Amanda Kijera: Liberal Human Rights Activist Raped in Haiti


.. and doesn’t learn a thing … blames White men for Haitian oppression.

We are not your weapons – we are women

By Amanda Kijera, civic journalist and activist in Haiti

Two weeks ago, on a Monday morning, I started to write what I thought was a very clever editorial about violence against women in Haiti. The case, I believed, was being overstated by women’s organizations in need of additional resources. Ever committed to preserving the dignity of Black men in a world which constantly stereotypes them as violent savages, I viewed this writing as yet one more opportunity to fight “the man” on behalf of my brothers. That night, before I could finish the piece, I was held on a rooftop in Haiti and raped repeatedly by one of the very men who I had spent the bulk of my life advocating for.

It hurt. The experience was almost more than I could bear. I begged him to stop. Afraid he would kill me, I pleaded with him to honor my commitment to Haiti, to him as a brother in the mutual struggle for an end to our common oppression, but to no avail. He didn’t care that I was a Malcolm X scholar. (he didn’t see her angel halo, Ed.) He told me to shut up, and then slapped me in the face. Overpowered, I gave up fighting halfway through the night.

Accepting the helplessness of my situation, I chucked aside the Haiti bracelet I had worn so proudly for over a year, along with it, my dreams of human liberation. Someone, I told myself, would always be bigger and stronger than me. As a woman, my place in life had been ascribed from birth. A Chinese proverb says that “women are like the grass, meant to be stepped on.” The thought comforted me at the same time that it made me cringe.

A dangerous thought. Others like it have derailed movements, discouraged consciousness and retarded progress for centuries. To accept it as truth signals the beginning of the end of a person–or community’s–life and ability to self-love. Resignation means inertia, and for the past two weeks I have inhabited its innards. My neighbors here include women from all over the world, but it’s the women of African descent, and particularly Haitian women, who move me to write now.

Truly, I have witnessed as a journalist and human rights advocate the many injustices inflicted upon Black men in this world. The pain, trauma and rage born of exploitation are terrors that I have grappled with every day of my life. They make one want to strike back, to fight rabidly for what is left of their personal dignity in the wake of such things. Black men have every right to the anger they feel in response to their position in the global hierarchy, but their anger is misdirected.

Women are not the source of their oppression; oppressive policies and the as-yet unaddressed white patriarchy which still dominates the global stage are. Because women–and particularly women of color–are forced to bear the brunt of the Black male response to the Black male plight, the international community and those nations who have benefitted from the oppression of colonized peoples have a responsibility to provide women with the protection that they need.

49 Comments

  1. Woman’s sexual whims are the ultimate gauge of superiority? Then by that narrow standard, blacks are superior to Asians, because many more White Women are attracted to black males than to Asians. – G.L.

    I think you are missing the point, Guest.

    For one thing, you are overlooking the elemental role of the male in pursuing and seeking out the company of the female — especially Black males, who are virtually always the pursuers of the White female, not the other way around — all Talmudvision fantasies aside.

    Regarding Asian females, and as I said before, it is often the ‘beta’ White guys that pursue their company as well, although with a great caveat: As the article I posted on Japanese women seeking out ‘Western’ (White) husbands demonstrates, it is a virtual cottage industry among a very appreciable number of Oriental women to pro-actively seek out the company of White men — even spending ample sums of money in the process.

    I don’t know of any women, of any other race, that does such strange things, especially if they really believe that they are part of a ‘superior’ race, tribe or nation — as we are always told by the HBD/’race realist’ crowd how highly “East’ Asians” supposedly think of themselves.

  2. If you weren’t profoundly unbalanced in your obsession with skin color to the exclusion of other hereditary traits, you’d realize that Greeks are much closer genetically to other White groups than Jews are.

    The Genetic Distance (Fst) between Germans and Greeks is only 0.0039, but in contrast the Genetic Distance between Germans and Ashkenazi Jews is 0.0072!

