White Nationalism — The Only Realistic Solution

The entire conservative and libertarian movements have mobilized everything they have against the passage of ObamaCare. At this time, it looks like the Democrats will still succeed. Even if, by some miracle, the bill is defeated, socialist health care in this country is an inevitability.

The Republicans are not even a useful opposition on issues of limited government; indeed, the most likely presidential nominee in 2012 passed some form of socialist health care in his own state. Republicans can also not be counted on to be of any use in the looming battle over amnesty, as many of the most “extreme” conservatives (Dick Armey, Grover Norquist, and Sarah Palin) are all on the other side.

Conservatism, as an electoral force, is finished. The constituency for it is disappearing and the social order it once exemplified has disintegrated. The battle to restrain the size of the state has failed massively, and as National Review columnist Mark Steyn notes in an excellent column, once an entitlement like health care is passed, there is no going back. Similarly, regardless of whether amnesty for illegal aliens is passed this session or in the future, the demographic battle has already been lost. California, the state that gave us Ronald Reagan and Richard Nixon, will never again elect anything resembling a conservative governor. Within fifteen years, Texas will be similarly lost to anything resembling conservatism.

There are essentially three responses about what to do with the large rump of white, conservative voters that will still be in an America that they no longer have any chance of governing through democratic means. The first is what the conservative movement will undoubtedly do, which is continue its program of foreign wars, cheap labor, deficit spending, and blaming the bigotry of its own supporters for its failure to win any minority votes. Conservatives are incapable of promoting white interests even for reasons of self preservation.

Hence, we get GOP head Ken Mehlman (Jew) apologizing for the “Southern Strategy,” which delivered innumerable victories to the Republican Party. We get Michael Steele (token Negro) installed as the new head of the Republican party, who promptly blows millions on a comically bad website filled with token minorities. He then manages to shovel money to failed candidates that endorse the Democrats and alternatively insults both the blacks he’s trying to recruit and the gullible whites that prop him up.

We get Mel Martinez, a Latino who attacked the GOP’s own base to try to win amnesty for illegal immigration.

We get silly buffoons like Dick Armey, leader of FreedomWorks and self appointed Tea Party pontiff who declares that his number one foreign policy priority is to protect Israel (not America) and who thinks that if all the anti-immigration members of the Republican Party are kicked out, socially conservative Hispanics (who for some reason have higher rates of out of wedlock birth, abortion, and crime) will vote for the party of tax cuts for millionaires. Not even the average Mexican illegal immigrant, who has less than a high school education, is as stupid as Dick Armey.

The second response is more interesting, and clearly the movement that is growing right now. This is the radically anti-state Right, exemplified by Ron Paul and the Campaign for Liberty and the less respectable elements such as the various constitutional militias and media figures such as Alex Jones. The problem with this movement is obvious.

For one, the culture of a “free state” would likely be even more degraded and degenerate than that farce of a culture that we have today, which is at least restrained by the timid remnants of a conservative, Christian, bourgeois society. However, even ignoring the question of culture altogether, libertarianism contains within it the seeds of its own destruction. Libertarians refuse to recognize the existence of race, they are just as defensive and cowardly as the Republicans when it comes to issues of political correctness, and they simply do not have the constituency that can actually lead them to victory. Leftists are fundamentally correct when they note that the Constitution and the abstractions about “rights” that libertarians hold to be sacred are manifestations of white privilege. They are. They were created by white men for a white nationalist society. They do not work and do not apply in any other context.

In a libertarian society that has no recognition of race, a colored underclass would quickly develop as the facts of racial difference in intelligence manifest themselves in the economy. Many Whites, absent civil rights laws and the fist of the managerial state, will associate with themselves and exclude blacks, Hispanics and Asians from certain establishments. While race mixing and miscegenation would undoubtedly continue, it would be far less prevalent. Class divisions would be even more associated with racial divisions than today. The white working class that would exist would have little stake in preserving a system that offers no guarantees for unemployment, medical care, social security, poverty relief, food stamps, or other social services, that, for better or worse, workers have come to expect and which serve as a deterrent from socialist radicalism. Absent these services, left wing extremists would be far more able to co-opt the white working class.

