact.com/preservationimperative.html
Separation: The Preservationist Imperative
Frank Salter in On Genetic Interests on exclusive territory being more important than birth rates:
Early marriage and child-rearing is the answer to the demographic problem.
Jews have been working for a long time to get us to drop our traditional White ways of doing things, ways that made us the most powerful peoples on the planet. Why then would we adopt the social habits of Blacks rather than reclaim our old ways? The Jewish media does everything they can to get us to act Black, so the solution is to…act Black?
I will make two comments here. First, I bought and read one of these “pick up artists books” years ago, and it was actually not at all vulgar. In fact, it was pretty much what anyone would say was okay. And even though the book had a short section for guys who just want to go out and get laid, even that section was not vulgar and simply had some straight forward suggestions on getting sex.
I also purused a few other such books and they were about the same, I also recall reading some sections of the book you have showing here, and I don’t recall it being all that vulgar, either, though maybe I am wrong. It’s been awhile. My point is simply that some of these books, though some having “catchy” titles, are actually pretty good advice and not what some here seem to be under the impression they are. In other words, they can help you get the idea good woman envisioned as what is desired as a mate and mother. They are not at all deserving of the condemnation some are trying to cast over them. I’m sure some are, but many are not.
Now, ahem, about those Amish girls. I think you might be a lil taken in by some misconceptions. It so happens that I have managed to have somewhat of a relationship with two Amish girls. It is certainly true they are religious and all that. But I can certainly assure you that the Amish are not prudes. They very much like sex and let me tell you, it is not restricted to missionary position with the lights out and prayer for forgiveness afterwards. And I very much gathered the two I knew were not much different than the rest.
People have a tendency to romanticize certain things and historical periods. And these romanticized fancies more often than not bear little resemblance to reality.
I had to laugh when I read about the Amish in the context you placed them above.
Matt,
FB wasn’t actually making the argument that sexual license is good for the European birth rate, but rather that sexual license is bad for the Non-European birth rate.
Partly I think he was being satiric against Feminism, by saying that if you really want to get those Non-White SOBs the best way to do it would be to do to their societies what Feminism did to the West.
Now what he proposed would be highly immoral in my opinion. Even if lowering the birthrate of this or that Non-European country with a really high birthrate would be desirable, there’s something screwed up about the idea of draining anybody’s society of ancient cultural traditions which deserve respect.
It didn’t do America in the late 19th Century any real harm that the population was exploding in this or that Non-European part of the World, because the immigration policy wasn’t so liberal to Non-European immigration as it is now, and because the immigration laws were actually enforced.
“But what’s stubborn and ignorant is turning to pick-up artist hijinks to turn around our demographic decline when more traditional (prudish) mating patterns have a proven record of actually working. While the number of children conceived by the two competing strategies is probably at par…”
Do you mean per man-year?
That would be hard to calculate, but my instinct is that even when you count in Cuckoldry, married White Men are conceiving at least a few more babies per man-year than unmarried White Men.
Married White Women are probably less likely to be on birth control, I would hope, and there’s no evidence that Married Women have any less sex than Unmarried Women of the same age.
Same amount of sex + Less birth control = More Conceptions.
Right?
“My own hometown is currently being overrun by…wait for it…Amish.”
Technology is the devil.
“They’re literally doubling in population every twenty years.”
It helps that more of them are staying in the life than in the past. Probably they get worse vibes from Non-Amish than their ancestors did in the 1910’s, 1950’s, etc.
“Utah is the only state in the union with a promising White birth rate, and that’s not because our missionaries are dropping wicked ‘negs’ at the bar.”
Its because the Mormons are still religious enough that the Women are sexually pure and amenable to Patriarchy enough to make marriage attractive to Men, and the single life unattractive enough to them.
It isn’t really so much about what the Men are doing, except reacting as any Men would react to the Women of their people being worthy of marriage.
“The FLDS Mormon communities have the highest birth rate of any people in the world. Period.”
And we all know a major reason why that is, my brother.
Sexual degeneracy, no.
Polygamy, yes.
For all the talk of Christianity, it is an absolute fact that gay marriage is legal in parts of these united States, but polygamy, which is biblical (!) is illegal.
Christianity as a weapon against Europe: “It is better to marry than to burn.”
Not exactly a ringing endorsement or racial strength.
“It is certainly true they are religious and all that. But I can certainly assure you that the Amish are not prudes. They very much like sex and let me tell you, it is not restricted to missionary position with the lights out and prayer for forgiveness afterwards.”
I would wager that a far higher percentage of their sexual acts are performed within marriage than the norm for nowadays, whatever the positions might be.
