The Foremost Problem created a post, “The 25 Most Important Pro-White Organizations”. I’m not going to be so bold as to rank the sites by importance, but I do think it would be fun and potentially helpful to list my ten favorite pro-White sites.
Life’s just not that simple. Like it or not, the best and most determined journalist out on the front lines of drawing attention to Whites being victimized by multicult madness is a Jew. While the goyim are content to reshuffle and repackage existing information and ideas, Stix is out there doing original research. He does the difficult and boring work that goes into sharing these powerful stories of people who’ve been repeatedly victimized by their aggressors, then victimized again by the media and government scumbags who try to ignore inconvenient tragedies.
James Edwards is nearly as eloquent, principled, and passionate about defending his people as he is handsome. He plays up his Southern humility and deference as much as he can, but he knows in the back of his mind that he’s our best hope for making a successful seque into mainstream politics. His radio show features nearly every noteworthy White Advocate. His blog offers a nice balance of good reporting and clever commentary.
It’s easy, especially for a geek, to lose touch with the spiritual dimension of our struggle. This Christian Kinist reminds me that we’ve lost far more than just our physical safety and our ability to speak fluent English with the new neighbors. We’ve lost our honor. We’ve lost our heritage. We’ve lost the spiritual core that once bloomed in White Christian Europe.
7. VDare
VDare’s status as a pro-White site is arguable. It features posters who aren’t even White, posters who would like for you to die in the desert for Israel, and posters who actually think that Irish illegal immigration is a serious concern. It doesn’t allow comments and it looks like it was designed by a shaky old man using HTML in Notepad on a 486DX machine running Netscape Navigator on an AOL account during the Clinton Administration. But despite all these sins, it’s among the best pro-White sites out there. It directly engages the daily news beat. It features Jared Taylor and Kevin MacDonald. It’s also the place to go for Steve Sailer, who would be pro-White if it weren’t for his suffering some kind of autistic disorder.
6. TakiMag
Damn you, CaptainChaos! 
I’m a former moderator from here…and yes, I probably deleted your anti-Semitic tirade. It doesn’t belong there. Jared Taylor could have had all the respect in the world but he chose honor, instead. He’s a soft-spoken Ivy League polymath with a nuanced perspective on race and identity who isn’t the least bit nuanced about the primary objective: White Advocacy. The site design is stale and the comments are a bit stifled relative to other forums, but Jared and his organization have awakened countless Americans (including myself) to the importance of preserving our precious racial heritage.
We’ve all ranted to each other about how we need to pioneer and master new media technologies to reach a wider audience. But VOR has actually done it. Their growing list of intelligent and amusing Internet radio shows are attracting new audiences and keeping the rest of entertained. If I were a betting man, I would bet that this site will become the hub of White Advocacy within the next five years.
3. The Occidental Observer / TOQ Online
This collective of pro-White scholars is managed by Professor Kevin MacDonald, but it’s led by the acerbic and imaginative Alex Kurtagic. Tom Sunic, Lasha Darkmoon, Merlin Miller, Kevin Lamb, and other luminaries regularly churn out brilliant essays on the big questions, the big issues, and the big problems. There’s so much overlap in name, style, and quality between TOO and TOQ that they’re both tied for third place, with TOQ offering a lot of great original content in addition to aggregating the best of the pro-White web.
This site offers a weekly skewering of our sorry state of affairs from a Christian Kinist’s perspective. As a web professional, I admire how he has adapted his prose to the medium rather than pretending he’s writing a newspaper article. He’s punchy, direct, often hilarious, and loaded with relevant links, images, and videos. He offers a welcome alternative to the repackaged humanism of contemporary Christian “leaders” and defends White America with the same honor and vigor that Christians once defended Europe.
The martial arts traditions began as collections of self-defense techniques but often devolved into something more like synchronized swimming. It’s the nature of humans to settle into increasingly rigid patterns of behavior, which is what makes Mixed Martial Arts so fun to watch. You can watch the traditions compete with hardly any rules and enjoy the creative energy that goes into fusing the differing styles into systems which are superior to their forebears.
OD is the MMA of White Advocacy, a valuable intersection where respectability and radicalism collide in an open forum. Atheists, neo-pagans, Christian Identity adherents, Kinists, Mormons, and even Jews are included in the fray. Obnoxious philo-Semites and monomaniacal anti-Semites get to the very heart of the Jewish Question while other posters offer targeted activist projects that the visitors to the site can actually use on the street.
The net result is an emergent synthesis of the best ideas, making it a dangerous place for arrogant anti-White activists to peddle their tired shtick. While we’re never going to agree on everything, the wide-open nature of this place makes it my favorite pro-White site.
Twitter
Facebook
Flickr
YouTube
I wasn’t going to bother with him, but after having torn you to pieces, I figured it would be unfair to let him go unscathed.
