In my last post, I described “fringe vanguardism” as a “dead branch” of White Nationalism, a throwback to Dark Ages of racialism. These alienated people deliberately isolate themselves from their contemporaries with wild costumes and extreme rhetoric. They wall themselves off from American culture in small, cult-like organizations of the elect few. These organizations are always small entrepeneurships led by a dynamic leader, usually a psychopath, who predicts the vanguard will capture power following a millenarian “collapse” of the federal government and economy.
I’ve been extremely dismissive of vanguardism of this sort. I favor a different approach: incrementally pushing our ideas ideas into the mainstream, exploitation of the Overton Window, creating a chain of discursive spaces (places where our issues can be discussed) that stretch from the margins to the mainstream, pumping our memes along this chain into the national political conversation, using cryptos in key positions to get our message out and change racial attitudes. We have to build a bridge to the mainstream that sympathizers and fresh recruits can travel down.
“White Advocacy” is a term that has been popping up more frequently in racialist circles. I think this idea has a lot of potential. If properly developed, it could become our first stepping stone into the mainstream. Let’s toy around with this idea.
1.) A “White Advocate” is explicitly pro-White. They believe that Whites should have a positive racial identity like negroes and Hispanics.
2.) A “White Advocate” believes in racial differences. They subscribe to a genomics based HBD theory of race.
3.) A “White Advocate” is opposed to political correctness and multiculturalism.
4.) A “White Advocate” supports traditional Christian moral values.
5.) A “White Advocate” believes in ground based activism and working within the democratic process to change the system.
6.) A “White Advocate” is opposed to affirmative action and third world immigration.
7.) A “White Advocate” believes that United States is a European country and that Whites should play a “leading role” in America. They want a healthy White majority to reassert its control.
8.) A “White Advocate” is a nationalist who believes in putting America first.
9.) A “White Advocate” does not endorse the ethnostate.
10.) A “White Advocate” isn’t willing to discuss the Jewish Question.
11.) A “White Advocate” wants nothing to do with Nazism or Ku Kluxery.
12.) A “White Advocate” wants to hold respectable suit and tie meetings.
13.) A “White Advocate” is committed to the republican ideal of individual liberty, not the liberal or libertarian version.
With this message, I think “White Advocates” could reach millions of racially conscious White Americans in the Deep South and get them involved in the pro-White movement. I think they might even be able to influence millions of implicit Whites in the South, West, and Midwest. A “White Advocate” political party might pick up a few state legislature and city council seats like the BNP or other European nationalist parties. It could get the ball rolling.
For the record, I am not endorsing “White Advocacy.” I’m not changing my views. I remain a White Nationalist committed to the ethnostate and discussion of the Jewish Question. A successful “White Advocacy” movement would only make my job easier. If you understand my strategy and way of thinking, it makes perfect sense. Instead of sounding like I am from Neptune to the mainstream, one infected and discourse poisoned by “White Advocacy,” I might only sound like I am from Mars or Jupiter. The whole idea of “White Advocacy” has enough flaws to make it a prime recruiting ground for White Nationalists.
The immediate objection to “White Advocacy” will be that it will become another Jew infested movement like “conservatism.” It will be derailed and perverted to Jewish ends. This is a powerful criticism. The ideal would be to have the ”White Advocacy” movement controlled by White Nationalist cryptos or sympathizers. They would staff all the important positions and control the levers of power. A parallel White Nationalist movement would continue to exclude Jews.
The communists successfully reinvented themselves as “civil rights activists” and “environmentalists.” They mainstreamed the communist position on race. I’m not proposing anything radically different here. In order to win, we have to look toward the mainstream, not the fringe.
Note: From this point forward, no discussions of Giles/Linder or RFM/VNN are allowed.
Twitter
Facebook
Flickr
YouTube
Good ideas. A little bourgeois…, but a good start and sound base.
Don’t organizations like this already exist, like the C. of C.C.?
Yes. Amren and CoCC fit this description. The term “White Advocacy” popped up at Amren not too long ago. Amren is “race realist”; CoCC is “conservative.”
I don’t think we can or need to create a mass movement, White Advocacy or otherwise. Only the masses can do that.