    That means Greeks are twice as close to you Nordics than even the least Middle Eastern of Jews are.

    So what?

    The genetic distance between Bedouins and Germans is more than twice that between Jews and Germans. That does not make Jews part of my racial ingroup. According to Cavalli-Sforza, the genetic distance between English and Bantus is more than twice the distance between English and Koreans. That does not make Koreans part of my racial ingroup.

    Germans/Russians Fst = 0.0079

    The table you are using gives 0.0037 as the German/Russian distance.

    Other interesting distances from that table:
    Swedish/German: 0.0007
    Swedish/Italian: 0.0064
    Swedish/Greek: 0.0084
    Swedish/Jewish: 0.0120

    http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.0030236

    “We computed FST statistics between clusters 1 (mostly NW [northwestern European]), 2 (mostly SE [southeast European]) and 3 (mostly AJ [Ashkenazi Jewish]), restricting our analysis to individuals unambiguously located in the center of each cluster (Figure 2). We obtained FST(1,2) = 0.005, FST(2,3) = 0.004 and FST(1,3) = 0.009.”

    Thus the genetic distance between Southern Europeans and Jews is less than the genetic distance between Southern Europeans and Northern Europeans.

  3. Also, Med genes are dominant, whereas Nordish ones are recessive. Mixing with Meds means Nordish phenotypes are dominated and don’t get expressed, while mixing with Russians may still allow the recessive Nordish phenotypes to be expressed.

    There’s the first mistake right there – assuming that most Russians are supposedly Nordic, um ‘Nordish’.

    I don’t know why so many of you have these fantasies of Russians like they are all a country of Ivan Drago’s or something… but let me tell you, they are essentially not.

  4. From “Table 3.4: Number of immigrants between 26 European ethnies needed to reduce the ethnic genetic interests of a random native by the equivalent of one child” in On Genetic Interests by Frank Salter

    Here are a few of the values for the English:

    German 57.2
    Belgian 83.7
    Danish 59.9
    Dutch 73.9

    Greek 6.5
    Italian 24.9
    Portuguese 8.9
    Spanish 27.0

  5. “So what?”

    So Mark and Half Sigma are full of it with their idea that defining Greeks as White means it follows that Jews are White as well.

    The two positions, that Greeks are White but Jews are not, are perfectly consistent.

    “Thus the genetic distance between Southern Europeans and Jews is less than the genetic distance between Southern Europeans and Northern Europeans.”

    That doesn’t apply to the Spanish:

    Spanish/Ashkenazi Jews: 0.0056
    Spanish/Irish: 0.0037
    Spanish/Germans: 0.0015
    Spanish/EastEura: 0.0033
    Spanish/Swedes: 0.0055

    Also Italians are closer to the Germans than they are to Ashkenazi Jews:

    Italians/Jews: 0.0040
    Italians/Germans: 0.0029

  6. “The genetic distance between Bedouins and Germans is more than twice that between Jews and Germans. That does not make Jews part of my racial ingroup.”

    As I said, it is possible for you to define your racial ingroup in such a way as to exclude Meds.

    You just have to exclude Russians as well, for the sake of basic consistency.

    The average Med is more related to you than the average Russian. Therefore no matter how tightly you choose to define your ingroup you can’t include Russians and exclude Meds.

  7. There’s the first mistake right there – assuming that most Russians are supposedly Nordic, um ‘Nordish’.

    No. I’m just assuming that Med genes are generally more dominant when it comes to physical phenotype.

  8. Reginald seems like a bright guy but he clearly has an agenda. It’s best to reserve judgment on these matters and wait for someone like n/a to chime in.

  9. The letter to Alternet by CMartel (#75) is tremendous. Very well-written with a balance between keeping it civilized and telling sharp truths. Maybe they won’t delete it and some Whites there will start de-programming.

  10. Russians aren’t Europeans.

    People obviously mean something different when they use the term White, which is unfortunate. Clear meaning and potential unity is compromised.

