Birth of a People, Rebirth of a Nation

One of the major disadvantages American white nationalists face is that American nationality can plausibly be separated from white racial identity.  This is a huge difference compared to the European situation.

As Paul Gottfried notes, European countries are now defining their identity in terms of abstract human rights and some kind of egalitarian universal history.  Nonetheless, whatever the propaganda, few people really believe it in their bones.  When people say “English,” they mean white.  Someone like “Sir” Trevor Phillips, even if he became Prime Minister or somehow heir to the throne itself, will never be a true son of Britain, and at some level, everyone knows this, including him.  European nationalists therefore have a great advantage.  A party such as the Vlaams Belang can appeal to a “Flemish” identity and everyone automatically knows what they are talking about, namely, who is Flemish, and who is not.  In the politically correct modern West, it is also an advantage that Europeans can fall back on national identities that are solely white but not defined by race.  A pro-Flemish group can not be portrayed as racist the same way that a “pro-white” group can.

In contrast, American identity, as painstakingly outlined by Tomislav Sunic in Homo Americanus:  Child of the Postmodern Age, is now almost exclusively defined by an ahistorical narrative culminating in a mythical equality.  Ignoring that equality and liberty are mortal enemies, and that the Founding Fathers were by any modern standard white nationalists, America has been successfully redefined into a sort of club where the price of admission is a belief in a vague concept of human rights and a shared appreciation of contradictory figures like George Washington, Martin Luther King Jr., Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, and Muhammad Ali.

Now this is absurd of course, but people really do believe it.  In some sense, it is plausible because an ethnic identity for Americans, what people like President Teddy Roosevelt called the “American race,” has been abandoned.  The late scholar Samuel Huntington, in his greatest work, attempted to the square the circle and marry the universalistic American creed with the American culture that grew out of the Anglo-Protestant ethnic core.  However, even he admitted that American identity, though dependent on a core ethnicity, was not defined by it.  Once that connection was broken, the only fallback was an American identity defined by white racial identity.
After the Civil War and Reconstruction, this essentially existed.  Left wing scholars in “white studies” are ironically close to the truth when they show how a conception of white identity that encompassed non Germanic whites was indispensable in creating the “normal” American identity.  They err of course, in believing that this is some kind of capitalist oppressor plot as opposed to an alliance based on biological and cultural reality.  However, Negroes were still in some sense considered Americans, even if only second class ones.  Eventually, after the so called civil rights movement, this core American identity was opened up to non whites.  This naturally transitioned to the abstract American identity we have today and now even saying that there even is something called an American culture is suspiciously racist.

As always, leftists are actually closer to the truth than conservatives here.  Leftists admit that America was founded as a white country.  White American conservatives, even when they prop up embarassing minstrel acts like Lloyd Martin are essentially conceding that “white” cultural norms are synonmous with American cultural norms.  However, until they are able to make the implicit whiteness explict, this is more reactionary posturing, waiting for Mexicans to care about the Constitution written by white slave owners or urban Negroes to thrill to the sounds of Yankee Doodle.

The Tea Parties are overtly anti-racist, and implicitly non-racist.  Nonetheless, they are overwhelmingly white.  Just the idea of whites gathering in white numbers has leftists scared out of their mind, in the same way that they hate and fear harmless crowds like NASCAR fans, gun lovers, or Sarah Palin supporters.  And now, someone has noticed the implications.  That someone is Pat Buchanan.

It is amazing to think how establishment Pat Buchanan really is, when all is said and done.  He was communications director for Ronald Reagan.  He has lived in Washington DC practically his entire life.  He knows everyone, and is essentially friends with everyone, even the liberals.  If conservatives hadn’t decided to sabotage themselves in 1992 and again in 1996, he could have been President, which would have saved America from mass immigration, 9/11, fiscal collapse, and eventual dissolution.  The rise and fall of Pat Buchanan will go down in history as the last chance the United States of America had to save itself.