I corrected some of your gross factual errors, and you think I have “an obsession” with you.
It is not true.
You prefer anecdotes. I prefer statistics. You can post a few stories about degenerates engaging in such activity, but there is absolutely no evidence to suggest that sex tourism to the Dominican Republic in a widespread phenomenon.
http://www.culturewars.com/2004/Challenge.htm
Surely you are aware that E. Michael Jones is an anti-Protestant, anti-”WASP” Papist.
This is irrelevant regarding the proportion of English ancestry in the Australian population relative to the proportion of Irish ancestry.
Why don’t you try to make sense? 9.08% of Australians identify as Irish, and to you this proves “the overwhelming Celtic heritage in Australia,” but 31.65% identify as English, and you think this means nothing.
I’m not sure about those identifying as “Australian,” but if it works anything like it does in the United States, a significant percentage of those are of English ancestry. Those who identify as “American” in the United States are mostly English.
http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/http_majorityrightscom_indexphp_mark_richardsons_did_australia_really/
From Majority Rights: Did Anglo-Australia really exist?
Discusses the ethnic ancestry of the Australian population
http://elecpress.monash.edu.au/pnp/free/pnpv7n4/v7n4_3price.pdf
This is a paper on the ethnic make-up of the Australian population.
Here is data from Table 2: Ethnic strength, 1947 to 2025, percentages
1947
English 54.3%
Irish 19.1%
Scottish 12.9%
1978
English 46.3%
Irish 14.8%
Scottish 12.5%
1988
English 46.0%
Irish 14.0%
Scottish 11.6%
1999
English 43.6%
Irish 12.1%
Scottish 11.4%
Muggles loves stating the obvious:
“Surely you are aware that E. Michael Jones is an anti-Protestant, anti-”WASP” Papist.”
Is that another one of these dark secrets you’ve brought to light?
http://www.abs.gov.au/Ausstats/ABS@.nsf/Previousproducts/1301.0Feature%20Article41995?opendocument&tabname=Summary&prodno=1301.0&issue=1995&num=&view=
From the Australian Bureau of Statistics
TABLE 4 MOST COMMONLY REPORTED ANCESTRIES IN 1986
English 35.6%
Australian 18.6%
Italian 3.3%
Irish 2.4%
Scottish 2.2%
Greek 1.9%
British 1.8%
English-Irish 1.7%
German 1.5%
Australian-English 1.2%
English-Scottish 1.2%
Chinese 1.1%
Aboriginal 1.0%
Dutch 1.0%
All others 25.4%
Akira,
My last comment on the subject because we must be boring everyone. You’re wrong. I’ve been through the process directly and nothing speaks the truth like experience.
MGLS,
As for Australia (Australian Embassy in Ireland website):
http://www.ireland.embassy.gov.au/dubl/relations.html
The whites that claim ‘Australian’ are not specific about ethnicity.
Pingback: Paved With Good Intentions | Spirit/Water/Blood
> THE EARLIEST “HATE” CRIMINALS
> If you can’t guess the people I have in mind, I’ll give you
> some clues—clues found in a major world religion that is many
> centuries old. I’ll call it Religion X.
> Religion X traces its roots back to the First Couple, Adam and
> Eve. They were on earth before any other form of worship—before
> Islam (appearing 14 centuries ago), before Hinduism or Buddhism
> (appearing 25 centuries ago), before even the worship of various
> gods in Mesopotamia (60 centuries ago).
> Early on, Religion X’ers were told by their God: “Love your
> neighbor—and even the stranger who dwells among you—as much as
> you love yourself.” But it wasn’t long before Religion X began
> rebelling against the laws of the One who had blessed and
> preserved it so much. In response God warned: “All those who hate
> me love death.”
> After centuries of hating their God (which predictably led to
> hatred of fellow humans, God’s creations), Religion X’ers were
> allowed by God to be conquered and transported to ancient Babylon
> where they experienced a 1,600-year-long “vacation.”
> If you haven’t guessed yet, the religion I’m describing is
> Judaism. But don’t stop reading. The
> most shocking stuff is just ahead!
> While in Babylon, the “wise men” among the people began
> formulating new laws which supposedly supplemented and explained
> the time-tested Old Testament writings. But the new rules actually
> contradicted and eventually replaced the original laws!
> The “new and improved” laws are collectively known as the
> Talmud. Even though rabbis are Talmudic experts, probably not one
> Jew in a thousand (and not one non-Jew in ten thousand) knows what
> is in the Talmud. Without further delay, here’s some of the
> Talmud’s “wisdom” (plus sources):
> (I) THE TALMUD HATES SCIENCE:
> Hyenas turn into bats after seven years, and later on turn into
> thorns and demons (Baba Kamma, 16a).
> Being naked in front of a lamp causes epilepsy (Pesahim, 112b).