    There is White as Europeans, White as skin tone (which would include Russians and… what? albinos the world over?), and White as NW Europeans.

  11. good lord… an tragedy like that, and this young woman still fails to learn some of this world’s truths.

  12. I am a Man of Color and would like to offer my services to free her from the oppression that the evil White man has forced on her.

    Or, I would like her to volunteer to live in my basement for a few weeks to cure me of my oppressed feelings, I have much pent up aggression and woudl need to take it on out on her (To spare the rest of the world) at least 6 times daily.

    Please forward me your email address and we can arrange the raping at a convenient time for both of us.

  13. women, women never changes.

    i hope she gets raped by a gang of white guys when she comes of the plane from Haiti.

    God i wish Hitler had won.

  14. Mark,

    If you weren’t profoundly unbalanced in your obsession with skin color to the exclusion of other hereditary traits, you’d realize that Greeks are much closer genetically to other White groups than Jews are.

    The Genetic Distance (Fst) between Germans and Greeks is only 0.0039, but in contrast the Genetic Distance between Germans and Ashkenazi Jews is 0.0072!

    That means Greeks are twice as close to you Nordics than even the least Middle Eastern of Jews are.

    It’s funny how some here turn so quickly into shrieking, dimwitted liberals. You must have arthritis with as many knee-jerk reactions as you have.

    You have completely misunderstood and misrepresented my post, and created a straw man.

    So Mark and Half Sigma are full of it with their idea that defining Greeks as White means it follows that Jews are White as well.

    His idea, not mine. I’ve also found this idea throughout the HBD community, that if you reject Jews you reject Southern Europeans. The problem is do Southern Europeans go along with it and unfortunately I’ve found a lot of them do.

  15. Reginald, you’re a walking, talking, squawking irrelevancy. Nobody gives a flying fuck about fst distance. The idea of southern swarthoids going around telling jews “I’m white but you’re not” is so ridiculous on the face of it takes a highly disturbed brain to even concoct such a thing. Southern or southeastern or eastern Europeans may have certain problems with aspects of Jewish influence (though they’re unlikely to go overboard with it the way the average vnntard does), but to distinguish themselves from Jews racially, and then on the basis that they’re “whiter“? Please. Idiocy so supreme doesn’t merit any further response. If your intention was to bring racialism into yet greater disrepute (as though that’s even necessary) consider your job done.

  16. The idea of southern swarthoids going around telling jews “I’m white but you’re not” is so ridiculous

    However the idea of southern swarthoids going around telling jews “I’m European but you’re not” is eminently sensible.

    … which is basically what Reginald’s point actually boils down to…

  17. “His idea, not mine.”

    That’s good Mark. It seemed to me that you were endorsing Half Sigma’s idea, and I’m very glad my impression was incorrect.

    “I’ve also found this idea throughout the HBD community, that if you reject Jews you reject Southern Europeans.”

    Those Jews are sneaky.

    “The problem is do Southern Europeans go along with it and unfortunately I’ve found a lot of them do.”

    That’s very unfortunate. Even leaving aside the serious genetic and geographical issues, viewing Jews as part of your ingroup is very dangerous, as Southern Europeans found out after Jew lovers in the Vatican utterly ruined Catholicism with Vatican II.

  18. Reginald, I hope you are not hostile to the genetic preservation of Nordics/Northwestern Europeans.

  19. She’s as brainwashed against the white race as ever the Germans were against Jews. “The SS have murdered my family! those damned Jews!!”

    The white race is being demonized by the CommuNazis just like they did with the Jews, and at the same time they bring millions of Muslim refugees from the countries they bomb. They are setting up a European civil war which will virtually wipe out the white male and millions of Muslims at the same time.

    This woman’s insanity is the result of a lifetime’s anti-white brainwashing.

  20. No I’m not.

    I wouldn’t be opposed to changing the marriage laws in such a way as to effect the reproductive isolation of those Whites 100% of Germanic and/or Celtic descent.