Now, however, even Pat knows the writing is on the wall.  In a bracing new column, “New Tribe Rising?,” Pat notes that America is breaking apart along the lines of ethnonationalism.  He knows that whites, and only whites, keep this farce of modern America limping along.  He also sees signs that whites are beginning to react against their constant demonization and degradation by our governing elite.  He writes,

Adversity and abuse increase the awareness of separate identity and accelerate the secession of peoples from each other… Palin and Tea Partiers now repeat Obama’s disparaging line about their clinging to Bibles and guns – with defiant pride.  As others have done in our multicultural and multiethnic nation, this people is beginning to assert its identity, unapologetically.

Pat also notes that other peoples have already defined themselves.  “Black America seems united. White America is the house divided, for it is in the womb of white America that this new people is gestating and fighting to be born.”

There’s the rub.  The hard part is that white Americans, real Americans, still identify with the cultural symbols, governmental institutions, and historical narratives of the United States, even though the United States of America is objectively the most anti-white force on the planet.  One can imagine a Southern secession movement or a Northwest Homeland crushed by Red, White, and Blue waving conservatives who think they are fighting for God and Country when they are really fighting for Goldman Sachs and Lady Gaga.

Any American white nationalist movement will have to accomplish the neat trick of somehow claiming the true American identity (which is historically correct) while denouncing and destroying just about everything the United States of America has come to symbolize today as well as the puerile Enlightenment silliness that led us inevitably to this point.  It will not be easy.
However, step one is simple to define, if not to achieve.  White Americans need to realize that however much they resist it, try to squirm out of it, or try to beg Michael Steele to free them from it, they are a people.  As Samuel Francis stated,

At a time when anti-white racial and ethnic groups define themselves in explicitly racial terms, only our own unity and identity as a race will be able to meet their challenge. If and when that challenge should triumph and those enemies come to kill us as Robert Mugabe has threatened to do to whites in Zimbabwe, they will do so not because we are ‘Americans’ or ‘Christians’ or ‘conservatives’ or ‘liberals,’ but because we are white.

A number of far left blogs are crying “Oh noes!  Racisms!” as could be expected.  Someone dared to mention white Americans exist and that they may have interests.  Of course, no one is actually opposed to ethnonationalism, not even the “I don’t see race conservatives” who are busy giving money to a party headed by a man cosponsoring conferences with his co-ethnic Al Sharpton.  It is whites, and only whites, who must sit down, shut up, and fund the people who hate them.

Whites are at least beginning to see the double standards.  We shouldn’t be over optimistic or do another “finally, people are waking up” type post.  They aren’t — not yet.  However, the gestation for a new people is at least taking place.

Saul Alinsky noted that you can not speak to people in terms that are outside their own experience.  White nationalists need to step up and start speaking to our people in terms that they understand. Our posts on Hitler and esoteric National Socialism and various movement dramas are all very well.  However, we need to start thinking realistically, practically, and politically about how to reach our noble, naive, and so easily abused white American folk.  While thought exercises like the ones today are fun, tomorrow is a new day and that needs to be our primary focus.

40 Comments

  1. It seems simple to inch in this direction. All Americans claim to believe in majority rule. Majority rule is largely sensible becuase what’s good for the aggregate majority is typically good for the country. Whites are the majority, always have been, but are in the strange position of being ruled by an anti-white minority. It is no different than if Israel were ruled by a Palestinian Arab. Most of these mainstream conservatives see what’s wrong with that. They certainly see what’s wrong with rule by Muslims. So it’s only a matter of time until they see the farce of whites being ruled by blacks and Hispanics who mostly hate them.

    No need to preach anything other than majority rule and preserving a known way of life that was superior to the current multiculti stew.

  2. http://racehist.blogspot.com/2008/04/what-is-american.html

    Harry Laughlin’s definition of an American:

    Definition of the American race
    Suitable for Legal and Technical Use, — and for General Understanding

    Racially, an American is a Caucasian each of whose ancestral lines traces directly to a member of the foundation racial stock of the American people, or to a race-assimilant thereto who was fully assimilated thereby.