Note that Whites are flocking to the tea movement. The government has so far ignored them, while the media suppresses coverage and editorializes demonization, especially of anyone who comes to be seen as a leader, eg. Beck, Bachmann.
That’s where the next major White/jew battle is shaping up. The tea partiers need to hear and understand how and why conservatism and liberalism became the jew-led, jewish-interest-serving neo-conservatism and neo-liberalism that they oppose and should be damned eager not to recreate.
I wrote something on this recently at my blog. Perhaps you’ll like.
I think paleoconservatives are basically “white advocates,” along the lines of Sam Francis’s endorsement of “Middle American” revolution. I think the things Lew Rockwell understands that guys at Reason don’t is that one reason many people oppose the welfare state is not because it’s terribly imposing on us individually, nor that we’re hurt by affirmative action directly, but because we’re offended at the crummy, lazy, mostly non-white people that it helps. In other words, it’s a question of “cui bono” and the totally ineffective mainstream libertarians, unlike the Ron Pauls and Lew Rockwells and others who made common cause with the paleoconservatives, don’t understand this. Their recent attempt along with new arrivals to the paleocons to make opposition to war the guiding principle will never fly because most real conservatives have a bit of bellicose tribal revenge-seeking in them and wouldn’t mind blowing up A-Rabs and what-not, and are more offended that we’re building schools and other stupid nonsense like that.
Anyway, these two points: “9.) A “White Advocate” does not endorse the ethnostate. 10.) A “White Advocate” isn’t willing to discuss the Jewish Question.” need not be too hard and fast. I’ll discuss either, particularly the latter, and would consider radical solutions to both if I thought them necessary, which I don’t. Even then, I think charity, Christianity, and basic decency need to guide our actions, even radical ones in self-defense.
Roach,
I’m having trouble loading your site. I know that you have written something of interest, but I cannot access it for some reason.
Hmm, not sure what problem is. Maybe try plugging in the long version of url: http://www.mansizedtarget.wordpress.com or http://www.mansizedtarget.com. If that doesn’t work, I’ll have to send it by carrier pigeon!
I understand what you’re trying to do here.
Amren already serves as a bridge to white nationalism for those moving along the nationalist continuum: Republican > Conservative > Paleoconservative > White Nationalist.
Sometimes as we have seen individuals get sidetracked by the JQ and end up in the Jewish ghetto; discouraging any talk of Jews, at least in a wild & crazy off-putting manner, would help recruits and converts complete the journey without getting knocked off course.
I’m not a fan of institutional Christianity in its present form (save maybe for the Eastern Orthodox), but I do understand the appeal to Americans and why White Advocacy would represent traditional Christian moral values, especially in the South.
However, if this is the case, you’re going to have to address the moral concerns that White Christians have regarding any discussions of race. In my experience, in discussing race and immigration with family and friends, some of whom are no longer even practising Christians, absolutely the single biggest obstacle is their understanding of Christian morality and why it precludes them from holding a pro-White position. If you’re going to be pro-White, which is generally perceived to be morally-tainted, you need to reconcile it with Christianity. Forget the Jews for a minute. Sometimes our biggest enemy is the Christian.
How is this “White advocacy” any different from the Republican party? The only thing you need to do is fire the new black GOP Chairman Michael Steele, and put back in the gay Jewish GOP Chairman Ken Mehlman from the Bush years.
When the Jewish lobby, the ADL, $PLC, and the rest of the usual suspects start attacking this “White advocacy” movement, what are you going to do? Pretend they aren’t Jewish and rant about “liberals” instead – exactly what the Republican party has been doing since the 1960s?
At a time when Jewish power in America is the most exposed, at a time when a backlash against Jewish power is at an all-time high, and at a time when the Jewish media is dying and becoming more irrelevant – you are going to maintain that mainstream “White advocacy” must refuse to discuss the Jewish question?
Whether Judeophiles like it or not, criticism of Jewish power *IS* now mainstream. Kow-towing to Jews is going to hurt, not help, any mainstream White movement.
No Jewish question, no White movement, it’s as simple as that.
