Wik’s Picks: Top Ten White Sites

The Foremost Problem created a post, “The 25 Most Important Pro-White Organizations”. I’m not going to be so bold as to rank the sites by importance, but I do think it would be fun and potentially helpful to list my ten favorite pro-White sites.

10. Nicholas Stix, Uncensored

Life’s just not that simple. Like it or not, the best and most determined journalist out on the front lines of drawing attention to Whites being victimized by multicult madness is a Jew. While the goyim are content to reshuffle and repackage existing information and ideas, Stix is out there doing original research. He does the difficult and boring work that goes into sharing these powerful stories of people who’ve been repeatedly victimized by their aggressors, then victimized again by the media and government scumbags who try to ignore inconvenient tragedies.

9. The Political Cesspool

James Edwards is nearly as eloquent, principled, and passionate about defending his people as he is handsome. He plays up his Southern humility and deference as much as he can, but he knows in the back of his mind that he’s our best hope for making a successful seque into mainstream politics. His radio show features nearly every noteworthy White Advocate. His blog offers a nice balance of good reporting and clever commentary.

8. Cambria Will Not Yield

It’s easy, especially for a geek, to lose touch with the spiritual dimension of our struggle. This Christian Kinist reminds me that we’ve lost far more than just our physical safety and our ability to speak fluent English with the new neighbors. We’ve lost our honor. We’ve lost our heritage. We’ve lost the spiritual core that once bloomed in White Christian Europe.

7. VDare

VDare’s status as a pro-White site is arguable. It features posters who aren’t even White, posters who would like for you to die in the desert for Israel, and posters who actually think that Irish illegal immigration is a serious concern. It doesn’t allow comments and it looks like it was designed by a shaky old man using HTML in Notepad on a 486DX machine running Netscape Navigator on an AOL account during the Clinton Administration. But despite all these sins, it’s among the best pro-White sites out there. It directly engages the daily news beat. It features Jared Taylor and Kevin MacDonald. It’s also the place to go for Steve Sailer, who would be pro-White if it weren’t for his suffering some kind of autistic disorder.

6. TakiMag

Damn you, CaptainChaos! 🙂

5. American Renaissance

I’m a former moderator from here…and yes, I probably deleted your anti-Semitic tirade. It doesn’t belong there. Jared Taylor could have had all the respect in the world but he chose honor, instead. He’s a soft-spoken Ivy League polymath with a nuanced perspective on race and identity who isn’t the least bit nuanced about the primary objective: White Advocacy. The site design is stale and the comments are a bit stifled relative to other forums, but Jared and his organization have awakened countless Americans (including myself) to the importance of preserving our precious racial heritage.

4. Voice of Reason Radio

We’ve all ranted to each other about how we need to pioneer and master new media technologies to reach a wider audience. But VOR has actually done it. Their growing list of intelligent and amusing Internet radio shows are attracting new audiences and keeping the rest of entertained. If I were a betting man, I would bet that this site will become the hub of White Advocacy within the next five years.

3. The Occidental Observer / TOQ Online

This collective of pro-White scholars is managed by Professor Kevin MacDonald, but it’s led by the acerbic and imaginative Alex Kurtagic. Tom Sunic, Lasha Darkmoon, Merlin Miller, Kevin Lamb, and other luminaries regularly churn out brilliant essays on the big questions, the big issues, and the big problems. There’s so much overlap in name, style, and quality between TOO and TOQ that they’re both tied for third place, with TOQ offering a lot of great original content in addition to aggregating the best of the pro-White web.

2. Spirit/Water/Blood

This site offers a weekly skewering of our sorry state of affairs from a Christian Kinist’s perspective. As a web professional, I admire how he has adapted his prose to the medium rather than pretending he’s writing a newspaper article. He’s punchy, direct, often hilarious, and loaded with relevant links, images, and videos.  He offers a welcome alternative to the repackaged humanism of contemporary Christian “leaders” and defends White America with the same honor and vigor that Christians once defended Europe.

1. Occidental Dissent

The martial arts traditions began as collections of self-defense techniques but often devolved into something more like synchronized swimming. It’s the nature of humans to settle into increasingly rigid patterns of behavior, which is what makes Mixed Martial Arts so fun to watch. You can watch the traditions compete with hardly any rules and enjoy the creative energy that goes into fusing the differing styles into systems which are superior to their forebears.

OD is the MMA of White Advocacy, a valuable intersection where respectability and radicalism collide in an open forum. Atheists, neo-pagans, Christian Identity adherents, Kinists, Mormons, and even Jews are included in the fray. Obnoxious philo-Semites and monomaniacal anti-Semites get to the very heart of the Jewish Question while other posters offer targeted activist projects that the visitors to the site can actually use on the street.