    (a) The foundation racial stock of the American people consists in all Caucasians who were inhabitants of the territory of the original United States at the consummation of American independence, September 3, 1783.

    (b) A race-assimilant to the foundation racial stock of the American people is a person readily assimilable thereby on account of nearness in blood-kinship thereto; such a person is a Caucasian all of whose ancestral lines trace directly to one or more of those previously established European races which furnished the ethnic elements of the foundation racial stock of the American people.

  3. Good post, Gregory.

    Not just the blatant hypocrisy, but the deeper contradictions of the system are becoming more apparent to average folks. The Kwa elects a black president, yet the non-whites keep raping, murdering, failing at school, and pimpin’ dat ride. And of course screeching racism every chance they get, and voting against white interests at every opportunity.

    In short, more whites are gradually waking up to the fact that nothing, literally nothing they can do will stop the never ending attack. To a simple person, if electing a black president doesn’t do the trick, what will? Nothing. Though the average person may not be thinking in terms of solutions yet, this basic fact of reality has to be sinking in more and more.

    Of course, white nationalists knew this all along. We knew that nothing would change, that the non-whites would keep doing their thing, becoming if anything emoldened to engage in even more destructive behaviors. But I remember, around the time of the election, that a lot of whites thought that some good might come of this. I remember that one working class woman, who didn’t vote for Obama, said “Maybe they (blacks) will start acting nicer.” LOL! Nice thought, though.

    We offer the only solution: a home of our own. A land without constant rape, murder, hectoring, cultural degradation, and group conflict. Is the typical white thinking about this yet? Almost certainly not. He’s still got quite a ways to go, but the journey has begun. Given the dynamics in play, more will be open to this message in the years ahead.

  4. American nationality can plausibly be separated from white racial identity.

    And this problem is actually a very simple one, and it’s an engineering problem, not a theoretical problem. Before mass media, no White Americans – aside from the over-educated – were ever swayed by “no such thing as race” and cultural Marxism and the like. Plenty of elites seemed to be, but outside them and a handful of exceptions, no one.

    A case in point – Vermont. It’s super-liberal (except strong gun rights) and is all very politically correct on racial issues. It’s also 99% White. So either the liberals honestly don’t understand, because they live in all white communities, or they don’t care for the same reason. Their only exposure is through the media.

    Very few people who live with the reality of race every day actually believe all the various multi-culti nonsense. Just as most White Christians in America don’t really take their beliefs all that literally. Just as 99% of Christians go to the doctor when they are sick, not the pastor, so most Whites move to all White school districts. Wasps are the best hypocrites because they are the most polite.

    If there were a White Television Network that had technical documentaries by kiev, a sermon by wiki, a talk show by proxium and pick pockets, with the evening news hosted by the White Rabbit Radio guy and southernavenger, and instead of Thomas “Flat Earth” Friedman, the expert giving the soundbites was Kevin MacDonald and Greg Johnson, have no doubt, the USA would be a WN paradise.

    Since at minimum 80% of White Americans are completely brainwashed by the media that you don’t control, you lose. The new elites are the people who control the media and the money. Until you take that away from the current elites, you are not elite. The only other alternative is to get most White people to stop watching TV and listening to radio, which is about as likely as teaching sheep to talk.

    QED

  5. Roach,
    That really feels like either dissimulation or denial. We’re due to become minorities here within my lifetime and you confidently declare that we needn’t assert our identity – they we need to only embrace our overlords’ superficial rhetoric about democracy?

    Are you actually suggesting that I serve up my children, nieces, and nephews to these irreligious abstractions?

    “I’ve got bad news and good news, kids…The bad news is that you’re all going to submit to a government which aims to exploit, marginalize, and eventually replace you and yours. The good news is that I don’t have to radically reconsider my political abstractions!”

  6. No need to preach anything other than majority rule and preserving a known way of life that was superior to the current multiculti stew.

