Censored at VNN: The Post Alex Linder doesn’t want read

I was a member of VNN Forum for more than half a decade, and I regularly visited the VNN homepage for several years before finally joining the forum in 2005. I have watched with no small degree of sadness as VNN has declined from a premiere outlet for pro-White news and commentary into a sad parody of itself.

Although my posting became less and less frequent, I continued to browse the forum and hoped things would turn around. Sadly, the decline continued unabated, and the few good men remaining at VNN slowly filtered out, abandoning the forum to neophytes, sycophants, trolls, and saboteurs. For several months of last year, Linder abandoned the main page of VNN itself, handing it over to an upstart IT tech who calls himself Socrates.

As his output decreased, both in terms of quantity and quality, Linder became desperate to shore up the donations upon which he depends for survival, and so he began targeting all White racialists that he viewed as a potential threat to his revenue stream. The most recent target he has chosen in this effort is The Occidental Quarterly, and specifically its editor, Greg Johnson.

Dr. Johnson went to VNNF late last year, believing that Linder’s rhetoric was sincere (a mistake on his part), and proceeded to engage Linder in a debate on WN strategy, which Johnson won handily. Ever the bad sportsman, Linder was reduced to unsubstantiated personal attacks on Johnson, which he has continued to launch for several months. He has since widened the attack to include everyone associated with the publication, including Dr. Kevin MacDonald, and the owner of this web site, Hunter Wallace. He has launched these base, ad hominem attacks purely out of personal anger, promising to bring “unrestricted warfare” to the doorsteps of hardworking pro-White activists. Who benefits from such activity?

Although I suspected I would be banned for doing it, I was compelled to go to VNNF and ask that very question: cui bono? I also felt a need to point out the sickening hypocrisy in Linder’s posturing. He not only banned me for my post, but he erased it from his “free speech forum,” and did a backdoor ban so his actions wouldn’t be obvious to other members of the forum. It does not say “banned” under my user name (TowardWewelsburg), and I can still use my PMs and browse the site, but I cannot post in any section of the forum.

So, without further ado, here is the post that Alex Linder doesn’t want you to read:

Alex Linder wrote:

“It’s true I have no principled opposition to homosexuals as writers. I do have a principled opposition to them as editors and leaders….It is true, as far as I know, that Regina Belser was/is a lesbian. She never hid it. The reason I worked with her was that she knew html, while I did not, and she was willing to post my daily writing on a website. At that point I did not know enough to set up a site and post my work, so, since she did, I thought it was best to have her do that. She was middle-aged when we started, and her sexuality really wasn’t relevant. Except in one way – and this was something I was not fully aware of when I started, and in fact is the basis of my position on homos today. My principled position…Regina Belser was, in effect, my editor for a brief period of time. She bailed when we had our first legal run in, when Vanguard Financial Services tried to bluff us out of our url. I told them to go fuck themselves, and nothing further was heard. The threat was enough to drive her off, however. That aside, during the period in which she was, in effect, my editor, she duly and professionally posted everything I wrote with one exception: she could not bring herself to post a spintro I wrote on the close association between homsexuals and pedophiles. This was the first time I realized that queers, even females, are very, very worried about anyone making the basic observation that many of those blasted by the general media as pedophiles are in factor homosexuals (male homosexuals, almost always). This discovery, again, brought on by her refusal to post my words, showed me that homosexuals have no place being editors of any publication that deals with politics. That is my principled position today. “

TowardWewelsburg responds:

“Alex,

You assert with fervency that “editors and leaders” must not be compromised by homosexuality, and that anyone compromised in this manner is not on our side and should be ruthlessly mocked and shunned.

At the same time, you acknowledge that you employed the skills of a homosexual. Apparently, you do not view this as undermining your “principled position” on the subject because she possessed a skill (html) that you did not.

The anecdote you relate suggests that you fired Regina when you “realized that queers, even females, are very, very worried about anyone making the basic observation that many of those blasted by the general media as pedophiles are in factor homosexuals,” but you were kind enough to dissuade us of that notion by explaining that Regina quit under the threat of legal sanctions. Thus, you have acknowledged that despite the fact that you knew she was a homosexual, and that you had come to believe during her tenure as editor of VNN that homosexuals were engaged in a conspiracy of silence regarding their link to pedophilia, you continued to employ her as your editor. We cannot accept the premise that she was exempt from this category of homosexual conspirator, given that you specifically cite her failure to print your column on the subject as your catalyst for “awakening” to the insidious nature of this far-ranging homosexual conspiracy.

If I am unpacking your argument correctly, we must view homosexuals as the natural conspirators that they are, and we must be resolute in our convictions on this matter at all times…unless someone possesses a skill that we do not possess, at which time it is suitable to put them into positions of authority.

Given the bizarre logic at work here, it is difficult to see your attacks on TOQ being motivated by anything other than naked greed and self interest.

I doubt there is a sincere racialist in the entire world who truly believes that mounting an attack on the likes of Kevin Macdonald advances the interest of our Cause. I urge readers, again, to ask themselves: who does it benefit?”

The culled post, above, was originally here:

http://vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=1087718&postcount=63

Obviously, Alex had no response to give me, and couldn’t bear to let the post stand as a testament to his hypocrisy. It was on page four of this thread before he scrubbed it:
http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?p=1087752#post1087752

Alex enjoys probing into the personal lives of others, and discussing them on the internet (often with no regard for truth) endlessly, but he grows very testy when asked personal questions about himself. I recall a mainstream radio interview several years ago in which he nearly flew off the handle when the hosts asked him about his illegitimate children and why he chose not to make his girlfriend an honest woman. If anyone remembers that interview, please contact me, as I’d like to hear it again.

Linder seems determined to “out” every White racialist he can. Undoubtedly, this is partly due to a “misery loves company” attitude on his part; Alex long ago ruined his career prospects and resides in his grandmother’s basement in Missouri. However, he also seems determined to shape these White Nationalists into caricatures that the system has drawn of “white supremacists:” ignorant, vulgar, and anathema to respectability itself. By encouraging White activists, particularly youth, to pigeon hole themselves in this manner, he is doing the work of the enemy. He is smart enough to know that fact, so his motivation remains puzzling.