Ultimately, the libertarian society would need an active domestic security force and a radically limited franchise in order to prevent the colored masses from either voting in socialism or overthrowing the system. To his credit, paleolibertarian Murray Rothbard (Jew) noted that the truth about racial differences should be shouted from the rooftops in order to preserve a libertarian society. He stated that “if you scratch an egalitarian, you will find a statist” and held that opposition to Martin Luther King Jr. was true mark of a libertarian. He even endorsed something approaching the ethnostate.

Unfortunately, this paleolibertarian movement that Rothbard exemplified is dead. As the leftward migration of LewRockwell.com shows, even the better libertarians feel the need to mouth politically correct platitudes about racial egalitarianism. Today, they overtly champion the Hispanic Conquest of the American Southwest and mass immigration. They deny racial differences because there are no races, only autonomous “individuals” that sprang fully formed from the ether.

(Racial identity for non whites, however, is ok.)

They champion Rothbard only so far as he remains within the boundaries of permissible debate. When challenged, they fall all over themselves in their willingness to prostrate themselves before the gods of egalitarianism.

It has been said that a capitalist will sell a rope to a Communist on Friday, even if he will be hanged with that rope on Sunday. Capitalists will always give in to their lust for cheap labor (read, colored labor) even if it dooms them in the long run. A society that has as its only standard of morality the profit motive will not be able to resist the profit motive. Any libertarian utopia that did exist would not last very long.

There is only one realistic alternative to the problems facing the white masses that built this country. That alternative is white nationalism. White nationalism is not racial realism, or conservatism, or immigration restriction. Realizing that race exists and that there are differences between them means that you have transcended ignorance, but does not make you a white nationalist.

White nationalism is far more radical. It is a political, cultural, and social movement that demands, as a matter of right and survival, an ethnostate that is explicitly designated for white people.

Despite this radicalism, it is far more practical and realistic to work for a white homeland than to be a moderate reformist. White victory will be difficult, and, frankly, our odds are not good. That said, a Southern homeland, or a Midwestern homeland, or even an Aryan empire in the Northwest led by Harold Covington will happen long before “true conservatives” do something like secure the border, or scrap the income tax, or even cut entitlements in the most trivial way. All the scribblers and self appointed philosophers simply are irrelevant. Conservatism, libertarianism, and the rest of these reformist approaches are not just immoral, they are fundamentally impractical. They have never worked, and they will never work. Conservatism and libertarianism were tried and they failed. They are only useful insofar as they serve as stepping stones to the white republic.

That is not just the Sorelian myth that we need. That is simply reality.


  1. “Simple decency also demands that we not blatantly insult the faith of so many of our comrades just because we may disagree with it.”

    You’re probably right. I’m pretty mad that a church that used to be segregrated now welcomes illegals with open arms.

    A universalist faith, one that anyone in the world can join, that goes to Africa looking for converts, whose churches, Catholic and Protestant, “reach out” to illegal immigrants is not something I disagree with on doctrinal or theistic belief terms alone. As an atheist and a white survivalist, I have no problem with Odinism, Christian Identity or any other ethnic/racial-based belief system. Christianity, OTOH, I believe, is hurting our people. The Eastern Orthodox Church, OTOH, might be able to resist being Jewdaized better.

    Jesus’ message was to the Jews. They needed to hear it (but most didn’t). It has nothing to do with me or my people. It was imposed on us by fiat against our will by King Olaf.

  2. …Christianity, OTOH, I believe, is hurting our people.


    I respectfully say that it actually was our People which hurt Christianity. Consider:

    15 However, if you do not obey the Lord your God and do not carefully follow all his commands and decrees I am giving you today, all these curses will come upon you and overtake you:

    16 You will be cursed in the city and cursed in the country.

    20 The Lord will send on you curses, confusion and rebuke in everything you put your hand to, until you are destroyed and come to sudden ruin because of the evil you have done in forsaking him.

    32 Your sons and daughters will be given to another nation, and you will wear out your eyes watching for them day after day, powerless to lift a hand.

    33 A people that you do not know will eat what your land and labor produce, and you will have nothing but cruel oppression all your days.