Obviously even in the 19th Century there were some people having sex outside of marriage, we have clandestine love letters and that sort of thing, but it was frowned upon in public and was considered shameful enough that there can be very little doubt that far less of it was happening than in this day and age.
After all, there must have been a reason people got married so much younger back then, and I don’t think all of it was a question of them wanting platonic companionship.
Nietzsche”which is biblical (!) is illegal.”
Just because polygamy occurred in the Bible, it does not mean God endorses it.
Correction:
(by Nietzsche): “polygamy, which is biblical (!) is illegal.”
Polygamy, yes.
No.
Sure thing Brutus. When you farted, did they chase you away?
It is perfectly fine for the middle class utilitarian to breed with multiple wives, in fact it is a middle class invention, for whites, at least. The middle class is not creative. They are amiable, and can be modeled like clay, all they need to contribute is more cogs in the machine. But they are necessary, for merchandising or whatever, but surely not to rule.
If polygamy is so great show me the genius of polygamy? Bach, the musical genius was BRED in the working class, and not in a polygamist family. These are division lines, and we are organic. Our hierarchy is organic. Most artists in fact originate in the working class. If they are not of the working class, then they are from the nobility, another class that does not take to weird religious polygamy as an open way of life, at least in White societies. Therefore, polygamy is a middle class phenomena. I am not writing as a critic. Reginald might love to know my family in Norway originates from a polygamist woman, she married brothers. Yes, we have the records.
I say that polygamy is no worse, and perhaps better, than divorce and remarriage, or “serial monogamy”. Men trade their wives for a younger version *all the time* in our society. At least under polygamy, the family stays intact.
If we had a strong monogamous culture with no divorce, there would be an argument against allowing polygamy. But what we have now? Polygamy would be preferable.
Young White men are *already* polygamous, they have several temporary wives in their youth, marry and have a few kids, then divorce and remarry another woman. Is wife-swapping someone less “degenerate” than having two wives that you care for and raise children with?
Bardamu is a repulsive pig. Wait – no insult intended, towards thenoble Swine.
A bunch of us booted that noxious cretin from our ahem social networking site months ago. Really, Matt – insults from that twist should be taken as a compliment.
“Sure thing Brutus. When you farted, did they chase you away?”
No, they never.
Veni Vidi Dixi: “Is wife-swapping someone less “degenerate” than having two wives that you care for and raise children with?”
What’s so acceptable about decent young White men dying as childless bachelors? Do you view homosexuality as degenerate? If so, be concerned when you get your wish-of the legalization and spread of mass polygamy!
Brutus, it’s funny, but I grew up in Amish country. I know what Rumspringa is. You’re full of shit. First you tell derogatory stories about the Southerners you “met” now it’s on to hinting you bedded a few Amish girls, and behind the pro-family facade, those White Amish girls are whores who want to do you doggy style.
Piss off.
A few things, Matt:
1) In the time since I wrote that post, I’ve realized that I was wrong about you. Reading some more of your work, I figured that I agree with you more than I disagree, and I’m man enough to admit when I’m wrong. This isn’t the first time I’ve done this – see my squabbles with “Hooking Up Smart” blogger Susan Walsh for an older example. I tend to express my appreciation for other writers in my Sunday link round-ups, because it brings material rewards.
2) “Fancy”? Really? And here I thought, with a blog name like In Mala Fide and a pseudonym like “Ferdinand Bardamu”, I was wearing my vulgarity on my sleeve. With me, what you see is what you get. I’m not a good person or a role model or a spokesman for any group but myself. I write to inform and entertain, with no agenda beyond my personal enjoyment. Stumbling onto my blog, seeing what’s etched on the front door and not expecting this is like walking into the Bunny Ranch and going, “My GOD, there are PROSTITUTES here!”
3) I’m part of the alternative right now? Awesome!
4) As Reginald mentioned (thanks man), I wrote that post tongue-in-cheek. The post isn’t about saving the white race, but damning other races to the hell we already live in. Or to phrase it another way, if you can’t be happy, you can at least make everyone else around you miserable. It’s the Internet, man – stop taking it so seriously. (Though I will say that the part about destruction being easier than creation is still true. If you have no moral scruples about destroying other cultures, the plan would work.)
5) You’re absolutely right that monogamous men sire more children then the promiscuous. Ron Guhname wrote a few posts about this last year and he came to the same conclusions you did, but he also noted that cads were beginning to overtake dads. I presume this is the ghettofication of America at work, as middle- and upper-class whites are outbred by the polyamorous underclasses.