    Do you see how you used the word “was”? You need to use that word because it’s all in the past tense. There’s nothing left to preserve. The values you’re promoting are the values that got us where we’re at. They’re the values that got us into the current multiculti stew.

    “No need to preach anything other than lying in the middle of the street. It was very comfortable until I got run over by a car.”

  7. Nice tribute to Buchanan and, for the most part, he deserves it. I remember his best run, when he won the New Hampshire primary and had the Republicrat oligarchs genuinely frightened. Then, though, he threw it all away by skipping South Carolina in order to participate in some stupid “debate” in Arizona. At least he tried. Trainspotter thinks that “more will be open” to Buchanan’s explicit WN and implicit anti-Jewish message “in the years ahead”, and I don’t doubt it. But we all are about to be overtaken by events. When the economy collapses and Civil War II begins, nothing will stimulate White Nationalism like the sight of millions of blacks and browns boiling out of the starving cities and into the suburbs, looking for food, loot, and white women. Going to be a hard lesson, though.

  8. “start thinking realistically, practically, and politically”

    I tried doing that on the Hitler birthday thread. The result? Veni Vedi Dixi yells “Move to Madagascar, Jew!”

  9. “Move to Madagascar, Jew!”

    When you JEWS turn in your Israeli Mossad counterparts for doing 911, then we’ll talk.

    Otherwise, move to Madagascar, JEW, – NO ONE WANTS YOU HERE, you dual loyalty TRAITORS.

    NUKE ISRAEL!

  10. Sigh. Here is the problem.

    Typical white American — It’s crap that blacks are allowed to embrace racial identities and we aren’t. Also, why is there so much crime in the inner city? Why can’t minorities ever catch up on standardized testing, no matter how much of my money we throw at them? And why is the media so liberal?

    Typical white nationalist — THE JEWS DID 9/11! Nuke Israel! Jesus Christ is a dead Jew on a stick! If you can’t see this, you’re a dumb slave of ZOG! 1488!!!!!!!!!!!

    Typical white American — Uh… thanks. Guess I’ll keep voting Republican.

    Grow up. We have to do better.

  11. @Gregory,
    Excellent post, very well said. In accordance with your call to appeal to normal Americans, Matt Parrott and a group of other White advocates have been developing a new book designed to introduce Whites to White Nationalism. To my knowledge, this is a unique project that has not been accomplished so far. Its called America Besieged!, and is designed to appeal to patriotic Americans, especially Tea Partiers. Would you please check it out at:
    http://hoosiernation.us/america_besieged
    We appreciate your comments and feedback, especially regarding suggestions for improvement.

  12. “White Americans need to realize that however much they resist it, try to squirm out of it, or try to beg Michael Steele to free them from it, they are a people.”

    We are – we are ethnic Americans; Americans whose ethnicity is “American”. Unhyphenated and unqualified. It is self evident that we are a distinct people from hyphenated Americans (Mexican-American, African-American etc), for what else is that hyphenated qualifier but a declaration of separateness, of difference and distinction? “American” describes the descendants of the original British settlers, along with all who came after who assimilated into that settler culture to the extent that they are indistinguishable from the descendants of those settlers.

  13. One of the major disadvantages American white nationalists face is that American nationality can plausibly be separated from white racial identity. This is a huge difference compared to the European situation.

    Only because of a cultural revolution and non-stop media propaganda. This was never historically the case. It hasn’t been that long since miscegenation laws were on the books. We have only been a multiracial proposition since the 1960s.

    This same reinventing of the country is being done in Europe as well, and is working quite successfully in Britain. Anyone can be British they keep telling us. I reject all of it.

  14. If Tea Partier can be capitalized then surely White can as well.

    Did ee cummings have a hand in naming “white” racial identity? Is it a gesture of humility to not capitalize the proper noun denoting our group, or an act of humiliation?