    34 The sights you see will drive you mad.

    41 You will have sons and daughters but you will not keep them, because they will go into captivity.

    43 The alien who lives among you will rise above you higher and higher, but you will sink lower and lower.

    44 He will lend to you, but you will not lend to him. He will be the head, but you will be the tail.

    47 Because you did not serve the Lord your God joyfully and gladly in the time of prosperity,

    49 The Lord will bring a nation against you from far away, from the ends of the earth, like an eagle swooping down, a nation whose language you will not understand,

    50 a fierce-looking nation without respect for the old or pity for the young.

    54 Even the most gentle and sensitive man among you will have no compassion on his own brother or the wife he loves or his surviving children,

    56 The most gentle and sensitive woman among you—so sensitive and gentle that she would not venture to touch the ground with the sole of her foot—will begrudge the husband she loves and her own son or daughter

    58 If you do not carefully follow all the words of this law, which are written in this book, and do not revere this glorious and awesome name—the Lord your God—

    62 You who were as numerous as the stars in the sky will be left but few in number, because you did not obey the Lord your God.

    Still think this applies to the “Jews”?

  3. What’s up with the weird posts like #49? They look like machine tags or something? Is that a “feature” of this software? Weird and irritating.

  4. The problem with A3P is exactly the problem I pointed out earlier – A3P is two generals and a half dozen part time infantry – with no logistics to answer emails.

    Parrot, my point about the media is this – suppose A3P shows up in a medium sized town in Indiana, goes door to door, gets a table at a local event, passes out some flyers.

    What is likely to happen? Channel 2 News will do a special report – Are Neo-Nazis invading Indiana? (Cut to stock film of klansmen and seig-heiling neo-nazis) Led by Holocaust denier Kevin MacDonald, A3P wants to deport minorities. Police ask for any information on threats. Etc. They can’t do that with something big like the Mormons.

    Richardson and Associates – a Data Mining Company – does mailing lists, fundraising lists, profiles enemy agents (like those reporters on channel 2) – and maybe even assists in getting people to answer the phone. Does A3P need a list of possible activists in a specific town? Call R&A. Is some group hassling your activists? Call R&A. Etc.

    It’s the middle-level organization we need – not writing books or articles, and not going door to door or holding up signs. Instead, it’s all the boring paperwork that still needs to get done.

  5. And the reason I try to sex up the idea with James Bond like analogies is because at the end of the day I’m sure no one is going to volunteer for this sort of work, and aren’t likely to get paid much, so it’s title inflation.

    Instead of office clerk, I’m going to call them Special Agent. Instead of, auditing this list of names, it’s going to be espionage.

  6. The BNP under Nick Griffin has increased its support exponentially and has total “brand awareness” in the UK. Everyone in the country knows who they are and what they stand for. The BNP is gaining support everyday; they now have a representative on the London Assembly and two representatives in the European Parliament. They are on the verge of taking their first seat in the House of Commons. It’s nothing to laugh at. Before Griffin took over, the BNP had only won one local council election in it’s whole history. Managing our image is something that must be done effectively if we are going to enter politics. It’s a burden that ALL parties and politicians must shoulder. The rules aren’t going to magically change for us.

    We don’t need advice from total failures Alex Linder and Bill White.

  7. #23 Kulacks Never learn, has the most profound of the many profound postings on this subject. I would suggest people read it, over and over, and think about it, considering all of the ramifications that it so delicately suggests. The left has indeed managed and mastered the value of the feeling of “belonging”. Belonging is the key in an era of total alienation.

  8. Again, #50 Kulacks never learn, points out something profound, that I used to dwell upon years ago, when a friends mother gave me a bible. I was never one of those born again types, but I used to wonder at the strange prophesies and how they seemed to relate to the U.S. so well.

  9. I need to say my two cents about something. There seems to be an increasing effort by the usual suspects to make White Nationalism more inclusive by accepting jews and their oriental allies. I don’t know how to say this politely but we need to be diligent in our efforts to keep shadowy hook nosed semitic demons and their goyim slaves from co-opting this movement and making it inaffective. We might wake up one day and find we’re part of a multicultural movement consisting of mixed race people, orientals, conservative homosexuals and neocons.

  10. SSSS,
    I preach the good gospel of doing the boring stuff, but I don’t think doing the boring things you’re talking about is incompatible with also being a conventional membership organization doing visible advocacy work.

