SWAG: Introduction

As always, criticism is invited.

Introduction

Persuading a modern American to cast off decades of indoctrination is possible, but very difficult. For most Americans, modernism, multiculturalism, globalism, and cultural Marxism are more firmly held beliefs than their religion. In fact, “anti-racism” is a lot like a religion, with its own saints (oppressed minorities), heretics (racists), demons (klansmen), and hell (Auschwitz).

Just a few decades ago, people driven into a blind rage would accuse others of being demonic or evil. Now, the worst thing one can possibly be in the American mind is a Nazi. This isn’t to suggest that Nazism should be defended. It shouldn’t be. The point is that the indoctrination we’re up against has been drilled in so effectively that even the most religious of Americans are often more offended by a “racist” than a satanist.

The good news is that the facts and daily reality remain firmly on our side. Despite the media’s constant censorship, the evening news confirms racial reality. Despite academia’s efforts to distort perception, most people still know which neighborhoods to avoid. Despite the fact that both major political parties firmly support Affirmative Action, most people think it’s patently unfair.

While advocacy can become very complicated, everything in this guide boils down to a simple declaration: “Our people have a right to exist.” This is the central concept that you should be steering your discussions toward and building your arguments around. Your people are the White American people. Your rights are both natural and divine. Your existence isn’t negotiable and those who argue otherwise are the moral defectives.

If you’re serious enough about White Advocacy to be reading this, then you’re already a rarity within a rarity: a White American man or woman who still embraces your roots and who is also serious about defending those roots. Our hope is that this guide can help fill your quiver with arrows in the daily struggle against those who seek to insult, exploit, and endanger our countrymen.

9 Comments

  1. While advocacy can become very complicated, everything in this guide boils down to a simple declaration: “Our people have a right to exist.” This is the central concept that you should be steering your discussions toward and building your arguments around. Your people are the White American people. Your rights are both natural and divine. Your existence isn’t negotiable and those who argue otherwise are the moral defectives.

    This is an excellent point.

  2. Sure, “our” people do have a right to exist. White nationalists rallying cry is “biology, and facts” against a supposed left-wing obscurantism and postmodernism. “Our People” means “Whites,” a group claimed not merely as a social construction, but one of flesh and blood. Light skinned, blond and brown, gray eyes.

    Yet when applied to white, blue, green, or gray eyed Jews, the “objective” race category dissolves into thin air – and suddenly facts and objectivity are no-where to be seen.

    No, really, its like magic!

    Sure, our existence isn’t negotiable. As isn’t anyone else\s. Yet VVN and Kevin MacDonald are annulling any possibility for this existence for that part of the White race, which doesn’t tow their line. For them, it seems, they are willing to suspend all the laws of gravity – usually so central to their image as positivist, clear-eyed scientists, telling society unpalatable truths.

  3. AngryJew,

    Woah…calm down! First of all, this guide is deliberately vague for the specific reason of trying to avoid the kinds of differences and tensions you’re bringing to this. The issues you discuss have their place, and I’m not supporting a broad ecumenicalism on this or any other controversy within White Advocacy. But that place is not in how persuadables are initially engaged.

    Since you solicited my opinion on the subject, I do believe that most Ashkenazi Jews are appropriately defined as White. However, “White American” isn’t actually a racial designation. It’s an ethnonational one. It’s a tribe. When I say “White American”, I’m excluding Frenchmen, despite having significant French heritage.

    Jews are an ethnicity. They are a nation. They are a tribe. They are an endogamous in-group. Judaism is more than a “religion” in the tacky Western sense of the word. It’s a tribal G.E.S. I’ve never argued against the existence of the Jewish people and never will.

    I suspect that, at the end of the day, you would be more upset by Israel being “wiped off the map” than Iowa being wiped off the map. I suspect that if forced by circumstance to choose one tribe or the other, you would go with the Jewish one. I would not be so presumptuous as to go to Russia, learn how to speak Russian, and declare that I’m Russian even though I retain the religious, social, and psychological identity of the White American.

    I would be a White American who lives in Russia and speaks Russian.

    I assert that you’re a Jew who lives in America and speaks English.

  4. “White Advocacy” is a tepid term, and means what, exactly? Advocates of ‘white rights’ goes back generations, and while we should never forget the past, the nationalization, or focus, of all our senses: Science, Art, Genetics, Philosophy all, in their turn, have finalized into a larger construct, and euphemistically described as White Nationalism which, by the way, implies that a more sophisticated and pro-active mindset exists.

    AngryJew:

    White Nationalists, like myself, do not demand your destruction, or deconstruction; please, tell your kind to do the same.

    Most WN’sts have faced the ugly side of ourselves, and admit and endorse change in certain areas. We do not, in a larger sense, seek to destabilize the Jewish State…and we will never submit to semitic influence and the destruction of our Western Traditional imperatives; sadly, to put this right, unless you create an ease of departure for your kind, it will take more than rhetoric to make this right for MY People.

  5. @Wikitopian
    I think your approach is the best. “We have a right to exist.” Who is going to deny that? A few extremists, maybe. This argument was used as the basis for the 1924 immigration act. If we were to build an ideology around our race, I think this is an excellent starting point.

    And you’re right – reality and the facts are clearly on our side. The only reason why more people don’t see this is because the mass media covers it up. (Just look at the PBS documentary “Race: The Power of an Illusion”)

    @AngryJew,
    This post doesn’t have anything to do with Jews. There’s a place for that discussion, but it doesn’t belong in this thread.

  6. @Faustus
    White Advocacy means what it looks like it means, advocating for our interests. It’s deliberately broad so that the guide can be of use to the most advocates of White interests possible. I’m not suggesting that it’s a complete solution.

    @Sam Davidson
    Thank you.

  7. AngryJew

    Yet VVN and Kevin MacDonald are annulling any possibility for this existence for that part of the White race

    The fact you would put VNN/Alex Linder in the same category as Kevin MacDonald is extremely disingenuous but hardly surprising for a Jewish commenter.

  8. In regard to AngryJew’s comment, Kevin MacDonald opined in an interview that he felt Jews should be classified as Middle Easterners, noting that they have on average something like 1/3 European genes, the rest being Semitic (according to the latest DNA studies). This fact, in conjunction with Wikitopian’s point about Jews being a separate tribe makes it very difficult to group Jews and Europeans as “Whites”.

    As a side note, one possible future outcome might be that Jews end up largely assimilating into the White genepool, and finding themselves with a more pro-European stance. One might imagine a future in 2100, when European Whites have fallen to 25% of the population, where Jewish intermarriage has proceeded much farther than at present, and where Jews come to realize that immigration policies and multiculturalism have created a nightmare for both Europeans and themselves.

  9. @Andrew

    I’m going to make two predictions:

    1. AngryJew won’t bother to seriously challenge the explanations I offered.

    2. AngryJew will continue his shtick.

    Even if one goes ahead and grants him his Whiteness, which I diverge somewhat from the rest of you in doing, he’s still not a White American. The proposition that one can be loyal to two nations is a pernicious lie, with several tons of dead White American servicemen and a swimming pool worth of White American blood testifying to the danger of abiding it.

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. Occidental Dissent » Blog Archive » SWAG: Table of Contents

Comments are closed.