> There’s medicinal value in dirt found in an outhouse’s shadow,
> also in a white dog’s excrement (Gittin, 69a,b).
> (II) THE TALMUD HATES FEMALES:
> The birth of a girl is an unhappy event (Baba Bathra, 16b).
> It is never good to talk too much to women including one’s own
> wife (Aboth, 1.5).
> All women are “temperamentally light-headed” (Kiddushin, 80b).
> It is okay to divorce your wife if she spoils your food, or if
> you find a more beautiful woman (Gittin, 91a).
> (III) THE TALMUD HATES CHILDREN:
> It is lawful for a girl three years old to have sexual
> intercourse (Abodah Zarah, 37a; Kethuboth, 11b,39a; Sanhedrin,
> 55b,69a,b; Yebamoth, 12a,57b,58a,60b).
> When a man commits sodomy with a boy under nine years of age,
> it “is not deemed as pederasty” (Sanhedrin, 54b,55a).
> Sexual intercourse with a boy under the age of eight is lawful
> since it isn’t fornication (Sanhedrin, 69b).
> (In other words, Religion X became X-rated! Is it any wonder
> that many Jewish persons today are liberally involved with the
> current sexual revolution and are even favorable towards
> legalization of adult-child sex?)
> (IV) THE TALMUD HATES ALL NON-JEWS:
> Since all Gentiles are only animals, all Gentile children are
> bastards (Yebamoth, 98a).
> When a non-Jew robs a Jew, he has to pay him back, but if a Jew
> robs a non-Jew, he doesn’t have to pay him back. Moreover, when a
> Gentile kills a Jew, the Gentile must be killed, but when a Jew
> kills a Gentile, “there is no death penalty” (Sanhedrin, 57a).
> It is okay to “use subterfuges” in a court of law in order to
> cheat a non-Jew (Baba Kamma, 113a).
> (V) THE TALMUD HATES CHRIST AND CHRISTIANS:
> Jesus was born a bastard (Jewish Encyclopedia, “Jesus”;
> Yebamoth, 49b).
> Mary, the mother of Jesus, was a whore and “played the harlot
> with carpenters” (Sanhedrin, 106a,b).
> Jesus “practised sorcery and enticed Israel to apostacy”
> (Sanhedrin, 43a).
> Jesus was punished and sent to Hell where he ended up in
> “boiling hot excrement” (Gittin, 56b,57a).
> Christians will go to Hell “and be punished there for all
> generations” (Rosh Hashanah, 17a).
> Those who read “the works of the Judeo-Christians, i.e., the
> New Testament” will end up in Hell (Sanhedrin, 90a).
> The books of the Christians “may not be saved from a fire, but
> they must be burnt in their place, they and the Divine Names
> occurring in them” (Shabbath, 116a).
> (Now you know what’s been inspiring many of the anti-Christian
> attitudes and actions these days.)
> By roughly 500 A.D. Jewish scribes had completed the voluminous
> Talmud, the written version of what had long been the Jews’ oral
> tradition—the tradition that Jesus condemns in the 23rd chapter
> of Matthew and other parts of the New Testament.
> Whenever anyone claims that for 1500 years the Talmud
> needlessly aggravated Gentiles (who in turn put Jews into ghettos
> and even the Holocaust), Jews can look at even earlier history and
> claim that the “anti-Jewishness” of the New Testament forced Jews
> to hit back with their printed version of the Talmud.
> Actually the New Testament, like a newspaper, merely reflects
> the true condition of Judaism at that time. If someone could prove
> that damaging descriptions of Jews never appeared before the New
> Testament, that would be one thing. But during many centuries
> prior to Jesus or any Christians, Jews were saying and doing the
> same things that we find them still saying and doing during New
> Testament days!
> If the New Testament record of their words and works is
> “anti-Semitic,” is the Old Testament record of the same
> rebelliousness just as “anti-Semitic”?
> A while ago I was talking with a young woman in Los Angeles who
> is training to become a rabbi. I asked her about the Talmud. (She
> seemed shocked I should know so much about it already!) “Oh,” she
> said, “I don’t think it’s as relevant as it once was.” When I told
> her that the “hate” movie “The Last Temptation of Christ” was an
> amazingly accurate reflection of the Talmud—and that more such
> “hate” films are in the works because Hollywood takes the Talmud
> seriously—she had no explanation.
> In the future when “hate” laws are passed, will the incredibly
> hate-filled Talmud and some hate-promoting film studios be swept
> under the rug?
[You are allowed to publish this non-copyrighted article. To avoid the prevalent internet censorship, feel free to change the title to "The Original 'Hate' Criminals" (or Crooks, etc.) or "The Earliest 'Hate' Rebels" (or People, Persons, etc.) or "The History of Hate" (or the Jews, the Hebrews, Judaism, etc.) or any other meaningful title, or no title.]
[Also Google "David Letterman's Hate, Etc."]