  11. Denise, do you really believe that a man walked on water, magically multiplied food, and was resurrected? Remember – this is integral to the Christian religion. As a Christian one must put this man above everyone else. You can break the commandments and commit sin – so long as you believe in Jesus and his magic. In fact, as a Christian one must believe that he or she was born with sin, and can only become absolved through a belief in Jesus. That, to me, is one of the most clever system of beliefs for a cult that has ever existed.

    You asked me what I’d replace it with. Firstly, I wouldn’t replace a cult with another cult. All of the positive ideas of Christianity, such as certain ethics and morals would be retained. The holidays and cultural activities would be de-Christianized as they had previously been de-paganized. Insofar as they provided social cohesion they would be encouraged. IMO, I don’t believe in rigidly enforcing these things on society. Most White people just want to be left alone so they can freely develop their own personal opinions and abilities.

    I wonder what would happen if you told everyone in your church that you were a racist, or an anti-semite? Would they give you a smile and a warm handshake? Would they serve you dinner?

  12. I’m not talking about the beliefs Sam Davidson, I’m just talking about the sheer tactical stupidity of alienating all those Whites – who have not ever ever had their Racial Cherries popped, and now are about to be raped and savaged – and they are going to need kindly, helpful Church of the White Race Counselors, when Racial Reality kicks the shi ite out of ’em. Also – that little story, told by Feminized Western Male, re: little old ladies and the loot – I guess you don’t like Zogbux after all.

    Again – what are ya selling? Is it as good as Eternal Life, and a really swell Super Hero Baby? I didn’t read anything that caught my imagination. I just got back from a TP event. Every-one there, except 1 Fillipina, was a White Christian. Had dinner with one of the fellas. He’s a bit of philosopher (if he and Robert Campbell ever “meet” – they’ll love exchanging ideas). He’s a very thoughtful, educated Christian. He knows lots of people in his community. Very well liked. He has already caught onto the demographic issues, all on his own. He now knows that there is an actual movement, with names, an words, for all the things he’s observed. I told him he’d love this blog. He actually filled me on others, in the group, that he knows well, that I can also point in this direction.

    It’s called casting your bread upon the waters, Sam.

    Lots of these folks have money. Lot’s don’t – but they have lots of contacts, and critical skills. They know how to do critical, practical things. (And the gals in the group are really, really good at the email, ground floor organizing, and paperwork bits, SSSS!)

    Would your prefer I refrain form telling all these horrid Christians about Occidental Dissent? After all – some of them may actually believe in the waters and fish bit.

  13. First of all, Gregory Hood has written a first rate article. Congratulations. I hope to see much more from him in the future.

    Second, the discussion on this thread is unusually rich and interesting. Where to begin?

    SSSS is right about how the movement needs to work on finding people who are competent middle managers. One of the most interesting practical lessons in MEIN KAMPF speaks to this issue. Apparently the party really started growing when it hired its first full-time secretary. Once there was someone there to always answer the phone, receive deliveries, etc., things began to take off. Our movement needs a few highly-intelligent, detail-oriented, tech-savvy people to make sure that the emails get answered. I know I would be much more productive with a secretary.

    SSSS: Your data-mining idea is something that has occurred to me as well, along with several allied businesses that movement people might invest in creating. But these are topics best discussed face to face.

    RE: Christianity: I am totally opposed to the tendency of white nationalist groups to be henpecked by Christians who whinge and protest whenever a non-Christian voice is raised and who constantly recommend that non-Christians keep themselves quiet, lest they cause the Christians to take their toys and go home.

    The reductio ad absurdum of this policy was a meeting I attended in which the 80% non-Christian audience bowed its head to say grace at the urging of . . . one of the non-believers. Will we still be saying grace when we are 100% non-believers?

    Another instance I witnessed was a heated argument between an atheist impersonating a Catholic and an atheist impersonating a Calvinist, who were on the brink of re-enacting the 30 Years’ War — and who would have been even more hostile towards me if I called them out on their preposterous charade.

    No more paddy-cake. We need to level up or die.