I favor White Advocacy but oppose your double-game regarding the Jews. The Jews might be many things, but they aren’t stupid. Unless we come to the table with clean hands, your strategy is not even pointless, it’s harmful.
who predicts the vanguard will capture power following a millenarian “collapse” of the federal government and economy.
I confess to being a little bit of an apocalyptic, for lack of a better term, but the “collapse” is more about the collapse of this model of culture.
The current culture we have of one use, single serving, throwaway society, serving a pedal to the metal economic growth, is obviously unworkable and coming to grief.
The “health of the global economy” is decoupling from the American consumer. That is, we can have a more or less growing world economy, and elites will do well, but Americans won’t, because they de-industrialized us and replaced good wages with debt.
This will force a change of the culture. The irony is that the power of the multiculters comes from a vapid, consumerist American. However, they can’t afford it any more. All wars end when they can’t pay for them any more, including Culture Wars.
The bankers, the bean counter CPA’s, are being forced to throw the American consumer overboard. Sink or swim, baby!
This is going to force a radical change in the culture. That’s all I mean when I talk “collapse.” Not Mad Max or Terminator or Soylent Green. A radical culture change like any other — like the information technology revolution. I think it’s going to be relatively sudden, too. The 1990′s was the decade of the computer revolution. In 1990, computers were glorified typewriters and calculators, By 2000, you could instantly access vast libraries of whatever information you wanted almost instantly.
The modern era has been marked by rapid and accelerating change every decade since the Industrial revolution. This change is not always going to be good for the bad guys, though. The bad guys don’t control history as much as you might think, and the whole point of being a real world activist is that you get to see people quickly “getting a clue” in front of your eyes.
You have to be confident in the ability of that big fat wrinkly gray brain, to EVOLVE. That’s what it does, and circumstances are forcing us to do so, and this trend will only spread and grow.
The idea that white advocacy is immoral is not only rooted in Christianity, but also in the anti-monarchist, anti-aristocratic biases that go back to the founding of America. There is a powerful aversion to the idea that one’s lot in life is to be largely determined by the various accidents of birth, including racial and genetic inheritance. And white advocates seem to be demanding protections and privileges based on their racial inheritance. (Never mind that other races are, of course, doing the same thing. ) That is why, to me, Sailler’s idea of “citizenism” might be a more compelling strategy than white advocacy.
This talk about traditional christian values comes as a shock from you.
Anti-social behavior should be opposed on logical grounds not biblical grounds.
Though I do agree that opening bashing religion (as I do) may be a stupid thing to do if you wanted mainstream support from the “average person.”
As long as they’re opposed to multiculturalism, affirmative action, and third world immigration (legal and illegal), why would it matter if Jews joined the “white advocacy” movement?
There is a third alternative to White Nationalism and White Advocacy, and that is White Activism with an emphasis on neighborhood activity rather than developing theory or creedal frameworks beyond that necessary to free the white voice and teach white-centricity.
We believe that white authenticity includes combining our white voice and white-centricity in local modeling efforts. The key to understanding it is to speak up in local affairs as a white person and to keep the discourse white-centric. There is no issue, whether racial or religious, that cannot be discussed in a white-centric way.
We believe that white people are smart enough and energetic enough to establish their own governmental-like or governmental structures when they are authentically white.
Part of our position is based on understanding that something somewhat similar occurred between the 1640s and the 1770s on the North American continent, between the Mayflower Compact and the Declaration of Independence. There’s no way the Pilgrims could have predicted events 120 years in the future while surrounded by wild animals, unfriendly natives, hostile European powers, and dark forests. Somehow we are back at that same point, just different dangers, and the ultimate future cannot be known until modeling of white speech and white-centricity can be shared with enough of the diverse white American peoples.
The reason that local speaking is important is that it models for other white people how to speak. In view of the fact that our adversary’s favorite technique is to silence us, this is critical.
We can talk about the Other all we want so long as we refer to it in terms of our own interests and values.
Well, I used to be an unaware “clueless white” and you guys won me to your side just by talking about these issues in a gentlemanly manner. So I propose:
a) continue doing what you’ve been doing
b) try new things out as well
“traditional Christian moral values” Millions of white people never even heard of Christianity and most to many couldn’t car less.Isn’t is the Jews who “gave” is Christianity in the first place.