The net result is an emergent synthesis of the best ideas, making it a dangerous place for arrogant anti-White activists to peddle their tired shtick. While we’re never going to agree on everything, the wide-open nature of this place makes it my favorite pro-White site.

About Matt Parrott 98 Articles
Matt Parrott is a low IQ wignat LARPing costume clown.

11 Comments

  1. MGLS seems to have an obsession with me. I hope you satisfied your obsession by reading through my scribbling.

    I corrected some of your gross factual errors, and you think I have “an obsession” with you.

    Re: “In comment 140, Akira says, “The majority of the [Founding Fathers of the United States] were also fully or partly Irish.””

    So?

    It is not true.

    Yeah. So what? What’s your point. You don’t like facts? That’s one of the main industries or perhaps the main industry of the Dom. Rep. Fat ugly old white women, married and bitterly divorced, European and American crowd the cafes and bars and hotels and beaches with poor 18 year old black studs, pretending there’s some romance, both knowing the old cows just want to get fucked by the black men.

    You prefer anecdotes. I prefer statistics. You can post a few stories about degenerates engaging in such activity, but there is absolutely no evidence to suggest that sex tourism to the Dominican Republic in a widespread phenomenon.

    Interesting. I must have missed those arguments in his calm, balanced, academic books. Was he drinking with Mel Gibson when he ranted these things?

    http://www.culturewars.com/2004/Challenge.htm
    Surely you are aware that E. Michael Jones is an anti-Protestant, anti-“WASP” Papist.

  2. Most immigrants over the past century have been Greeks, Italians, Slavs, Arabs, Chinese etc.

    This is irrelevant regarding the proportion of English ancestry in the Australian population relative to the proportion of Irish ancestry.

    Re: “Regarding Akira’s false claims about the white population in Australia being mostly Irish: 2006 Census: Australian 37.13%: English 31.65%: Irish 9.08%: Scottish 7.56%”

    I try my best to be nice, calm, peaceful. But you’re a complete idiot.

    First of all, many or most of those 37.13% “Australians” are also either Irish or part Irish, as are many or most of the 31.65% “English” and the 7.56% “Scottish”.

    Get it? 1891 census! Still the era of settlement. Around the time of federation. 7.2% BORN in Ireland. Plus other British settlers who were bound to include Irish or part-Irish. Plus Australian-born Irish. All together, the majority were more or less Irish, and probably a greater proportion than the Englishness of Australians back then, esp. considering that Scots are Irish cousins. So why on Earth are you talking about 2006? Was Australia founded and settled in 2006? Anyway, the fact that even in 2006, 9.08% of Australians identify themselves primarily as “Irish” (and their Scottish cousins at 7.56%), proves the overwhelming Celtic heritage in Australia even today after a century of increasingly multi-kulti immigration.

    Try to make more sense next time. Or just try to make any sense…

    Why don’t you try to make sense? 9.08% of Australians identify as Irish, and to you this proves “the overwhelming Celtic heritage in Australia,” but 31.65% identify as English, and you think this means nothing.

    I’m not sure about those identifying as “Australian,” but if it works anything like it does in the United States, a significant percentage of those are of English ancestry. Those who identify as “American” in the United States are mostly English.

  3. Muggles loves stating the obvious:

    “Surely you are aware that E. Michael Jones is an anti-Protestant, anti-”WASP” Papist.”

    Is that another one of these dark secrets you’ve brought to light?

  4. http://www.abs.gov.au/Ausstats/[email protected]/Previousproducts/1301.0Feature%20Article41995?opendocument&tabname=Summary&prodno=1301.0&issue=1995&num=&view=
    From the Australian Bureau of Statistics

    TABLE 4 MOST COMMONLY REPORTED ANCESTRIES IN 1986

    English 35.6%
    Australian 18.6%
    Italian 3.3%
    Irish 2.4%
    Scottish 2.2%
    Greek 1.9%
    British 1.8%
    English-Irish 1.7%
    German 1.5%
    Australian-English 1.2%
    English-Scottish 1.2%
    Chinese 1.1%
    Aboriginal 1.0%
    Dutch 1.0%
    All others 25.4%