    Perhaps it began as a gesture of humility, denoting the lesser, looser significance Europeans felt for Whiteness as compared to a more primal Flemish, English, or German identity. But in America, today, it has become a gesture of humiliation, especially when contrasted with the conspicuous convention to capitalize “African-American”, “Latino”, “Asian”, and “Jew” – biopolitical identities that are no less loose and no more valid to capitalize than White.

  15. “We have to do better.”

    The former President of Italy has openly stated that everyone knows Mossad did 911.

    No one pays attention to this website, sorry for blowing off a little steam. But still, nuke Israel.

  16. “It’s crap that blacks are allowed to embrace racial identities and we aren’t. Also, why is there so much crime in the inner city? Why can’t minorities ever catch up on standardized testing, no matter how much of my money we throw at them? And why is the media so liberal?”

    Yeah, blacks are doing poorly in school and the inner city crime. That’s not really as important as nuking Israel, the people who killed 3000 people in New York and Washington, and lied us into multiple wars.

    We should focus on low inner city test scores?

    We are literally under attack, no time to worry about blacks who can’t read.

  17. “Since at minimum 80% of White Americans are completely brainwashed by the media that you don’t control, you lose. The new elites are the people who control the media and the money. Until you take that away from the current elites, you are not elite. The only other alternative is to get most White people to stop watching TV and listening to radio, which is about as likely as teaching sheep to talk.”
    5 Veni Vidi Dixi

    White people aren’t watching as much TV or listening to as much radio. This isn’t helping as much as it could because they’re still watching and listening to the same jew produced garbage on youtube, bought by the Google jews, and their ipods built by jew financed (Arthur Rock provided the original venture capital) Apple.

    Jews have lost some of their power because the web is an open system. They’d like to change that but it’s not easy with a literal world wide web.

    What we need is “a White Television Network that had technical documentaries by kiev, a sermon by wiki, a talk show by proxium and pick pockets, with the evening news hosted by the White Rabbit Radio guy and southernavenger, and instead of Thomas “Flat Earth” Friedman, the expert giving the soundbites was Kevin MacDonald and Greg Johnson”, but rather than using the obsolete 20th century technology of broadcasting we should use web casting and file sharing.

    The goal is a 24 hour video broadcast. To start it could be nothing more than a daily newscast from a white nationalist perspective. Just a half hour a day of quality programming. The bare minimum standard for this would be the same that’s required of a local TV station. The show must go on. Every day that broadcast goes out on time. Every broadcast meets basic quality standards. No stuttering, anti-telegenic anchors. Fox news uses a tactic that we should be able to imitate. They have the best looking anchorwomen. This is important. People believe what good looking women say. That’s a large part of the Sarah Palin phenomenon.

    Behind the scenes all that’s required is professionalism and high standards. In front of the camera you need to look good. Obviously everyone involved in should be white, especially the anchorwomen.

    For content there must be a focus on white issues. Not implicit white issues, explicit ones. The stuff that Rush Limbaugh can’t talk about we should be pounding at every opportunity. Ending legal immigration. Ending all guest worker programs. Protecting our manufacturing base with tariffs. Exposing the jewish role in the financial swindles. Exposing the jewish role in promoting war.

    To work this would have to be so good that a viewer looking at a clip of it on youtube could mistake it for a cable news program. That means good looking anchorwomen (I can’t repeat that often enough), professional delivery, multiple camera angles, smooth camera movement, a good looking set (no sitting in front of a green screen), well designed graphics and titles, fast paced live editing, and an intelligent script to read off the teleprompter.

    Dr. William Pierce accomplished a great deal with a weekly half hour broadcast on shortwave radio and uploaded to websites. If we could start with a weekly newscast, a broadcast quality production, we could reach far more people in 2010 than Pierce did in 2002.

  18. The United States of America is no more. America was white. America was Christian. America was baseball and apple pie. America was a republic. This is not America. We’re not talking about the lipstick, we’re talking about the pig.

  19. For “broadcast” read “webcast”, by “broadcast quality” I mean it should look like a professionally produced TV program.