6) To the extent that Roissysphere bloggers advocate sexual degeneracy to save civilization (the ones that still care, that is), they do so not as an end in itself, but as a stepping-stone to reimposing patriarchy and traditionalism. The idea is that if liberal, feminist society is on its way out, accelerating its collapse will enable the patriarchs to reimpose order among the ashes. See the old Cherokee curse, “May you have everything you desire!” I guess I’m a proponent of this view, though I’ve been having my doubts about it as of late. You don’t have to agree with it to see the logic behind it.
7) If Roissy isn’t your cup of joe, I highly recommend Athol Kay:
http://www.marriedmansexlife.com/
He approaches women with a similar premise and worldview, but instead of advocating mindless hedonism, he’s a proponent of monogamy, marriage and family. There’s no reason why a dedicated WN couldn’t use his advice to sire a brood. There are a number of other smaller blogs who argue the same thing, but Athol’s is by far the best.
8) Thanks for the link. I always appreciate publicity.
And as for the usual suspects who will pounce on me with the usual tired insults (hi MGLS!), let me write your rants for you:
Ferdinand Bardamu is evil incarnate. He’s a degenerate nihilist because he writes things that I don’t want to hear. Bardamu is also a sexual pervert because he admits to doing things that everyone over the age of 14 does, has done, or wishes they could do but can’t because they’re basement-dwelling nerds who fulminate online about saving the white race to compensate for their lack of a sex life. He also uses four-letter words, which I can’t handle because I’m a wilting violet. He probably kicks cripples down staircases too.
Now just save that to your computer and paste it whenever my name comes up to save yourself time. You’re welcome.
Later, haters.
SITS
“What’s so acceptable about decent young White men dying as childless bachelors?”
It’s not acceptable – I think it’s a terrible tragedy. I believe in one man, one woman, for life. I am fanatically anti-divorce. I’m just saying that if I put on my rationalist hat, polygamy doesn’t seem any worse than “serial monogamy” that we have today.
I actually agree with you – but at this stage in the game, when Whites are dying off, I’m not going to concern myself with the few decent White polygamists.
And to be sure, this is not to say I’m any more moral than anyone, in fact, these opinions of mine are due to seeing the damage first hand.
And as for the usual suspects who will pounce on me with the usual tired insults (hi MGLS!), let me write your rants for you:
Ferdinand Bardamu is evil incarnate. He’s a degenerate nihilist because he writes things that I don’t want to hear. Bardamu is also a sexual pervert because he admits to doing things that everyone over the age of 14 does, has done, or wishes they could do but can’t because they’re basement-dwelling nerds who fulminate online about saving the white race to compensate for their lack of a sex life. He also uses four-letter words, which I can’t handle because I’m a wilting violet. He probably kicks cripples down staircases too.
Now just save that to your computer and paste it whenever my name comes up to save yourself time. You’re welcome.
Later, haters.
Pathetic. This is an insightful look into Bardamu’s mentality, though.
Unsurprisingly, Bardamu failed to respond to any of my points about exclusive territory and birth rates.
What’s so acceptable about decent young White men dying as childless bachelors? Do you view homosexuality as degenerate? If so, be concerned when you get your wish-of the legalization and spread of mass polygamy!
Men are much more likely than women to not have the desire to get married and have children. It’s possible that a few men who are enthralled to sexual urges and unable to find any other outlet might turn to homosexuality, but I think the most likely scenario is most men who don’t have families devoting their time & energies to career, artistry and hobbies, while the others will end up just going after hookers and sluts. Basically the way men who don’t have children today act, only there will be a few more of them.
If Mr. “bardamu’s” article is barely disguised naked vulgarity, why feature it on the OD website?
“In Mala Fide” is a pigsty — can’t you tell? Why degrade OD by including it in your blog roll?
What do “In Bad Faith” and “Stupid Girl of the Month” have to do with Western Racial and Cultural Preservation?
MOB
Ferdinand,
I took your post as a blend of wit and message, believing that the last paragraph was more message than wit – particularly the last sentence: “Hence the white race will be outbred into extinction because of the stubbornness and ignorance of the people who claim to want to save it.”. But the bottom line is that I wanted to say what I said and your timing was perfect.
Original: “Ferdinand Bardamu is evil incarnate. He’s a degenerate nihilist because he writes things that I don’t want to hear.”
Edited for Accuracy: “Ferdinand Bardamu is an attention whore. He’s a degenerate mediocrity because he writes to distract himself from his own wasted potential.”
You can copy and paste the corrected version if you find it rings true.
Wow, what tripe, refuse and fecal matter the OP has spewed. His arrogance and hatred, mixed with racist attitudes is enough to make one want to gag and vomit. How sad I am to have stumbled across this site. 🙁
Brutus:
I dated an Amish girl for a short while. She ran far away from Amish land, but she was into shit too weird for me, so I never did anything with her and never called her again. I’m pretty sure she was not the norm, otherwise she would’ve probably stayed put, right?