    And there’s no more reason for Southern Europeans to be allowed to immigrate into Northern Europe, than there is to let Northern Europeans immigrate into Southern Europe.

  21. “The problem is do Southern Europeans go along with it and unfortunately I’ve found a lot of them do.”

    That’s very unfortunate.

    This is only because of the unclear meanings of the word “White”. If everyone simply said Europeans or a similar term meaning Europeans it would clear up the confusion. Then Southern Europeans would have no reason to go along with it.

  22. Amazing how almost every thread winds up discussing either ‘Nordicism’ or polygamy, or actually, both.

    Incredible.

  23. I wouldn’t be opposed to changing the marriage laws in such a way as to effect the reproductive isolation of those Whites 100% of Germanic and/or Celtic descent.

    Racial preservation cannot be achieved by changing marriage laws, segregation, apartheid, or other such measures. Geographic separation is necessary for racial survival. Opposing separation effectively means opposing racial preservation.

    Quoting from Richard McCulloch’s article “Separation: The Preservationist Imperative”:

    http://racialcompact.com/preservationimperative.html

    In 1988 I had the opportunity to meet William Gayley Simpson, author of Which Way Western Man . At that time he was in his nineties and in declining health. He compensated for his lack of conversational endurance by distilling the essence of his thought into one very terse and pointed message: “Separate or die.” Those were his last words to me, and that is fitting, for that simple phrase tells us two vitally important things. First, that racial separation is necessary for the long-term preservation of the Northern European race, the founding and still the majority American racial type, which I refer to as the Nordish race. It is a simple matter of either-or — either racial separation or racial death. Second, that the alternative to racial destruction, the solution to the Nordish racial crisis, is racial separation. Not immigration restrictions, segregation, white supremacism or other half-measures, nor anything that need harm other races or violate their legitimate rights and interests. [Note 1] None of these things can save us. Only separation can. Separation is the preservationist imperative.

    The reason separation is necessary for racial preservation is simple — the evolution and continued existence of different races is made possible by reproductive isolation. When different populations are reproductively isolated they cannot interbreed or intermix, and consequently evolve in different directions, developing into different races with their own unique and distinct ensemble of genetic traits. Reproductive isolation requires an absence of physical contact. As a practical matter, this requires geographic separation.

  24. Amazing how almost every thread winds up discussing either ‘Nordicism’ or polygamy, or actually, both.

    Incredible.

    Exactly after I post that comment, another one follows on ‘Nordicism’ :/

    Do you all have ADD and/or OCD or something?!?

  25. Amazing how almost every thread winds up discussing either ‘Nordicism’ or polygamy, or actually, both.

    Incredible.

    Exactly after I post that comment, another one follows on ‘Nordicism’ :/

    Do you all have ADD and/or OCD or something?!?

    LOL. I’m dying of laughter here. Charlemagne made the comment of the day.

  26. It’s funny how an article like this can make the racism emerge…some of your comments are sick and you should be ashamed to have written them. (A dirty white woman who deserved to be raped because she has mulatto kids and hung around in Haiti…yea that sums it up huh) I will leave it at that because not going to let worthless people like you get the best of my anger. You are not worth it.

  27. Exactly after I post that comment, another one follows on ‘Nordicism’ :/

    Do you all have ADD and/or OCD or something?!?

    So you’re trying to paint people here who discuss “Nordicism” and favor Nordish Preservation as being “weirdos” with psychological disorders. Kind of like what Jews have done and still do against Whites, asserting and slandering Whites who have national feelings and go against Jew-dictated orthodoxy as being addled with psychological disorders.

    Let me guess. You’re of Med lineage. Right?

  28. Let me guess. You’re of Med lineage. Right?

    Not exactly.

    I am of French descent, northern in particular, including the Breton region of France, so I would, presumably, be included in the Nordish-American category as well.