  20. An excellent assessment of the current state of White identity, or the lack of it in the USA, Gregory. It’s a frustrating dilemma for all of us. Because we are dealing with a really dumbed down White population, who are brainwashed, blindsided, willfully ignorant, and under the spell of the alien controlled MSM, its enough to frustrate the most rational, hardcore White nationalist. Our people have no real White leadership, except for David Duke and a few others, and recruitable Whites are going to have to be won over, one by one, however difficult the challenges. What we clearly need are genuine, organized White advocacy groups, with racially explicit leadership, and lot’s of high quality ideological gristmills (like O.D., TOQ, Stormfront, AmRen, Am. Free Press, Political Cesspool, et al). It’s an uphill struggle, with a non-White landslide coming at us, with ever growing momentum. As Jared Taylor implores, it is a race against time. The ludicrous historical process in the West is rapidly running its self-destructive, suicidal course, and we have to be prepared to succeed amongst the ruins.

  21. Your attacks on esoteric nazism, Atlantis supermen and a love for all things national socialist is nutty, Mr. Hood.

    Don’t you know that placating a small percentage of current white nationalists for their eccentricities is the way forward!! Shunning the good people who might by chance happen upon a website and be automatically turned off by the odes to Hitler, Nazis and Covington is a marketing victory we should all be proud of and support!

    I love visiting websites like TOQonline.com to read about outlandish, goofy and fatuous ideas that 10 people reading the site care about.

    It’s a win strategy!

  22. Typical white nationalist — THE JEWS DID 9/11! Nuke Israel! Jesus Christ is a dead Jew on a stick! If you can’t see this, you’re a dumb slave of ZOG! 1488!!!!!!!!!!!

    And what would your solution to this problem be?

  23. Go to a Tea Party, find the people most seemingly to be a little politically incorrrect and make friends.
    Much later you can start to educated them about who is behind their problems. Jewish mass media barrons.
    In the 19th century real Americans stopped oriental immigration when it had only reached 300,000 on the west coast. Without 20th century Jewish media brainwashing we would NEVER have gotten to the point of 1/3 of the population being non-white.
    But remember, T.P. people offten don’t or are afraid to think in racial terms.
    They are however unafraid to oppose illegal border jumping, partial birth abortion, gay pride day in public shools, etc, etc.
    If your new friend is for prayer in schools, show him Burt Prelutsky’s “The Jewish Grinch Who Stole Christmas.” In other words show him how Jews impact HIS favorite issue.
    If he’s against border jumping, show him Stephen Steinlights “The Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demography”.
    If he’s against tyrancial centralized government, show him Benjamin Ginsbur’s “The Fatal Embrace.”
    Let him know what the agenda’s of the Jewish nation are by letting him read it from the Jewish dissidents criticism of their own people.
    If he’s FOR strong home land security, show him Victor Ostrovsky’s “By Way of Deception”.
    Oh and if he doesn’t believe Jews control the media, give him a copy of Goldbergs “Jewish Power”.

  24. To # 15 S.L. Toddard:
    http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2007/11/18/affirmative_action_hyphenated/
    November 18th, 2007 9:11 am
    Roger Kimball (NeoCon)
    —-
    A favorite weapon in the armory of multiculturalism is the lowly hyphen. When we speak of an African-American or Mexican-American or Asian-American these days, the aim is not descriptive but deconstructive. There is a polemical edge to it, a provocation. The hyphen does not mean “American, but hailing at some point in the past from someplace else.” It means “only provisionally American: my allegiance is divided at best.” (I believe something similar can be said about the feminist fad for hyphenating the bride’s maiden name with her husband’s surname. It is a gesture of independence that is also a declaration of divided loyalty.) It is curious to what extent the passion for hyphenation is fostered more by the liberal elite than the populations it is supposedly meant to serve. How does it serve them? Presumably by enhancing their sense of “self-esteem.” Frederick Douglass saw through this charade some one hundred and fifty years ago. “No one idea,” he wrote, “has given rise to more oppression and persecution toward colored people of this country than that which makes Africa, not America, their home.”
    —-