Now I live pretty close to Amish land and I gotta say, I was pretty surprised to find out some of the stuff going on there, especially the Amish coke cartels and such…they are more effected by the outside world than most people realize. If they wanna preserve their community, they should rethink Rumspringe.
At least those that stay Amish do wind up with a lot of kids.
“Men are much more likely than women to not have the desire to get married and have children.”-H. Rock White
http://www.bakadesuyo.com/who-wants-marriage-and-children-more-men-or-w
“Men and women did not differ in their self-reported desires for marriage and children. However, the typical man was perceived as having a lower desire for both marriage and children and the typical woman as having a higher desire for both.”
http://www.mediate.com/articles/psych.cfm
“1. Women initiate divorce twice as often as men.”
I pretty much think that today’s social engineering is not the end of history or perpetual. Its possible to have a government that controls everything a population does like Cuba or Korea, but due to our immigration policies and welfare policies I don’t think our gooberment will be able to survive the triage necessary to its survival beyond a few blue state counties. The rest of us are on our own to create what we want to create.
“Brutus, it’s funny, but I grew up in Amish country. I know what Rumspringa is. You’re full of shit. First you tell derogatory stories about the Southerners you “met” now it’s on to hinting you bedded a few Amish girls, and behind the pro-family facade, those White Amish girls are whores who want to do you doggy style.
Piss off.”
Is “piss off” your typical comeback whenever anyone contradicts your romanticized version of what people actually are? People who actually know something and do not just live in a dream world like you?
I never said Amish girls were whores, but if you think they are the innocent little lambs like you imply, you are dead wrong.
And yes, since you brought it up, they do like doggy style.
I agree with Veni Vidi Dixi.
Vlad can you elaborate on the Amish topics you mentioned?
Roissy has absolutely no interest in traditionalism and western civilization – where on earth did you get that idea? He’s all for miscegenation, as I’ve pointed out before.
The whole “fight degeneracy with more degeneracy” shitck doesn’t make sense. If whites don’t get a handle on their demographics, then the consequences are essentially permanent. It’s not something (feminism, liberalism) that we can just wait to go out of fashion; it is something that must be actively countered on a cultural basis. Neither of the gamer characters here present any sort of solution along those lines – just more degeneracy.
I consider this, along with immigration, to be one of the primary issues right now. It is one of the issues of which I see no room for debate: either you are for the traditional white family (and all that it entails) or you are not. If you are not, you should be shunned and ostracized as your fundamental goals differ from those of us seeking to preserve the white race.
Donald wrote: I consider this, along with immigration, to be one of the primary issues right now. It is one of the issues of which I see no room for debate: either you are for the traditional white family (and all that it entails) or you are not. If you are not, you should be shunned and ostracized as your fundamental goals differ from those of us seeking to preserve the white race.
Yes, I am pretty much getting to this same position Donald.
“I agree with Veni Vidi Dixi.
Vlad can you elaborate on the Amish topics you mentioned?”
I want everyone to let these two sentences sink in.
He agrees with Veni Vidi Dixi, but in the next sentence wants someone who knows about the Amish to tell him about them.
I, too, agree with Donald.
I look at it this way: While it’s true we can’t really turn back the clock to a more moral time, we can however trash the old clock and make a new one that has the features we liked in the old one before it ‘broke’, so to speak.
We can’t all be paragons of virture, but that doesn’t mean we imitate the ways of our enemies in such a way that it tarnishes that which makes our race unique.
What I am trying to say is that while, yes, we should observe how our enemies harm us and try and either deflect and/or turn their tactics back at them, we shouldn’t necessarily play by the enemy’s rules.
In this case, you don’t fight fire with fire, but fire with water. We can’t use the enemy’s degeneracy against it directly, that would only strengthen their foundation. The question is: what is the water?
In a healthy society, “game” hustlers would be horse whipped and ran out of town on a rail for defiling the honorable daughters, sisters, and wives of honorable men.
In the crappy one we have, on the other hand, knocking up tarts is one of the few sources of new white people.
Well, up here in E/central PA we have the mennonites and the stricter Amish. I’m pretty sure the coke ring was the Old Order Amish near lancaster city. They were lower level peddlers for the Pagans MC. There are also the child abuse allegations, some of which came from the mouth of that runaway that I dated.
simply search: amish cocaine and amish child abuse and see how many hits you get.
It’s hard enough for them to avoid the ‘English’ as the call us, but rumspringe makes it even worse for the young ones. Delivery pizza, beer, music, sexual permissiveness, video games…big temptations to people who never grew up around that stuff.