    I am emphatically not against Northern European preservation — nor was I trying to brand you guys as ‘weirdos’ or anything else like it. My ‘ADD’ comment was meant at the frustration that many of us feel over a few of you guys — Reginald and MGLS in particular — riding their hobby horses into every thread imaginable to carry on their personal food fight. Tis’ all.

  29. “Women are not the source of their oppression;”
    I guess she missed the bit where the UN only handed out food to women and the women were singing and dancing in the street as the men looked on, cowed by soldiers with automatic weapons, hungry and tired. I wonder if the man who allegedly (because western women are liars and hypocrites in the main) raped her was one of those men who was cowed by an M-16, hungry and tired, and saw women being fed while he went hungry? I wonder if he got it into his head to make a woman pay for his humiliation? Who knows? But when you start abastatusing men? You have better be reading so take the shitstorm that is coming back at you. Stupid bitch. No sympathy. None. Men get treated far worse in divorce and they don’t have to go to a devastated country to be so. I’m sick of women whining and complaining about ‘rape’.

  30. First things first. Is there any proof she was raped in the first place? For all we know it never happened, or she simply had consensual sex with someone on a roof in Haiti and is spinning this tale for its political value.

  31. Blow it all up, fuck it. Send humanity to hell. The sooner the better

    Johnny why not just kill yourself arleady? Seriously, why suffer like this? It’s just not worth it, dude. Let the brainwashed sheeple do all the “living” (if that’s what one call it) on this cosmic joke of a planet. Surely awesome aryan specimens like you have got better things to do, right? Go on man, you can do it — Valhalla awaits.

    Lockeford, no, no, no that’s (“I am but you’re not”) pure jew-on-the-brain, single-jewish-cause, jew-hatin’ bullshit too. It’s complete crap. Worse, it’s embarrassing.

  32. Essentially she is trying to find a scapegoat. She’s trying to cope with the fact that she got raped and needed someone or something to blame. The fact is, people who commit crimes should be accountable. You’re rather brainwashed, aren’t you Amanda?

  33. This girl sure is spending a lot of time, effort and money to make herself feel good about being hot for Black men. It would be interesting to find out how she feels about her Dad.

  34. Silver,

    I don’t think it’s “jew-on-the-brain”. That’s WP’s preserve.

    The distinction is a valid ethnic and cultural difference. That was the point of Reginald sharing the genetic information, which has been supported by other sources. Jews are not Europeans. Jews refer to themselves as “Semites”, as in “Don’t be anti-Semetic, Silver!” and they mean themselves.

    I don’t recall any Spaniards or Italians ever saying that.

    What, are you now saying that Southern Europeans ARE jews??

  35. Silver believes the ancient peoples of Southern Europe were essentially Nordic, and became “Meds” by mixing with Semitic wogs. That is probably true.

  36. Silver believes the ancient peoples of Southern Europe were essentially Nordic, and became “Meds” by mixing with Semitic wogs. That is probably true. – CC

    These scores from Richard Lynn’s IQ and the Wealth of Nations:

    Italy IQ 102/99 (95/92) Basilicata (-/89) Bozen/South Tyrol (-/100) Campania (-/87) Emilia Romagna (-/97) Friuli-Venezia Giulia (-/100) Liguria (-/93) Lombardy (103/96) Piedmont (99/96) Puglia (-/88)Sardinia (-/87) Sicily (-/86) Trient (-/99) Tuscany (99/-) Veneto (102/99),

    Jesus Christ. There’s a bigger gap in IQ between the average German and the average Sicilian than there is between the Average white and black American. In the mean Southern Italians are in intelligence barely discernible from the Levantines and North Africans, for example, Egypt IQ 83/82, Syria IQ 87/82 and Lebanon IQ 86/82, whom we know to have migrated by the millions into Italy during the first few centuries AD, and of whom no racial theorist I can think of failed to note the patent similarity of phenotype.

    Not to mention the genetic surveys which report near-eastern y-dna lineages in Meds and the presence of sickle cell anemia in some parts of Southern Europe, both sure signs of admixture.