    Thus the policy I follow is this, stated for the whole world:

    (1) I state openly that I am not a Christian, that Christianity is one of the primary sources of Jewish power in the West, and that Christian values — universalism, egalitarianism, altruism, turning the other cheek, etc. — are promoting the death of the white race. But there is no reason not to be NICE while saying such things. One does not need to engage in village atheist blasphemies. I am totally opposed to religious OR anti-religious proselytism within white nationalist organizations. Moreover, my policy as an editor is to engage all points of view within the WN community as long as they are argued in a civil and constructive manner.

    (2) Once my cards are on the table, I am willing to work with professed Christians who share my desire to save our race. Although, to be perfectly frank, I am wary of such allies, because I am afraid that they will yellow out when things get tough and they are forced to choose between their Christian values and racial loyalty. What will my Catholic comrades do when the first cannibal pope is elected?

    (3) The White Republic I seek is, like Covington’s Northwest American Republic, neutral on religious matters. There is no way to create an effective movement unless we adhere to strict religious neutrality, thus any state that we might create will enshrine that value.

    (4) Just as my race is my nation, my race is my religion as well. I need no other.

  14. SD
    “I wonder what would happen if you told everyone in your church that you were a racist, or an anti-semite? Would they give you a smile and a warm handshake? Would they serve you dinner?”

    First of all, I doubt I am either by your definition. I have no fear of explaining my views to my congregants.

    You missed my overall point: You don’t understand how deeply personal it is an offense that a ignorant is hectoring my beliefs. To illustrate, my reply was deeply personal. To use one sentence to denounce a whole faith-tradition-religion (the one of your own, may I add, White Man), is an offense that we will have to do away with and makes you tactless, and frankly, unwise. Not allie material. Whites need to reject Critical Theory (which is what you were employing). How many tools from the liberal/Semitic shed does a person need to employ, before I suspect which artisan you direct your allegiance?

    Please don’t misunderstand, Sam (and Greg), I am in favor of any historical white faith tradition, including paganism, Mormonism, etc. They all NEED to have a part at the table — And constructive criticism is always welcomed. I understand some of the fervor must be sublimated for cohesion (our US military is a very good example). Remember, your heart may belong to Jesus, but your ass belongs to the Corp?

    I leave you with a quote from my favorite Jewish philosopher:

    “It would be impossible for this to be any other way. As one LOVES only those traits in the other which one would wholeheartedly embrace oneself, yet can never fully attain, so one HATES in the other only that which one never wants to be, yet which one partially retains. One does not hate something with which one has nothing in common …”


  15. GJ:
    “Christianity is one of the primary sources of Jewish power in the West, and that Christian values — universalism, egalitarianism, altruism, turning the other cheek, etc. — are promoting the death of the white race.”

    Please see above. Perhaps modern Christianity. Not my church/ethos/tradition. But this is the same argument we always come back to and should hash out some day over a brew. My bone to pick is leaving the Critical Theory in the dust – If the US Military put the above quote on the wall of the recruitment centers in the South, besides head scratching, most young 18 year old men would walk out. It is a no go. And any viable movement in the US will have to also sublimate the eternal bias against faiths. Scoff all you want in your private counsel (if that is what turns your crank), but until our leadership is able to STFU, and sacrifice some of their Semitic tendencies… you got nothing but words. Words can tear down, but without allowing for the heart, they seldom build.


  16. Denise, I understand your point. I will avoid this topic from now on.

    “Not my church/ethos/tradition. ”

    What church do you belong to?

  17. Bobby #57 and #58,

    Thank you so much for the words of encouragement. Very kind and thoughtful of you.

    Yes, our problem, above all, is that the putative leadership of the so-called ‘Right-wing’ is full of narcissists, ego-maniacs and sometimes socio-paths (and of course many of its ‘followers’ are as well), however, this DOES NOT MEAN that these men cannot change for the better, for themselves, and ultimately for the movement.

    Problem is, is that so much of modern-day ‘American’ society is corrupt to its very core — hence nearly all living here are affected one way or another, to some degree, by the awful ‘pop-culture’ that permeates and clouds our better judgement.

