For one thing, strongarm Federal meddling and intrusion into State affairs has been the biggest tool for the Left to impose their “values” on the rest of us. Brown v. Board. The school prayer cases. The “Civil Rights” Act. The Immigration Reform Act. Forced busing. Roe v. Wade. Lawrence v. Texas. And now the hate crimes law.

I agree that Buchanan is dealing with issues that are of critical important to the real America–and these are winning issues–but restoring constitutional order is not a trivial matter either. (Nor is the crashing dollar.) Perhaps the winning candidate is the one who takes up BOTH mantles!

The Huckster benefited from a slobbering burst of positive media coverage that seemed to come out of nowhere.

The Right’s problem isn’t its ostensible opposition to social liberalism. This is broadly popular even in the Blue States. It is the libertarian inspired economic platform.

All of the Republican candidates were anti-immigration during the primaries. Most of them intended to flip-flop later. That’s exactly what McCain did, and Romney has also flipped flipped since the primary.

The real anti-immigration candidates like Tancredo never got any traction. I don’t think there are many votes to be had by taking an anti-immigration position. I know the polls say people are for it, but that doesn’t mean it’ll sway their votes.

Look at the left. They have Blacks and queers in the same tent and have pretended for decades that everybody’s getting along. And in the relatively rare event that the two prove at odds, they just blame an innocent third party for the problem and move on. This was a great riposte to that crap at TakiMag and I’m very disappointed that the best use the Menckenites had for their time was discussing how to most efficiently tear themselves apart.

You need to look at the media agenda, which is always the jew agenda.

As far as the zionist agenda goes Ron Paul was by far the most dangerous serious candidate running in 2008. That’s why he was taken down by the Jew Republic with that old newsletter story.

The jews ideal candidate was Giuliani, a neocon fanatic for both open borders and invading the world and a social liberal.

Next up was McCain, who secretly hates the religious right as much as your typical jew liberal.

The jews knew that Huckabee was a minor threat even if he somehow got the nomination. He had a record of being soft on immigration and he was all for the jew’s wars. Jewry could use his religion to manipulate him the same way they manipulated George W. Bush.

Huckabee’s function, along with McCain’s close friend Thompson, was to prevent Romney from getting the nomination.

Of the big four candidates (Giuliani, McCain, Huckabee, Romney) Romney was the one the jews liked the least.

Religion is the reason. There’s no more implicitly white religion than Mormonism. And the modern state of Israel has no special status in Mormon theology. But more important, jews hate Mormons. They hate their whiteness, they hate their virtue, and they especially hate the way Mormons act like white jews, networking and excluding non-Mormons from business.

A jew can’t trust a Mormon to sell out to jewry at the critical moment because he’s already sold himself to Mormonism.

That’s why Romney had to be taken out and replaced with either a typical fundamentalist jew tool or a complete whore like McCain.

Don’t forget that other group of MAR’s, those that voted for Perot in 92 and 96. They were implicitely white, pragmatic, resourceful, and nationalist. A good combo. Good people, though I never shared their enthusiasm for Perot.

How McCain could have become the candidate after his complete disgrace and repudiation in trying to push for amnesty just goes to show how much influence the media has. The 2008 primary for both parties was an object lesson in how the media almost totally controls who is “in” and who is “out”.