  5. > THE EARLIEST “HATE” CRIMINALS

    > If you can’t guess the people I have in mind, I’ll give you
    > some clues—clues found in a major world religion that is many
    > centuries old. I’ll call it Religion X.
    > Religion X traces its roots back to the First Couple, Adam and
    > Eve. They were on earth before any other form of worship—before
    > Islam (appearing 14 centuries ago), before Hinduism or Buddhism
    > (appearing 25 centuries ago), before even the worship of various
    > gods in Mesopotamia (60 centuries ago).
    > Early on, Religion X’ers were told by their God: “Love your
    > neighbor—and even the stranger who dwells among you—as much as
    > you love yourself.” But it wasn’t long before Religion X began
    > rebelling against the laws of the One who had blessed and
    > preserved it so much. In response God warned: “All those who hate
    > me love death.”
    > After centuries of hating their God (which predictably led to
    > hatred of fellow humans, God’s creations), Religion X’ers were
    > allowed by God to be conquered and transported to ancient Babylon
    > where they experienced a 1,600-year-long “vacation.”
    > If you haven’t guessed yet, the religion I’m describing is
    > Judaism. But don’t stop reading. The
    > most shocking stuff is just ahead!
    > While in Babylon, the “wise men” among the people began
    > formulating new laws which supposedly supplemented and explained
    > the time-tested Old Testament writings. But the new rules actually
    > contradicted and eventually replaced the original laws!
    > The “new and improved” laws are collectively known as the
    > Talmud. Even though rabbis are Talmudic experts, probably not one
    > Jew in a thousand (and not one non-Jew in ten thousand) knows what
    > is in the Talmud. Without further delay, here’s some of the
    > Talmud’s “wisdom” (plus sources):
    > (I) THE TALMUD HATES SCIENCE:
    > Hyenas turn into bats after seven years, and later on turn into
    > thorns and demons (Baba Kamma, 16a).
    > Being naked in front of a lamp causes epilepsy (Pesahim, 112b).
    > There’s medicinal value in dirt found in an outhouse’s shadow,
    > also in a white dog’s excrement (Gittin, 69a,b).
    > (II) THE TALMUD HATES FEMALES:
    > The birth of a girl is an unhappy event (Baba Bathra, 16b).
    > It is never good to talk too much to women including one’s own
    > wife (Aboth, 1.5).
    > All women are “temperamentally light-headed” (Kiddushin, 80b).
    > It is okay to divorce your wife if she spoils your food, or if
    > you find a more beautiful woman (Gittin, 91a).
    > (III) THE TALMUD HATES CHILDREN:
    > It is lawful for a girl three years old to have sexual
    > intercourse (Abodah Zarah, 37a; Kethuboth, 11b,39a; Sanhedrin,
    > 55b,69a,b; Yebamoth, 12a,57b,58a,60b).
    > When a man commits sodomy with a boy under nine years of age,
    > it “is not deemed as pederasty” (Sanhedrin, 54b,55a).
    > Sexual intercourse with a boy under the age of eight is lawful
    > since it isn’t fornication (Sanhedrin, 69b).
    > (In other words, Religion X became X-rated! Is it any wonder
    > that many Jewish persons today are liberally involved with the
    > current sexual revolution and are even favorable towards
    > legalization of adult-child sex?)
    > (IV) THE TALMUD HATES ALL NON-JEWS:
    > Since all Gentiles are only animals, all Gentile children are
    > bastards (Yebamoth, 98a).
    > When a non-Jew robs a Jew, he has to pay him back, but if a Jew
    > robs a non-Jew, he doesn’t have to pay him back. Moreover, when a
    > Gentile kills a Jew, the Gentile must be killed, but when a Jew
    > kills a Gentile, “there is no death penalty” (Sanhedrin, 57a).
    > It is okay to “use subterfuges” in a court of law in order to
    > cheat a non-Jew (Baba Kamma, 113a).
    > (V) THE TALMUD HATES CHRIST AND CHRISTIANS:
    > Jesus was born a bastard (Jewish Encyclopedia, “Jesus”;
    > Yebamoth, 49b).
    > Mary, the mother of Jesus, was a whore and “played the harlot
    > with carpenters” (Sanhedrin, 106a,b).
    > Jesus “practised sorcery and enticed Israel to apostacy”
    > (Sanhedrin, 43a).
    > Jesus was punished and sent to Hell where he ended up in
    > “boiling hot excrement” (Gittin, 56b,57a).
    > Christians will go to Hell “and be punished there for all
    > generations” (Rosh Hashanah, 17a).
    > Those who read “the works of the Judeo-Christians, i.e., the
    > New Testament” will end up in Hell (Sanhedrin, 90a).
    > The books of the Christians “may not be saved from a fire, but
    > they must be burnt in their place, they and the Divine Names
    > occurring in them” (Shabbath, 116a).
    > (Now you know what’s been inspiring many of the anti-Christian
    > attitudes and actions these days.)
    > By roughly 500 A.D. Jewish scribes had completed the voluminous
    > Talmud, the written version of what had long been the Jews’ oral
    > tradition—the tradition that Jesus condemns in the 23rd chapter
    > of Matthew and other parts of the New Testament.
    > Whenever anyone claims that for 1500 years the Talmud
    > needlessly aggravated Gentiles (who in turn put Jews into ghettos
    > and even the Holocaust), Jews can look at even earlier history and
    > claim that the “anti-Jewishness” of the New Testament forced Jews
    > to hit back with their printed version of the Talmud.
    > Actually the New Testament, like a newspaper, merely reflects
    > the true condition of Judaism at that time. If someone could prove
    > that damaging descriptions of Jews never appeared before the New
    > Testament, that would be one thing. But during many centuries
    > prior to Jesus or any Christians, Jews were saying and doing the
    > same things that we find them still saying and doing during New
    > Testament days!
    > If the New Testament record of their words and works is
    > “anti-Semitic,” is the Old Testament record of the same
    > rebelliousness just as “anti-Semitic”?
    > A while ago I was talking with a young woman in Los Angeles who
    > is training to become a rabbi. I asked her about the Talmud. (She
    > seemed shocked I should know so much about it already!) “Oh,” she
    > said, “I don’t think it’s as relevant as it once was.” When I told
    > her that the “hate” movie “The Last Temptation of Christ” was an
    > amazingly accurate reflection of the Talmud—and that more such
    > “hate” films are in the works because Hollywood takes the Talmud
    > seriously—she had no explanation.
    > In the future when “hate” laws are passed, will the incredibly
    > hate-filled Talmud and some hate-promoting film studios be swept
    > under the rug?