“does not endorse the ethnostate”-what’s an ethnostate?
“wants to hold respectable suit and tie meetings.”Why not a tuxedo and evening dresses-this is silly.
Read this and see where christians are getting their PC information:
http://www.christiananswers.net/catalog/bk-oneblood.html
Never mind that racialism was the norm in America up until a few decades ago.
Crypto-Aryan has been sharply critical of the ethnostate, said miscegenation rates of up to ten percent are not a big deal, and said he might consider a quadroon white. Now, like Braun, Crypto-Aryan is also opposed to white racialism.
http://vdare.com/taylor/050929_citizenism.htm
http://vdare.com/taylor/051108_citizenism2.htm
Jared Taylor debates “citizenism” with Sailer
http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/sailer_to_taylor_2/
http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/citizen_sailer/
Responses to Citizen Sailer at Majority Rights
Excellent posts, Kievsky and White Activist. These things need to be talked about, and talked about a lot. Everywhere, and all the time. We are now dealing with a shrinking and dispossessed White middle class, that is just beginning to realize that it has been cheated, lied to, and now intimidated and threatened. The consumer is now in hopeless debt, the “service economy” cannot be sustained, let alone paid for, and deteriorating conditions are America’s “future”. The sparks of discontent are already beginning to fly, witness the ‘tea parties’, and the growing revulsion to the mulatto in the White House. The unease is palpable everywhere. These conditions are only going to get worse, as the Cargo Cult Economy produces fewer goodies for the pampered, subsumed, and until now, somnolent White middle class. The Jews now have the best ‘democracy’ that their money can buy, but what happens when there’s not enough money left to keep the dried-up milk herd financially happy, housed or fed? The proverbial white geese are now getting killed, and are starting to squawk.
As the economic plundering runs its insatiable course, huge segments of the White middle class are going to be pauperized and forced into the gutter to compete with hostile non-Whites for the remaining crumbs. This economic malaise is visible to all, all but the kosher conservatives, the Cato Institute groupies and the self-centered country club set. White folks have been bribed and clueless for a long time, but their wealth is rapidly being cannibalized by their plutocratic ‘benefactors’. I think we are witnessing a classic historical process, to wit: The Decline and Fall of Anglo America. O’Meara has broached this same theme in some of his prescient essays. Hunger and fear, along with crushed ‘entitlement’ expectations are powerful motivating forces. If this resentment leads to political instability, and this in turn leads to racial/national identity, interwoven with hope for economic relief __that can drive a populist surge, this may be our key to power. The question is, as push comes to shove, are White’s going to stampede through Jewry’s Bolshevik gate, or rally to their own kind through a White populist counter-revolution? We’d better get prepared.
If in the end enough Whites are not so intellectually and emotionally connected to the interest their people have in survival and the corresponding need to avoid dispossession that the Jews can say and do what they want and it won’t matter then nothing else we can do will mean shit.
I don’t see mainstream white advocacy going anywhere. The problem is that the centers of power are already heavily non-white, for definitions of white which exclude Jews. I’ve read that only 20% of Ivy Leaguers are white gentiles, for example. They’re allergic to any sort of white racial consciousness, and they’re not going to let pro-whites march through their institutions. That ship sailed a long time ago. The vanguardists got that one right. The current system has to collapse for any sort of WN to get anywhere.
The closest thing that would have a shot without a regime change would be deracinated GNXP-style cognitive elitism (which is far better than being inundated with third-world hordes, IMO).
OTOH, it’s doubtful that anybody would listen to raging costume nazis even in the event of a Kunstlerian meltdown, so suit and tie mainstreamers may actually make better vanguardists than self-proclaimed vanguardists.
“This economic malaise is visible”
Re-name the country- Malaisia.
Not surprising Crypto-Aryan, who is Jewish, blames Christianity for color-blind Americans. Of course, Christianity in America was always compatible with, and an influence on, White racial awareness, and liberals rightly complain that Christian churches are still the most segregated institution in America. Conservative Christians are among the most racially conscious Americans. Jews like Crypto-Aryan seem “programmed” to attack Christianity, likely because Christianity excludes Jews. A similar trend can be found among homosexuals.