    Even the best and brightest of of our White men can fall victim to the ‘marketing of evil’ that the Other side routinely pushes through their controlled media. In other words, although they may rightfully see that miscegenation is wrong and evil — they may not, for example, see divorce and cheating on one’s spouse as necessarily wrong and bad as it indeed is to our People.

    As a matter of fact, I consider promiscuity and relationship infidelity the ultimate ‘gateway drug’ in to a life of downward spiral — all other committments one may wish to take up after that become much more tenuous and strained.

    After all, if you cannot pledge proper fidelity to your own spouse, and immediate family, your own immediate kith-n-kin, than there really is no way in hell that you are going to be able to show the proper committment to an ideological cause — or the requisite love and committment to your comrades devoted to that very struggle.

    The Left has always understood this very real fact of human nature. This is why it seeks to atomize White Christians (and only White Christians) every chance it gets, particularly through promoting narcissistic behaviors among the best and brightest of White, who indeed would and could be potential White leaders (sadly, so many indeed keep repeatedly falling for it :/).

    In this vein, they know how to co-opt the very same people from our kind in to Leftist movements by knowing just how to appeal to what truly motivates men: namely, a sense of pride, a sense of purpose and a sense of belonging.

    Really, not all that much else fundamentally matters … not money, not ‘status’, not even access to ‘chicks’. No, White men are indeed motivated by more altruistic principles than all those (on average), it is just that they need the proper environment to bring all these (sometimes recessive) traits out and in to full fruition. Hence any all all modern examples and paradigms of leadership for our People — especially trying to ape Jewish behavior, is ultimately doomed to failure, since that is not Us, nor is it even – biologically – possible to be Us. Ultimately, I feel Christianity has many of the answers to many of these mysterious and very paradoxical questions that face (and often vex) Us.

  18. As well, Bobby, contrary to what some might say, Christianity, properly understood, can and indeed does give its adherents an enhanced sense of courage and resoluteness in dealing with issues that they see are important to them… namely, the protection and preservation of their People and Homeland.

    Contrary to what Liberals and ‘Christo-skeptics’ may (misunderstandingly) believe, real Christianity is not at all hostile to racial and national preservation — or mutually exclusive to it. Christianity (and properly reading and studying the Bible, so as to actually understand what it is saying), compliments rather than contradicts this seeming dichotomy.

    One thing, however, that the Christianity of either the ‘Old’ or the ‘New’ Testament is adamantly against: and that is any man, tribe or nation wishing to play God. This is what is considered the ultimate transgression.

    In other words, the Lord is not here to serve the White Race; however, if the White race, God’s People, faithfully serve Him, with humility rather than arrogance, He will bless them exponentially, and reward them, and ‘make them as numerous as the stars in the sky’.

    2 Chronicles 7:14
    “If My people who are called by My name will humble themselves, and pray and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin and heal their land”

    Anything else is TalMUDism — the worshipping of man rather than God, of which the Lord will be absolutely merciless in punishing (as mentioned in Deuteronomy — and scores of other Biblical passages). For any White men to envy or feel jealousy towards Jews for their narcissistic racial self-worship is an insult to the Lord, and everything He and the Prophets exhorted us to be on guard against. Consider:

    Proverbs 3:31
    Envy thou not the oppressor, and choose none of his ways

    Proverbs 24:1
    Be not thou envious against evil men; Neither desire to be with them:

    Here is also one of General Thomas ‘Stonewall’ Jackson’s favorite Biblical verses, often read – and said – before going into battle, instilling in him and his brave soldiers the necessary courage and convictions in their mission, and what they were doing was noble and just –

    2 Samuel 10:12
    Be strong, and let us show ourselves courageous for the sake of our people and for the cities of our God; and may the LORD do what is good in His sight.”

6 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. In Which We Call Shenanigans On White-Worship | Spirit/Water/Blood
  2. Institutional Failure: The Limits of “Implicit Whiteness.” « Disparate Planet
  3. The League of American Patriots » Articles » White Nationalism — The Only Realistic Solution
  4. White Nationalism — The Only Realistic Solution « Locust blog
  5. Gregory Hood, "Waking Up from the American Dream: What Makes Republicans Tick?" | Counter-Currents Publishing
  6. Gregory Hood, "What Trump Didn’t Predict" | Counter-Currents Publishing

Comments are closed.