My beef with him, along with many other WN’s, is his inconsistent doubletalk on the Race Question–and getting worse and worse in his Herb-like quest for ‘respectability’.

Nothing specific concerning any inside dirt on him (anyone else have any?), though again I have heard more than a few people say he played a quite different tune when he was editor (?) I believe of Southern Partisan.

Also heard that he is arrogant to the nth degree, which may be in line with his hang-ups on status and social ‘approval’.

I’m becoming more convinced by the day that the function of “conservatism”-paleo as well as mainstream-is to guard the borders of what is a liberal empire.”Conservatives” keep “extremists” out,thereby insuring the continuity of the liberal regime,and in recompense receive a modicum of privilege from the imperial system.

“…Anglo-American civilization is worthless.”
It is worthless,Prozium.

“I’m too young to remember when Sam Francis got fired from the Washington Times or when Peter Brimelow was canned at National Review, but their career misfortunes do seem to have pushed both of them in a more pro-white direction.”

I’ve recently been informed that F.Roger Devlin was fired on account of his essays dealing with feminism and female misbehaviour.Does anyone have an additional information on this?Where was he fired from?

“Thomas Fleming is an opportunist on the racial question. Many among the Racialist Right have heard him make statements to the contrary of what he has been out-gassing lately”

I think Fleming has lost his mind.Everything comes down to Aristotle’s emphasis on family and kinship as reinterpreted by Aquinas.Or in other words,shut up,eat your greens,and dont have any sex outside of marriage.What a bore.
Do you have any inside dirt on Fleming,Truth?

I agree with him that the mainstream conservative movement essentially displaces the racialist movement, and therefore has to be attacked and destroyed. Kievsky used the analogy of why carbon monoxide is poisonous – blood more readily bonds to CO than O2, so you die from lack of oxygen. I think that’s a useful way of looking at it.

Still, while Pat Buchanan is pretty far removed from hardcore WN, he’s pretty far removed from the mainstream conservative movement as well… it’s hard to say whether or not Buchanan is diverting people from serious racialism or whether he’s highlighting the deficiencies in mainstream conservatism and providing people with a convenient gateway to something better.

I believe Steve Sailer was canned from NR, and Brimelow from Forbes (or was it both?).

At any rate, it sometimes seems as if at least Sailer is trying to get his ‘ol job(s) back’ within Establishment circles with his inconsistency on the JQ–nary a word for Pat on his blog–even though he is the movie critic with The American Conservative, the magazine Pat started.

If this is the case, he is delusional!

His recent approach is that of a hedge-better, somewhat akin to Sweden’s position of ‘neutrality during the Second War of White Genocide–oops, I mean the Second World War.

This supposed ‘neutrality’ on Sweden’s part boiled down to this axiom: “If the German’s win, we’re Fellow Aryans–If the Anglo-Americans win (the ‘allies’) we’re Fellow DemocRats”… .