    Mike

  25. To phil white AND Junghans:

    Exactly. If I had to start a movement or die, it would look exactly like a TP. High volume, motivated, implicitly unsettled. I’d then start picking and choosing… one-by-one for promotion.
    The IRA is a good template, but broader.
    There would need to be a blood-oath, global guerrilla group, a political-face group, a religious element group, reaching into the last, great mass of regularly meetings of Whites. There would be a campus outreach, a youth outreach, combining the two former.
    The focus is not “we are the majority.” The focus is taking back OUR country, and RECREATING OUR NATION, from those who destroyed it, and those who continue to profit from the destruction. A Corruptocracy, A warfare-central banking-internationalist faceless group, traitors all, who are very concerned about keeping you mesmerized in your servitude.
    How about an Americanized version of Nick Griffin’s Easter Letter to Supporters:

    Dear Fellow Patriot,

    A special event that happened recently has changed my outlook on our struggle and the situation facing our sacred country. That event was the peaceful, sensible, mature debate with the Christian Party leader George Hargreaves and a large number of Christian Party members. I thoroughly enjoyed the entire debate which was noticeably absent of the usual hysterical fanaticism of the liberal-left.

    It made me think long and hard about a new dimension of our struggle: our Christian religion, culture and traditions. In the past too much emphasis has been placed on the ethnic aspect of our present national dilemma, whilst the longest running feature of our identity has been overlooked: the fact that our country has been held together and guided for millennia by our common, ancient religion: Christianity.

    And before you misunderstand me, I do not mean the gut-wrenching politically correct quasi-Marxist nonsense spewing forth from the treacherous leaders of the modern Anglican Church. I mean the traditional, upright, decent and honest Christianity that defended Europe from Islamic conquest, the Christianity of the Crusades and the Christianity of our forefathers.

    There is nothing in traditional Christianity about world government, abolishing the nations, enslaving the world to finance capitalism and big business, eradicating traditional unique cultures and national identities, the promotion of sexual perversion, the glorification of treason, letting criminals run rampant and political correctness.

    No, the Christianity of our forefathers was about honesty, family, patriotism, sacrifice, loyalty, king and country. For over 1,000 years Christianity held our people together and guided us through the centuries. If Christianity had not existed Europe would have been conquered by Islam centuries ago.

    I made the irrefutable point during the debate with the Christian Party that the British National Party is the only political organisation in Britain that wants to keep this country fundamentally Christian, with Christian values, traditions and culture. Every other political party would happily allow Islam to engulf our Christian homeland.

    After the General Election, all BNP leaflets will carry a Christian Cross to demonstrate our commitment to maintaining and preserving our Christian heritage as a nation. Politically correct scoundrels like Rowen Williams will cry foul but we have nothing to be ashamed of as we are the defenders of Britain’s Christian heritage, just like our Crusader ancestors in the Middle Ages.

    So this weekend enjoy the Christian festival of Easter with pride and remember the War Heroes that fell in the many wars to defend our homeland. Be proud of your British, Christian identity and reject the false guilt and self-loathing of the liberal-left political class.

    The darkest hour is just before the dawn, but be of good cheer for Christ Our Lord is risen!

    Yours sincerely,

    Nick Griffin

  26. FWM – I hadn’t seen that letter thanks for posting it. That is the very thing that CWNY always speaks to.

  27. “White Americans need to realize that however much they resist it, try to squirm out of it, or try to beg Michael Steele to free them from it, they are a people.”

    I don’t think this is really the problem. Well, maybe I’m misinterpreting you. But I think the real problem is not getting white Americans to realize they’re a people, but getting them to fundamentally realign their sense of peoplehood.

    My basic point here is that white Americans already have a racial identity, but, it’s thoroughly pathological. Our racial identity includes:

    NO talking about or thinking about white racial identity; it MUST be wholly subconscious, and you must pretend it doesn’t exist or you risk excommunication.