  37. Hmmm.. She’s either an Andrea Dworkin understudy or is looking to carry forward Andrea’s special brand of male hate. Either way, I find it ironic that she hates men who’ve never done anything to her and loves the men who raped her. Is this loon for real?

  38. “Silver believes the ancient peoples of Southern Europe were essentially Nordic, and became ‘Meds’ by mixing with Semitic wogs.”

    That’s absolute garbage.

    Southern Europeans are genetically closer to Middle Easterners because of the Neolithic Revolution causing a migration from the Levantine into the arable parts of Europe.

    This migration occured LONG before Ancient Times, long before the Ancient Greeks and Ancient Romans.

    This event probably even occured before there was any such thing as Nordics.

    This event happened all the way back from 9500 to 7000 BCE.

    “Archeologists believe that food-producing societies first emerged in the Levantine region of southwest Asia at the close of the mini-Ice Age around 12,000 BC, and developed into a number of regionally distinctive cultures by the eighth millennium BC. Remains of food-producing societies in the Aegean have been carbon-dated to around 6500 BC at Knossos, Franchthi Cave, and a number of mainland sites in Thessaly. Neolithic groups appear soon afterwards in the Balkans and south-central Europe. The Neolithic cultures of southeastern Europe (the Balkans, Italy, and the Aegean) show some continuity with groups in southwest Asia and Anatolia (e.g., Çatalhöyük).

    Current evidence suggests that Neolithic material culture was introduced to Europe via western Anatolia, and that similarities in cultures of North Africa and the Pontic steppes are due to diffusion out of Europe. All Neolithic sites in Europe contain ceramics, and contain the plants and animals domesticated in Southwest Asia: einkorn, emmer, barley, lentils, pigs, goats, sheep, and cattle. Genetic data suggest that no independent domestication of animals took place in Neolithic Europe, and that all domesticated animals were originally domesticated in Southwest Asia.[4] The only domesticate not from Southwest Asia was broomcorn millet, domesticated in East Asia.[5]

    Perhaps the first scholar to posit a large-scale Neolithic migration, based on genetic evidence, was Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza. By applying principal component analysis to data from “classical genetic markers” (protein polymorphisms from ABO blood groups, HLA loci, immunoglobulins, etc), Cavalli-Sforza discovered interesting clues about the genetic makeup of Europeans. Although being very genetically homogeneous, several patterns did exist.[8] The most important one was a north-western to south-eastern cline with a Near Eastern focus. Accounting for 28% of the overall genetic diversity in the European samples in his study, he attributed the cline to the spread of agriculture from the Middle East circa 10,000 to 6,000 years ago[9].

    Cavalli-Sforza’s explanation of demic diffusions stipulated that the clines were due to the population expansion of neolithic farmers into a scarcely populated, hunter-gathering Europe, with little initial admixture between agriculturalists and foragers.

    Although the above studies propounded a ‘significant’ Neolithic genetic contribution, they did not quantify the exact magnitude of the genetic contribution. Dupanloup performed an admixture analysis based on several autosomal loci, mtDNA and NRY haplogroup frequencies. The study was based on the assumption that Basques were modern representatives of Palaeolithic hunter-gatherers’ gene pool, and Near Eastern peoples were a proxy population for Neolithic farmers. Subsequently, they used admixture analysis to estimate the likely components of the contemporary European gene pool contributed by the two parental populations whose members hybridized at a certain moment in the past. The study suggested that the greatest Near Eastern admixture occurs in the Balkans (~80%) and Southern Italy (~60%), whilst it is least in peoples of the British Isles (estimating only a 20% contribution). The authors concluded that the Neolithic shift to agriculture entailed major population dispersal from the Near East.[14]