I agree with him on Sailer’s “citizenism” model, which seems to me to be a first step towards reclaiming Whites’ rightful heritage. Combine citizenism with a clear-eyed understanding of Jewish subversion and racial realism, and we’ll have something.
Oh, and add Iceman, also at least part-Jewish, to the anti-Christian crowd. Is this really a coincidence? I doubt it.
Merry Christmas everybody.
Republicans and cons aren’t explicitly pro-white so they wouldn’t qualify as white advocates.
I think you could replace “Christian values” with “middle-class values” and achieve nearly the same thing.
Anyone else get the impression that things are starting to move in a more radical direction? For instance, if you read Lewrockwell.com, have you noticed how many articles there have been lately on weapons? I don’t remember that a few years ago.
Coldequation ~ so suit and tie mainstreamers may actually make better vanguardists
I advocate the suit-and-tie approach. Some of us are raving anti-Jewish WNs who wear a suit and tie every day and hold respectable positions in banks and corporations, serve on the boards of community groups, churches, charities, alumni organizations, chambers of commerce, philharmonic societies, wine tasting clubs, yacht clubs, etc….and we’re positioning ourselves so that we can make a difference for when the SHTF. We’re WN spies, or plants, ready to make a move against the enemy, when it counts.
Today Islamophobia is in terms of its organizing principle for Whites what anti-Semitism was in the ’20′s and ’30′s. Every single successful European nationalist party recognizes it – even erstwhile neo-Nazis of the B.N.P. vintage do. Islam is a cultural and demographic threat in the way that Jews simply aren’t. Additionally, by playing up Islamophobia we’ll have vast Jewish resources at our disposal. I note that although the old liberal Jewish organizations stated their displeasure at the Swiss vote, the “Jewish street” (as indicated by the Zionist blogosphere) congratulated the Swiss as finally firing the first salvo against the Arabization of the European continent. In fact, a visit to the most extremist French Zionist sites makes it plain that the Swiss haven’t gone far enough for Right-wing Jews. I welcome that development. I also take note that Israel’s Knesset is debating right now a similar anti-minarets statutes for the Jewish state. I welcome that development, too. Should it be promulgated, it’ll have the advantage of effectively shutting down any similar future protestations from the organized Jewish community or individual Israeli representatives who might be tempted to criticize the Swiss or any other Europeans. I’m very pleased that Israel is run my ethnic cleansers and ethno-fascists of Liberman’s and Netanyahu’s high calibre. It becomes impossible for Israel to officially condemn fellow racial nationalists in Europe and elsewhere without looking like crazy hypocrites. Can one imagine Liberman issuing diplomatic protestations because Haider was included in an Austrian coalition government? That’s precisely what Israel did at the time, even though Haider, unlike Liberman, never called for the deportation of Arabs who are citizens. We should rejoice at the radicalization of Israeli politics.
“It becomes impossible for Israel to officially condemn fellow racial nationalists in Europe and elsewhere without looking like crazy hypocrites.”
When did that ever stop them? Jews admire hypocracy. They call it chutzpah.
FB is right about Europe, but wrong about America. Islam is not a demographic threat to America, and Islamophobia in America basically means War for Israel.
For FB, it’s perfectly acceptable for Jews to have all the power in America, because if we beg them enough and promise to send our kids to die for Israel fighting Islam, then they may even be nice to us and stop promoting massive non-White immigration.
Of course, no White with a shred of self-respect would agree to such a pathetic and subservient strategy.
Radical Islam also poses a threat to the U.S. – whether that threat is real or not is immaterial for its organizing potential. The invisible enemy is always the most dangerous one!
“Now, like Braun, Crypto-Aryan is also opposed to white racialism.”
I can’t speak for Crypto-Aryan, but I’m not opposed to White racialism. I favor it.
“For FB, it’s perfectly acceptable for Jews to have all the power in America, because if we beg them enough and promise to send our kids to die for Israel fighting Islam, then they may even be nice to us and stop promoting massive non-White immigration.