    (Fill in liberal nonsense on race here; we all know the story)

    Whites toe the line because they don’t want to be thrown out of the tribe, not because they’re actually deracinated. The signs of this are EVERYWHERE, you just have to know what to look for.

  28. For example, all members of the white tribe know that their “anti-racism” and racial stupidity is a “white thing.” They don’t acknowledge it, not even to themselves, but they know because it’s reflected in their behavior. Whites know perfectly well that the rules (e.g., though shalt not be racist) don’t apply to non-whites. Ever seen a white get all holier-than-thou with a non-white over racism? Nope. That’s because non-whites aren’t a part of the tribe, and so aren’t held to tribal rules, or tribal opprobrium.

  29. Some sober analysis on this thread, and let me add one more: Harping on Israel is a total waste of time. Netanyahu is not leading the culture of critique and Israel is at best a sideshow in what is happening in the west. The vast sums of money being sent to prop it up are a symptom of the problem, not the main issue. Saying “the Mossad pulled off 911” is an extraordinary claim requiring extraordinary evidence. In the absence of such, it sounds ridiculous to rattle it off as fact and talk like this turns off the vast majority of whites who may be sympathetic to our cause. I used to admire David Duke, but seeing his website degenerate into little more than a non-stop anti-Israeli screed has caused me to question his judgment. Perhaps he is writing for a foreign audience, but Americans looking for answers as to why their nation is going down the tubes just aren’t interested in that.

  30. That’s right, Nightowl. Israel is the “symptom”; the cause is the domestic Jewish money-power and media-power, which owns and controls the globalist demicanrepublicrat oligarchy that is destroying our culture, our economy, our nation, and our race. Organized Jewry is aware that they may not, in the end, get away with it. In the meantime, they bill us to maintain their escape hatch.

  31. Some sober analysis on this thread, and let me add one more: Harping on Israel is a total waste of time. Netanyahu is not leading the culture of critique and Israel is at best a sideshow in what is happening in the west.

    Israel is American non-Gentilery’s Achilles Heel. Any counterattack to the Culture of Critique should begin there. Whites despise hypocrisy and Israel is exhibit A in American Jewry’s monstrous hypocrisy. What do we gain by giving that up?

  32. Peoples of European stock (and everyone else) should be allowed to have for themselves what non-Gentiles have for themselves in Israel. That’s pretty much a one-line explanation for and justification of ethnonationalism.

    It’s a hydrogen bomb of cognitive dissonance and I see no reason (other than a narrow, hypocritical dedication to non-Gentile interests to the exclusion of all else) to refrain from using it.

  33. Saying “the Mossad pulled off 911? is an extraordinary claim requiring extraordinary evidence.

    But saying Osama Bin Laden did it does not? Dick Cheney said they never claimed Osama did it.

    In the absence of such, it sounds ridiculous to rattle it off as fact and talk like this turns off the vast majority of whites who may be sympathetic to our cause.

    Nonsense – 911 Truth is *far* more popular than Hitler worship and Nazi glorification.
    No, the US Army college has said that

  34. V V D,

    You will have a hard time convincing me of that your version of 9/11 is true, since I don’t trust your reasoning abilities.

    Why? You conclude I am a Jew, but I am not. Not even a little bit. I couldn’t move to Israel if I wanted to. In fact, I probably couldn’t even visit Israel – I’m probably on some secret ADL list of “anti-semites”, and my visa request would probably be denied. My teenage cousin is ethnically half-Jewish, but I doubt she is a Mossad agent. Between homework, Hannah Montana and baysitting, she doesn’t have much time to plot the destruction of the western world.

3 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. Birth of a People, Rebirth of a Nation - White News Now Forums
  2. Birth of a People, Rebirth of a Nation - Stormfront
  3. Birth of a People, Rebirth of a Nation | The Occidental Quarterly

Comments are closed.