    Formerly there had been much debate about whether the westerly spread of agriculture from the Near East was driven by farmers actually migrating, or by the transfer of ideas and technologies to indigenous hunter-gatherers. However, in a very recent study in 2010, researchers have studied the genetic diversity of modern populations to throw light on the processes involved in these ancient events. The new study, funded by the Wellcome Trust, examines the diversity of the Y chromosome. Mark Jobling, who led the research, said: “We focused on the commonest Y-chromosome lineage in Europe, carried by about 110 million men, it follows a gradient from south-east to north-west, reaching almost 100% frequency in Ireland. We looked at how the lineage is distributed, how diverse it is in different parts of Europe, and how old it is.” The results suggested that the lineage R1b1b2 (R-M269), like E1b1b or J lineages, spread together with farming from the Near East. Prior archaeological[29][30][31][32][33] and metrological[34][35] studies had arrived at similar conclusions in support of the migrationist model.

    Dr Patricia Balaresque, first author of the study, added: “In total, this means that more than 80% of European Y chromosomes descend from incoming farmers. In contrast, most maternal genetic lineages seem to descend from hunter-gatherers. To us, this suggests a reproductive advantage for farming males over indigenous hunter-gatherer males during the switch from hunting and gathering, to farming”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neolithic_Europe

  39. “In the mean Southern Italians are in intelligence barely discernible from the Levantines and North Africans…”

    Most Southern Italians are not Sicilians, therefore your statement is a damned lie.

    IQ and the Wealth of Nations gives Italy overall IQ of 102.

    That’s much higher than the overall IQ of 95 the same book gives for Germans, or the IQ of 96 given to the Russians.

    It is also higher than the IQ of 98 given to the French.

    And even the Sicilians were only 3 points behind the Irish.

    So I guess according to you the Irish are at the absolute cusp of being barely discernible from the Levantines and North Africans in intelligence.

    Worthless lying cherry picker, who pretends not to even know that most Southern Italians aren’t Sicilians.

  40. “I think you are missing the point, Guest.”

    Maybe. Not to belabor this issue, but I just don’t follow your logic.

    “For one thing, you are overlooking the elemental role of the male in pursuing and seeking out the company of the female — especially Black males, who are virtually always the pursuers of the White female, not the other way around — all Talmudvision fantasies aside.”

    Yet there are an estimated 80,000 white women who fly to the carribean every year to get banged by rastas. The white women actually pay for the “favor”. White women more frequently actively pursue black males than asian males, whom they’re virtually completely uninterested in.

    ” it is a virtual cottage industry among a very appreciable number of Oriental women to pro-actively seek out the company of White men — even spending ample sums of money in the process.

    I don’t know of any women, of any other race, that does such strange things, especially if they really believe that they are part of a ’superior’ race, tribe or nation — as we are always told by the HBD/’race realist’ crowd how highly “East’ Asians” supposedly think of themselves.”

    Again, I don’t know what this has to do with superiority. By this definition, since you claim no other women behave this way, Asians are inferior to everyone else, including blacks? I just don’t follow and don’t see what this has to do with anything. It doesn’t matter what Asians think of themselves. The point was, I thought, that we can roughly gauge a people merits by crime rates, intelligence, academic and cultural achievements, sexual promiscuity, etc. You’re reducing it to just one issue. Whatever. We’re not going to agree. Let’s put this baby to bed.

  41. Very nice, Reginald. None of it changes that:

    -Sickle cell anemia’s presence in SE is sure sign of admixture

    -High concentrations of near east and north african lineages are a sure sign of admixture

    -Many of the Southern Italians resemble Semites by phenotype

    -Germany received 102 as a mean score, not 95 as you claim.

    Now, Italy did score a 102 overall but as the data i posted clearly shows that is indicative of Northerners, who are Germanic and have not received any Semitic admixture over time. All of Southern Italy and Sicily did and that began in Antiquity.

    Worthless lying cherry picker, who pretends not to even know that most Southern Italians aren’t Sicilians.

    There’s not enough variation between them genetically for it to matter.

    All told, I am against calling white that which isn’t.

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. Nation of Cowards » Blog Archive » Lunatic White Women Raped In Haiti…

Comments are closed.