Of course, no White with a shred of self-respect would agree to such a pathetic and subservient strategy.”
You’re putting words in my mouth and building straw men. I have something entire different in mind. A collaboration presupposes the possibility of a mutually beneficially arrangement.
I’ve got to say, when I see people wearing a head scarf and full beard, let’s just say that the feeling that goes through my mind isn’t a very nice one. It does have a mass organizing potential. I know damn well they’d all support Sharia law if they had the influence.
BTW, I’m not opposed to highly intelligent Arabs who are more secular and reject Sharia law. I even admired Saddam Hussein. I don’t want them to immigrate in massive numbers, but I don’t hate them just for being Arabs.
I think the reason people organized against Jews in the 1920′s was not that they believed in Hitler’s racial theories, but because Jews were supporting Communism. Hitler was insane (in my opinion) but sane people still discussed Jewish influence frankly. Stalin, Churchill and the Polish people all were critical of Trotskyism and Jewish participation in Bolsehvism to some extent. Hitler just took the anti-Semitic atmosphere and went WAY TOO FAR!
“White advocacy” sounds a lot like what Jared Taylor is doing with Amren.
#20 Junghans
Good post.
#23 TabuLa Raza
Rename the country Malaise-a. Ha ha ha,
#24 W.T Mann
As a christian myself, a reformed de-heebed christian faith would be the strongest unifier we could use. The christian faith was always compromised. To the degree that in the late 20th century, anglo americans and protestants in general began to call christiandom – judeo/christianity is a sign the whole concept has forever slid off the rails. Christianity and Judeaism are diametrically opposed. The O.T. is part of the hole in our heads and hold on our throats the Jews have on our society, and needs to be divorced from the faith and recognized as anathema forever….and all faiths that hold to it separated from Christianity. Christian Identity movements based on British Israelism are a mental disease – adherents need to be treated and recognized as delusional and sick. We must finally excise the cancer of Judaism from our civilization. Judaism has been the root of all evil, so to speak, in our faith and civilization. Jews are foreigners and infiltrators in our society, much more than Islam, which is much closer to Christianity. The judaic spirit is eternally \ committed to the destruction of Christianity, the worship of money and power over all else, and the enslavement of gentiles
The new testament is also the guide par excellence on how to deal with the J.Q.
Christianity does not condone genocide or violence, but it does necessitate exclusion and indentification of Jews, for their safety and our own.
Fred Brown makes his appearance to argue we must ally with Jews for money and access to power. But this fight is about the power of money over everything…which means about the Jews in our society. We will fight because there are things above money. There are things we hold sacred and inviolable. Things that throughout time have safeguarded our society from the expanse of Western civilization over time, down through the Nations of the West to the towns and neighborhoods to the newest born infant.
A movement that does not incorporate Christianity, healed from it’s cancer of Judaism …is not a movement that is in sync with history. Christianity alone, without its Judaic counterpart, is the religion of mankind that points to a future, that explains the outlook of the evolved man, Western man free and universal, Judaism is the religion of slaves and demons.
If my kingship were of this world, my servants would fight, that I might not be handed over to the Jews” ( John 18.36).
If my kingship were of this world, my servants would fight, that I might not be handed over to the Jews” ( John 18.36).
#23 Surely the capital would be Kuala L’Impure.
Not to worry; the Fight will be here long after the holiday Pork is gone.
All the Best to our Folk, everywhere.
http://www.whitenewsnow.com/forums/philosophy-ideology/1448-western-imperative-culture-bearers.html
It’s not right to say I’m against white racialism, I’m on the fence about it, and really about all of these ideas. I just suggested that Sailer’s citizenism might be a better way to go on a purely political level. Among other things, whites ought to THRIVE under such regime.
Also, I’m not against Christianity. Whether or not Christianity has alien, semitic roots or not, there is no question to my mind listening to Bach and Handel on Christmas eve, that white Europeans assimilated Christianity and made it their own, in a most beautiful way. Merry Christmas to all!
Every thread at OD devolves into a Jew-infected debate.
Why exactly is that?
It’s interesting that the entire Caucasoid world, and I’m including populations outside of Europe, is under the influence of Abraham.