    [You are allowed to publish this non-copyrighted article. To avoid the prevalent internet censorship, feel free to change the title to “The Original ‘Hate’ Criminals” (or Crooks, etc.) or “The Earliest ‘Hate’ Rebels” (or People, Persons, etc.) or “The History of Hate” (or the Jews, the Hebrews, Judaism, etc.) or any other meaningful title, or no title.]

    [Also Google “David Letterman’s Hate, Etc.”]

  6. I’m a former moderator from here…and yes, I probably deleted your anti-Semitic tirade. – Matt Parrot
    For what it’s worth, my thoughts on your confirming what everyone knew follows. By the way, Rense.com, deserves a spot on that list. While not explicitly pro-White, it is the single, best centralized clearinghouse on no-holds barred information for the “truth movement.”

    Everyone who writes seriously about what I’ve dubbed this Menace in our Midst seems to be on a quest to write the perfect, most succinct essay that will win anyone over upon first reading it. For several years, I used to blog at “American Renaissance” which at one time seemed to hold great promise as it was an intellectual site founded by Jared Taylor purportedly devoted to addressing the plight of what ails the Western nations and the European people/descendants’ demise. In 2006 during their annual conference, an event transpired which caused Jared to write about the issue in a piece called “The Jewish Question” and let it be known that henceforth the Jews were welcomed into the fold. A critical miscalculation. I can’t prove it, but I believe from that point onward American Renaissance was compromised (sold-out) to Jewish money.

    That’s the biggest weapon they wield. By their control of the money supply and credit (private Jewish banking cabal better known as “The Federal Reserve), they can literally engineer bubbles (as they have been doing since 1913), crash stocks and assets and then buy everything they want for pennies on the dollar. That’s how they comprise over 50% of the American billionaires (though allegedly only 2 – 3% of our populace) and liberally fund every subversive cause imaginable, and offer big donations to silence opposition. It is a known fact that a Jew donated 100 million dollars to the Sierra Club to buy their silence on our immigration tsunami. It worked. We simply can’t compete with that.

    Anyway, my bigger point is that American Renaissance began censoring anything anyone wrote with regards to Jews so the many informed, quality posters there became experts at using veiled language to get their points across. What became so glaringly obvious and troubling to me was one could write anything critical (so long as it was within the confines of good taste) about Muslims, Blacks, Hispanics, and even Whites, but criticism of Jews was off-limits. What a joke! You have a website purportedly devoted to discussing the War on the West, but you can’t identify collectively the actual CULPRITS waging it. I finally could not stand the intellectual fraud any longer, and quit writing there. Nevertheless, I came across what I consider to this day to be the best, most powerful, bone-chilling, skin-crawling post I’ve ever read regarding the Jews, and this brilliant writer communicated his message using exquisitely crafted, veiled language to get it past the censors there. It was written on an article (book review actually) entitled “The Untold Story of White Slavery”:

    “I am gratified that FINALLY amren has focused on the one subject that is relevant to EVERY topic that is posted here: white slavery — and its been a long time coming! By that I mean the topic of white slavery is analogous to the elusive ” theory of everything ” – the unified field theory which physicists and scientists have long struggled to attain. Those of you with a mathematical bent will know what I mean in terms of implicit and explicit deductions following from postulates and theorems. Here goes : Theorem ( backed by empirical fact ): White slavery is ongoing, flourishing as never before in our modern times; and it has actually never ended ( they only want you to believe that black slavery has ended ). P: 90% of whites know nothing about it. Therefore: D1: There must be a media / educational blackout about the topic for at least several generations; ergo, whites have not been in control of their media since at least the end of WWII, perhaps earlier. D2: The educated 5% who ARE aware of it are powerless to disseminate this knowledge to the general public; either economically unable, or facing deadly sanctions if they do so. D3: The elite group who do NOT want this known to the public are much more powerful, unified, and focused than those who do, and their interests are antagonistic to that of whites in general. D4 : The 5% who become accidentally privy to this and intelligent enough to grasp the horrifying implications, are frozen into inaction, and resort to denial and wishful thinking. They realize that they have been lied to and manipulated into acting AGAINST their self – interest for several generations, and that they can’t explain their OWN willful ignorance in facilitating it. D5 : This 5% also realizes that the same powerful enemy has brainwashed their own children into false guilt, making them pliable politically to act against their own interest. D6 : That this sophisticated criminal element has infiltrated and corrupted the highest levels of government, and that they would not hesitate to target his own children into slavery if they thought they could get away with it without significant consequence ( Mass immigration, outsourcing of jobs, taxation of the productive for the benefit of the uncompetitive being merely parallel forms of dispossession ). D7 : That it is only a matter of time before this overt white slavery threat will lap into the average white man’s sphere of concern ( that of his own family )— i.e. first the millions of weak, defenseless, helpless women/children victims of eastern Europe, then on to the progressively weakening western Europeans( perhaps 10 – 20 years from now ) , and then finally to the poor whites of America, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, etc. If this sounds like wild fantasy, its only because your mind cannot handle the ominous implications of the raw truth; indeed it touches on your deepest, worst fears and nightmares; the idea that whites are NOT in control in the way they think they are; that the Rubicon of failure and defeat may have been crossed a long time ago, and that all you are witnessing now are the flames of disaster flickering in the REAR VIEW MIRROR. It explains why the most enthusiastic posters on this site will not touch this topic ( white slavery ) with a ten foot pole.
    Posted by WS at 11:09 PM on September 9

  7. I’m a former moderator from here…and yes, I probably deleted your anti-Semitic tirade. It doesn’t belong there – Matt Parrott

    “Anti-semitic tirade?” Here’s my question for you, Mr. Parrott, self-admitted “former moderator?” Were you instructed to censor (as you expose yourself for what you are by calling legitimate protestations of anti-Gentilism “tirades”) criticisms of those Oh-So-Special Ones? If not, than quite frankly, my dear, you have no business here or anywhere else in this very real war being waged against US because you are, like the Christian Zionists who dominate the neoCON alternative news websites like the Jewish-owned “Breitbart,” “American Thinker,” and such and delete anything and everything including fact-based links right from the Jews’ own publications, a HUGE part of the “Jewish problem” and an enemy to those trying to awaken the masses to this Menace in our Midst. I would like for you to explain yourself and respond to my following excerpt:

    “Anyway, my bigger point is that American Renaissance began censoring anything anyone wrote with regards to Jews so the many informed, quality posters there became experts at using veiled language to get their points across. What became so glaringly obvious and troubling to me was one could write anything critical (so long as it was within the confines of good taste) about Muslims, Blacks, Hispanics, and even Whites, but criticism of Jews was off-limits. What a joke! You have a website purportedly devoted to discussing the War on the West, but you can’t identify collectively the actual CULPRITS waging it. I finally could not stand the intellectual fraud any longer, and quit writing there.”

    Because if you can’t come up with a better case than you’ve given with regards to Jared Taylor’s choosing “honor” (does honor trump truth, Mr. Parrott, because I always thought the virtues went hand-in-hand?), I don’t know why you are even being given an audience here. As far as I’m concerned, you’re a traitor and a coward and so too is Jared Taylor.

  8. ha, this shill admits he silences white people for talking about Jews on AmRen while talking about how he loves whites and freedom.

Comments are closed.