I think most NS people are crazy but I agree with them on that one point. Go against religion.
Iceman
The jews claim Abraham as a jew, but he was not a jew. He lived before there were jews, it is doubtful he ever lived at all but was just an idea connected to the lineage of someone in power at the time. The religion of the book was nothing a bunch of disparate lunar myths with no book, untill the rule of the Greeks. Judaism would not exist without the ideas and the literature,myths and religion of the Greeks. Neither would Christianity. It is the Greeks who the entire world lives under the influence of, not the Jews. As to your statement about the influence of Abraham..your inference is the influence of the Jews…Abraham was a patriarch from the El moon god sect, and not a Jew. Mohammed didn’t borrow from the Jews, but the original El god religion. The same one the Jews borrowed from.
And interesting fact that Christians never deal with, and interesting example of how something can be in view of all, but seen by none, is at his death on the cross Jesus invoked the original god
“Eli Eli lama sabachthani?”
It has never been admitted or even disclosed by religionists, and seldom by scholars in public, the ‘Eli’ or ‘Eloi’ is not the god of the jews. I’ve always wondered if it were the Jews who labored to keep this secret. People who say Jesus was not a jew do not know at all what they are talking about….but they could be right for reasons that they would find disturbing. The Jews are only the exoteric component of Israel, the esoteric component were not jews, but Israelites (the two are not synonomous no matter what the Jews say….) and may exist today as humble syrian, lebonese and coptic Christians living under the threat of annihilation by Israel inhabited by Jews.
The fact there is no archeological evidence of an Israel before 350 BC suggests of proves the books of the Pentateuch are a fable.
-> a fable put together by the pharisees and saducees of the jews to usurp the kingdom of Israel during the disorganization of occupation by Greeks. Much the same way as it describes the embezzlement of Ishmaels birthright – in fact this act might be describing this very act.
-> the act of fratricide where Judah killed and drove off the other tribes of Israel. An act of complete opposition to God. Very similiar to the Cain and Abel story – along with the banishment and the mark or stigmata.
Iceman: ‘Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I know my client is guilty. But there are mitigating factors you should consider. You see, my client had a very rough childhood in which he was given every advantage but was plagued by fears of what the heartless mob – that means you people – would do to him if given the chance. So he decided to import another, even more heartless mob, to do to you, what he feared you would do to him if given the chance. I’m sure you can all sympathize, you know you would have done the same in his place. But there is another consideration, yet more important, I submit. My client is more sensitive than you are, he feels pain more acutely than you do. Punishing him would simply hurt him too badly. He couldn’t take it. At least not like you can, which is, in a way, why what he did to you is not really all that bad. I’m sure you’ll understand.’
Crypto-Aryan: ‘I say acquit! Whose with me?’
Middle-aged White lady: ‘I think he may have a point.’
Hick From The Sticks: Mumbles to himself, scratches his balls, wonders when the bailiff will be back with their Arby’s lunch, wonders when the hanging will commence.
““White advocacy” sounds a lot like what Jared Taylor is doing with Amren.”
Yes it does and in fact the first time I encountered this term is in nigra Carol Swains book of interviews cumbersomely titled “Contemporary Voices of White Nationalism in America”.
A section of the book is about White Advocacy and she lists Jared Taylor, someone named Reno Wolfe, and ironically enough MICHAEL LEVIN so one should expect Friendrich Braun to jump on the band-wagon since it appears to be something friendly to the ‘Traditional Enemy’!!! (as David Irving calls them.)
Crypto-Aryan
It’s not right to say I’m against white racialism, I’m on the fence about it, and really about all of these ideas. I just suggested that Sailer’s citizenism might be a better way to go on a purely political level. Among other things, whites ought to THRIVE under such regime.
Then the non-whites would vote to tax away the white’s money.
Come to think of it, this is well under way.
Pingback: Americas past was not whites oppressing others uniformly « Old Atlantic Lighthouse
There is really a difference between a “right wing extremist” who happens to hold racialist views and a white nationalist.
I’m definitely the former, not the later. My view on human nature would still be harsh if the entire world was white.